Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

Expand Messages
  • Deks Ashiru
    Mr Nnabuagha,   Why does Emeka (anti-Yoruba) as you claim took Sola Adeeyo s (from Yoruba tribe) money.  Should the (Yoruba) Ambassadors Oluwole
    Message 1 of 28 , Nov 1, 2011
      Mr Nnabuagha,
       
      Why does Emeka (anti-Yoruba) as you claim took Sola Adeeyo's (from Yoruba tribe) money.  Should the (Yoruba) Ambassadors Oluwole Rotimi and Adefuye let Emeka go away with Naija money because of his Igbo tribe or you believe if Emeka is yoruba man they wont go after him.for the money? We can not move forward if people are still thinking like you. A robber is a robber, I BETT YOU MORE OF HIS CLIENTS WILL STILL BE MAKING SAME CLAIM AGAINST HIM.  
       
      - On Mon, 10/31/11, kingsley Nnabuagha <kingsnna@...> wrote:

      From: kingsley Nnabuagha <kingsnna@...>
      Subject: Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
      To: "igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com" <igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>, "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>, "IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>, "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>, "abiausa@yahoogroups.com" <abiausa@yahoogroups.com>, "anambraforum@yahoogroups.com" <anambraforum@yahoogroups.com>, "Ebe Umu Igbo" <IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>, "igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com" <igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>, "Igboevents" <IgboEvents@yahoogroups.com>, "imostatecongress@yahoogroups.com" <imostatecongress@yahoogroups.com>
      Cc: "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>, "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>
      Date: Monday, October 31, 2011, 10:53 PM

       
      Folks,
       
      I am yet to see one, just one Yoruba guy come out in open and speak objectively on this Emeka Ugwuonye's matter. I have deliberately kept silence, following all comments and responses on this matter, hoping that one person would make my day and show one reason to halt the concern we have about lack of individual opinion.
       
      As for Buhari and his team, I have my HUGE problem with them. None, not even one could speak objectively. One begins to wonder how such person would lead a country in the 21st century.
       
      Nigeria is steps behind, both in globalization and development and we all know what and what need to be done but either fears of fear or afraid of the inevitable seem to be hindering and inhibiting us from acting. I am challenging one Yoruba man/woman to act independently like a liberal mind and speak truth. If one Yoruba man can do that, others will follow and soon, we may have a democratic and liberated South-West.
       
      Let truth be told, Emeka Ugwuonye's case is now a human rights case and it has exposed the weakness in EFCC's structure and how the officials can easily be manipulated. The Yoruba people have spotted the laxity in EFCC structure and now pesting on her.
      And for those thinking differently should check this: How do we analyse this? A Yoruba Ambassador had an issue with Emeka, another Yoruba wanted Emeka's job and later got it, another Yoruba took Emeka to court in the US and Emeka won him, another Yoruba Ambassador heard that Emeka went home and chased him to Nigeria, a Yoruba EFCC official arrested him, he was beaten black and blue, detained, and later released, he has returned home for court appointment, news came that another Yoruba person has written another allegation against Emeka, and another Yoruba EFCC official and partner picked him up from Abuja and took him to Lagos, a Yoruba State. The Yoruba spokes person of EFCC has announced many terrible things about Emeka and majorities of all Yoruba contributors in these fora have found Emeka Ugwuonye guilt even before going to court.
       
      WHERE ARE NOLLYWOOD PRODUCERS AND DIRECTOR? This will make the best comedy of the decade. Possible name for movie: Nigeria Must Survive
       
       
      Regards
       
       
      Uzoma KLN
      [Life is simple, do not make it difficult]

      From: Ike Agbor <ikeagbor@...>
      To: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
      Cc: "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>; "igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com" <igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 10:36 PM
      Subject: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

       
      "If you have any morals,you would have been able so see something wrong in a lawyer stealing his client's fund." Yinka
       
      This is the problem I have with you guys and your inchoate aspiration for national spotlight cum leadership; you have already come to the conclusion that a lawyer stole his client's funds.
      My brother you are depraved and lack the capacity for leadership and anyone that thinks otherwise should go ahead and prop you up as his or her leader; you have already called Emeka Ugwuonye a thief right.
      I hope no one puts you at the head of catching rabbits in Nigeria or else you couldn't differentiate between rabbits and rats; it is a sad day to call yourself a spokesman for Buhari.
      Lead your pack and good luck.
       
      Ike

       
      From: yinka odumakin <yodumakin@...>
      To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; "IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
      Cc: "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>; "igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com" <igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:06 PM
      Subject: Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

       
      Ike:
      If you have any morals,you would have been able so see something wrong in a lawyer stealing his client's fund.
      You have no condemnation fir the thief but accuse the owner of keeping his stuff where a thief can see it.
      Moral depravity!
      Yinka.
      "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
      From: Ike Agbor <ikeagbor@...>
      Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
      To: IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com<IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com<NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
      ReplyTo: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      Cc: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com<NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com<Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com<NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>; igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com<igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

       
      "You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail."
      Yinka odumakin.
      And that was from the man priming himself as a Minister/spokesperson for a President Buhari.
      And you are also right; to go to jail or not is now based on the whims and caprices of the judge who would want to send an Emeka to jail because we are cheering him on and then on the other hand were we not to cheer him on, the judge would demur on incarcerating an Emeka.
       
      Well Yinka is one of the people trumping himself up as a change agent showing himself here and there and then you wonder why Nigeria is going backwards with each generation.
       
      Yinka went on, "I'm shocked you were asking why Adeeyo did not report Emeka to Maryland Bar. The Attorney Grievance Commission would have de barred him long time ago. If you doubt this, Adeeyo still has that option though."
       
      Who would hire anyone that reasons this way as a dog-catcher; well only in Nigeria could that happen!
      If Yinka Odumakin is imbibed with any scintilla of ratiocination to even aspire to lead a team of dog catchers, he would explain to us why an Adeeyo who was at some point or still is a denizen of Maryland in the U.S would hesitate to report Emeka Ugwuonye to the Maryland Bar to one, get his money back with interest and two teach Emeka lesson; to resort to the services of thugs in Nigeria where dog-catchers would want to cheer him on and this "Adeeyo still has that option though."
       
      By gosh at the beginning some of thought that we were dealing with reasonable people aspiring for leadership here and then they write and you see the emptiness in them…
       
      Ike

       
      From: Igboka Uwadiegwu <igboka.uwadiegwu@...>
      To: "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
      Cc: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "igboworldforum@yahoogroups.com" <igboworldforum@yahoogroups.com>; "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 1:35 PM
      Subject: [IgboWorldForum] Re1 : To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

       
      "You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail." outed bigot odumakin.

      The above is from a man who thought he could fly like a butterfly and perch INSIDE Aso Rock along with Buhari.
      The above is from a self-qualified moral crusader and "progressive"...

      And U wonder why this nation is FUCKED FOREVER. A 3rd world nation with 3rd rate progressives and 3rd rate values.
      Too many MASKED hypocrites swaggering around thinking they are sweetly fooling their world.
      Too many BASTARDS who do not believe in ANYTHING but their freaking interests and their thirst for power...even for a minimally ridiculous power.

      What has "cheering" somebody...anybody, got to do with REAL justice if that justice is worth its SALT ?  Should a respectable justice be so fragile and so shaky that some "cheering" (whatever that means) could destabilize it and INFLUENCE its course ? If this were to happen, then such a justice is a FUNNY one, a gutter one, a worthless one, a CONTEMPTIBLE one...

      And when a nation, any nation, has such a vile justice, then such a nation is downright contemptible as well.

      odumakin, you bleeding motherfuckers are playing with the institutions of this nation as if they aren't worth any more than a piece of a dog shit...yet the NEXT moment you will be presenting your worthless bigoted selves as some possible saviors of the same nation. A nation, you rascal animals MORALLY crashed.

      All a worthy nation has is her institutions. You fuck with those institutions for some temporary conveniences, you "useless" that nation and you may as well piss on her.
      When the burst happens, as it surely would, it's precisely wet-ass hypocrites like you who will be pointing accusing fingers elsewhere.

      Igboka





      De : "mikeogarasu@..." <mikeogarasu@...>
      À : NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com; "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com" <edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com>
      Envoyé le : Lundi 31 Octobre 2011 17h24
      Objet : Re: ||NaijaObserver|| To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

       
      Erg,
      I know an adage - once something is lost, you look for it any which way. I will have to do a little googling to establish what EFCC was created to do. I happen to know sola adeeyo personally too and I recall he was Dr Gambaris pa of some sort back in the mid 80s fresh from his sojourn in the United States.
      Would he go to the FBI or the CIA with a petition if he has personal dealings with another person and expect the FBI/CIA or would he go to court. Moreso when he is dealing with a lawyer validly in practise in the US?
      Please clarify.
      MA
      Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria.
      From: eRG <edoregeneration@...>
      Sender: NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:36:33 +0000 (GMT)
      To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com<NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com<NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>; edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com<edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com>
      ReplyTo: NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: ||NaijaObserver|| To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

       
      Pastor Joe,

      You've done well on this matter and I thank you for your patience in putting the feet of our so-called human rights activist to the fire.
      That was a poser you threw out there; Sola Adeeyo's kind-heartedness didn't want to get Emeka disbarred but was prepared to get "Hammed" administer MKO's treatment to Emeka in EFCC's custody.
      I have learnt some new things today; in times of crisis, truth is so sacrosanct that you need a body guard of lies to protect it.
       
      eRG
      "God gives, Man hoards and Satan steals" - eRG's Father

      From: Joe Attueyi <topcrestt@...>
      To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Monday, 31 October 2011, 15:20
      Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

       
      Yinka
      Once again you deviate from substantive issues.

      I cannot be defending or cheering Emeka on an issue I have no details. Unlike you, I will not come to a conclusion based ONLY on Sola Adeeyo's version. So Sola Adeeyo, out of the kindness of his heart, does not want Emeka disbarred? That is why he refused to report him to his local bar. Hmm!

      Anyway back to the substance of my position. Anybody accused of a crime ought to be charged before a judge within 48 hours. Only a judge has the right to hold a Nigerian in custody beyond 48 hours. This is basic human rights. That the accused sued your friend for libel does NOT abridge his rights. Like the lesson Dr Idowu taught the other day: even if you are not able to do anything about it you can at least speak against it.

      I thought you guys are the human rights activists? Abi these rights are they relative?

      Joe

      --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@...> wrote:
      >
      > Joe:
      > You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail.
      > I'm shocked you were asking why Adeeyo did not report Emeka to Maryland Bar.The Attorney Grievance Commission would have de barred him long time ago.
      > If you doubt this,Adeeyo still has that option though.
      > Of all the libel cases you guys encouraged him to file,how many has he won?
      > But what baffles me most is that none of you sees anything wrong in an attorney criminally converting his client funds to his own!
      > Where is "moral compass?"
      > Yinka.
      >
      > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@...>
      > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:38:30
      > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
      > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
      >
      > Razak
      > Interesting you call me pro Emeka because Emeka himself will not agree with you
      >
      > I have been around long enough to know that Emeka's travails is a power fight underlined by our normal ethnic warfare. This fight goes way back to rag tag ambassador. Yinka trying to tell me otherwise was what I refused to accept.
      >
      > BTW Yinka self nominated as our contact to EFCC Hopefully he will help us determine who is lying between EFCC and Elombah.com.
      >
      > IF Emeka has been held by EFCC since last Wednesday without being brought before a judge then I expect you and Yinka to mount the barricades on his behalf. No?
      >
      > Joe
      >
      > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, Razaq Oladosu <alaremu2007@> wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > > Joe and every other pro- Emeka folks on this fora should please be dignifying enough to answer some very simple but fundamental questions as follows: Did Emeka actually collect the said money on behave of his client?,if yes, did he made appropriate remittance as at when due? If NO, then why?,
      > > Is this a norm for attorney to refuse to remit fund collected in trust for clients? That is all we need to know for now
      > > All these our Iyanminrin brothers seems to be acting true to type, because we know that events where and when their brothers are caught in the act of armed robbery in the past, they will tell you "NA BUSINESS E DO", so, is this another case of "NA BUSINESS EMEKA DO"
      > > On whether the EFCC is right or wrong, my people, all of you knows I am not a fan of the anti corruption out fit, but on this Emeka case, he should be used as an example to all that "NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW" , if Governors could be made to forfeit properties and are given very stringent bail conditions to boot,please who is Mr AMERICAN SCAMMER Emeka to think that he deserves a slap on the wrist in this case
      > > And to all of you that cares to know, YINKA is not representing EFCC, here or any where,so do direct your enquiries to the appropriate quarters
      > >
      > > BUSKA
      > >
      > >
      > > Sent from my iPad
      > >
      > > On Oct 31, 2011, at 1:44 PM, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
      > >
      > > > Joe:
      > > > The EFCC offered Emeka bail which he rejected and they said they charged him to court within 24 hours.
      > > > The moment Emeka was charged,the rest is between him and the court.
      > > > Yinka.
      > > >
      > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
      > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
      > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:39:05 -0000
      > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
      > > > ReplyTo: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Yinka
      > > > You are diverting the conversation away from it's key issues. And Olu Ojedokun seems to want to help both of us understand the legal issues.
      > > >
      > > > The key things I want to understand are:
      > > >
      > > > 1) if Emeka refused EFCC admin bail then EFCC should be able to hold him for 48 hours. After that they MUST charge him to court. AFTER 48 HOURS, Only a court should be able to remand a Nigerian citizen in custody.
      > > >
      > > > Is your understanding of this different?
      > > >
      > > > Can the police arrest Yinka Odumakin the activist and once he rejects the terms under which they are offering him admin bail, "file charges" against him and then hold him indefinitely until such a time "the court gives him a date"?
      > > >
      > > > I have asked Olu Ojedokun, a lawyer , to also educate me.
      > > >
      > > > Joe
      > > >
      > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Joe:
      > > > > The EFCC complied with the law by offering Emeka bail the day he was arrested.But that was inchoate because he refused to surrender his passport as demanded by the bond,even when former governors complied with such.
      > > > > Special citizen Emeka above the law?
      > > > > You also want the law modified for Emeka so that he can be in court when charges are filed?He should be able to draft the charges too.
      > > > > Yinka.
      > > > >
      > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
      > > > >
      > > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
      > > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:06:13
      > > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
      > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
      > > > >
      > > > > Yinka
      > > > > Thanks for the clarification.
      > > > >
      > > > > My previous understanding was that a detainee could not be held for more than 48 hours without being charged to court. Only the court could then either grant him bail or remand him in custody.
      > > > >
      > > > > I was not aware that by simply "filing charges" against an accused, EFCC could hold an accused in custody until such a time, indeterminate, when the court "gives the accused a date"!
      > > > >
      > > > > We learn every day.
      > > > >
      > > > > BTW could you ascertain from your EFCC contact whether Emeka was in court when his case was filed before the judge?
      > > > >
      > > > > Joe
      > > > >
      > > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Joe:
      > > > > > Read me carefully.
      > > > > > The EFCC said they have filed charges against him and it is the court that has to give him a date.
      > > > > > The case is with the Lagos High Court and once charges are filed,an accused is technically in the custody of the court.
      > > > > > Yinka.
      > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
      > > > > >
      > > > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
      > > > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:17:38
      > > > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
      > > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Yinka
      > > > > > Could you kindly provide the details of the court to which Emeka was charged, which then remanded him in custody
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Joe
      > > > > >
      > > > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Okpia:
      > > > > > > You are a master of obfuscation no be small!How has the way Emeka being holding Adeeyo money become the bigger issue over the fact that money due was not paid.
      > > > > > > Adeeyo has nothing to convince Attueyi on having convinced EFCC that his money is with Emeka.
      > > > > > > You are not telling the truth that EFCC is holding Emeka without charges.
      > > > > > > I called the EFCC and this is what I got:
      > > > > > > 1 Emeka was offered administrative bail the day he was arrested but he "rejected" it by refusing to surrender his passport as required by the bail bond.
      > > > > > > 2.Charges were proffered against him the following day and it is the court that is now expected to give him a date.Technically he is in the custody of the court.
      > > > > > > If you have nothing to contradict the above,it is your mouth that needs a big padlock.
      > > > > > > Yinka.
      > > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > > > > From: eRG <edoregeneration@>
      > > > > > > Sender: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:07:23
      > > > > > > To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com<NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com<NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com>; edo-ciao@yahoogroups.com<edo-ciao@yahoogroups.com>
      > > > > > > Reply-To: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > > Subject: [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Alagba Odumakin:
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > You're trying to play smart here with this your line of enquiry. Why don't you ask Sola Adeeyo to tell us why and how Emeka has been holding on to his money for 4 years with no recourse to justice even in the land of opportunity in the US of A where the transaction took place.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > I've refrained from responding to any of the ongoing cyber ethnic war on this issue until I saw your mail.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Now, let's cut to the chase, you have my number right? Go and ask Sola Adeeyo to come out and convince Joe Attueyi since I'm not an accountant on this issue. If we find his story plausible, I guarantee to organise the payment of $94,000 to him within 7 days.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > And while you're at it, tell me which law forbids EFCC from arraigning Emeka after arresting him for over 5 days? You should have kept your mouth shut anyway. Is your madam a foremost human right activist proud of your stance on this matter given the fact you've spoken to Sola Adeeyo?
      > > > > > > Â
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > eRG
      > > > > > > "God gives, Man hoards and Satan steals" - eRG's Father
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > ________________________________
      > > > > > > From: yinka odumakin <yodumakin@>
      > > > > > > To: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com; nigerianworldforum@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > > Sent: Monday, 31 October 2011, 10:29
      > > > > > > Subject: Re: [NaijaPolitics] [NIgerianWorldForum] Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Â
      > > > > > > Joe:
      > > > > > > 1 It is out of fair-mindedness that I asked Dan to inquire from Emeka why he is holding on to Adeeyo's money for over 4years,since I don't have access to him.
      > > > > > > 2 Why must you dictate to Adeeyo the option he must use to collect his money after breach of trust by the attorney?You have beaten a child and you are telling him how to cry mildly!
      > > > > > > 3 I don't see the "ethnic" bit in all this.Emeka converted Adeeyo's money illegally and the cheated reports to EFCC headed by FARIDA WAZIRI in Nigeria where EBELE AZIKIWE Jonathan is President!
      > > > > > > Where is the tribal angle?
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Yinka.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
      > > > > > > ________________________________
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
      > > > > > > Sender: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:06:08 -0000
      > > > > > > To: <NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com>
      > > > > > > ReplyTo: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > > Subject: [NaijaPolitics] [NIgerianWorldForum] Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
      > > > > > > Â
      > > > > > > Yinka
      > > > > > > You are doing selective reading.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > 1) you should NOT determine who or what is wrong simply by hearing Sola Adeeyo's version. Any fair minded person knows to hear the two sides of the story
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > 2) my views in (1) above is reinforced by my knowledge that Sola is an accomplished banker of repute. I will like to know why in 4 years the bar association Emeka belongs to has not been petitioned by Sola. Anybody familiar with the legal community will confirm that that approach would have gotten Sola his money faster and created professional problems for Emeka. Do you know why this approach has not been followed in 4 years?
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > 3) I hope you are not trying to convince me that there is no tribal angle to Emeka's woes with EFCC. That would be akin to saying that ragtag ambassador was fired for professional reasons it may be a power play but underlying it is our usual ethnic warfare. Let's not play the ostrich here.
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > Joe
      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > --- In NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Joe:
      > > > > > > > Your position on EFCC not being a debt collection agency is really debatable.Emeka did not borrow money from Adeeyo here,what has happened is more of criminal conversion of clients funds-in the realm of 419 really.
      > > > > > > > But as a man with "moral compass",what is the justification for a lawyer holding his client's fund for over four years?
      > > > > > > > I need your honest answer bearing in mind your admonition to Prof Adeboye on "wrong is wrong until it is my brother who is involved"
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Yinka.
      > > > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
      > > > > > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:22:35
      > > > > > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
      > > > > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Yinka,
      > > > > > > > Emeka Ugwuonye's case(s) is part of an elite power tussle of who-pass-who. Rag tag ambassador lost round 1 and round 2 is being played in Emeka's court. Iin Nigeria, every instrument from the ethnic to the religious is fair in the power war.
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Sola Adeeyo is an accomplished finance professional. If what you wrote below is all there is to the matter then I am sure Sola would have petitioned the bar association that Emeka belong's to and Sola would have gotten his money by now ( and Emeka reprimanded). there are always 2 sides to any story
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > EFCC is not supposed to be a debt collection agency. it becomes one when those with temporary upperhand use it as an instrument in an ongoing power struggle.
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > Joe
      > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, yinkaodumakin@ wrote:
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Dan:
      > > > > > > > > You need to do more work on this report.
      > > > > > > > > Sola Adeeyo,MR and not Mrs is somebody I know very well.
      > > > > > > > > I asked him yesterday about this issue with Emeka and he explained how a friend introduced him to Emeka when his money was tampered with in the bank by some fellows who were intercepting his mails.
      > > > > > > > > Contrary to the ethnic dimension being introduced by some people into a deal gone awry,the fellow who introduced Emeka to Adeeyo is a Yoruba who knows countless Yoruba lawyers in America.But he recommended Emeka because he recognized his strength in such briefs.
      > > > > > > > > Emeka handled the brief successfully and the bank paid the money into a client's account in Emeka's custody and Adeeyo thought his problem was over.
      > > > > > > > > But not so fast.Anytime he called Emeka to transfer his money,it was either he was in Hong Kong or Honolulu.This went on for years.
      > > > > > > > > At a point he cornered Emeka in Nigeria,he made an undertaking to repay the money with 15% interest.
      > > > > > > > > It all remained a promise until Adeeyo petitioned the EFCC three months ago.
      > > > > > > > > The straightforward question to ask Emeka is :why hold on to your client's funds for over 4 years?
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Yinka.
      > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > > > > > > From: hammed hassan <olijek@>
      > > > > > > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > > > > Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:13:38
      > > > > > > > > To: <nigerianworldforum@yahoogroups.com>
      > > > > > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: [NIgerianWorldForum] EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Mr. Odera,
      > > > > > > > > You are going to do a lot of help to Emeka when you mellow down on this type of internet report.
      > > > > > > > > Your explosive and sometimes framed up reports on EFCC and Emeka is not going to help your man at all.
      > > > > > > > > Have you checked the roster of EFCC to see who and who that are there. You wold have found that MAJORITY of the officers are LAWYERS. So they know what they are doing. You don't have to take to my advice, if you choose you can keep on and let us see the end. The case of MKO is still very fresh.
      > > > > > > > > Good luck and Good night.
      > > > > > > > > Hammed
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > To: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com; NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; naijaobserver@yahoogroups.com; OmoOdua@yahoogroups.com; naijaintellects@...; talknigeria@yahoogroups.com; wic_open_forum@yahoogroups.com; worldigbocongress@yahoogroups.com; igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com; igboevents@yahoogroups.com; igboworldforum@yahoogroups.com; republicreport@; Emekaugwuonye@
      > > > > > > > > From: odera.igbo@
      > > > > > > > > Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:36:22 -0700
      > > > > > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > EFCC vs Emeka Ugwuonye â€" The Facts, The Latest Intrigues
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > '''We arrested four former governors and they are not talking, Emeka was arrested and released in May and he started attacking us. By the time we keep him here for two years we will know how he will get the money to pay his lawyers�, the source fumed. Adding: â€Å"we will stop him from talking.'
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Written by Daniel Elombah
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Saturday, 29 October 2011 15:57
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Is EFCC a corrupt incompetent organisation that simply arrests people for propaganda purposes, and to simply re-assure foreign donors that "we are working"? Has Nigeria’s primary anti-corruption agency been turned into a debt collection agency? Or are they a willing tool for the powerful to oppressor the weak in the Nigeria society? Is the EFCC a tool for whichever government in power to muzzle the opposition? Is Francis Nzeribe
      > > > > > > > > correct when he said: "What I quarrel with EFCC and ICPC's operation, is that these bodies are terribly incompetent, docile, compromised and almost as corrupt as the corruption they should fight."
      > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > Let me start this analysis by quoting, Kola Dafe, a commentator on Elombah.com:
      > > > > > > > > He said: â€Å"EFCC have no reason to re-arrest Attorney Emeka Ugwuonye on the basis of the complaint alleged to have been made by a client of Emeka's law firm based in the U.S. If EFCC were to be helpful to the complainant, they should have advised him/her to seek redress through the American Bar Association�.
      > > > > > > > > As a Lawyer in the UK, I am quite aware that if any client of mine feels that I have dealt inappropriately with any funds paid into a client account, he has the Solicitors Regulation Authority to run to, and the SRA always looking for opportunity to deal with African lawyers will only be too happy to strike my name of the rolls if I am found liable, and the UK Police will not hesitate to jail me if any crime was found to have been committed.
      > > > > > > > > Kola also said: â€Å"But because EFCC is an "instrument of intimidation", it was tempted (I will say co-opted) to put its dirty nose into the matter over which the whole of Nigeria has no jurisdiction. With the heavy workload that EFCC has to cope with, it is unbelievable it has time to act as a private debt collector. Didn’t the Attorney-General of the Federation recently decide that EFCC should drop some high profile cases of corruption, looting and bank robberies purely on cost grounds. Even the $1.5M case for which EFCC has been "hunting" Emeka here and everywhere could easily have been dealt with inside the U.S. If the Nigerian Embassy has a case, why didn't they prosecute it within U.S. jurisdiction?�
      > > > > > > > > I say to Kola, EFCC has effectively turned themselves into high-handed debt collectors in Nigeria. I have heard stories of debtors inarcerated in EFCC gulag for years - some have even died in EFCC cells - because they were unable to pay either debt, or bribes demanded by EFCC operatives. But that is a story for another day, I am still gathering my facts on this issue.
      > > > > > > > > Evidently, Kola is also unaware that the Nigerian Embassy had lodged a complaint on this same issue with the Washington DC Bar and lost. The Council threw out their petition, saying they were unable to meet neither the minimum nor intermediate ethical standard that would prompt them to take action.
      > > > > > > > > The Bar Council advised the Embassy to seek remedies in the US civil court where the required onus; civil preponderance of evidence may avail them. The Council further advised that it would be futile to seek remedies in a criminal court where the standard of proof would be â€Å"beyond reasonable doubt�.
      > > > > > > > > The Embassy took the advice and too Emeka to a Maryland Court, where the civil matter is still pending.
      > > > > > > > > I saw a copy of the DC Bar Council decision with my own eyes.
      > > > > > > > > Kola continued: â€Å"Apparently, they need a bully and the typical Nigerian brutal system of justice to deal with Emeka. It is time to let modern legal process prevail. The amount of dollars involved is so insignificant compared to the Billions in US Dollars and Naira that EFCC was set up to recover for Nigeria from the Serial Looters of Treasuries and Banks who run the "Show" in Abuja�.
      > > > > > > > > EFCC vs Emeka Ugwuonye: Latest Intrigues
      > > > > > > > > The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, again Friday failed to arraign American Lawyer re-arrested on Wednesday after he attended the Federal High Court, Abuja. They also refused to release him because he refused to surrender his passport. Attorney Ephraim Emeka Ugwuonye flew in from his base in the United States last week to defend himself in the two charges previously preferred against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC in two different courts.
      > > > > > > > > Emeka would have been released yesterday if he had surrendered his passport. Told that the EFCC told Emeka to surrender his passport before they could release him, His counsel wondered why, and for what purpose should he release his passport?
      > > > > > > > > If EFCC want to seize his passport, they should apply to the courts, he said.
      > > > > > > > > EFCC sources speaking anonymously told Elombah.com they wanted to teach Emeka a lesson for â€Å"making noise�.
      > > > > > > > > â€Å"We arrested four former governors and they are not talking, Emeka was arrested and released in May and he started attacking us. By the time we keep him here for two years we will know how he will get the money to pay his lawyers�, the source fumed. Adding: â€Å"we will stop him from talking.
      > > > > > > > > Asked why they brought Emeka down to Lagos, the EFCC source said that is â€Å"where we have friendly judges.�
      > > > > > > > > â€Å"We own Lagos judges and we own the courts in Lagos�, he said
      > > > > > > > > â€Å"We will stop him from talking...now we have succeeded in keeping him here over the weekend, and next week there will probably be a public holiday, so he will stay with us for some more time...why didn't he surrender his passport as he agreed to do yesterday?â€�

