Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Worshipers at the Secular Altar

Expand Messages
  • Chris Ashcraft
    http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&program=News-CSC&id=2077&callingPage=discoMainPage Worshipers at the Secular Altar By: David
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 27, 2004

      Worshipers at the Secular Altar

      By: David Klinghoffer
      Los Angeles Times
      June 17, 2004


      David Klinghoffer is a columnist for the Jewish Forward. His latest book is "The Discovery of God:
      Abraham and the Birth of Monotheism" (Doubleday, 2003).

      Everyone knows that the place of religion in the public sphere is facing serious challenges. There
      is some confusion, however, about where those challenges come from. Is it from civil libertarians?
      Atheists? Actually, no. The larger answer to the question may surprise you.

      Consider the Supreme Court's decision to overturn a ruling by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of
      Appeals that struck the words "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance. Affecting 10 million
      schoolchildren in nine Western states, the 9th Circuit's ruling was rejected on a technicality:
      The Supreme Court felt that the California atheist, Michael Newdow, who brought the case lacked
      procedural standing to do so.

      Or consider the battle over the official seal of Los Angeles County. The seal includes a tiny
      cross, over which the American Civil Liberties Union threatened to file suit. After the civil
      libertarians successfully intimidated the county supervisors � who agreed to alter the seal � more
      than 1,000 people rallied at the county's Hall of Administration to keep the cross on the seal.
      Other American cities and counties with crosses on their seals await suits or threats from the

      What we are observing here is not what it may appear to be � a struggle of religion against no
      religion. It is instead a battle pitting one religion, broadly speaking, against another. On one
      side we have, primarily, the biblical faith of Jews and Christians. On the other side, secularism.
      If you object that secularism has no deity, remember that other recognized faiths, for example Zen
      Buddhism, likewise lack a belief in God.

      What is a religion, then? Simply, a system of beliefs based on stories that explain where life
      comes from, what life means, and what we, as living beings, are supposed to be doing with our few
      allotted years. Judaism and Christianity have their sacred stories � the biblical account of
      creation, followed by Noah's flood and on through the entire narrative of Scripture � along with
      their codes of right conduct. For Jews and Christians, the meaning of human existence lies in
      communion with God in the context of eternal life.

      For each element of Judeo-Christian faith, secularism has its counterpart. Like Christianity and
      Judaism, secularism promises eternal life � well, long life, which is the central point of the
      most common strain of secular faith and which explains the pop-cultural focus on moral
      commandments having to do with physical health: Thou shalt not smoke. Thou shalt not get fat. Thou
      shalt fight global warming by taking the bus to work. Indeed, thou shalt vote for public subsidies
      for mass transit. In secularist doctrine, a fat person isn't merely unhealthy; he is a sinner in
      need of salvation. To address his situation, one secular gospel preaches the good news of the
      South Beach Diet, another that of the apostle Atkins.

      There is a secular creation account � evolution through random mutation and natural selection, a
      just-so story increasingly challenged by scientists. A few years ago the Discovery Institute, a
      Seattle think tank, took out advertisements in the New York Review of Books and the New Republic
      listing a hundred distinguished Darwin-doubting scholars, at institutions from Berkeley to MIT.

      There is even a flood story, told in the new movie "The Day After Tomorrow," wherein a modern-day
      Noah (played by Dennis Quaid) warns of an impending inundation brought on by global warming. As in
      biblical tradition, his neighbors pay no attention and subsequently perish. At the film's end, a
      few survivors are picked up by helicopter from the tops of Manhattan skyscrapers, just as Noah and
      his family survive when their ark is cast up on the peak of Mt. Ararat.

      It emerges that, in the controversies surrounding the Pledge of Allegiance and the L.A. County
      seal, what we're seeing is an unacknowledged interreligious civil war. Centuries ago in Europe and
      the Middle East, intolerant faiths sought to suppress one another, erasing symbols of their rivals
      wherever possible. Churches were converted to mosques, their crosses removed. Synagogues were
      converted into churches, their Jewish symbols effaced. Today the church of secularism agitates
      against its rival, the Judeo-Christian tradition. In the interest of honest debate, at the very
      least it would be of benefit to recognize secularism for what it is: an aggressive religion
      competing for converts, a faith lacking the candor to speak openly of its aims.

      Christopher W. Ashcraft
      Northwest Creation Network
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.