Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

8249Re: Lux Radio Theater log

Expand Messages
  • Scott
    Dec 2, 2008
      I don't think repeat should be in there either. How about listing
      the one or two main actors that make it different.

      Scott


      --- In OTR-Project@yahoogroups.com, "Kurt" <schriever@...> wrote:
      >
      > --- In OTR-Project@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew Steinberg"
      > <nightkey5@> wrote:
      > >
      > > In the Lux Radio Theater, the term (repeat) has been added after
      the
      > > title of over 100 shows. Unless the exact same show was
      repeated, I
      > > don't see the point of pointing out the same story was used
      > > previously. To put it another way, if a new cast re-does a
      story, I
      > > don't consider it a repeat. I am proposing to delete the term
      > (repeat)
      > > from throughout the log, but wanted to get other opinions before
      > doing
      > > this.
      > >
      >
      > Andrew,
      >
      > I'm with you on this. No need to clutter the log with excess
      > notations unless the subsequent airings are literally rebroadcasts
      of
      > transcriptions. This is a simple but clear approach that is
      already
      > the norm in most other logs where multiple uses of the same script
      > have occurred, based on what I've seen in my limited travels in
      > Otter. There are already plenty of log-by-log idiosyncrasies out
      > there which would benefit from similar cleanup to what you suggest
      > rather than piling on more one-off decision making efforts.
      >
      > Kurt
      >
    • Show all 10 messages in this topic