      (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
    • Yinka Odumakin
      Buska,Let all the defenders of the indefensible read all the cases of lawyers who tampered with clients accounts in these compilations and show one that was
      Message 2 of 28 , Nov 1, 2011

        Buska,Let all the defenders of the indefensible read all the cases of lawyers who tampered with clients accounts in these compilations and show one that was not treated as a crime:

        FEATURED LAWYERS

        Bent Lawyers - solicitors, Barristers whatever, they fiddle the system bend the Law and are by any standard -- criminals, and what they do proves this.

        WHAT MAKES MATTERS WORSE ARE BODIES LIKE THE LAW SOCIETY AND BAR COUNCIL, THEY PREVENT THEIR MEMBERS FROM BEING CAUGHT OR FOUND OUT, SO WE BEGIN WITH THE LAW SOCIETY IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT THIS IS INDEED THE CASE.

        ' Law Society fined £1 million'

        Before 2008 THE LAW SOCIETY was fined a staggering one million pounds for its poor service in the investigation of complaints made against corrupt solicitors.  The Solicitors Complaints Bureau have more than 20,000 complaints each year,  The trouble here is, It is staffed by solicitors to investigate solicitors and as we know with the Police, the results will not be good because of this.  The fine bears this out, but sadly, it does not mean that things will get better for the public.  Solicitors are in the main, arrogant and believe themselves to be above the law, and that's what infuriates ordinary people who are forced to use them or come in contact with this profession.

        Complaints were found to take months, and then get referred back to the lawyer with no action taken.  Calls for an Independent body to investigate are always thrown aside by the profession and it' s easy to see why.

        ' Law Society fined £275,000 for a second time'

        In 2008 they were fined yet again for not having an adequate system for dealing with complaints and bent Lawyers, this despite giving assurances in the previous year to improve matters.  They even played down the complaints by halving them to 10,000 --- massaging the figures, not unlike the Government.

        In the nineties, a report revealed that almost £15 million was paid out to clients who had claimed compensation and the bureau admitted that the compensation fund would easily top £58 million.  ' Dishonesty is the principle reason in most cases' said a spokesman for the bureau.  They conceded that in that particular year there had been 17,001 complaints lodged, 45 solicitors struck off, another 32 suspended and 42 were fined. 70 Law firms were shut down, and more were still under some kind of investigation.  ' Stealing from clients seemed to be one of the more serious trends emerging from Law firms.' he said.

        A Ms. Morrison was 'stonewalled' by the Solicitors Complaints Bureau for five years!  which resulted in the Ombudsman being involved.  She said ' The SCB are a Solicitors Protection Bureau in my opinion, no wonder people are reluctant to fight their complaint with them  --- especially as it takes the average person 56 days work to earn enough to pay a solicitor for one day's work.'  The SCB were not prepared to comment on the case.

        Pensioner 77yr-old Peggy Wood battled with the Law society and Solicitors Complaints Bureau for 16 years and sadly lost.  She made a complaint about her solicitors acting under a conflict of interest.  She squared up to The Law Society and that was her mistake.  They knew how to play this case for all it was worth knowing that this frail pensioner could not win.  Delays, more court appearances, more paperwork, new hearings, the legal services ombudsman, more delay and hey presto, 16 years and they win. These are the people who claim the Law is fair.  Rubbish, the Law Society is a club for crooks.

        ' A Law unto themselves '

        Indeed, this says it all and we shall be dealing with cases of  their greed concerning LEGAL AID and plundering the NHS at £800 an hour and amounting to £3 million a week.  This was highlighted by the NHS Litigation Authority -- £114 million a year was paid out.  Legal aid firms such as Allen and Ovry in London were earning in the region of £377,000 a year profit for each solicitor.  Robbery at a Legal level, and theirs for the taking, and they do  --- the Judiciary do alright for themselves, they need stopping.

        ' Cheating Lawyers '

        A survey revealed that Law Students were the worst offenders in cheating, over half broke the rules in exams passing other people's work off as their own.  62 per cent of would-be solicitors plagiarised other's work in connection with fieldwork and essays according to Varsity.  1000 students at Cambridge took part in the survey that revealed this and said they did not have enough time to do things properly.  December 2008.

        Below, we have a selection of cases and Lawyers involved.

         

        'THIEVING SOLICITOR JAILED '

        LAWYER STUART NELSON was found guilty of stealing £179,000 from elderly widows - client accounts.  He worked in the firm, Metcalfe, Copeman and Pettefar in Kings Lynn, Norfolk.  Nelson took on the alias - Stephen Harris for use on Land Registry papers and forged  the signatures of his clients; all who were vulnerable.  He like others in his profession, stole to fund a luxurious life style buying expensive cars.  He received three years behind bars.

         

        ' LAWYER IN DRUGS INCIDENT '

        SOLICITOR SIMON WALKER was arrested after putting cannabis into food for a youngsters cricket team.  Walker who worked in the firm Appleby, Hope and Matthews of Middlesbrough was arrested with another man.

         

        ' SOLICITOR STOLE FROM CLIENTS '

        LAWYER IAN DENNING, who mainly handled divorce cases, pilfered £130,000 from accounts at the Norwich firm of Leathes Prior.  He used the money on holidays and buying luxury goods, which he said was to win back his wife.  He raided eight accounts in all before being caught and was sentenced to two years in jail.

         

        ' THIEVING LAWYER IS STRUCK OFF '

        SOLICITOR DAVID RAWLINGS stole more than £250,000 from client accounts to pay off his debts.  He persuaded his clerk to alter records in order that he was not discovered.  He flew the country and escaped to Thailand because no one took away his passport although he was bailed to appear on theft charges.

         

        ' BARRISTER JAILED FOR INTIMIDATION '

        LAWYER JUSTIN WEBSTER was jailed for two years after being found guilty of conducting a campaign of intimidation against his mistress.  His girlfriend also a Lawyer, said Justin informed her he was a powerful Lawyer who could tear her apart in any courtroom confrontation.  He was arrested five times, ordered to pay £1,500  compensation, breached a restraining order, with an amazing arrogance and ignored all the court orders.  He also threatened to ruin her.  He had treated the Magistrates Court with an air of complete disregard said the judge.

         

        ' CONVICTED SOLICITOR ON PROBATION '

        TOP LAWYER JONATHAN BRIERLEY was sentenced to two years probation for sexual assault on woman.  He also had three previous convictions for assault, one for criminal damage and ordered to pay compensation of £1,000. 

         

        ' BLACKMAILING BARRISTER '

        A female Barrister after being on the run for ten years was finally caught.  LAWYER CAROL LENA WINSTON-CHURCHILL appeared at the Old Bailey to face blackmail charges.  She threatened to tell the employers of a wealthy investment banker that he was a homosexual.  Instead of buying a house he gave her £100,000.  She evaded capture when she was allowed bail and fled the country only to return later and set up a new chambers.

         

        ' TWO LAWYERS IN FUND SCAM '

        WEALTHY SOLICITORS JIM BERESFORD AND DOUGLAS SMITH were struck off for skimming off the fund for sick miners.  £50 million skimmed off and the firm was making £46,000 a day in fees.  They saw the £3.4 billion fund as rich pickings and exploited the situation to the full.

         

        ' SOLICITOR HELPS HIMSELF TO CLIENT'S ACCOUNTS '

        LAWYER DIXIT SHAH conceived an elaborate scheme to get £6 million from the accounts of home-buyers who trusted the firm.  Making himself Senior Manager, he was able to transfer money from accounts to his own.  He fled the country before he could be charged. 

         

        ' VISA SCAM LAWYER IS JAILED '

        SOLICITOR JATINDER KUMAR SHARMA was jailed for seven years for operating the  £1.5 million scam using bogus documents and false identities, conspiracy to defraud and deception.  When police raided his office they found 90,000 documents, 980 visa application files, false University certificates, academic records and bank statements.

         

        ' BARRISTER IN SEX ASSAULT ON TEENAGER '

        LAWYER FAUZ MOHAMMED KHAN told a teenage girl after sexually assaulting her - I was just testing you in case you are ever called as a witness.  He was jailed for four months by Chester Magistrates.

         

        ' COUNCIL LAWYER THREATENS PENSIONER '

        LAWYER MICHAEL SMITH with the Waltham Forest council threatened a vulnerable pensioner in order to suppress a payout of compensation being publicly known.  The arrogant Lawyer defended the mistake by Leytonstone Council Tax collectors as an error after having bailiffs serve a notice of collection concerning money never owed, but went ahead with a court claim despite the pensioner not knowing of these claims.  Representing his council he wanted this affair to be kept secret. Private Investigator John Barrymore found other complaints against the Lawyer when he made enquiries. We had someone phone us and they claimed there was a dark secret in his early days, but sadly they did not ring back. What we do know is that his intimidation of ordinary citizens goes back several years and this is not his first time in using his position to make threats. One questions how many other secrets exist concerning this Lawyer? -- A Lawyer who will go to great lengths to silence any opposition no matter what.

         

        'FRAUD LAWYER JAILED '

        BRISTOL SOLICITOR SAWYER was jailed after attempting to defraud American Express. He used counterfeit cheques to the value of £150,000, it was the  biggest seizures of forged traveller#s cheques.  He was previously fined over mortgage fraud, he was jailed for three years.  His legal clerk, Errol Howell was cleared of conspiracy due to a lack of evidence.

         

        ' SOLICITOR PAYS OUT OVER SUPPRESSION OF FACTS'

        LAWYER MARYLIN LAWSON of  James Eldridge and Son, on the Isle of Wight had to pay a couple £82,000 for not divulging that their new home was to be next to a council refuse tip already planned.  The £112,000 dream house had devalued to a mere £30,000 as a result of the council site.

         

        ' BARRISTER GIVEN SUSPENDED SENTENCE '

        Q.C. JAMES BONNEY was banned from driving for five years and given a suspended four-month prison sentence for his second drink/driving offence.  Selected as a Deputy High Court Judge, he failed to stop for police and was found to be four times over the legal limit.

         

        ' RACE COUNCIL LAWYER VICTIMISED COLLEAGUE '

        SOLICITOR CHRISTOPHER BOOTHMAN decided after knowing the panel applicant had made a complaint against him, manipulated the other members to discount her application. 

         

        ' BARRISTER DEFRAUDS BENEFITS AGENCY '

        LAWYER GRAEME WOOD of London, swindled more than £10.000 in state benefits to pay the monthly rent of £1,350. He concealed his earnings from three London colleges where he acted as a lecturer.  He was jailed for a year by the Knightsbridge Crown Court.

         

        ' LAWYER ARRESTED AND HELD IN CELLS '

        LEADING LAWYER MARK SUTHERLAND FISHER, a main partner in the legal firm of Duncan and Duncan of Dingwall, Easter Ross, was locked up over the weekend and faced charges not specified in court on the Monday.

         

        ' SOLICITOR STEALS FROM CLIENTS '

        KEITH WILSON, SOLICITOR in Jackson and Partners of Colchester was struck 0ff for misappropriating £31,000 from two widowed clients by arranging a will that would name him the beneficiary. 

