27180RE: [OSCALEMODELERS] NMRA Weights
- Jan 24, 2014Same with the LIonel offset AAR twin hoppers and some of the MTH ones (probably made in the same factory); they are what they are. This is not so much a problem with the primary three-rail market, where most of the trackage is level, trains are relatively short, and locomotives generally overpowered.
Ceres & Canisteo RR Co./Champlain County Traction Co.
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:00:02 -0800
Subject: Re: [OSCALEMODELERS] NMRA WeightsThat is why Atlas does not earn the NMRA Conformance Award for many of their products.Ken RDes Peres, MOFrom: "aroman@..." <aroman@...>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 4:48 AM
Subject: Re: [OSCALEMODELERS] NMRA WeightsAccording to this chart, a typical 2-bay short hopper should weigh in at about 13 ounces. This “feels” about right. I recently purchased some new Atlas die-cast hoppers. I believe they neglect to mention the model weight on theor web-site. As a result, I was taken aback when I received the cars and found they weigh in at a bloated 1/2-oz short of two pounds!! Now, on level track this may not strike you as terrible (the trucks are very free-rolling), but on my layout there is one very steep grade - unrealistically so, but unfortunately the only way I could engineer it. At two pounds per car, it takes an awful lot of loco to drag those suckers up-grade. And should the couplers ever part at an unscheduled time ...look out below! Certainly an outfit like Atlas must know about ideal weights. What’s the problem? Sure it’s die-cast... but just make the walls thinner for gosh sakes. And it holds true for other cars I bought, such as their tank cars and others.No, the included coal load is not part of the problem... it’s plastic. And no, I have no desire to drill out the castings to shed weight. Not at those prices! It’s one reason I really prefer to run the OLD Atlas (Roco) plastic hoppers, shortening, modifying and upgrading them to suit my layout.~Andy R!
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>