Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

After resurfacing, Chief Illiniwek should stay retired

Expand Messages
  • Robert Schmidt
    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/dave_zirin/10/30/chiefilliniw ek/ Chief concern After resurfacing, Chief Illiniwek should stay retired Posted:
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 1 6:16 AM

      Chief concern
      After resurfacing, Chief Illiniwek should stay retired

      Posted: Tuesday October 30, 2007 2:56PM; Updated: Tuesday October 30, 2007

      Last weekend an unfortunate figure returned to the University of Illinois,
      and it wasn't Jeff George. Chief Illiniwek, the former school mascot, was
      back to adorn floats and assorted regalia at Homecoming to the cheers of
      some and the bitter horror of those who thought the feathered one had been
      retired for good.

      You may have thought that the Chief was banned last year after the NCAA
      called Illiniwek a "hostile or abusive" mascot and prevented the school
      from hosting postseason games as long as it paraded him about. You may have
      thought Illinois had joined dozens of other schools from Stanford to St.
      John's in putting Native American caricatures to bed. You thought wrong.

      A victory 20 years in the making was overturned when Illinois chancellor
      Richard Herman declared that the Homecoming ban violated the U.S.
      constitution saying, "The University values free speech and free expression
      and considers Homecoming floats, decorations, costumes and related signage
      all representations of such personal expression."

      Yes, our forefathers fought and died to protect the right to display
      caricatures of the conquered at public institutions of higher learning. The
      word Illiniwek means "tribe of superior men." In making the decision to
      allow Chief Illiniwek to return, Herman acted in a manner of the inferior,
      following instead of leading.

      Those whose heart is with the dancing chief were thrilled, calling
      Homecoming "a victory parade." The organization Students for Chief Illini
      issued a statement saying that the original policy was a "slap in the face
      to people in the community to say you can't support your symbol." In an
      irony that could only be found in the bizarre lexicon of university
      political correctness, the group uses the world "symbol" instead of
      "mascot" because the term "mascot" is offensive to Chief Illiniwek.

      Keep in mind, that there never was a Chief Illiniwek. No one with that name
      ever existed. His costume is not in keeping with anything the Illini tribe
      ever wore and the dance at halftime was created in 1926 by the Boy Scouts.
      But by all means support such a noble symbol.

      The Chief was certainly celebrated at Homecoming. No counter protestors
      were reported and thousands of attendees wore Chief regalia. Although no
      Native American organizations support the Chief, he was celebrated lustily.

      The same students and alumni that clamor for the Chief as a symbol of
      Native American nobility, put far more time and energy into a fictional
      chief than aiding actual Native Americans. Students of Native American
      descent are a mere 0.2% of the overall student population, and 0.1% of the
      faculty. "Honoring" Native Americans is confined to a white guy in buckskin
      pants and feathers (only whites have portrayed the Chief throughout it's
      81-year history).

      There was little said about the fact that while Chief Illiniwek never
      existed, the Illini tribe did. They were torn apart, forcibly removed so
      schools like Illinois could take root. Chief Ron Froman of the Peoria tribe
      once said of the Chief, "I don't think it was to honor us, because, hell,
      they ran our (butts) out of Illinois."

      Since there is nothing honorable about resurrecting the Chief, is it then
      an issue of freedom of speech? In a letter to Chancellor Herman, professor
      Antonia Darder wrote, "If a float maker wants to use KKK imagery or a noose
      hanging from a tree on a homecoming float, is this now also acceptable
      under the auspices of 'free expression?' Or if a float maker wants to use
      images of people copulating or nude participants on a float, would this
      also be accepted as the freedom of personal expression? And if not, why
      not? Certainly if public nudity is considered immoral or at least
      inappropriate, why not public racism?"

      This is the climate in which Herman resurrects the Chief. The latest in
      this marathon battle of memory, history, and the role of sports in this
      process comes two weeks after the death of Native American activist and
      longtime leader of the American Indian Movement, Vernon Bellecourt.

      Bellecourt spent years as a thorn in the side of organizations like the
      Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians, demanding that they change their
      mascots. He once said, "Our detractors always say, 'We are honoring you.'
      It's not an honor. In whose honor, we have to ask. Beginning with the
      pilgrims at Plymouth Rock, about 16 million of us were wiped out, including
      whole villages in Washington."

      To other teams with Indian nicknames and to their fans, he said, "No more
      chicken feathers ... No more paint on faces. The chop stops here."

      Maybe the University of Illinois should step up and honor Bellecourt by
      putting Chief Illiniwek to rest -- for good.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.