         

        ' SEX ATTACK SOLICITOR STRUCK OFF '

        TAUNTON SOLICITOR SIMON JACKSON was jailed for 15 months after sex attacks on four teenage girls.  He attacked one girl fifty times, he groped and fondled the girls for his own gratification.  One of his former clients claimed Jackson was one of the best solicitors in Somerset and Taunton would be worse off without him!!!

         

        ' LAWYER STOLE CLIENT'S MONEY FOR SCHOOL FEES '

        SOLICITOR ANDREW LARMAN was jailed for twelve months after admitting nine charges of false accounting and another 111 offences to be taken into consideration.  To fund his son at Public School he took £37,000 of clients cash to pay Winchester College.  Some of the money went on a holiday, hotels and shopping sprees.

         

        ' SOLICITOR STRUCK OFF FOR DECEPTION '

        LAWYER MALCOLM TURNBULL abused the trust of the firm Turnbull Williams of Honiton by taking £185,000 to buy a farm.  Eventually it ran up to £300,000 in debt leaving his partner to repay it.  Mr. Turnbull admitted three charges of misconduct and was ordered to be struck off after a fourth charge was taken into consideration.

         

        ' RAPE CASE LAWYER IN TROUBLE AGAIN '

        SOLICITOR ANGUS DIGGLE  who had served a two year jail term for attempted rape, was arrested for being drunk and disorderly, which landed the abusive Lawyer with being struck off.

         

        ' SOLICITOR TAKES CLIENT'S CASH '

        DEVON LAWYER JOHN OATEN admitted stealing more than £50,000 from accounts held by the practice.  Plymouth Crown Court was found guilty of falsifying accounts and theft.

         

        ' LAWYER IN BRUTAL ASSAULT '

        THUG SOLICITOR KEVIN McCARTHY was fined £3,000 for assaulting Mr. Barry McKendrick at a party.  The assault left the victim with a fractured skull.  There was no order for compensation because the victim could not be in court, he confirmed that a civil case for damages would be launched.

         

        ' SOLICITOR IN DRUGS SUPPLY JAILED '

        GREEDY LAWYER TONY DARNELL was described in court as a calculating, determined scheming criminal.  He was caught supplying drugs and jailed for 11 years by the Chester Crown Court. 

         

        ' DRINK/DRIVE BARRISTER GETS PROBATION '

        LAWYER ROBERT POWELL-JONES crashed into two cars whilst being four times over the legal limit.  Magistrates stunned the public when they let him off a jail sentence considering the seriousness of the crash.  He was given 18 months probation and 75 hours community service.

         

        ' SOLICITOR IN ASSAULT ROW '

        LAWYER ALLEN CHUBB  hurled a woman out into the street in an outrage emanating from a 'disagreement with a client'  Senior partner with Child and Child in Belgravia, he was ordered to pay £1,000 compensation and £40,000 costs.  He was convicted of assault and falsely imprisoning Laura Harold.

         

        ' LAWYER STRUCK OFF FOR DECEPTION '

        SOLICITOR JOHN ANTHONY BRAITHWAITE  deceived clients into thinking he had won cases when in fact he'd neglected them in favour of paying out of his own pocket.  The tribunal ruled that he was motivated by foolishness, which could not really mitigate the deceptive element completely even though there were no losers in the public domain because he wanted his clients to be happy.

         

        ' ARREST WARRANT FOR SOLICITOR '

        LAWYER JAMES McINTYRE  was charged with driving without motor insurance, but he failed to appear in court for the hearing, a warrant was issued for his arrest.

         

        ' MISCONDUCT LAWYER APPEALS AGAINST DISMISSAL'

        SOLICITOR NEWTON FERRERS who faced a disciplinary hearing based on his misconduct in the profession, appealed  for leniency as he was facing a divorce, and being struck off would only make things worse.

         

        'SACKED SOLICITOR CLAIMS DOUBLE-STANDARDS '

        Patricia Durham Hall who worked for Bevan Ashford in Exeter was removed for being drunk.  She denied this and stated that Bevan Ashford Solicitors were frequently on pub crawls and being singled out was deliberate by the firm.  She intends to claim for unfair dismissal.  Bevan Asford refused to comment.

         

        ' LAWYER JAILED FOR STEALING AND MISCONDUCT '

        SOLICITOR PHILLIP HUXTABLEof Bournemouth charged £60,000 an hour in his plan to steal over £3 million from grieving families as he dealt with their wills.  He charged one family £22,700 for just £4,500 of actual work.  Huxtable transferred money out of his client's account and claim it was costs.  He would sometimes charge £1,000 for a phone call.  He charged one client £123,000 when the it should have been just £27,000. He was described as an arrogant liar in court and was jailed for three and a half years.

         

        'JAILED FRAUD LAWYER COMMITS FRAUD AGAIN '

        SOLICITOR NICHOLAS BUTCHER committed the same offence again after being previously jailed for fraud it was revealed as he yet again stood in the dock for a second time.  The struck-off solicitor joined a firm called Willmakers of Distinction set up by a businessman.  The firm had no indemnity nor was it prepared to give an honest deal it was heard.  In court it was heard that they fiddled and stole from people who had arranged wills with them.  Solicitor Nicholas Butcher was sentenced to three and a half years for theft.

         

        ' JAILED BARRISTER TO SUE CHANCELLOR '

        LAWYER FAUZ KHAN a prominent civil rights barrister is suing the Lord Chancellor for £9,000 in legal fees for working on his own defence. The barrister was sentenced to four months in jail for molesting a girl in his chambers, who was the girlfriend of a client. He was convicted by Chester Magistrates in 1999 of indecent assault.  On appeal it was decided that the girl lied and was prone to making false allegations.   The Manchester based lawyer launched an appeal after the sentence only to find that Mold Crown Court upheld the sentence. The Court of Appeal found that the case had not been adequately investigated by the police, and two of the police officers involved were to face disciplinary action. He launched a High Court claim for compensation.

         

         LAWYERS AND THE LEGAL AID SCAM

        Over a 100 LAWYERS have been accused of cheating in Legal Aid claims which cost the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds.  The Lord Chancellor received a list of Barristers suspected of making excessive charges involving criminal trials.  The Bar Council was notified by his department.

        Four QC's MICHAEL HILL, CLARE MONTGOMERY, COLIN NICHOLLS and PHILIP HACKETT had their legal aid fees reduced; these four Barristers were not on the list passed to the bar council.

        Even Mike Mansfield QC had his claim for £22,000 reduced to £12,000 by the House of Lords Committee.

        Mark Stobbs for the Bar Council said they would come down heavily on members whose claims were so excessive as to be unjustifiable and amount to misconduct.  ' Any Barristers who are found guilty of misconduct will be dealt with and publicly named.' he said

        NO LIST OF ANY BARRISTERS APPEARED --- HOW STRANGE?

        We have our own little list here:

        ' LAWYER GETS 5 YEARS FOR £2.25 MILLION LEGAL AID SWINDLE '

        CROOKED SOLICITOR ALAN PRITCHARD used the Legal aid system to 'print money' .  He managed to get people to sign blank legal aid forms and told them it was part of a petition to secure hosing improvements.  He teamed up with legal consultant Peter Lane and Brian O'Connor to make bogus claims which were like a production line set up.  Pritchard's firm abused the 'green form' scheme because the Legal Aid Board relied on honesty rather than proof.

        ' SOLICITOR NETTED OVER £8 MILLION IN LEGAL AID FRAUD '

        LAWYER TIM ROBINSON was jailed for 'master-minding a record £8m legal aid scam.  Robinson's Law Firm milked the legal aid system for six years before being rumbled.   The court heard that his firm was 'riddled with corruption ' and this involved his team of solicitors and clerks.  His personal fortune was well over £3 million.  It took 11 years to complete the investigation. He was jailed for 15 years and 4 months.

        'LEGAL AID SOLICITOR IN £1 MILLION FRAUD '

        BENT LAWYER GARY GROSBERG  along with his staff tricked the poor in order to launch a £1million pound swindle on Legal Aid.  Bogus cases were filed under invented names.  He got strangers to sign the forms saying they had been advised on a legal problem and had received an interview.  The swindle went on for five years at Grosberg & Co. in Leigh.  He was only caught out when someone noticed the similarity of the signatures.  The proceeds were to fund luxury cars and holidays.  He and his firm were charged with conspiracy to defraud.  He was also given Legal Aid for his defence --- and who granted him legal aid?  yes, his fellow lawyers of course, -- how about that??

        ' LAWYER IN LEGAL AID SCAM KEEPS £2MILLION?'

        SOLICITOR BERNARD RISDALE-TOMBLING  who made false legal aid claims managed to outwit CPS Lawyers and keep £2million.  Although he got a 4 year jail sentence after admitting bogus legal claims worth £731,000, he claimed the CPS could not prove all his cash came from the scam.  Nottingham Crown Court overturned the CPS claim for more money.

         

        ' THE LEGAL AID SCANDAL STILL LIVES ON '

        2010, AND LEGAL AID IS BIG BUSINESS FOR LAWYERS.  There was promises of a reform on legal aid, but now we can reveal that in a memo in Government circles shows that the taxpayers are paying over £1 million a month to lawyers who make vain attempts to represent criminal clients.  The report highlighted over five years barristers and solicitors have taken £50 million in legal aid for failed appeals.  £830,000 is spent every month on legal aid lost causes. It certainly shows that the lawyers and legal profession is up to its old tricks -- conning the public at every turn.

         

        THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE MONEY POT & LAWYERS

        Yes, they go from legal aid to skimming off the National Health Service.  Lawyers are taking £1 out of every £2 paid for blunders resulting out of claims.  Lawyers bill the NHS £800 an hour for their services, under a compensation scheme to cover claims for negligence and accidents within the hospital.  In one case in Liverpool, Lawyers tendered a bill for £4.5 million and after a challenge it was reduced to £43,000.  Although the case was referred to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the firm was not rebuked over the matter --- and was not publicly named?

        THE NHS Litigation Authority handles around 9,000 claims for negligence every year, and a claim is likely to take one and a half years.  Lawyers often named 'Ambulance Chasers' claim tens of millions in costs from the scheme.

         

        THE ASYLUM SCAM AND LAWYERS

        Many lawyers play the system to their full advantage with false claims the Immigration Minister claims.  Many cases are unclear and Lawyers misuse the Law to boost the claim payout. 

         

        THE DWP LAWYERS and the corruption that hides within.

        Before exposing the central players, I will mention colleague Martin and his site DWPCORRUPTION.CO.UK who mainly deal with corrupt matters associated with Jobcentreplus, and other departments in this area.  Most of the names are on his list, and on his site you can see a bigger picture of the rot in Government.

        The List of Legal representatives are;

        DANIEL LAVERCOMBE, NIGEL FISHER, SUSAN DEORDON, RICHARD THOMAS, PHILIP ELVY, MRS. M.MORGAN and C. CRICKETTS.

        All the above could be described as a connived conspiracy against public interests.

        DANIEL LAVERCOMBE, solicitor in this litigation department is the main feature here.

        This expose deals with the actions of Daniel Lavercombe and how far he goes (with the help of colleagues) to conceal and suppress public information.

        A public site on the web gave out the information that Daniel Lavercombe had fabricated evidence against jobcentre claimants.  The information was and is supported by Private Detective John Barrymore in Luton, he made several background enquiries which resulted in other information to add to what was already said.  Using his influence, Lavercombe had the page removed on the Yahoo site and to add to this he got Yahoo to suppress all messages to the public domain issued by Richard to be censored, and have him warned off.

        Recently, Deputy District Judge Wiggins said of this page, ' It's not worth worrying about, it proves nothing and one expects this of the Internet.'

        Yet, Lavercombe did see this as a threat and important contrary to the Judge, which lends weight to the fact that it was true and only someone willing to lean on a web provider to suppress it shows its relevance to him and the DWP department.  

        The female Barrister who represented the DWP locally was asked several times if Lavercombe was corrupt, and she ignored this and did not answer.

        Daniel Lavercombe along with Nigel Fisher feature on DWPCORRUPTION.CO.UK, Martin tells me he has been aware of Lavercombe.  Nigel Fisher is connected with fabrication etc, in the same mode as Lavercombe, and that account is fully explored on his website.  Nigel Fisher and Co have tried to silence and shutdown his site three times, which certainly points to something rotten in this little band of Lawyers.

        Daniel Lavercombe cannot silence everybody no matter how powerful he thinks he is, and this site will tell it like it is and expose corrupt Lawyers.

         

        The crumbling integrity of the C.P.S.  -- Lawyers thereof.

        ' The Crown Prosecution Service pay out £600,000 '

        RACISM AND MS.AZIZ, a prosecution Lawyer with the CPS.  She was suspended for telling a joke, and that joke has cost the taxpayer a staggering £1 million after taking into consideration costs at £500,000.  They certainly spend public money freely.

        The CPS has been accused of institutional Racism by three of its own Lawyers. 

        Three Asian Prosecutors - Maria Bamieh, Peter Shah and Dillip Navapurkar, say that discrimination has prevented them from being promoted.  David Calvert-Smith QC was appointed to look into the matter.  Perhaps this might cost the taxpayer another £3 million?

        'THE CROWN PROSECUTOR AND THE LIES SHE TOLD '

        LAWYER PENELOPE SCHOFIELD who worked for the CPS lied for her Police Detective lover when he was arrested on Drink/Driving charges.  Under questioning she told lie upon lie to protect him, she claimed she had driven the the car when in fact he had been driving under the influence of alcohol.  The Lawyer from Hambledon Hampshire said her lover DC. Nigel Phillips was distraught at being breathalysed, so she decided to help him.  Afterwards when it became clear their stories didn't hold together, she said -'I'm ashamed at what I have done.'

        She denied perverting the course of justice and fabricating a false statement with intent to deceive.

        She obviously does not comprehend that lying is exactly within the meaning of ' perverting the course of justice  but neither do the police when it suits them as you can see in BENT COPS LIST on this site.

        CPS GIVE BACK £33 MILLION TO CONVICTED CROOK

        A Roger Cook Programme revealed that convicted crook John Palmer walked away with £33 million pounds of confiscated cash after Lawyers at the CPS failed/bungled the case against him.

        CPS BLUNDERS IN THE MURDER CASE OF TWO FRENCH STUDENTS

        Crown Prosecution Lawyers have been blamed for many of the errors surrounding the case of two French students who were brutally killed by two murderers, one of whom should have been in prison.  Dan O Connex with Nigel Farmer, tortured and killed the two friends who were in the UK on an exchange student plan, for a few pounds, computer games and mobile phones.  The Police did nothing and the Lawyers sat back in their cosy departments oblivious to what their inaction had caused.  Thankfully, the parents of the two boys intend to sue these departments for the lack of care shown to French Nationals.

        THE CROWN PROSTITUTION SERVICE?

        PROSECUTOR KEITH BATCH usually tries vice girls before the court, but, when the court is over he became a male prostitute himself charging £60 for sex services, £20 for a massage.  The Suffolk Branch of the CPS declined to comment over the matter, but former boss Sir Allan Green a Director of Public Prosecutions, resigned after being caught kerb crawling in London's King's Cross.

        CPS LAWYER POSES AS 'EROTIC ACTOR' FOR EXTRA CASH

        LAWYER CLIFFORD ALLISON who concentrates on files concerning the special crime division, advertises for work as a nude model.  This would seem straight-forward if it were not for the fact he was doing this while on sick leave.  He apparently claimed he was under too much stress to continue office work.  Former treasurer with the Bar Council, the £80,000 a year Barrister was on a six month full pay deal while performing as a semi-pro 'erotic model'  Sir Kenneth MacDonald QC was baffled by this and a spokesperson at the CPS wanted clarification of this issue when we contact him they said.

        CPS SLAMMED BY JUDGE OVER TAINTED CASE

         JUDGE OWEN STABLE ATTACKED THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE after acquitting a man brought to court on false charges presented by the police.  Landlord Mr.Davis of The White Hart in Bethnal Green refused entry to several off-duty cops who then engaged in a brawl.  Bullyboy   cops from the nearby station began a vendetta that landed the Pub Owner on several trumped up charges.  The Judge said there was no ounce of a case against the landlord.  ' It is outrageous that the Crown Prosecution Service arranged for Mr. Davis to be prosecuted'  He also told Prosecuting Barrister Mr. John Coffey ' I cannot believe this case went ahead on the advice of counsel as responsible as you are ' He condemned the waste of taxpayers money spent on the two day case.  It was suggested that the CPS concern it's time and money investigating the real culprits -- the Police and wondered if it was the CPS being bias and embarrassed by appearing to justify bent cops in the hope they could work together on good terms.

         

        CPS FLAWED BY ITS OWN SELF-SERVING SYSTEM

        The idea was to prevent miscarriages of justice when the police brought their own prosecutions,  Lawyers were supposed to do it better and do it right.  This is not so these days, they have got too comfortable and are making many mistakes.  Ever since, the number of forms required to be filled in for each offence has proliferated .  Many of these forms consist of 'tick boxes,; and often the CPS and police disagree over which box should be ticked.  The file is then sent back and forth between the two services, with the result that some of these forms are lost or mislaid.  In these instances, the case is often dropped.  Police Officers are not specifically required to keep copies of the files but have found they must do so to cover the loss of forms in transit.  Many of these forms are of no value to anyone except statisticians, and the Lawyers know that.  The taxpayer could be spared the huge legal fees if the lower courts were allowed police prosecutions -- the safeguards could easily be observed by the aid of an Ombudsman, and if there was some dispute it could be referred up to a higher court or Judge.

         

        CORRUPTION INQUIRY LOOKS AT THE CPS

        A MAJOR CORRUPTION INQUIRY HAS BEEN LAUNCHED INTO THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE, yes indeed, and that was launched after a series of criminal investigations were compromised. A list of police informers was passed to criminals from within the lawyers at the CPS.  The information was believed to be accessed from CPS computer files.  The National Crime Squad raided the CPS and arrested three men.  The Senior Administration Officer at the CPS Mark Herbert was arrested at his home in Twickenham.  Attorney General John Morris failed in his bid to have details of the corruption allegations suppressed.

         

        ' CPS - A Pathetic bunch of liars '

        A SPEEDING DRIVER, NOT JUST ANY DRIVER, DRIVER TO JACK STRAW MP.  And that is the difference.  Lawyers at The Crown Prosecution Service claimed ' insufficient evidence -- and passenger security at risk ' yet he was caught ' red-handed '  -- the driver admitted putting his foot down to avoid an accident?  -- he drove at 103 mph.  In cases involving the public, the whole matter goes before a court -- it is not for the police and the CPS to decide innocence or guilt, but to collect evidence and prepare a case.  They let him get away with it because of privilege and the MP involved -- and it stinks to high heaven.

        The following members of the public voiced these opinions -  John Stevens of Woodley, Berks.  M. Danvers of Lutterworth, Leicester.  Bryn Jones of Colwyn Bay, Clwyd.  T. Brennan of Hastings, E. Sussex.  E. Rowley, Lytham-St Anne's.  Andrew Maggs, Bury, Lancs.  Alan Riley, Radford, Nottinghamshire.  E. T. Broderick, Derby.

         

        ' Man on false charges threatens to sue the CPS '

        Welder Kurt Peterman of Wellington, Somerset, was wrongly accused of attacking a man and charged with grievous bodily harm, and other offences.  After ruining his life and putting him through hell, the case was suddenly discontinued because the man who accused him was well known to the police already.  Solicitor Brian Pixton of the CPS offered nothing but the usual rhetoric.  It is hoped that that Peterman did sue the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE and apply for legal aid too.

