Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Messages List

53466

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

D R Lindberg: Right! Once they are worn down by weathering and erosion, they are no longer igneous and metamophic rocks, are they? When sediment hardens, it
palmcharlesUU
9:22 PM
#53466
 
53465

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

... From: palmcharlesUU palmcharlesUU@... [OriginsTalk] To: OriginsTalk@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2015 12:21 PM Subject: Re: [OriginsTalk]
Laurie Appleton
9:13 PM
#53465
 
53464

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

D R Lindberg: Geologists know that if their understanding of the ages of the strata were wrong, then their whole understanding of how geological forces work
palmcharlesUU
9:12 PM
#53464
 
53463

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

D R Lindberg: So igneous rocks and metamorphic rocks could not have been laid down by a flood. So what was dogmatic or misleading about David's statement? Or
drlindberg21
9:01 PM
#53463
 
53462

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

Charles P: You are creating confusion for yourself, D R. Geologists use the same technologies no matter what their beliefs are about the ages of the strata.
drlindberg21
8:39 PM
#53462
 
53461

Danger of Hydrogen Explosion/Fukushima.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnZzwAOO7J4&feature=em-uploademail *Published on May 23, 2015* UPDATE. Nuclear official warns of explosions at Fukushima plant
palmcharlesUU
8:21 PM
#53461
 
53460

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

D R Lindberg: So igneous rocks and metamorphic rocks could not have been laid down by a flood. So what was dogmatic or misleading about David's statement? Or
palmcharlesUU
8:09 PM
#53460
 
53459

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

LA> Fancy the fact that various noted evolutionists have written in their books that the Creation Scientists regularly "ROUTED" their evolutionary opponents
mephili
7:37 PM
#53459
 
53458

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

Charles P: From the video at Time 21:51: A very small sample of zircon has an age of 2.8 billion years old and 3.3 billion years old ---- ON THE SAME SAMPLE.
drlindberg21
7:37 PM
#53458
 
53457

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

R Lindberg: I suppose to you, saying that birds are not insects or trees are not caterpillers is a "dogmatic and misleading statement." Look up the
drlindberg21
7:23 PM
#53457
 
53456

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

Laurie: (To Charles) Only those "experts" whose religion is evolution, would need to change their religion of evolutionism, of course. Those who are
palmcharlesUU
7:21 PM
#53456
 
53455

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

... From: palmcharlesUU palmcharlesUU@... [OriginsTalk] To: OriginsTalk@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2015 11:11 AM Subject: Re: [OriginsTalk]
Laurie Appleton
6:58 PM
#53455
 
53454

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

Charles P (To Laurie): You can easily see how some people create confusions for themselves, write about it, and then are unable to explain their confusions.
mephili
6:57 PM
#53454
 
53452

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

... From: mephili@... [OriginsTalk] To: OriginsTalk@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2015 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [OriginsTalk] Re: Is the geologic
Laurie Appleton
6:55 PM
#53452
 
53453

Re: Is the geologic column with its millions of years essential for

... From: palmcharlesUU palmcharlesUU@... [OriginsTalk] To: OriginsTalk@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2015 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [OriginsTalk]
Laurie Appleton
6:55 PM
#53453
 
View First Topic Go to View Last Topic
Loading 1 - 15 of total 53,466 messages