How can Science for Speciation explain the diversity of life?

Expand Messages
• Gluadys: How does ID help us know that a scrabble tile is designed and not a product of natural process? It is certainly not on the grounds of complexity,
Message 1 of 320 , Oct 19, 2012
Gluadys: How does ID help us know that a scrabble tile is designed and not
a product of natural process? It is certainly not on the grounds of
complexity, specified or not.

Charles P: Evolution is easily recognized without knowing anything about
"The Evolutioner". Natural selection is easily recognized without knowing
anything about "The Natural Selector". Design is easily recognized without

Perry Marshall: http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/incompleteness/ G�del�s
Incompleteness Theorem says: �Anything you can draw a circle around cannot
explain itself without referring to something outside the circle �
something you have to assume but cannot prove.�

Science: http://www.geosociety.org/positions/position1.htm Science, by
definition, is a method of learning about the natural universe by asking
questions in such a way that they can be answered empirically and
verifiably. If a question cannot be framed so that the answer can be
tested, and the test results can be reproduced by others, then it is not
science.

Charles P: Evolution is inside the circle. Natural selection is inside
the circle. Design is inside the circle. All three are easily recognized
by the average reader without having to debate definitions. All three can
can't explain themselves without referring to something outside the circle
-- something we have to assume but can't prove.

James A Shapiro: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/29849 As
I like to repeat, if Newton could not get it right, what hope is there
for the rest of us? Vannevar Bush wrote that science is an
"endless frontier." We never get final answers. But then, we never run out

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
• Gluadys: How does ID help us know that a scrabble tile is designed and not a product of natural process? It is certainly not on the grounds of complexity,
Message 320 of 320 , Oct 19, 2012
Gluadys: How does ID help us know that a scrabble tile is designed and not
a product of natural process? It is certainly not on the grounds of
complexity, specified or not.

Charles P: Evolution is easily recognized without knowing anything about
"The Evolutioner". Natural selection is easily recognized without knowing
anything about "The Natural Selector". Design is easily recognized without

Perry Marshall: http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/incompleteness/ G�del�s
Incompleteness Theorem says: �Anything you can draw a circle around cannot
explain itself without referring to something outside the circle �
something you have to assume but cannot prove.�

Science: http://www.geosociety.org/positions/position1.htm Science, by
definition, is a method of learning about the natural universe by asking
questions in such a way that they can be answered empirically and
verifiably. If a question cannot be framed so that the answer can be
tested, and the test results can be reproduced by others, then it is not
science.

Charles P: Evolution is inside the circle. Natural selection is inside
the circle. Design is inside the circle. All three are easily recognized
by the average reader without having to debate definitions. All three can
can't explain themselves without referring to something outside the circle
-- something we have to assume but can't prove.

James A Shapiro: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/29849 As
I like to repeat, if Newton could not get it right, what hope is there
for the rest of us? Vannevar Bush wrote that science is an
"endless frontier." We never get final answers. But then, we never run out