         

        ' CPS LAWYER APPEARS IN COURT OVER BRIBE CHARGES '

        LAWYER SARFRAZ IBRAHIM from Cardiff, a senior lawyer with the South Wales Crown Prosecution Service, appeared before Swansea Crown Court on Corruption charges and Perverting the course of justice.  In a sting operation mounted by the police, Ibrahim told a undercover cop that he could drop an assault case if he were offered £20,000.  The police carried out the operation due to an informant who claimed the upcoming trial of a man might be about to be rigged.  Ibrahim accepted the bribe and was arrested.  The case continues.

         

        ' CPS Accountability just a calculated lie '

        A SENIOR PROSECUTOR PUBLICLY SAID - ' WE ARE EXTREMELY ACCOUNTABLE ' -- ' Decisions have to be justified in our management reports ' he said.  This admission clearly shows that accountability is internal and not for public consumption or a matter for public.  The management report is a published annual report which means very little because it's a manufactured and carefully crafted item released to the public after it is only safe to do so.  This is amplified by the way the CPS acts towards any scrutiny from outside its little kingdom - a report said it acts secretively and unbelievably slow when asked to provide information.  The CPS is only answerable to the Attorney General, who in turn answers to government.

        One appalling fact is that Prosecution Barristers often receive the case brief the night before a trial or hearing or even on the very morning of the case according to the Royal Commission Crown Court Study.  A third of conferences between client and lawyer last less than fifteen minutes, and 70 per cent less than half an hour.

        Everyday in a Crown Court prosecutors who barely know the facts of a case will open a trial with a standard off-the-peg reading from the file of documents because they fail to observe the case in real terms thus leading to the missing of obvious points and cross-examinations that are completely ludicrous and time-wasting. Because they don't know, neither do the jury who are often completely baffled by the whole thing.

        A Detective Sergeant was quoted as saying ' The Prosecutors act and behave so high and mighty -- and consider everyone else in the law beneath them.  Yet they often screw up cases because they haven't prepared it properly.  You see both prosecutor and defence lawyers in the bar at lunch break having wine together like 'the Bar Old Boy Network' -- looking after themselves as usual.'  -- ' you feel like spanking them! '

        Funny he mentions spanking, we mention quite a few of them into that on this site!

         

        ' CPS and Police blame each other in fiasco trial '

        AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE blamed the Crown Prosecution Service over case of villager who was put in a cell, DNA - tested and finger-printed and taken to court over trimming a hedge?  The case cost the taxpayer well over £5,000.  It took seven months while the case was being prepared for the CPS to finally admit that Mr. Brian Lenthall had done nothing illegal, which ended abruptly by all charges being dropped.  The Police said ' Any questions as to why a decision was brought to prosecute this case should be directed at the CPS '  A spokesman for the CPS said ' The police were given several opportunities to provide further evidence '  But villager Mr. Lenthall believes someone acted maliciously and they decided to pursue the matter knowing how weak it was hoping that I would be convicted because lawyers were backing the charge.

         

        ' CPS take Eight Months to drop insufficient case '

        THE CPS and HAMPSHIRE POLICE paraded Matthew Price before the magistrates court and each time it was adjourned until the CPS lawyers decided to discontinue with the case.  They claimed insufficient evidence after eight months and supposedly preparing a case.  INSPECTOR PAUL SAVILL of the Hampshire Police made the decision to hound Matthew Price until he decided to post the entire story on you-tube for millions of people to see.  The Crown Prosecution Service wasted resources and public money yet remained unsympathetic and unmoved on how they had squandered taxpayers money.

         

        ' CPS Deliberately withheld evidence - three judges decide '

        THREE APPEAL COURT JUDGES came to the conclusion that the Crown Prosecution Service deliberately withheld evidence from the defence counsel. The judges quashed the sentences given out to environmental activists who were accused of conspiracy to commit aggravated trespass at the Ratcliffe-on-Soar Power Station. The judges made it quite clear to the CPS that this kind of behaviour was not acceptable.

         

        ' Judge outraged by CPS Decision to prosecute man '

        At Snaresbrook Crown Court, JUDGE OWEN STABLE QC turned to the court and said ' There is not a scintilla of a case here, I am totally baffled.  What the accused Mr.Davis did, cannot be remotely regarded as engaging in an affray -- he was the victim ' said the judge angrily. ' It's outrageous that the Crown Prosecution Service arranged for him to be prosecuted; there seems to have been no police investigation whatsoever into how the alleged fracas began'  He then paused and faced CPS Prosecuting Barrister John Coffey. ' I cannot believe this case went ahead on the advice of counsel as responsible as you are.'      Mr.Coffey said that the police insisted on it because they had 'history' with the defendant.    The judge snapped back, ' Then it is outrageous this case has gone to court and that we have spent two days on it, it has been a complete waste to the taxpayer.'

        Mr Davis the defendant, and Landlord, said the police had waged a vendetta against him because they couldn't bully or intimidate him.  he has now been given the go-ahead to sue the police.

         

        QC Pontificates about rooting out corruption and leaves out lawyers

        Eminent Barrister Steven Silber urged The Law Commission to have new definitions to root out corruption. He said corruption was a national and international problem.  Although ' Acting corruptly ' is used in current legislation, it is not defined and in case law the meaning is also confused.  He recommended that a person or persons acting corruptly - a person who confers an advantage should be regarded in law as doing so 'corruptly' if he or she intends that an agent should do (or omit to do) something and believes that, if the agent so acts, it would probably be primarily in return for gaining the advantage rather than for some legitimate reason. This would also apply to ' performing functions corruptly' in that the agent's conduct was motivated by the hope of a corrupt reward , whether or not there was any agreement to that effect. 'agent' being defined in terms of anyone who has agreed to perform functions , whether for another person or for the public (or both).  -- corruptly conferring, or offering or agreeing to confer, an advantage; corruptly obtaining, soliciting or agreeing to obtain an advantage; corrupt performance by an agent of his or her functions as an agent; and receipt by an agent of a benefit which consists of, or is derived from, an advantage which the agent knows or believes to have been corruptly obtained.

        LAWYERS SHOULD READ THE ABOVE SO THAT THEY KNOW AND UNDERSTAND WHAT CORRUPTION IS, BECAUSE MANY OF THEM FALL INTO THOSE DEFINITIONS AND DENY WRONGDOING AND RELY ON QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE TO ESCAPE JUSTICE -- LAWYERS WERE LEFT OUT OF THE COMMISSION'S DEFINITIONS.  SILBER PROBABLY THOUGHT IT DIDN'T APPLY TO THE BROTHERHOOD AND MEMBERS OF THE BAR COUNCIL.

         

        More Lawyers -- More fiddling on an old tune

        '60 SOLICITORS UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE SERIOUS FRAUD SQUAD'

        A property housing scam concerning MORRIS PROPERTIES revealed that sixty solicitors were being investigated for irregularities and deals with the company.  The Serious Fraud Squad said that the scam was a complex one involving great sums of money.  Solicitors WATSON & BROWN were the subject of a TV Expose programme that was looking into the dodgy property deals and disappearing cash that was going into the pockets of unscrupulous Lawyers and the like.  The Solicitors Regulation Board was said to be looking into the activities of the Lawyers involved.

         

        ANOTHER LIST OF DREADFUL LAWYERS:

        F.D.SACHS & C0.

        FIELD, FISHER & WATERHOUSE.

        DAVID & SNAPE.

        WOODFINES.

        DAVENPORT LYONS.

        WRAGGE & CO.

        ALLETSONS.

        TURBERVILLES.

        ALMS & YOUNG.

        BRODIES.

        GRAHAM WHITE

        Solicitors --  David Hudson, Hannah Newbury, Peter Garsden, Francis Sachs, Kevin Dooley, Chris Duggans, Tony Hodgkiss and barrister Stuart Stevens.

         

        ' The case of the Barrister and the unquiet skeleton'

        A Barrister who makes claims to have an impeccable reputation conceals one incident that makes this a nonsense as the past comes to haunt him.

        NICHOLAS HOWARD HAMBLIN, Criminal Barrister with Westgate Chambers in Lewes -- the home of The Bar Council.  Some of his colleagues would say if he got away with it in the past, it should stay there, but if we are to consider solicitor James McIntyre who drove without insurance having a warrant for his arrest issued, then this must be exposed for that reason.

        The photo below along with the car in question goes back to the 1980's when he was studying Law to become the Barrister he is now.  Being on the right side of the Law then did not really figure high on his agenda, he was a wannabe musician living in Wembley, third rate, and out to do anything.  One evening he begged to have a go in the Triumph GT Sports car and having no insurance did not stop him driving it around Muswell Hill.  He might have knocked someone down, crashed, but luckily he didn't, neither was he caught by plod.  He still sees it as a Wheeze!!

        The car and the barrister can be seen in the photos below.

        Now, he's the wonderful criminal Barrister with a reputation, but not a squeaky clean one eh?

         

        ' THE CROOKED LAWYER AND POLICE CHIEF '

        SHAHROKH MIRESKANDARI, described as one of London's leading ethnic minority solicitors, has a tainted reputation involving his part in the Hinduja Passport Scandal of seven years ago and was convicted for his role in a consumer fraud in the USA. 

        His qualifications are under scrutiny by the Solicitors Regulation Authority after it was discovered he had a Law Degree from ' a university in Hawaii ' which was found to be a mailing office closed down by the authorities.

        Super rich and influential friend Keith Vaz MP, Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee urged a Judge to delay proceedings against his Lawyer friend Shahrokh Mireskandari in a communicate he sent to the court.  Police Chief Al Dizael another friend of the Lawyer, was suspended after he told the Lawyer how to balk the case and get round the accusations brought by the Metropolitan Police  ---Dazael narrowly escaped corruption charges being proved against him five years previously.

        The Lawyer who earns £750 an hour is named the mastermind behind a race war paralysing Scotland Yard involving the Met. Police Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur's claim of racial discrimination against head Police Chief Sir Ian Blair.

        The whole affair concerning this Lawyer, and there has been plenty of press coverage, suggests corruption at its most deepest level.

         

        ' Conspiracy, Deceit and Conflict of Interest by Lawyers'

        This amazing case concerns the involvement of six lawyers, two firms and the Law Society, all playing their part in a cover-up that left one woman angry and disappointed in the legal profession  -- and why was this?  because they all stood by and some actively cheated her on behalf of a client who fled amid bankruptcy and serious matters of conspiracy to defraud his sister from her inheritance.

        The Lawyers involved were: NEVILLE WATKINS of Bolitho Way, DAVID GRIMSTEAD of Bolitho Way, FRANCIS WORSLEY of Bolitho Way.  Solicitor MICHAEL GREGSON of Littlehampton and Lawyers Mr RAFFERTY, Mr. DARNLEY SMITH and MR. WHITE of Bransdon Childs.

        Our story begins with a will made by Edith May Rushin in 1977 leaving her estate to be shared equally between son Dwight Rushin and Dierdre Rushin absolutely -- prepared and drawn up by BOLITHO WAY in Southsea.  It was witnessed by solicitor Neville Watkins, a name that features throughout this sordid affair.

        The property to be divided was in Craneswater Avenue, and it was made into two separate flats.  Edith May Rushin was to reside in the ground floor flat until her move to an old people's care home.  The will was quite clear and was not changed.  However, in 1988 Edith claimed she had sold the top flat to her son Dwight and this was handled by Neville Watkins using the freehold deeds.  But the flat was on a letting agreement, and the deeds showed two names, and a mortgage was being sought. This unusual transfer and conveyance was followed by the fact that Edith May did not receive an account, nor was their any document of transfer to be found concerning the top flat?  In1997 son Dwight Rushin found himself in severe financial difficulties and along with selling his house in Rowlands Castle, he managed to promote the sale of the top flat, which he would have been entitled to under the will.  This seems okay, but it was apparently sold to him?  it is at this point things begin to take a nasty turn --- one of deceit and underhand dealings.  Daughter Dierdre Rushin was offered the chance to buy it, but could not use the family solicitors who were Bolitho Way, Dwight and his mother Edith May now held sway in this area.  Dierdre Rushin approached Bransdon Childs Solicitors -- messrs Rafferty, Darnley Smith and White to represent her interests.  Then strangely and out of the blue, Deidre Rushin discovered that the top flat was to be repossessed by the Mortgage Company Portman Building Society.  Dierdre Rushin applied to the TSB for a loan and they requested an inspection of the deeds and a copy of the transfer document?   Solicitor Neville Watkins of Bolitho Way ignored all requests despite his involvement with the property and the family.  It later transpired that Portman held the deeds.  The next twist in this tale arrives in the guise of Miss Valerie Billet, a secretary employed by Bransdon Childs (who were supposedly meant to represent Dierdre Rushin's interests).  'Close friend' solicitor Michael Gregson of Littlehampton arranged a private mortgage on her behalf --- miss Billet alleged this was a cash sum.  Dierdre Rushin had been more or less gazumped to all intent and purposes.  Yet what of Bransdon Childs? who were they looking out for? not their client obviously.  Neville Watkins of Bolitho Way remained aloof thus hindering any transparency in these proceedings.  It also transpired that in 1997 Watkins had drawn up a transfer document concerning the ground floor flat which suddenly deprived Dierdre Rushin of half of her inheritance --- she was only going to be able to claim half of the flat whilst Dwight's son Adam and daughter Samantha held claim to a quarter each.  This was drawn up in Dec 1997. Dwight Rushin had effectively got his hands on three quarters of the property with the help of Watkins despite a will being in existence that could not fulfil its function namely -- for the property to be shared equally and absolutely as it should.  Bolitho Way and Watkins in particular must have known they were now beginning to cheat Dierdre Rushin out of her right to have a fair share, and this does not come close to being a fair share.  Returning to the top flat situation Dierdre recalls in a conversation with miss Billet that she admitted there was no lease or anything else in her possession?   In respect of the ground floor flat Bolitho Way and Watkins admit in a letter to Portsmouth Council in 2002 that prior to the transfer of 1997, Dierdre Rushin held full title alone on the flat.  Things got worse and Mr Watkins refused to answer questions on the irregular way things had been dealt with and Bransdon Childs suggested to Dierdre that she contact the Law Society.  They responded by saying 'she was not a client of Bolitho Way' and refused to act.  They could have advised her to complain to the solicitors complaints bureau, but they chose not to.  Helpful -- No, Responsibility -- Nil.  It is quite obvious at this point that Bransdon Childs were inadequate and bias, and that the Law Society had decided to look after one of their own.  Dierdre then faced mounting costs regarding property repairs and applied for a council grant.  Mr Rowe requested the deeds.  He obtained confirmation that the lower flat owner was indeed Dierdre Rushin and solicitor Francis Worsley of Bolitho Way had signed this letter confirming it.  Contradiction soon followed by Bolitho solicitor David Grimstead, he phoned  and declared their had been a mistake ---not the first?  His behaviour soon turned aggressive and unprofessional towards Dierdre Rushin and he blocked her from speaking to Francis Worsley.  This was soon followed by the change of mood by miss Billet who later refused to pay her half of

        (Message over 64 KB, truncated)

      • eRG
        Alagba Odumakin: Eka ro Sir, Your Solicitor Hall of Shame is not comprehensive enough for two main reasons; 1. I didn t see Emeka Ugwuonye s. Well, may be
        Message 3 of 28 , Nov 1, 2011
          Alagba Odumakin:

          Eka ro Sir,

          Your Solicitor Hall of Shame is not comprehensive enough for two main reasons;

          1. I didn't see Emeka Ugwuonye's. Well, may be that's why some people are working overtime strenuously to get him in it.
          2. You forgot to add Walter Lee Blair, Bolaji Aluko's drug-dealing solicitor currently serving jail time.

          You see na, please say "thank you" to me!
           
          eRG
          "God gives, Man hoards and Satan steals" - eRG's Father


          From: Yinka Odumakin <yodumakin@...>
          To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
          Cc: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; OmoOdua@yahoogroups.com; TalkNigeria@yahoogroups.com; NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
          Sent: Tuesday, 1 November 2011, 8:23
          Subject: Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

           
          Buska,Let all the defenders of the indefensible read all the cases of lawyers who tampered with clients accounts in these compilations and show one that was not treated as a crime:
          Bent Lawyers - solicitors, Barristers whatever, they fiddle the system bend the Law and are by any standard -- criminals, and what they do proves this.
          WHAT MAKES MATTERS WORSE ARE BODIES LIKE THE LAW SOCIETY AND BAR COUNCIL, THEY PREVENT THEIR MEMBERS FROM BEING CAUGHT OR FOUND OUT, SO WE BEGIN WITH THE LAW SOCIETY IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT THIS IS INDEED THE CASE.
          ' Law Society fined £1 million'
          Before 2008 THE LAW SOCIETY was fined a staggering one million pounds for its poor service in the investigation of complaints made against corrupt solicitors.  The Solicitors Complaints Bureau have more than 20,000 complaints each year,  The trouble here is, It is staffed by solicitors to investigate solicitors and as we know with the Police, the results will not be good because of this.  The fine bears this out, but sadly, it does not mean that things will get better for the public.  Solicitors are in the main, arrogant and believe themselves to be above the law, and that's what infuriates ordinary people who are forced to use them or come in contact with this profession.
          Complaints were found to take months, and then get referred back to the lawyer with no action taken.  Calls for an Independent body to investigate are always thrown aside by the profession and it' s easy to see why.
          ' Law Society fined £275,000 for a second time'
          In 2008 they were fined yet again for not having an adequate system for dealing with complaints and bent Lawyers, this despite giving assurances in the previous year to improve matters.  They even played down the complaints by halving them to 10,000 --- massaging the figures, not unlike the Government.
          In the nineties, a report revealed that almost £15 million was paid out to clients who had claimed compensation and the bureau admitted that the compensation fund would easily top £58 million.  ' Dishonesty is the principle reason in most cases' said a spokesman for the bureau.  They conceded that in that particular year there had been 17,001 complaints lodged, 45 solicitors struck off, another 32 suspended and 42 were fined. 70 Law firms were shut down, and more were still under some kind of investigation.  ' Stealing from clients seemed to be one of the more serious trends emerging from Law firms.' he said.
          A Ms. Morrison was 'stonewalled' by the Solicitors Complaints Bureau for five years!  which resulted in the Ombudsman being involved.  She said ' The SCB are a Solicitors Protection Bureau in my opinion, no wonder people are reluctant to fight their complaint with them  --- especially as it takes the average person 56 days work to earn enough to pay a solicitor for one day's work.'  The SCB were not prepared to comment on the case.
          Pensioner 77yr-old Peggy Wood battled with the Law society and Solicitors Complaints Bureau for 16 years and sadly lost.  She made a complaint about her solicitors acting under a conflict of interest.  She squared up to The Law Society and that was her mistake.  They knew how to play this case for all it was worth knowing that this frail pensioner could not win.  Delays, more court appearances, more paperwork, new hearings, the legal services ombudsman, more delay and hey presto, 16 years and they win. These are the people who claim the Law is fair.  Rubbish, the Law Society is a club for crooks.
          ' A Law unto themselves '
          Indeed, this says it all and we shall be dealing with cases of  their greed concerning LEGAL AID and plundering the NHS at £800 an hour and amounting to £3 million a week.  This was highlighted by the NHS Litigation Authority -- £114 million a year was paid out.  Legal aid firms such as Allen and Ovry in London were earning in the region of £377,000 a year profit for each solicitor.  Robbery at a Legal level, and theirs for the taking, and they do  --- the Judiciary do alright for themselves, they need stopping.
          ' Cheating Lawyers '
          A survey revealed that Law Students were the worst offenders in cheating, over half broke the rules in exams passing other people's work off as their own.  62 per cent of would-be solicitors plagiarised other's work in connection with fieldwork and essays according to Varsity.  1000 students at Cambridge took part in the survey that revealed this and said they did not have enough time to do things properly.  December 2008.
          Below, we have a selection of cases and Lawyers involved.
           
