- Goto Message #
(10)Thanks for clarifying! WHEW! I thought we were doing all our multiple attacker melees incorrectly (ie. Counting any additional brigades for numbers only)!
(3)Correct. PS: This is my new Email address (email@example.com), an alias for my old Hotmail address mandated by Microsoft. However, the old Hotmail address will
(4)Roger the dog
Fetching Sponsored Content...
(10)Point taken Drew, I'll definitely correct that. I'm really not sure about a Prussian-dominated Rheinbund on the other hand (a la Micheal's idea). I'd thought
(8)Thanks Allan I do indeed have John Gill's books and invaluable they are to. I'm afraid I have a confession to make insofar that whilst I own a copy of AoE I
(10)Hi, Does a disordered cavalry brigade that is charged by infantry and who make a good March Table result countercharge the infantry? And, do they then always
(4)Hi Simon That has always in the rules I've used since 1976 until AoE about 2005/6 -1 for each casualty per figure (20 men per figure) which is 5% -1 for each
(26)Mike It adds very little to the game IMHO when you stop players from the MAD scenario. If thats what they want let them do it as it means at least everyone is
(16)The scenario I'm modelling (Espinosa) has a BUA larger than 4"X4". There is no evidence that the town was part of the fight, but it is on the battlefield and
(4)A big help, Phil. Thank you. It gives me some ideas about how terrain might be handled.
(3)Michael Brown has shared OneDrive files with you. To view them, click the images below.
(3)Great. Thanks! Mark D. Pawelski Executive Vice-president, Operations Phone (708)563-8359 Fax (708)496-7367 firstname.lastname@example.org
View First Topic Go to