Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Messages List

55666

Re: Scientific creationists

Victor : Bishop Augustine speculated on the existence of time. Stanley : The words “In the beginning” was not speculated by Augustine but was the words
Stanley Sethiadi
3:09 AM
#55666
 
55665

Genesis is History

From WillBrooks Monday 6th July AM GMT   Genesis is history! by Jonathan Sarfati Ourministry supports the authority of the Bible from the very first
will brooks
2:43 AM
#55665
 
55664

Re: The Myth of Horse Evolution

From WillBrooks Monday 6th July AM GMT FAO Charles   D R Lindberg (To Will): What is your explanation for theexistence of fossilslike these, that God needed
will brooks
2:35 AM
#55664
 
55663

Re: An Unscientific Faith

I am not trying to prove "deep time" since the Old Testament does not mention "time" per se. Hebrew had no specific word for time nor did they conjugate verbs
ptolemy1022
10:38 PM
#55663
 
55662

Re: The Evidence of Horse Evolution et al.

Charles P (To Björn): The experts have prepared what they BELIEVE to be a list of transitional fossils. It is a "tentative" list ---- subject to change at
palmcharlesUU
9:15 PM
#55662
 
55661

Re: Lewontin was mistaken Maya

Response: LOL, no you, you probably haven't read either of our talks you just trust hers. I read them, but I already know from experience that Glaudys is very
osoclasi
8:10 PM
#55661
 
55660

Re: Lewontin was mistaken Maya

Response: Well I think you've confused yourself because you once said you didn't think the laws of logic actually exist. If they don't exist then there is no
osoclasi
8:08 PM
#55660
 
55659

Re: The Evidence of Horse Evolution et al.

... Charles P (To D R Lindberg): You do not have a verifiable methodology to distinguish between a "horse fossil" and a "non-horse fossil". Proof-of-concept:
bjorn07se
7:27 PM
#55659
 
55658

Re: Enzyme Families–Shared Evolutionary History or Sha red Design

BL: I believe it has been shown by several "ID skeptics" that Dembski's filter for identifying "design" doesn't work, in theory and practice. Really? Who were
jimmygoff2001
7:21 PM
#55658
 
55657

Re: The Myth of Horse Evolution

Charles P (To D R Lindberg): You do not have a verifiable methodology to distinguish between a "horse fossil" and a "non-horse fossil". Proof-of-concept: D R
palmcharlesUU
6:17 PM
#55657
 
55656

Re: An Unscientific Faith

Charles P (To Stanley): Thank you for keeping Victor to the verifiable standard of where "It is written" in the Bible. Victor will probably use this Internet
palmcharlesUU
6:08 PM
#55656
 
55655

Re: The Myth of Horse Evolution

D R Lindberg (To Will): What is your explanation for the existence of fossils like these, that God needed to practice until He got it right? Charles P: You
drlindberg21
5:58 PM
#55655
 
55654

Re: Enzyme Families–Shared Evolutionary History or Shared Design?

... BL: IDers of course claim that a never seen, never identified power of clearly supernatural dimensions continuously interferes in our daily lives and has
bjorn07se
5:42 PM
#55654
 
55653

Scientific creationists

Scientifically minded creationists come from a long tradition of interpreting the Bible with the latest ideas of the philosophers. Bishop Augustine died around
ptolemy1022
5:22 PM
#55653
 
55652

Re: Lewontin was mistaken Maya

No, you’re presenting your interpretation of what their sources say. Glaudys’ interpretation was more reasonable. I trust her judgement over yours.
Stewart
5:12 PM
#55652
 
View First Topic Go to View Last Topic
Loading 1 - 15 of total 55,666 messages