          'THIEVING SOLICITOR JAILED '
          LAWYER STUART NELSON was found guilty of stealing £179,000 from elderly widows - client accounts.  He worked in the firm, Metcalfe, Copeman and Pettefar in Kings Lynn, Norfolk.  Nelson took on the alias - Stephen Harris for use on Land Registry papers and forged  the signatures of his clients; all who were vulnerable.  He like others in his profession, stole to fund a luxurious life style buying expensive cars.  He received three years behind bars.
           
          ' LAWYER IN DRUGS INCIDENT '
          SOLICITOR SIMON WALKER was arrested after putting cannabis into food for a youngsters cricket team.  Walker who worked in the firm Appleby, Hope and Matthews of Middlesbrough was arrested with another man.
           
          ' SOLICITOR STOLE FROM CLIENTS '
          LAWYER IAN DENNING, who mainly handled divorce cases, pilfered £130,000 from accounts at the Norwich firm of Leathes Prior.  He used the money on holidays and buying luxury goods, which he said was to win back his wife.  He raided eight accounts in all before being caught and was sentenced to two years in jail.
           
          ' THIEVING LAWYER IS STRUCK OFF '
          SOLICITOR DAVID RAWLINGS stole more than £250,000 from client accounts to pay off his debts.  He persuaded his clerk to alter records in order that he was not discovered.  He flew the country and escaped to Thailand because no one took away his passport although he was bailed to appear on theft charges.
           
          ' BARRISTER JAILED FOR INTIMIDATION '
          LAWYER JUSTIN WEBSTER was jailed for two years after being found guilty of conducting a campaign of intimidation against his mistress.  His girlfriend also a Lawyer, said Justin informed her he was a powerful Lawyer who could tear her apart in any courtroom confrontation.  He was arrested five times, ordered to pay £1,500  compensation, breached a restraining order, with an amazing arrogance and ignored all the court orders.  He also threatened to ruin her.  He had treated the Magistrates Court with an air of complete disregard said the judge.
           
          ' CONVICTED SOLICITOR ON PROBATION '
          TOP LAWYER JONATHAN BRIERLEY was sentenced to two years probation for sexual assault on woman.  He also had three previous convictions for assault, one for criminal damage and ordered to pay compensation of £1,000. 
           
          ' BLACKMAILING BARRISTER '
          A female Barrister after being on the run for ten years was finally caught.  LAWYER CAROL LENA WINSTON-CHURCHILL appeared at the Old Bailey to face blackmail charges.  She threatened to tell the employers of a wealthy investment banker that he was a homosexual.  Instead of buying a house he gave her £100,000.  She evaded capture when she was allowed bail and fled the country only to return later and set up a new chambers.
           
          ' TWO LAWYERS IN FUND SCAM '
          WEALTHY SOLICITORS JIM BERESFORD AND DOUGLAS SMITH were struck off for skimming off the fund for sick miners.  £50 million skimmed off and the firm was making £46,000 a day in fees.  They saw the £3.4 billion fund as rich pickings and exploited the situation to the full.
           
          ' SOLICITOR HELPS HIMSELF TO CLIENT'S ACCOUNTS '
          LAWYER DIXIT SHAH conceived an elaborate scheme to get £6 million from the accounts of home-buyers who trusted the firm.  Making himself Senior Manager, he was able to transfer money from accounts to his own.  He fled the country before he could be charged. 
           
          ' VISA SCAM LAWYER IS JAILED '
          SOLICITOR JATINDER KUMAR SHARMA was jailed for seven years for operating the  £1.5 million scam using bogus documents and false identities, conspiracy to defraud and deception.  When police raided his office they found 90,000 documents, 980 visa application files, false University certificates, academic records and bank statements.
           
          ' BARRISTER IN SEX ASSAULT ON TEENAGER '
          LAWYER FAUZ MOHAMMED KHAN told a teenage girl after sexually assaulting her - I was just testing you in case you are ever called as a witness.  He was jailed for four months by Chester Magistrates.
           
          ' COUNCIL LAWYER THREATENS PENSIONER '
          LAWYER MICHAEL SMITH with the Waltham Forest council threatened a vulnerable pensioner in order to suppress a payout of compensation being publicly known.  The arrogant Lawyer defended the mistake by Leytonstone Council Tax collectors as an error after having bailiffs serve a notice of collection concerning money never owed, but went ahead with a court claim despite the pensioner not knowing of these claims.  Representing his council he wanted this affair to be kept secret. Private Investigator John Barrymore found other complaints against the Lawyer when he made enquiries. We had someone phone us and they claimed there was a dark secret in his early days, but sadly they did not ring back. What we do know is that his intimidation of ordinary citizens goes back several years and this is not his first time in using his position to make threats. One questions how many other secrets exist concerning this Lawyer? -- A Lawyer who will go to great lengths to silence any opposition no matter what.
           
          'FRAUD LAWYER JAILED '
          BRISTOL SOLICITOR SAWYER was jailed after attempting to defraud American Express. He used counterfeit cheques to the value of £150,000, it was the  biggest seizures of forged traveller#s cheques.  He was previously fined over mortgage fraud, he was jailed for three years.  His legal clerk, Errol Howell was cleared of conspiracy due to a lack of evidence.
           
          ' SOLICITOR PAYS OUT OVER SUPPRESSION OF FACTS'
          LAWYER MARYLIN LAWSON of  James Eldridge and Son, on the Isle of Wight had to pay a couple £82,000 for not divulging that their new home was to be next to a council refuse tip already planned.  The £112,000 dream house had devalued to a mere £30,000 as a result of the council site.
           
          ' BARRISTER GIVEN SUSPENDED SENTENCE '
          Q.C. JAMES BONNEY was banned from driving for five years and given a suspended four-month prison sentence for his second drink/driving offence.  Selected as a Deputy High Court Judge, he failed to stop for police and was found to be four times over the legal limit.
           
          ' RACE COUNCIL LAWYER VICTIMISED COLLEAGUE '
          SOLICITOR CHRISTOPHER BOOTHMAN decided after knowing the panel applicant had made a complaint against him, manipulated the other members to discount her application. 
           
          ' BARRISTER DEFRAUDS BENEFITS AGENCY '
          LAWYER GRAEME WOOD of London, swindled more than £10.000 in state benefits to pay the monthly rent of £1,350. He concealed his earnings from three London colleges where he acted as a lecturer.  He was jailed for a year by the Knightsbridge Crown Court.
           
          ' LAWYER ARRESTED AND HELD IN CELLS '
          LEADING LAWYER MARK SUTHERLAND FISHER, a main partner in the legal firm of Duncan and Duncan of Dingwall, Easter Ross, was locked up over the weekend and faced charges not specified in court on the Monday.
           
          ' SOLICITOR STEALS FROM CLIENTS '
          KEITH WILSON, SOLICITOR in Jackson and Partners of Colchester was struck 0ff for misappropriating £31,000 from two widowed clients by arranging a will that would name him the beneficiary. 
           
          ' SEX ATTACK SOLICITOR STRUCK OFF '
          TAUNTON SOLICITOR SIMON JACKSON was jailed for 15 months after sex attacks on four teenage girls.  He attacked one girl fifty times, he groped and fondled the girls for his own gratification.  One of his former clients claimed Jackson was one of the best solicitors in Somerset and Taunton would be worse off without him!!!
           
          ' LAWYER STOLE CLIENT'S MONEY FOR SCHOOL FEES '
          SOLICITOR ANDREW LARMAN was jailed for twelve months after admitting nine charges of false accounting and another 111 offences to be taken into consideration.  To fund his son at Public School he took £37,000 of clients cash to pay Winchester College.  Some of the money went on a holiday, hotels and shopping sprees.
           
          ' SOLICITOR STRUCK OFF FOR DECEPTION '
          LAWYER MALCOLM TURNBULL abused the trust of the firm Turnbull Williams of Honiton by taking £185,000 to buy a farm.  Eventually it ran up to £300,000 in debt leaving his partner to repay it.  Mr. Turnbull admitted three charges of misconduct and was ordered to be struck off after a fourth charge was taken into consideration.
           
          ' RAPE CASE LAWYER IN TROUBLE AGAIN '
          SOLICITOR ANGUS DIGGLE  who had served a two year jail term for attempted rape, was arrested for being drunk and disorderly, which landed the abusive Lawyer with being struck off.
           
          ' SOLICITOR TAKES CLIENT'S CASH '
          DEVON LAWYER JOHN OATEN admitted stealing more than £50,000 from accounts held by the practice.  Plymouth Crown Court was found guilty of falsifying accounts and theft.
           
          ' LAWYER IN BRUTAL ASSAULT '
          THUG SOLICITOR KEVIN McCARTHY was fined £3,000 for assaulting Mr. Barry McKendrick at a party.  The assault left the victim with a fractured skull.  There was no order for compensation because the victim could not be in court, he confirmed that a civil case for damages would be launched.
           
          ' SOLICITOR IN DRUGS SUPPLY JAILED '
          GREEDY LAWYER TONY DARNELL was described in court as a calculating, determined scheming criminal.  He was caught supplying drugs and jailed for 11 years by the Chester Crown Court. 
           
          ' DRINK/DRIVE BARRISTER GETS PROBATION '
          LAWYER ROBERT POWELL-JONES crashed into two cars whilst being four times over the legal limit.  Magistrates stunned the public when they let him off a jail sentence considering the seriousness of the crash.  He was given 18 months probation and 75 hours community service.
           
          ' SOLICITOR IN ASSAULT ROW '
          LAWYER ALLEN CHUBB  hurled a woman out into the street in an outrage emanating from a 'disagreement with a client'  Senior partner with Child and Child in Belgravia, he was ordered to pay £1,000 compensation and £40,000 costs.  He was convicted of assault and falsely imprisoning Laura Harold.
           
          ' LAWYER STRUCK OFF FOR DECEPTION '
          SOLICITOR JOHN ANTHONY BRAITHWAITE  deceived clients into thinking he had won cases when in fact he'd neglected them in favour of paying out of his own pocket.  The tribunal ruled that he was motivated by foolishness, which could not really mitigate the deceptive element completely even though there were no losers in the public domain because he wanted his clients to be happy.
           
          ' ARREST WARRANT FOR SOLICITOR '
          LAWYER JAMES McINTYRE  was charged with driving without motor insurance, but he failed to appear in court for the hearing, a warrant was issued for his arrest.
           
          ' MISCONDUCT LAWYER APPEALS AGAINST DISMISSAL'
          SOLICITOR NEWTON FERRERS who faced a disciplinary hearing based on his misconduct in the profession, appealed  for leniency as he was facing a divorce, and being struck off would only make things worse.
           
          'SACKED SOLICITOR CLAIMS DOUBLE-STANDARDS '
          Patricia Durham Hall who worked for Bevan Ashford in Exeter was removed for being drunk.  She denied this and stated that Bevan Ashford Solicitors were frequently on pub crawls and being singled out was deliberate by the firm.  She intends to claim for unfair dismissal.  Bevan Asford refused to comment.
           
          ' LAWYER JAILED FOR STEALING AND MISCONDUCT '
          SOLICITOR PHILLIP HUXTABLEof Bournemouth charged £60,000 an hour in his plan to steal over £3 million from grieving families as he dealt with their wills.  He charged one family £22,700 for just £4,500 of actual work.  Huxtable transferred money out of his client's account and claim it was costs.  He would sometimes charge £1,000 for a phone call.  He charged one client £123,000 when the it should have been just £27,000. He was described as an arrogant liar in court and was jailed for three and a half years.
           
          'JAILED FRAUD LAWYER COMMITS FRAUD AGAIN '
          SOLICITOR NICHOLAS BUTCHER committed the same offence again after being previously jailed for fraud it was revealed as he yet again stood in the dock for a second time.  The struck-off solicitor joined a firm called Willmakers of Distinction set up by a businessman.  The firm had no indemnity nor was it prepared to give an honest deal it was heard.  In court it was heard that they fiddled and stole from people who had arranged wills with them.  Solicitor Nicholas Butcher was sentenced to three and a half years for theft.
           
          ' JAILED BARRISTER TO SUE CHANCELLOR '
          LAWYER FAUZ KHAN a prominent civil rights barrister is suing the Lord Chancellor for £9,000 in legal fees for working on his own defence. The barrister was sentenced to four months in jail for molesting a girl in his chambers, who was the girlfriend of a client. He was convicted by Chester Magistrates in 1999 of indecent assault.  On appeal it was decided that the girl lied and was prone to making false allegations.   The Manchester based lawyer launched an appeal after the sentence only to find that Mold Crown Court upheld the sentence. The Court of Appeal found that the case had not been adequately investigated by the police, and two of the police officers involved were to face disciplinary action. He launched a High Court claim for compensation.
           
           LAWYERS AND THE LEGAL AID SCAM
          Over a 100 LAWYERS have been accused of cheating in Legal Aid claims which cost the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds.  The Lord Chancellor received a list of Barristers suspected of making excessive charges involving criminal trials.  The Bar Council was notified by his department.
          Four QC's MICHAEL HILL, CLARE MONTGOMERY, COLIN NICHOLLS and PHILIP HACKETT had their legal aid fees reduced; these four Barristers were not on the list passed to the bar council.
          Even Mike Mansfield QC had his claim for £22,000 reduced to £12,000 by the House of Lords Committee.
          Mark Stobbs for the Bar Council said they would come down heavily on members whose claims were so excessive as to be unjustifiable and amount to misconduct.  ' Any Barristers who are found guilty of misconduct will be dealt with and publicly named.' he said
          NO LIST OF ANY BARRISTERS APPEARED --- HOW STRANGE?
          We have our own little list here:
          ' LAWYER GETS 5 YEARS FOR £2.25 MILLION LEGAL AID SWINDLE '
          CROOKED SOLICITOR ALAN PRITCHARD used the Legal aid system to 'print money' .  He managed to get people to sign blank legal aid forms and told them it was part of a petition to secure hosing improvements.  He teamed up with legal consultant Peter Lane and Brian O'Connor to make bogus claims which were like a production line set up.  Pritchard's firm abused the 'green form' scheme because the Legal Aid Board relied on honesty rather than proof.
          ' SOLICITOR NETTED OVER £8 MILLION IN LEGAL AID FRAUD '
          LAWYER TIM ROBINSON was jailed for 'master-minding a record £8m legal aid scam.  Robinson's Law Firm milked the legal aid system for six years before being rumbled.   The court heard that his firm was 'riddled with corruption ' and this involved his team of solicitors and clerks.  His personal fortune was well over £3 million.  It took 11 years to complete the investigation. He was jailed for 15 years and 4 months.
          'LEGAL AID SOLICITOR IN £1 MILLION FRAUD '
          BENT LAWYER GARY GROSBERG  along with his staff tricked the poor in order to launch a £1million pound swindle on Legal Aid.  Bogus cases were filed under invented names.  He got strangers to sign the forms saying they had been advised on a legal problem and had received an interview.  The swindle went on for five years at Grosberg & Co. in Leigh.  He was only caught out when someone noticed the similarity of the signatures.  The proceeds were to fund luxury cars and holidays.  He and his firm were charged with conspiracy to defraud.  He was also given Legal Aid for his defence --- and who granted him legal aid?  yes, his fellow lawyers of course, -- how about that??
          ' LAWYER IN LEGAL AID SCAM KEEPS £2MILLION?'
          SOLICITOR BERNARD RISDALE-TOMBLING  who made false legal aid claims managed to outwit CPS Lawyers and keep £2million.  Although he got a 4 year jail sentence after admitting bogus legal claims worth £731,000, he claimed the CPS could not prove all his cash came from the scam.  Nottingham Crown Court overturned the CPS claim for more money.
           
          ' THE LEGAL AID SCANDAL STILL LIVES ON '
          2010, AND LEGAL AID IS BIG BUSINESS FOR LAWYERS.  There was promises of a reform on legal aid, but now we can reveal that in a memo in Government circles shows that the taxpayers are paying over £1 million a month to lawyers who make vain attempts to represent criminal clients.  The report highlighted over five years barristers and solicitors have taken £50 million in legal aid for failed appeals.  £830,000 is spent every month on legal aid lost causes. It certainly shows that the lawyers and legal profession is up to its old tricks -- conning the public at every turn.
           
          THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE MONEY POT & LAWYERS
          Yes, they go from legal aid to skimming off the National Health Service.  Lawyers are taking £1 out of every £2 paid for blunders resulting out of claims.  Lawyers bill the NHS £800 an hour for their services, under a compensation scheme to cover claims for negligence and accidents within the hospital.  In one case in Liverpool, Lawyers tendered a bill for £4.5 million and after a challenge it was reduced to £43,000.  Although the case was referred to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the firm was not rebuked over the matter --- and was not publicly named?
          THE NHS Litigation Authority handles around 9,000 claims for negligence every year, and a claim is likely to take one and a half years.  Lawyers often named 'Ambulance Chasers' claim tens of millions in costs from the scheme.
           
          THE ASYLUM SCAM AND LAWYERS
          Many lawyers play the system to their full advantage with false claims the Immigration Minister claims.  Many cases are unclear and Lawyers misuse the Law to boost the claim payout. 
           
          THE DWP LAWYERS and the corruption that hides within.
          Before exposing the central players, I will mention colleague Martin and his site DWPCORRUPTION.CO.UK who mainly deal with corrupt matters associated with Jobcentreplus, and other departments in this area.  Most of the names are on his list, and on his site you can see a bigger picture of the rot in Government.
          The List of Legal representatives are;
          DANIEL LAVERCOMBE, NIGEL FISHER, SUSAN DEORDON, RICHARD THOMAS, PHILIP ELVY, MRS. M.MORGAN and C. CRICKETTS.
          All the above could be described as a connived conspiracy against public interests.
          DANIEL LAVERCOMBE, solicitor in this litigation department is the main feature here.
          This expose deals with the actions of Daniel Lavercombe and how far he goes (with the help of colleagues) to conceal and suppress public information.
          A public site on the web gave out the information that Daniel Lavercombe had fabricated evidence against jobcentre claimants.  The information was and is supported by Private Detective John Barrymore in Luton, he made several background enquiries which resulted in other information to add to what was already said.  Using his influence, Lavercombe had the page removed on the Yahoo site and to add to this he got Yahoo to suppress all messages to the public domain issued by Richard to be censored, and have him warned off.
          Recently, Deputy District Judge Wiggins said of this page, ' It's not worth worrying about, it proves nothing and one expects this of the Internet.'
          Yet, Lavercombe did see this as a threat and important contrary to the Judge, which lends weight to the fact that it was true and only someone willing to lean on a web provider to suppress it shows its relevance to him and the DWP department.  
          The female Barrister who represented the DWP locally was asked several times if Lavercombe was corrupt, and she ignored this and did not answer.
          Daniel Lavercombe along with Nigel Fisher feature on DWPCORRUPTION.CO.UK, Martin tells me he has been aware of Lavercombe.  Nigel Fisher is connected with fabrication etc, in the same mode as Lavercombe, and that account is fully explored on his website.  Nigel Fisher and Co have tried to silence and shutdown his site three times, which certainly points to something rotten in this little band of Lawyers.
          Daniel Lavercombe cannot silence everybody no matter how powerful he thinks he is, and this site will tell it like it is and expose corrupt Lawyers.
           
