Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

[World Streets] New comment on There they go again, burying poor old Vélib. (Hey....

Expand Messages
  • Eric Britton
    Eric Britton has left a new comment on your post There they go again, burying poor old Velib. (Hey... : Here is an example of how poorly researched and
    Message 1 of 2 , Nov 1, 2009
      Eric Britton has left a new comment on your post "There they go again,
      burying poor old Velib. (Hey...":

      Here is an example of how poorly researched and reported news travels
      fast. This from the Charleston Daily Mail in Charleston Virginia USA,
      with the author spinning his tale 100% on what he read in the paper.

      We all need to be more careful with the truth.

      Eric Britton
      Editor, World Streets


      Source: http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/2836

      The tree-huggers of Paris came up with a plan. People would rent
      bicycles around the city, and ride them to another part of the city and
      turn them in to another bike rental shop.

      The rental would be 1 euro a day or 29 euros a year

      The specially designed bikes cost $3,500 each.

      But guess what? People are not so honest. You give them a $3,500 bike
      for $1.50 and they will pedal that bike away and you will never see it
      again. These overpriced bikes are selling well on the black market in
      Eastern Europe and North Africa.

      With 80 percent of the initial 20,600 bicycles stolen or damaged, the
      Program's organizers have had to hire several hundred people just to
      fix them. And along with the dent in the city-subsidized budget has
      been a blow to the Parisian psyche,� the New York Times reported.

      So the company that is behind this just went bust, right?


      And I'm pretty sure the company, JCDecaux, had an ulterior motive for
      going into this silly

      So despite the increasing costs, Paris and JCDecaux are pressing on.
      The company invested about $140 million to set up the system and
      provides a yearly fee of about $5.5 million to Paris, which also gets
      rental fees for the bikes. In return, the companys 10-year contract
      allows it to put up 1,628 billboards that it can rent,� the New York
      Times reported.

      So there is a possibility that the company is making enough money off
      the billboards to offset the losses on the bikes.

      As for the city, it has agreed to spend $600 per bike for every bike
      stolen or damaged beyond 4%, so it is paying a shade less than $9.4
      million a year to replace or repair those bikes. It may be making money
      on its share of teh rental fees, but the $5.5 million yearly fee is
      eaten up quickly under this agreement.

      I just love how naive and trusting everyone is in Paris. When he is
      done being president, maybe Barack Obama can become the Mayor of Paris.

      Posted by Eric Britton to World Streets at Sunday, 01 November, 2009
    • Paul DeMaio
      Eric Britton has left a new comment on your post There they go again, burying poor old Vélib. (Hey... : An article in The New York Times, titled French
      Message 2 of 2 , Nov 4, 2009
        An article in The New York Times, titled "French Ideal of Bicycle-sharing Meets Reality" discusses the problem Paris has been having with vandalism and theft of bike-sharing bikes with 80% of the initial bikes having been replaced. Data has been hard to come by, however, Velib' is an outlayer in terms of theft and vandalism in a bike-sharing programs due to social unrest in the Parisian suburbs. Until recently, the suburbs have generally been a place in America, where those who can afford to leave the ills of the city, have fled. In Paris, however, the suburbs are a place for those who cannot afford to live in the luxury of the city.

        There's technology and demography. I'm not aware of problems with JCDecaux's technology working poorly in other cities that use their system, so demography is the key issue. There's a great deal of social unrest in Paris' suburbs as sociologist Bruno Marzloff stated in The New York Times article. A European Working Conditions Observatory report highlights just how bad things are in France's suburbs with "the unemployment rate... between 35% and 54% for men, between 40% and 60% for women, and between 30% and 50% for young people."

        Instead of ad campaigns telling people to respect the bikes, JCDecaux and the City of Paris should be using the bikes to respect the people, if they aren't already. The very same individuals who are damaging the bikes should be employed by JCDecaux to repair them. Until the super high unemployment rates decrease, the social unrest will continue and bike-sharing as a representative of the City will be a pawn in their battles.

        Outside of the social unrest factor, bike-sharing is a good value for its expense. If you calculate the cost per trip of moving a person by bike-sharing, foot, transit, and car, I'd put my money on bike-sharing being the most cost efficient at moving a person per mile. The cost of building a mile of track or asphalt for the other vehicles is expensive, compared to that of what a bike needs.

        In this calcuation you would need to include the public health benefits in terms of decreased medical expenses due to increased activity, lowered emissions, and increased productivity as folks can spend their time where they want to be, rather than stuck in traffic. Cities spend hundreds of millions working on these issues and bike-sharing leverages benefits associated with each.

        You would also need to include in this calculation how much positive publicity Paris has garnered from around the world for their bold bike-sharing innovation. It seems as if everybody has heard about "those bikes in Paris" even if they don't know what Velib' or bike-sharing is. The value of this publicity alone has got to be in the tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. France continues to remain at the top of the list of countries with international tourist arrivals, according to the World Tourism Organization, and it's likely that many of these visitors are visiting Paris and are one of the up to 145,000 trips per day that are made on Velib'.

        So I'd say that even with a high vandalism and theft rate that bike-sharing is too important to Paris for it to shutter its program. Bike-sharing isn't the problem, it's part of the solution, if we let it be.

        Paul DeMaio, Washington DC USA
        The Bike-sharing Blog

        Posted by Eric Britton to World Streets at Wednesday, 04 November, 2009
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.