          The crumbling integrity of the C.P.S.  -- Lawyers thereof.
          ' The Crown Prosecution Service pay out £600,000 '
          RACISM AND MS.AZIZ, a prosecution Lawyer with the CPS.  She was suspended for telling a joke, and that joke has cost the taxpayer a staggering £1 million after taking into consideration costs at £500,000.  They certainly spend public money freely.
          The CPS has been accused of institutional Racism by three of its own Lawyers. 
          Three Asian Prosecutors - Maria Bamieh, Peter Shah and Dillip Navapurkar, say that discrimination has prevented them from being promoted.  David Calvert-Smith QC was appointed to look into the matter.  Perhaps this might cost the taxpayer another £3 million?
          'THE CROWN PROSECUTOR AND THE LIES SHE TOLD '
          LAWYER PENELOPE SCHOFIELD who worked for the CPS lied for her Police Detective lover when he was arrested on Drink/Driving charges.  Under questioning she told lie upon lie to protect him, she claimed she had driven the the car when in fact he had been driving under the influence of alcohol.  The Lawyer from Hambledon Hampshire said her lover DC. Nigel Phillips was distraught at being breathalysed, so she decided to help him.  Afterwards when it became clear their stories didn't hold together, she said -'I'm ashamed at what I have done.'
          She denied perverting the course of justice and fabricating a false statement with intent to deceive.
          She obviously does not comprehend that lying is exactly within the meaning of ' perverting the course of justice  but neither do the police when it suits them as you can see in BENT COPS LIST on this site.
          CPS GIVE BACK £33 MILLION TO CONVICTED CROOK
          A Roger Cook Programme revealed that convicted crook John Palmer walked away with £33 million pounds of confiscated cash after Lawyers at the CPS failed/bungled the case against him.
          CPS BLUNDERS IN THE MURDER CASE OF TWO FRENCH STUDENTS
          Crown Prosecution Lawyers have been blamed for many of the errors surrounding the case of two French students who were brutally killed by two murderers, one of whom should have been in prison.  Dan O Connex with Nigel Farmer, tortured and killed the two friends who were in the UK on an exchange student plan, for a few pounds, computer games and mobile phones.  The Police did nothing and the Lawyers sat back in their cosy departments oblivious to what their inaction had caused.  Thankfully, the parents of the two boys intend to sue these departments for the lack of care shown to French Nationals.
          THE CROWN PROSTITUTION SERVICE?
          PROSECUTOR KEITH BATCH usually tries vice girls before the court, but, when the court is over he became a male prostitute himself charging £60 for sex services, £20 for a massage.  The Suffolk Branch of the CPS declined to comment over the matter, but former boss Sir Allan Green a Director of Public Prosecutions, resigned after being caught kerb crawling in London's King's Cross.
          CPS LAWYER POSES AS 'EROTIC ACTOR' FOR EXTRA CASH
          LAWYER CLIFFORD ALLISON who concentrates on files concerning the special crime division, advertises for work as a nude model.  This would seem straight-forward if it were not for the fact he was doing this while on sick leave.  He apparently claimed he was under too much stress to continue office work.  Former treasurer with the Bar Council, the £80,000 a year Barrister was on a six month full pay deal while performing as a semi-pro 'erotic model'  Sir Kenneth MacDonald QC was baffled by this and a spokesperson at the CPS wanted clarification of this issue when we contact him they said.
          CPS SLAMMED BY JUDGE OVER TAINTED CASE
           JUDGE OWEN STABLE ATTACKED THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE after acquitting a man brought to court on false charges presented by the police.  Landlord Mr.Davis of The White Hart in Bethnal Green refused entry to several off-duty cops who then engaged in a brawl.  Bullyboy   cops from the nearby station began a vendetta that landed the Pub Owner on several trumped up charges.  The Judge said there was no ounce of a case against the landlord.  ' It is outrageous that the Crown Prosecution Service arranged for Mr. Davis to be prosecuted'  He also told Prosecuting Barrister Mr. John Coffey ' I cannot believe this case went ahead on the advice of counsel as responsible as you are ' He condemned the waste of taxpayers money spent on the two day case.  It was suggested that the CPS concern it's time and money investigating the real culprits -- the Police and wondered if it was the CPS being bias and embarrassed by appearing to justify bent cops in the hope they could work together on good terms.
           
          CPS FLAWED BY ITS OWN SELF-SERVING SYSTEM
          The idea was to prevent miscarriages of justice when the police brought their own prosecutions,  Lawyers were supposed to do it better and do it right.  This is not so these days, they have got too comfortable and are making many mistakes.  Ever since, the number of forms required to be filled in for each offence has proliferated .  Many of these forms consist of 'tick boxes,; and often the CPS and police disagree over which box should be ticked.  The file is then sent back and forth between the two services, with the result that some of these forms are lost or mislaid.  In these instances, the case is often dropped.  Police Officers are not specifically required to keep copies of the files but have found they must do so to cover the loss of forms in transit.  Many of these forms are of no value to anyone except statisticians, and the Lawyers know that.  The taxpayer could be spared the huge legal fees if the lower courts were allowed police prosecutions -- the safeguards could easily be observed by the aid of an Ombudsman, and if there was some dispute it could be referred up to a higher court or Judge.
           
          CORRUPTION INQUIRY LOOKS AT THE CPS
          A MAJOR CORRUPTION INQUIRY HAS BEEN LAUNCHED INTO THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE, yes indeed, and that was launched after a series of criminal investigations were compromised. A list of police informers was passed to criminals from within the lawyers at the CPS.  The information was believed to be accessed from CPS computer files.  The National Crime Squad raided the CPS and arrested three men.  The Senior Administration Officer at the CPS Mark Herbert was arrested at his home in Twickenham.  Attorney General John Morris failed in his bid to have details of the corruption allegations suppressed.
           
          ' CPS - A Pathetic bunch of liars '
          A SPEEDING DRIVER, NOT JUST ANY DRIVER, DRIVER TO JACK STRAW MP.  And that is the difference.  Lawyers at The Crown Prosecution Service claimed ' insufficient evidence -- and passenger security at risk ' yet he was caught ' red-handed '  -- the driver admitted putting his foot down to avoid an accident?  -- he drove at 103 mph.  In cases involving the public, the whole matter goes before a court -- it is not for the police and the CPS to decide innocence or guilt, but to collect evidence and prepare a case.  They let him get away with it because of privilege and the MP involved -- and it stinks to high heaven.
          The following members of the public voiced these opinions -  John Stevens of Woodley, Berks.  M. Danvers of Lutterworth, Leicester.  Bryn Jones of Colwyn Bay, Clwyd.  T. Brennan of Hastings, E. Sussex.  E. Rowley, Lytham-St Anne's.  Andrew Maggs, Bury, Lancs.  Alan Riley, Radford, Nottinghamshire.  E. T. Broderick, Derby.
           
          ' Man on false charges threatens to sue the CPS '
          Welder Kurt Peterman of Wellington, Somerset, was wrongly accused of attacking a man and charged with grievous bodily harm, and other offences.  After ruining his life and putting him through hell, the case was suddenly discontinued because the man who accused him was well known to the police already.  Solicitor Brian Pixton of the CPS offered nothing but the usual rhetoric.  It is hoped that that Peterman did sue the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE and apply for legal aid too.
           
          ' CPS LAWYER APPEARS IN COURT OVER BRIBE CHARGES '
          LAWYER SARFRAZ IBRAHIM from Cardiff, a senior lawyer with the South Wales Crown Prosecution Service, appeared before Swansea Crown Court on Corruption charges and Perverting the course of justice.  In a sting operation mounted by the police, Ibrahim told a undercover cop that he could drop an assault case if he were offered £20,000.  The police carried out the operation due to an informant who claimed the upcoming trial of a man might be about to be rigged.  Ibrahim accepted the bribe and was arrested.  The case continues.
           
          ' CPS Accountability just a calculated lie '
          A SENIOR PROSECUTOR PUBLICLY SAID - ' WE ARE EXTREMELY ACCOUNTABLE ' -- ' Decisions have to be justified in our management reports ' he said.  This admission clearly shows that accountability is internal and not for public consumption or a matter for public.  The management report is a published annual report which means very little because it's a manufactured and carefully crafted item released to the public after it is only safe to do so.  This is amplified by the way the CPS acts towards any scrutiny from outside its little kingdom - a report said it acts secretively and unbelievably slow when asked to provide information.  The CPS is only answerable to the Attorney General, who in turn answers to government.
          One appalling fact is that Prosecution Barristers often receive the case brief the night before a trial or hearing or even on the very morning of the case according to the Royal Commission Crown Court Study.  A third of conferences between client and lawyer last less than fifteen minutes, and 70 per cent less than half an hour.
          Everyday in a Crown Court prosecutors who barely know the facts of a case will open a trial with a standard off-the-peg reading from the file of documents because they fail to observe the case in real terms thus leading to the missing of obvious points and cross-examinations that are completely ludicrous and time-wasting. Because they don't know, neither do the jury who are often completely baffled by the whole thing.
          A Detective Sergeant was quoted as saying ' The Prosecutors act and behave so high and mighty -- and consider everyone else in the law beneath them.  Yet they often screw up cases because they haven't prepared it properly.  You see both prosecutor and defence lawyers in the bar at lunch break having wine together like 'the Bar Old Boy Network' -- looking after themselves as usual.'  -- ' you feel like spanking them! '
          Funny he mentions spanking, we mention quite a few of them into that on this site!
           
          ' CPS and Police blame each other in fiasco trial '
          AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE blamed the Crown Prosecution Service over case of villager who was put in a cell, DNA - tested and finger-printed and taken to court over trimming a hedge?  The case cost the taxpayer well over £5,000.  It took seven months while the case was being prepared for the CPS to finally admit that Mr. Brian Lenthall had done nothing illegal, which ended abruptly by all charges being dropped.  The Police said ' Any questions as to why a decision was brought to prosecute this case should be directed at the CPS '  A spokesman for the CPS said ' The police were given several opportunities to provide further evidence '  But villager Mr. Lenthall believes someone acted maliciously and they decided to pursue the matter knowing how weak it was hoping that I would be convicted because lawyers were backing the charge.
           
          ' CPS take Eight Months to drop insufficient case '
          THE CPS and HAMPSHIRE POLICE paraded Matthew Price before the magistrates court and each time it was adjourned until the CPS lawyers decided to discontinue with the case.  They claimed insufficient evidence after eight months and supposedly preparing a case.  INSPECTOR PAUL SAVILL of the Hampshire Police made the decision to hound Matthew Price until he decided to post the entire story on you-tube for millions of people to see.  The Crown Prosecution Service wasted resources and public money yet remained unsympathetic and unmoved on how they had squandered taxpayers money.
           
          ' CPS Deliberately withheld evidence - three judges decide '
          THREE APPEAL COURT JUDGES came to the conclusion that the Crown Prosecution Service deliberately withheld evidence from the defence counsel. The judges quashed the sentences given out to environmental activists who were accused of conspiracy to commit aggravated trespass at the Ratcliffe-on-Soar Power Station. The judges made it quite clear to the CPS that this kind of behaviour was not acceptable.
           
          ' Judge outraged by CPS Decision to prosecute man '
          At Snaresbrook Crown Court, JUDGE OWEN STABLE QC turned to the court and said ' There is not a scintilla of a case here, I am totally baffled.  What the accused Mr.Davis did, cannot be remotely regarded as engaging in an affray -- he was the victim ' said the judge angrily. ' It's outrageous that the Crown Prosecution Service arranged for him to be prosecuted; there seems to have been no police investigation whatsoever into how the alleged fracas began'  He then paused and faced CPS Prosecuting Barrister John Coffey. ' I cannot believe this case went ahead on the advice of counsel as responsible as you are.'      Mr.Coffey said that the police insisted on it because they had 'history' with the defendant.    The judge snapped back, ' Then it is outrageous this case has gone to court and that we have spent two days on it, it has been a complete waste to the taxpayer.'
          Mr Davis the defendant, and Landlord, said the police had waged a vendetta against him because they couldn't bully or intimidate him.  he has now been given the go-ahead to sue the police.
           
          QC Pontificates about rooting out corruption and leaves out lawyers
          Eminent Barrister Steven Silber urged The Law Commission to have new definitions to root out corruption. He said corruption was a national and international problem.  Although ' Acting corruptly ' is used in current legislation, it is not defined and in case law the meaning is also confused.  He recommended that a person or persons acting corruptly - a person who confers an advantage should be regarded in law as doing so 'corruptly' if he or she intends that an agent should do (or omit to do) something and believes that, if the agent so acts, it would probably be primarily in return for gaining the advantage rather than for some legitimate reason. This would also apply to ' performing functions corruptly' in that the agent's conduct was motivated by the hope of a corrupt reward , whether or not there was any agreement to that effect. 'agent' being defined in terms of anyone who has agreed to perform functions , whether for another person or for the public (or both).  -- corruptly conferring, or offering or agreeing to confer, an advantage; corruptly obtaining, soliciting or agreeing to obtain an advantage; corrupt performance by an agent of his or her functions as an agent; and receipt by an agent of a benefit which consists of, or is derived from, an advantage which the agent knows or believes to have been corruptly obtained.
          LAWYERS SHOULD READ THE ABOVE SO THAT THEY KNOW AND UNDERSTAND WHAT CORRUPTION IS, BECAUSE MANY OF THEM FALL INTO THOSE DEFINITIONS AND DENY WRONGDOING AND RELY ON QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE TO ESCAPE JUSTICE -- LAWYERS WERE LEFT OUT OF THE COMMISSION'S DEFINITIONS.  SILBER PROBABLY THOUGHT IT DIDN'T APPLY TO THE BROTHERHOOD AND MEMBERS OF THE BAR COUNCIL.
           
          More Lawyers -- More fiddling on an old tune
          '60 SOLICITORS UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE SERIOUS FRAUD SQUAD'
          A property housing scam concerning MORRIS PROPERTIES revealed that sixty solicitors were being investigated for irregularities and deals with the company.  The Serious Fraud Squad said that the scam was a complex one involving great sums of money.  Solicitors WATSON & BROWN were the subject of a TV Expose programme that was looking into the dodgy property deals and disappearing cash that was going into the pockets of unscrupulous Lawyers and the like.  The Solicitors Regulation Board was said to be looking into the activities of the Lawyers involved.
           
          ANOTHER LIST OF DREADFUL LAWYERS:
          F.D.SACHS & C0.
          FIELD, FISHER & WATERHOUSE.
          DAVID & SNAPE.
          WOODFINES.
          DAVENPORT LYONS.
          WRAGGE & CO.
          ALLETSONS.
          TURBERVILLES.
          ALMS & YOUNG.
          BRODIES.
          GRAHAM WHITE
          Solicitors --  David Hudson, Hannah Newbury, Peter Garsden, Francis Sachs, Kevin Dooley, Chris Duggans, Tony Hodgkiss and barrister Stuart Stevens.
           
          ' The case of the Barrister and the unquiet skeleton'
          A Barrister who makes claims to have an impeccable reputation conceals one incident that makes this a nonsense as the past comes to haunt him.
          NICHOLAS HOWARD HAMBLIN, Criminal Barrister with Westgate Chambers in Lewes -- the home of The Bar Council.  Some of his colleagues would say if he got away with it in the past, it should stay there, but if we are to consider solicitor James McIntyre who drove without insurance having a warrant for his arrest issued, then this must be exposed for that reason.
          The photo below along with the car in question goes back to the 1980's when he was studying Law to become the Barrister he is now.  Being on the right side of the Law then did not really figure high on his agenda, he was a wannabe musician living in Wembley, third rate, and out to do anything.  One evening he begged to have a go in the Triumph GT Sports car and having no insurance did not stop him driving it around Muswell Hill.  He might have knocked someone down, crashed, but luckily he didn't, neither was he caught by plod.  He still sees it as a Wheeze!!
          The car and the barrister can be seen in the photos below.
          Now, he's the wonderful criminal Barrister with a reputation, but not a squeaky clean one eh?
           
          ' THE CROOKED LAWYER AND POLICE CHIEF '
          SHAHROKH MIRESKANDARI, described as one of London's leading ethnic minority solicitors, has a tainted reputation involving his part in the Hinduja Passport Scandal of seven years ago and was convicted for his role in a consumer fraud in the USA. 
          His qualifications are under scrutiny by the Solicitors Regulation Authority after it was discovered he had a Law Degree from ' a university in Hawaii ' which was found to be a mailing office closed down by the authorities.
          Super rich and influential friend Keith Vaz MP, Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee urged a Judge to delay proceedings against his Lawyer friend Shahrokh Mireskandari in a communicate he sent to the court.  Police Chief Al Dizael another friend of the Lawyer, was suspended after he told the Lawyer how to balk the case and get round the accusations brought by the Metropolitan Police  ---Dazael narrowly escaped corruption charges being proved against him five years previously.
          The Lawyer who earns £750 an hour is named the mastermind behind a race war paralysing Scotland Yard involving the Met. Police Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur's claim of racial discrimination against head Police Chief Sir Ian Blair.
          The whole affair concerning this Lawyer, and there has been plenty of press coverage, suggests corruption at its most deepest level.
           
          ' Conspiracy, Deceit and Conflict of Interest by Lawyers'
          This amazing case concerns the involvement of six lawyers, two firms and the Law Society, all playing their part in a cover-up that left one woman angry and disappointed in the legal profession  -- and why was this?  because they all stood by and some actively cheated her on behalf of a client who fled amid bankruptcy and serious matters of conspiracy to defraud his sister from her inheritance.
          The Lawyers involved were: NEVILLE WATKINS of Bolitho Way, DAVID GRIMSTEAD of Bolitho Way, FRANCIS WORSLEY of Bolitho Way.  Solicitor MICHAEL GREGSON of Littlehampton and Lawyers Mr RAFFERTY, Mr. DARNLEY SMITH and MR. WHITE of Bransdon Childs.
          Our story begins with a will made by Edith May Rushin in 1977 leaving her estate to be shared equally between son Dwight Rushin and Dierdre Rushin absolutely -- prepared and drawn up by BOLITHO WAY in Southsea.  It was witnessed by solicitor Neville Watkins, a name that features throughout this sordid affair.
          The property to be divided was in Craneswater Avenue, and it was made into two separate flats.  Edith May Rushin was to reside in the ground floor flat until her move to an old people's care home.  The will was quite clear and was not changed.  However, in 1988 Edith claimed she had sold the top flat to her son Dwight and this was handled by Neville Watkins using the freehold deeds.  But the flat was on a letting agreement, and the deeds showed two names, and a mortgage was being sought. This unusual transfer and conveyance was followed by the fact that Edith May did not receive an account, nor was their any document of transfer to be found concerning the top flat?  In1997 son Dwight Rushin found himself in severe financial difficulties and along with selling his house in Rowlands Castle, he managed to promote the sale of the top flat, which he would have been entitled to under the will.  This seems okay, but it was apparently sold to him?  it is at this point things begin to take a nasty turn --- one of deceit and underhand dealings.  Daughter Dierdre Rushin was offered the chance to buy it, but could not use the family solicitors who were Bolitho Way, Dwight and his mother Edith May now held sway in this area.  Dierdre Rushin approached Bransdon Childs Solicitors -- messrs Rafferty, Darnley Smith and White to represent her interests.  Then strangely and out of the blue, Deidre Rushin discovered that the top flat was to be repossessed by the Mortgage Company Portman Building Society.  Dierdre Rushin applied to the TSB for a loan and they requested an inspection of the deeds and a copy of the transfer document?   Solicitor Neville Watkins of Bolitho Way ignored all requests despite his involvement with the property and the family.  It later transpired that Portman held the deeds.  The next twist in this tale arrives in the guise of Miss Valerie Billet, a secretary employed by Bransdon Childs (who were supposedly meant to represent Dierdre Rushin's

          (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
        • Yinka Odumakin
          Okpia: Thanks for the updates on: 1 Walter Lee Blair serving term for his crime. 2 Emeka ugwuonye who was suspended for 90 days by the state of Maryland and
          Message 4 of 28 , Nov 1, 2011
            Okpia:
            Thanks for the updates on:
            1 Walter Lee Blair serving term for his crime.
             2 Emeka ugwuonye who was suspended for 90 days by the state of Maryland and currently standing trial on fraud charges.

            Yinka.
            Sent from my I pad.

            On Nov 1, 2011, at 8:39 AM, eRG <edoregeneration@...> wrote:

             

            Alagba Odumakin:

            Eka ro Sir,

            Your Solicitor Hall of Shame is not comprehensive enough for two main reasons;

            1. I didn't see Emeka Ugwuonye's. Well, may be that's why some people are working overtime strenuously to get him in it.
            2. You forgot to add Walter Lee Blair, Bolaji Aluko's drug-dealing solicitor currently serving jail time.

            You see na, please say "thank you" to me!
             
            eRG
            "God gives, Man hoards and Satan steals" - eRG's Father


            From: Yinka Odumakin <yodumakin@...>
            To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
            Cc: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; OmoOdua@yahoogroups.com; TalkNigeria@yahoogroups.com; NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
            Sent: Tuesday, 1 November 2011, 8:23
            Subject: Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

             
            Buska,Let all the defenders of the indefensible read all the cases of lawyers who tampered with clients accounts in these compilations and show one that was not treated as a crime:
            Bent Lawyers - solicitors, Barristers whatever, they fiddle the system bend the Law and are by any standard -- criminals, and what they do proves this.
            WHAT MAKES MATTERS WORSE ARE BODIES LIKE THE LAW SOCIETY AND BAR COUNCIL, THEY PREVENT THEIR MEMBERS FROM BEING CAUGHT OR FOUND OUT, SO WE BEGIN WITH THE LAW SOCIETY IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT THIS IS INDEED THE CASE.
            ' Law Society fined £1 million'
            Before 2008 THE LAW SOCIETY was fined a staggering one million pounds for its poor service in the investigation of complaints made against corrupt solicitors.  The Solicitors Complaints Bureau have more than 20,000 complaints each year,  The trouble here is, It is staffed by solicitors to investigate solicitors and as we know with the Police, the results will not be good because of this.  The fine bears this out, but sadly, it does not mean that things will get better for the public.  Solicitors are in the main, arrogant and believe themselves to be above the law, and that's what infuriates ordinary people who are forced to use them or come in contact with this profession.
            Complaints were found to take months, and then get referred back to the lawyer with no action taken.  Calls for an Independent body to investigate are always thrown aside by the profession and it' s easy to see why.
            ' Law Society fined £275,000 for a second time'
            In 2008 they were fined yet again for not having an adequate system for dealing with complaints and bent Lawyers, this despite giving assurances in the previous year to improve matters.  They even played down the complaints by halving them to 10,000 --- massaging the figures, not unlike the Government.
            In the nineties, a report revealed that almost £15 million was paid out to clients who had claimed compensation and the bureau admitted that the compensation fund would easily top £58 million.  ' Dishonesty is the principle reason in most cases' said a spokesman for the bureau.  They conceded that in that particular year there had been 17,001 complaints lodged, 45 solicitors struck off, another 32 suspended and 42 were fined. 70 Law firms were shut down, and more were still under some kind of investigation.  ' Stealing from clients seemed to be one of the more serious trends emerging from Law firms.' he said.
            A Ms. Morrison was 'stonewalled' by the Solicitors Complaints Bureau for five years!  which resulted in the Ombudsman being involved.  She said ' The SCB are a Solicitors Protection Bureau in my opinion, no wonder people are reluctant to fight their complaint with them  --- especially as it takes the average person 56 days work to earn enough to pay a solicitor for one day's work.'  The SCB were not prepared to comment on the case.
            Pensioner 77yr-old Peggy Wood battled with the Law society and Solicitors Complaints Bureau for 16 years and sadly lost.  She made a complaint about her solicitors acting under a conflict of interest.  She squared up to The Law Society and that was her mistake.  They knew how to play this case for all it was worth knowing that this frail pensioner could not win.  Delays, more court appearances, more paperwork, new hearings, the legal services ombudsman, more delay and hey presto, 16 years and they win. These are the people who claim the Law is fair.  Rubbish, the Law Society is a club for crooks.
            ' A Law unto themselves '
            Indeed, this says it all and we shall be dealing with cases of  their greed concerning LEGAL AID and plundering the NHS at £800 an hour and amounting to £3 million a week.  This was highlighted by the NHS Litigation Authority -- £114 million a year was paid out.  Legal aid firms such as Allen and Ovry in London were earning in the region of £377,000 a year profit for each solicitor.  Robbery at a Legal level, and theirs for the taking, and they do  --- the Judiciary do alright for themselves, they need stopping.
            ' Cheating Lawyers '
            A survey revealed that Law Students were the worst offenders in cheating, over half broke the rules in exams passing other people's work off as their own.  62 per cent of would-be solicitors plagiarised other's work in connection with fieldwork and essays according to Varsity.  1000 students at Cambridge took part in the survey that revealed this and said they did not have enough time to do things properly.  December 2008.
            Below, we have a selection of cases and Lawyers involved.
             
            'THIEVING SOLICITOR JAILED '
            LAWYER STUART NELSON was found guilty of stealing £179,000 from elderly widows - client accounts.  He worked in the firm, Metcalfe, Copeman and Pettefar in Kings Lynn, Norfolk.  Nelson took on the alias - Stephen Harris for use on Land Registry papers and forged  the signatures of his clients; all who were vulnerable.  He like others in his profession, stole to fund a luxurious life style buying expensive cars.  He received three years behind bars.
             
            ' LAWYER IN DRUGS INCIDENT '
            SOLICITOR SIMON WALKER was arrested after putting cannabis into food for a youngsters cricket team.  Walker who worked in the firm Appleby, Hope and Matthews of Middlesbrough was arrested with another man.
             
            ' SOLICITOR STOLE FROM CLIENTS '
            LAWYER IAN DENNING, who mainly handled divorce cases, pilfered £130,000 from accounts at the Norwich firm of Leathes Prior.  He used the money on holidays and buying luxury goods, which he said was to win back his wife.  He raided eight accounts in all before being caught and was sentenced to two years in jail.
             
            ' THIEVING LAWYER IS STRUCK OFF '
            SOLICITOR DAVID RAWLINGS stole more than £250,000 from client accounts to pay off his debts.  He persuaded his clerk to alter records in order that he was not discovered.  He flew the country and escaped to Thailand because no one took away his passport although he was bailed to appear on theft charges.
             
            ' BARRISTER JAILED FOR INTIMIDATION '
            LAWYER JUSTIN WEBSTER was jailed for two years after being found guilty of conducting a campaign of intimidation against his mistress.  His girlfriend also a Lawyer, said Justin informed her he was a powerful Lawyer who could tear her apart in any courtroom confrontation.  He was arrested five times, ordered to pay £1,500  compensation, breached a restraining order, with an amazing arrogance and ignored all the court orders.  He also threatened to ruin her.  He had treated the Magistrates Court with an air of complete disregard said the judge.
             
            ' CONVICTED SOLICITOR ON PROBATION '
            TOP LAWYER JONATHAN BRIERLEY was sentenced to two years probation for sexual assault on woman.  He also had three previous convictions for assault, one for criminal damage and ordered to pay compensation of £1,000. 
             
            ' BLACKMAILING BARRISTER '
            A female Barrister after being on the run for ten years was finally caught.  LAWYER CAROL LENA WINSTON-CHURCHILL appeared at the Old Bailey to face blackmail charges.  She threatened to tell the employers of a wealthy investment banker that he was a homosexual.  Instead of buying a house he gave her £100,000.  She evaded capture when she was allowed bail and fled the country only to return later and set up a new chambers.
             
            ' TWO LAWYERS IN FUND SCAM '
            WEALTHY SOLICITORS JIM BERESFORD AND DOUGLAS SMITH were struck off for skimming off the fund for sick miners.  £50 million skimmed off and the firm was making £46,000 a day in fees.  They saw the £3.4 billion fund as rich pickings and exploited the situation to the full.
             
            ' SOLICITOR HELPS HIMSELF TO CLIENT'S ACCOUNTS '
            LAWYER DIXIT SHAH conceived an elaborate scheme to get £6 million from the accounts of home-buyers who trusted the firm.  Making himself Senior Manager, he was able to transfer money from accounts to his own.  He fled the country before he could be charged. 
             
            ' VISA SCAM LAWYER IS JAILED '
            SOLICITOR JATINDER KUMAR SHARMA was jailed for seven years for operating the  £1.5 million scam using bogus documents and false identities, conspiracy to defraud and deception.  When police raided his office they found 90,000 documents, 980 visa application files, false University certificates, academic records and bank statements.
             
            ' BARRISTER IN SEX ASSAULT ON TEENAGER '
            LAWYER FAUZ MOHAMMED KHAN told a teenage girl after sexually assaulting her - I was just testing you in case you are ever called as a witness.  He was jailed for four months by Chester Magistrates.
             
            ' COUNCIL LAWYER THREATENS PENSIONER '
            LAWYER MICHAEL SMITH with the Waltham Forest council threatened a vulnerable pensioner in order to suppress a payout of compensation being publicly known.  The arrogant Lawyer defended the mistake by Leytonstone Council Tax collectors as an error after having bailiffs serve a notice of collection concerning money never owed, but went ahead with a court claim despite the pensioner not knowing of these claims.  Representing his council he wanted this affair to be kept secret. Private Investigator John Barrymore found other complaints against the Lawyer when he made enquiries. We had someone phone us and they claimed there was a dark secret in his early days, but sadly they did not ring back. What we do know is that his intimidation of ordinary citizens goes back several years and this is not his first time in using his position to make threats. One questions how many other secrets exist concerning this Lawyer? -- A Lawyer who will go to great lengths to silence any opposition no matter what.
             
            'FRAUD LAWYER JAILED '
            BRISTOL SOLICITOR SAWYER was jailed after attempting to defraud American Express. He used counterfeit cheques to the value of £150,000, it was the  biggest seizures of forged traveller#s cheques.  He was previously fined over mortgage fraud, he was jailed for three years.  His legal clerk, Errol Howell was cleared of conspiracy due to a lack of evidence.
             
            ' SOLICITOR PAYS OUT OVER SUPPRESSION OF FACTS'
            LAWYER MARYLIN LAWSON of  James Eldridge and Son, on the Isle of Wight had to pay a couple £82,000 for not divulging that their new home was to be next to a council refuse tip already planned.  The £112,000 dream house had devalued to a mere £30,000 as a result of the council site.
             
            ' BARRISTER GIVEN SUSPENDED SENTENCE '
            Q.C. JAMES BONNEY was banned from driving for five years and given a suspended four-month prison sentence for his second drink/driving offence.  Selected as a Deputy High Court Judge, he failed to stop for police and was found to be four times over the legal limit.
             
            ' RACE COUNCIL LAWYER VICTIMISED COLLEAGUE '
            SOLICITOR CHRISTOPHER BOOTHMAN decided after knowing the panel applicant had made a complaint against him, manipulated the other members to discount her application. 
             
            ' BARRISTER DEFRAUDS BENEFITS AGENCY '
            LAWYER GRAEME WOOD of London, swindled more than £10.000 in state benefits to pay the monthly rent of £1,350. He concealed his earnings from three London colleges where he acted as a lecturer.  He was jailed for a year by the Knightsbridge Crown Court.
             
            ' LAWYER ARRESTED AND HELD IN CELLS '
            LEADING LAWYER MARK SUTHERLAND FISHER, a main partner in the legal firm of Duncan and Duncan of Dingwall, Easter Ross, was locked up over the weekend and faced charges not specified in court on the Monday.
             
            ' SOLICITOR STEALS FROM CLIENTS '
            KEITH WILSON, SOLICITOR in Jackson and Partners of Colchester was struck 0ff for misappropriating £31,000 from two widowed clients by arranging a will that would name him the beneficiary. 
             
            ' SEX ATTACK SOLICITOR STRUCK OFF '
            TAUNTON SOLICITOR SIMON JACKSON was jailed for 15 months after sex attacks on four teenage girls.  He attacked one girl fifty times, he groped and fondled the girls for his own gratification.  One of his former clients claimed Jackson was one of the best solicitors in Somerset and Taunton would be worse off without him!!!
             
            ' LAWYER STOLE CLIENT'S MONEY FOR SCHOOL FEES '
            SOLICITOR ANDREW LARMAN was jailed for twelve months after admitting nine charges of false accounting and another 111 offences to be taken into consideration.  To fund his son at Public School he took £37,000 of clients cash to pay Winchester College.  Some of the money went on a holiday, hotels and shopping sprees.
             
            ' SOLICITOR STRUCK OFF FOR DECEPTION '
            LAWYER MALCOLM TURNBULL abused the trust of the firm Turnbull Williams of Honiton by taking £185,000 to buy a farm.  Eventually it ran up to £300,000 in debt leaving his partner to repay it.  Mr. Turnbull admitted three charges of misconduct and was ordered to be struck off after a fourth charge was taken into consideration.
             
            ' RAPE CASE LAWYER IN TROUBLE AGAIN '
            SOLICITOR ANGUS DIGGLE  who had served a two year jail term for attempted rape, was arrested for being drunk and disorderly, which landed the abusive Lawyer with being struck off.
             
            ' SOLICITOR TAKES CLIENT'S CASH '
            DEVON LAWYER JOHN OATEN admitted stealing more than £50,000 from accounts held by the practice.  Plymouth Crown Court was found guilty of falsifying accounts and theft.
             
            ' LAWYER IN BRUTAL ASSAULT '
            THUG SOLICITOR KEVIN McCARTHY was fined £3,000 for assaulting Mr. Barry McKendrick at a party.  The assault left the victim with a fractured skull.  There was no order for compensation because the victim could not be in court, he confirmed that a civil case for damages would be launched.
             
            ' SOLICITOR IN DRUGS SUPPLY JAILED '
            GREEDY LAWYER TONY DARNELL was described in court as a calculating, determined scheming criminal.  He was caught supplying drugs and jailed for 11 years by the Chester Crown Court. 
             
            ' DRINK/DRIVE BARRISTER GETS PROBATION '
            LAWYER ROBERT POWELL-JONES crashed into two cars whilst being four times over the legal limit.  Magistrates stunned the public when they let him off a jail sentence considering the seriousness of the crash.  He was given 18 months probation and 75 hours community service.
             
            ' SOLICITOR IN ASSAULT ROW '
            LAWYER ALLEN CHUBB  hurled a woman out into the street in an outrage emanating from a 'disagreement with a client'  Senior partner with Child and Child in Belgravia, he was ordered to pay £1,000 compensation and £40,000 costs.  He was convicted of assault and falsely imprisoning Laura Harold.
             
            ' LAWYER STRUCK OFF FOR DECEPTION '
            SOLICITOR JOHN ANTHONY BRAITHWAITE  deceived clients into thinking he had won cases when in fact he'd neglected them in favour of paying out of his own pocket.  The tribunal ruled that he was motivated by foolishness, which could not really mitigate the deceptive element completely even though there were no losers in the public domain because he wanted his clients to be happy.
             
            ' ARREST WARRANT FOR SOLICITOR '
            LAWYER JAMES McINTYRE  was charged with driving without motor insurance, but he failed to appear in court for the hearing, a warrant was issued for his arrest.
             
            ' MISCONDUCT LAWYER APPEALS AGAINST DISMISSAL'
            SOLICITOR NEWTON FERRERS who faced a disciplinary hearing based on his misconduct in the profession, appealed  for leniency as he was facing a divorce, and being struck off would only make things worse.
             
            'SACKED SOLICITOR CLAIMS DOUBLE-STANDARDS '
            Patricia Durham Hall who worked for Bevan Ashford in Exeter was removed for being drunk.  She denied this and stated that Bevan Ashford Solicitors were frequently on pub crawls and being singled out was deliberate by the firm.  She intends to claim for unfair dismissal.  Bevan Asford refused to comment.
             
            ' LAWYER JAILED FOR STEALING AND MISCONDUCT '
            SOLICITOR PHILLIP HUXTABLEof Bournemouth charged £60,000 an hour in his plan to steal over £3 million from grieving families as he dealt with their wills.  He charged one family £22,700 for just £4,500 of actual work.  Huxtable transferred money out of his client's account and claim it was costs.  He would sometimes charge £1,000 for a phone call.  He charged one client £123,000 when the it should have been just £27,000. He was described as an arrogant liar in court and was jailed for three and a half years.
             
            'JAILED FRAUD LAWYER COMMITS FRAUD AGAIN '
            SOLICITOR NICHOLAS BUTCHER committed the same offence again after being previously jailed for fraud it was revealed as he yet again stood in the dock for a second time.  The struck-off solicitor joined a firm called Willmakers of Distinction set up by a businessman.  The firm had no indemnity nor was it prepared to give an honest deal it was heard.  In court it was heard that they fiddled and stole from people who had arranged wills with them.  Solicitor Nicholas Butcher was sentenced to three and a half years for theft.
             
            ' JAILED BARRISTER TO SUE CHANCELLOR '
            LAWYER FAUZ KHAN a prominent civil rights barrister is suing the Lord Chancellor for £9,000 in legal fees for working on his own defence. The barrister was sentenced to four months in jail for molesting a girl in his chambers, who was the girlfriend of a client. He was convicted by Chester Magistrates in 1999 of indecent assault.  On appeal it was decided that the girl lied and was prone to making false allegations.   The Manchester based lawyer launched an appeal after the sentence only to find that Mold Crown Court upheld the sentence. The Court of Appeal found that the case had not been adequately investigated by the police, and two of the police officers involved were to face disciplinary action. He launched a High Court claim for compensation.
             
             LAWYERS AND THE LEGAL AID SCAM
            Over a 100 LAWYERS have been accused of cheating in Legal Aid claims which cost the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds.  The Lord Chancellor received a list of Barristers suspected of making excessive charges involving criminal trials.  The Bar Council was notified by his department.
            Four QC's MICHAEL HILL, CLARE MONTGOMERY, COLIN NICHOLLS and PHILIP HACKETT had their legal aid fees reduced; these four Barristers were not on the list passed to the bar council.
            Even Mike Mansfield QC had his claim for £22,000 reduced to £12,000 by the House of Lords Committee.
            Mark Stobbs for the Bar Council said they would come down heavily on members whose claims were so excessive as to be unjustifiable and amount to misconduct.  ' Any Barristers who are found guilty of misconduct will be dealt with and publicly named.' he said
            NO LIST OF ANY BARRISTERS APPEARED --- HOW STRANGE?
            We have our own little list here:
            ' LAWYER GETS 5 YEARS FOR £2.25 MILLION LEGAL AID SWINDLE '
            CROOKED SOLICITOR ALAN PRITCHARD used the Legal aid system to 'print money' .  He managed to get people to sign blank legal aid forms and told them it was part of a petition to secure hosing improvements.  He teamed up with legal consultant Peter Lane and Brian O'Connor to make bogus claims which were like a production line set up.  Pritchard's firm abused the 'green form' scheme because the Legal Aid Board relied on honesty rather than proof.
            ' SOLICITOR NETTED OVER £8 MILLION IN LEGAL AID FRAUD '
            LAWYER TIM ROBINSON was jailed for 'master-minding a record £8m legal aid scam.  Robinson's Law Firm milked the legal aid system for six years before being rumbled.   The court heard that his firm was 'riddled with corruption ' and this involved his team of solicitors and clerks.  His personal fortune was well over £3 million.  It took 11 years to complete the investigation. He was jailed for 15 years and 4 months.
            'LEGAL AID SOLICITOR IN £1 MILLION FRAUD '
            BENT LAWYER GARY GROSBERG  along with his staff tricked the poor in order to launch a £1million pound swindle on Legal Aid.  Bogus cases were filed under invented names.  He got strangers to sign the forms saying they had been advised on a legal problem and had received an interview.  The swindle went on for five years at Grosberg & Co. in Leigh.  He was only caught out when someone noticed the similarity of the signatures.  The proceeds were to fund luxury cars and holidays.  He and his firm were charged with conspiracy to defraud.  He was also given Legal Aid for his defence --- and who granted him legal aid?  yes, his fellow lawyers of course, -- how about that??
            ' LAWYER IN LEGAL AID SCAM KEEPS £2MILLION?'
            SOLICITOR BERNARD RISDALE-TOMBLING  who made false legal aid claims managed to outwit CPS Lawyers and keep £2million.  Although he got a 4 year jail sentence after admitting bogus legal claims worth £731,000, he claimed the CPS could not prove all his cash came from the scam.  Nottingham Crown Court overturned the CPS claim for more money.
             
            ' THE LEGAL AID SCANDAL STILL LIVES ON '
            2010, AND LEGAL AID IS BIG BUSINESS FOR LAWYERS.  There was promises of a reform on legal aid, but now we can reveal that in a memo in Government circles shows that the taxpayers are paying over £1 million a month to lawyers who make vain attempts to represent criminal clients.  The report highlighted over five years barristers and solicitors have taken £50 million in legal aid for failed appeals.  £830,000 is spent every month on legal aid lost causes. It certainly shows that the lawyers and legal profession is up to its old tricks -- conning the public at every turn.
             
            THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE MONEY POT & LAWYERS
            Yes, they go from legal aid to skimming off the National Health Service.  Lawyers are taking £1 out of every £2 paid for blunders resulting out of claims.  Lawyers bill the NHS £800 an hour for their services, under a compensation scheme to cover claims for negligence and accidents within the hospital.  In one case in Liverpool, Lawyers tendered a bill for £4.5 million and after a challenge it was reduced to £43,000.  Although the case was referred to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the firm was not rebuked over the matter --- and was not publicly named?
            THE NHS Litigation Authority handles around 9,000 claims for negligence every year, and a claim is likely to take one and a half years.  Lawyers often named 'Ambulance Chasers' claim tens of millions in costs from the scheme.
             
            THE ASYLUM SCAM AND LAWYERS
            Many lawyers play the system to their full advantage with false claims the Immigration Minister claims.  Many cases are unclear and Lawyers misuse the Law to boost the claim payout. 
             
            THE DWP LAWYERS and the corruption that hides within.
            Before exposing the central players, I will mention colleague Martin and his site DWPCORRUPTION.CO.UK who mainly deal with corrupt matters associated with Jobcentreplus, and other departments in this area.  Most of the names are on his list, and on his site you can see a bigger picture of the rot in Government.
            The List of Legal representatives are;
            DANIEL LAVERCOMBE, NIGEL FISHER, SUSAN DEORDON, RICHARD THOMAS, PHILIP ELVY, MRS. M.MORGAN and C. CRICKETTS.
            All the above could be described as a connived conspiracy against public interests.
            DANIEL LAVERCOMBE, solicitor in this litigation department is the main feature here.
            This expose deals with the actions of Daniel Lavercombe and how far he goes (with the help of colleagues) to conceal and suppress public information.
            A public site on the web gave out the information that Daniel Lavercombe had fabricated evidence against jobcentre claimants.  The information was and is supported by Private Detective John Barrymore in Luton, he made several background enquiries which resulted in other information to add to what was already said.  Using his influence, Lavercombe had the page removed on the Yahoo site and to add to this he got Yahoo to suppress all messages to the public domain issued by Richard to be censored, and have him warned off.
            Recently, Deputy District Judge Wiggins said of this page, ' It's not worth worrying about, it proves nothing and one expects this of the Internet.'
            Yet, Lavercombe did see this as a threat and important contrary to the Judge, which lends weight to the fact that it was true and only someone willing to lean on a web provider to suppress it shows its relevance to him and the DWP department.  
            The female Barrister who represented the DWP locally was asked several times if Lavercombe was corrupt, and she ignored this and did not answer.
            Daniel Lavercombe along with Nigel Fisher feature on DWPCORRUPTION.CO.UK, Martin tells me he has been aware of Lavercombe.  Nigel Fisher is connected with fabrication etc, in the same mode as Lavercombe, and that account is fully explored on his website.  Nigel Fisher and Co have tried to silence and shutdown his site three times, which certainly points to something rotten in this little band of Lawyers.
            Daniel Lavercombe cannot silence everybody no matter how powerful he thinks he is, and this site will tell it like it is and expose corrupt Lawyers.
             
            The crumbling integrity of the C.P.S.  -- Lawyers thereof.
            ' The Crown Prosecution Service pay out £600,000 '
            RACISM AND MS.AZIZ, a prosecution Lawyer with the CPS.  She was suspended for telling a joke, and that joke has cost the taxpayer a staggering £1 million after taking into consideration costs at £500,000.  They certainly spend public money freely.
            The CPS has been accused of institutional Racism by three of its own Lawyers. 
            Three Asian Prosecutors - Maria Bamieh, Peter Shah and Dillip Navapurkar, say that discrimination has prevented them from being promoted.  David Calvert-Smith QC was appointed to look into the matter.  Perhaps this might cost the taxpayer another £3 million?
            'THE CROWN PROSECUTOR AND THE LIES SHE TOLD '
            LAWYER PENELOPE SCHOFIELD who worked for the CPS lied for her Police Detective lover when he was arrested on Drink/Driving charges.  Under questioning she told lie upon lie to protect him, she claimed she had driven the the car when in fact he had been driving under the influence of alcohol.  The Lawyer from Hambledon Hampshire said her lover DC. Nigel Phillips was distraught at being breathalysed, so she decided to help him.  Afterwards when it became clear their stories didn't hold together, she said -'I'm ashamed at what I have done.'
            She denied perverting the course of justice and fabricating a false statement with intent to deceive.
            She obviously does not comprehend that lying is exactly within the meaning of ' perverting the course of justice  but neither do the police when it suits them as you can see in BENT COPS LIST on this site.
            CPS GIVE BACK £33 MILLION TO CONVICTED CROOK
            A Roger Cook Programme revealed that convicted crook John Palmer walked away with £33 million pounds of confiscated cash after Lawyers at the CPS failed/bungled the case against him.
            CPS BLUNDERS IN THE MURDER CASE OF TWO FRENCH STUDENTS
            Crown Prosecution Lawyers have been blamed for many of the errors surrounding the case of two French students who were brutally killed by two murderers, one of whom should have been in prison.  Dan O Connex with Nigel Farmer, tortured and killed the two friends who were in the UK on an exchange student plan, for a few pounds, computer games and mobile phones.  The Police did nothing and the Lawyers sat back in their cosy departments oblivious to what their inaction had caused.  Thankfully, the parents of the two boys intend to sue these departments for the lack of care shown to French Nationals.
            THE CROWN PROSTITUTION SERVICE?
            PROSECUTOR KEITH BATCH usually tries vice girls before the court, but, when the court is over he became a male prostitute himself charging £60 for sex services, £20 for a massage.  The Suffolk Branch of the CPS declined to comment over the matter, but former boss Sir Allan Green a Director of Public Prosecutions, resigned after being caught kerb crawling in London's King's Cross.
            CPS LAWYER POSES AS 'EROTIC ACTOR' FOR EXTRA CASH
            LAWYER CLIFFORD ALLISON who concentrates on files concerning the special crime division, advertises for work as a nude model.  This would seem straight-forward if it were not for the fact he was doing this while on sick leave.  He apparently claimed he was under too much stress to continue office work.  Former treasurer with the Bar Council, the £80,000 a year Barrister was on a six month full pay deal while performing as a semi-pro 'erotic model'  Sir Kenneth MacDonald QC was baffled by this and a spokesperson at the CPS wanted clarification of this issue when we contact him they said.
            CPS SLAMMED BY JUDGE OVER TAINTED CASE
             JUDGE OWEN STABLE ATTACKED THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE after acquitting a man brought to court on false charges presented by the police.  Landlord Mr.Davis of The White Hart in Bethnal Green refused entry to several off-duty cops who then engaged in a brawl.  Bullyboy   cops from the nearby station began a vendetta that landed the Pub Owner on several trumped up charges.  The Judge said there was no ounce of a case against the landlord.  ' It is outrageous that the Crown Prosecution Service arranged for Mr. Davis to be prosecuted'  He also told Prosecuting Barrister Mr. John Coffey ' I cannot believe this case went ahead on the advice of counsel as responsible as you are ' He condemned the waste of taxpayers money spent on the two day case.  It was suggested that the CPS concern it's time and money investigating the real culprits -- the Police and wondered if it was the CPS being bias and embarrassed by appearing to justify bent cops in the hope they could work together on good terms.
             
            CPS FLAWED BY ITS OWN SELF-SERVING SYSTEM
            The idea was to prevent miscarriages of justice when the police brought their own prosecutions,  Lawyers were supposed to do it better and do it right.  This is not so these days, they have got too comfortable and are making many mistakes.  Ever since, the number of forms required to be filled in for each offence has proliferated .  Many of these forms consist of 'tick boxes,; and often the CPS and police disagree over which box should be ticked.  The file is then sent back and forth between the two services, with the result that some of these forms are lost or mislaid.  In these instances, the case is often dropped.  Police Officers are not specifically required to keep copies of the files but have found they must do so to cover the loss of forms in transit.  Many of these forms are of no value to anyone except statisticians, and the Lawyers know that.  The taxpayer could be spared the huge legal fees if the lower courts were allowed police prosecutions -- the safeguards could easily be observed by the aid of an Ombudsman, and if there was some dispute it could be referred up to a higher court or Judge.
             
            CORRUPTION INQUIRY LOOKS AT THE CPS
            A MAJOR CORRUPTION INQUIRY HAS BEEN LAUNCHED INTO THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE, yes indeed, and that was launched after a series of criminal investigations were compromised. A list of police informers was passed to criminals from within the lawyers at the CPS.  The information was believed to be accessed from CPS computer files.  The National Crime Squad raided the CPS and arrested three men.  The Senior Administration Officer at the CPS Mark Herbert was arrested at his home in Twickenham.  Attorney General John Morris failed in his bid to have details of the corruption allegations suppressed.
             
            ' CPS - A Pathetic bunch of liars '
            A SPEEDING DRIVER, NOT JUST ANY DRIVER, DRIVER TO JACK STRAW MP.  And that is the difference.  Lawyers at The Crown Prosecution Service claimed ' insufficient evidence -- and passenger security at risk ' yet he was caught ' red-handed '  -- the driver admitted putting his foot down to avoid an accident?  -- he drove at 103 mph.  In cases involving the public, the whole matter goes before a court -- it is not for the police and the CPS to decide innocence or guilt, but to collect evidence and prepare a case.  They let him get away with it because of privilege and the MP involved -- and it stinks to high heaven.
            The following members of the public voiced these opinions -  John Stevens of Woodley, Berks.  M. Danvers of Lutterworth, Leicester.  Bryn Jones of Colwyn Bay, Clwyd.  T. Brennan of Hastings, E. Sussex.  E. Rowley, Lytham-St Anne's.  Andrew Maggs, Bury, Lancs.  Alan Riley, Radford, Nottinghamshire.  E. T. Broderick, Derby.
             
            ' Man on false charges threatens to sue the CPS '
            Welder Kurt Peterman of Wellington, Somerset, was wrongly accused of attacking a man and charged with grievous bodily harm, and other offences.  After ruining his life and putting him through hell, the case was suddenly discontinued because the man who accused him was well known to the police already.  Solicitor Brian Pixton of the CPS offered nothing but the usual rhetoric.  It is hoped that that Peterman did sue the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE and apply for legal aid too.
             
            ' CPS LAWYER APPEARS IN COURT OVER BRIBE CHARGES '
            LAWYER SARFRAZ IBRAHIM from Cardiff, a senior lawyer with the South Wales Crown Prosecution Service, appeared before Swansea Crown Court on Corruption charges and Perverting the course of justice.  In a sting operation mounted by the police, Ibrahim told a undercover cop that he could drop an assault case if he were offered £20,000.  The police carried out the operation due to an informant who claimed the upcoming trial of a man might be about to be rigged.  Ibrahim accepted the bribe and was arrested.  The case continues.
             
            ' CPS Accountability just a calculated lie '
            A SENIOR PROSECUTOR PUBLICLY SAID - ' WE ARE EXTREMELY ACCOUNTABLE ' -- ' Decisions have to be justified in our management reports ' he said.  This admission clearly shows that accountability is internal and not for public consumption or a matter for public.  The management report is a published annual report which means very little because it's a manufactured and carefully crafted item released to the public after it is only safe to do so.  This is amplified by the way the CPS acts towards any scrutiny from outside its little kingdom - a report said it acts secretively and unbelievably slow when asked to provide information.  The CPS is only answerable to the Attorney General, who in turn answers to government.
            One appalling fact is that Prosecution Barristers often receive the case brief the night before a trial or hearing or even on the very morning of the case according to the Royal Commission Crown Court Study.  A third of conferences between client and lawyer last less than fifteen minutes, and 70 per cent less than half an hour.
            Everyday in a Crown Court prosecutors who barely know the facts of a case will open a trial with a standard off-the-peg reading from the file of documents because they fail to observe the case in real terms thus leading to the missing of obvious points and cross-examinations that are completely ludicrous and time-wasting. Because they don't know, neither do the jury who are often completely baffled by the whole thing.
            A Detective Sergeant was quoted as saying ' The Prosecutors act and behave so high and mighty -- and consider everyone else in the law beneath them.  Yet they often screw up cases because they haven't prepared it properly.  You see both prosecutor and defence lawyers in the bar at lunch break having wine together like 'the Bar Old Boy Network' -- looking after themselves as usual.'  -- ' you feel like spanking them! '
            Funny he mentions spanking, we mention quite a few of them into that on this site!
             
            ' CPS and Police blame each other in fiasco trial '
            AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE blamed the Crown Prosecution Service over case of villager who was put in a cell, DNA - tested and finger-printed and taken to court over trimming a hedge?  The case cost the taxpayer well over £5,000.  It took seven months while the case was being prepared for the CPS to finally admit that Mr. Brian Lenthall had done nothing illegal, which ended abruptly by all charges being dropped.  The Police said ' Any questions as to why a decision was brought to prosecute this case should be directed at the CPS '  A spokesman for the CPS said ' The police were given several opportunities to provide further evidence '  But villager Mr. Lenthall believes someone acted maliciously and they decided to pursue the matter knowing how weak it was hoping that I would be convicted because lawyers were backing the charge.
             
            ' CPS take Eight Months to drop insufficient case '
            THE CPS and HAMPSHIRE POLICE paraded Matthew Price before the magistrates court and each time it was adjourned until the CPS lawyers decided to discontinue with the case.  They claimed insufficient evidence after eight months and supposedly preparing a case.  INSPECTOR PAUL SAVILL of the Hampshire Police made the decision to hound Matthew Price until he decided to post the entire story on you-tube for millions of people to see.  The Crown Prosecution Service wasted resources and public money yet remained unsympathetic and unmoved on how they had squandered taxpayers money.
             
            ' CPS Deliberately withheld evidence - three judges decide '
            THREE APPEAL COURT JUDGES came to the conclusion that the Crown Prosecution Service deliberately withheld evidence from the defence counsel. The judges quashed the sentences given out to environmental activists who were accused of conspiracy to commit aggravated trespass at the Ratcliffe-on-Soar Power Station. The judges made it quite clear to the CPS that this kind of behaviour was not acceptable.
             
            ' Judge outraged by CPS Decision to prosecute man '
            At Snaresbrook Crown Court, JUDGE OWEN STABLE QC turned to the court and said ' There is not a scintilla of a case here, I am totally baffled.  What the accused Mr.Davis did, cannot be remotely regarded as engaging in an affray -- he was the victim ' said the judge angrily. ' It's outrageous that the Crown Prosecution Service arranged for him to be prosecuted; there seems to have been no police investigation whatsoever into how the alleged fracas began'  He then paused and faced CPS Prosecuting Barrister John Coffey. ' I cannot believe this case went ahead on the advice of counsel as responsible as you are.'      Mr.Coffey said that the police insisted on it because they had 'history' with the defendant.    The judge snapped back, ' Then it is outrageous this case has gone to court and that we have spent two days on it, it has been a complete waste to the taxpayer.'
            Mr Davis the defendant, and Landlord, said the police had waged a vendetta against him because they couldn't bully or intimidate him.  he has now been given the go-ahead to sue the police.
             
            QC Pontificates about rooting out corruption and leaves out lawyers
            Eminent Barrister Steven Silber urged The Law Commission to have new definitions to root out corruption. He said corruption was a national and international problem.  Although ' Acting corruptly ' is used in current legislation, it is not defined and in case law the meaning is also confused.  He recommended that a person or persons acting corruptly - a person who confers an advantage should be regarded in law as doing so 'corruptly' if he or she intends that an agent should do (or omit to do) something and believes that, if the agent so acts, it would probably be primarily in return for gaining the advantage rather than for some legitimate reason. This would also apply to ' performing functions corruptly' in that the agent's conduct was motivated by the hope of a corrupt reward , whether or not there was any agreement to that effect. 'agent' being defined in terms of anyone who has agreed to perform functions , whether for another person or for the public (or both).  -- corruptly conferring, or offering or agreeing to confer, an advantage; corruptly obtaining, soliciting or agreeing to obtain an advantage; corrupt performance by an agent of his or her functions as an agent; and receipt by an agent of a benefit which consists of, or is derived from, an advantage which the agent knows or believes to have been corruptly obtained.
            LAWYERS SHOULD READ THE ABOVE SO THAT THEY KNOW AND UNDERSTAND WHAT CORRUPTION IS, BECAUSE MANY OF THEM FALL INTO THOSE DEFINITIONS AND DENY WRONGDOING AND RELY ON QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE TO ESCAPE JUSTICE -- LAWYERS WERE LEFT OUT OF THE COMMISSION'S DEFINITIONS.  SILBER PROBABLY THOUGHT IT DIDN'T APPLY TO THE BROTHERHOOD AND MEMBERS OF THE BAR COUNCIL.
             
            More Lawyers -- More fiddling on an old tune
            '60 SOLICITORS UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE SERIOUS FRAUD SQUAD'
            A property housing scam concerning MORRIS PROPERTIES revealed that sixty solicitors were being investigated for irregularities and deals with the company.  The Serious Fraud Squad said that the scam was a complex one involving great sums of money.  Solicitors WATSON & BROWN were the subject of a TV Expose programme that was looking into the dodgy property deals and disappearing cash that was going into the pockets of unscrupulous Lawyers and the like.  The Solicitors Regulation Board was said to be looking into the activities of the Lawyers involved.
             
            ANOTHER LIST OF DREADFUL LAWYERS:
            F.D.SACHS & C0.
            FIELD, FISHER & WATERHOUSE.
            DAVID & SNAPE.
            WOODFINES.
            DAVENPORT LYONS.
            WRAGGE & CO.
            ALLETSONS.
            TURBERVILLES.
            ALMS & YOUNG.
            BRODIES.
            GRAHAM WHITE
            Solicitors --  David Hudson, Hannah Newbury, Peter Garsden, Francis Sachs, Kevin Dooley, Chris Duggans, Tony Hodgkiss and barrister Stuart Stevens.
             
            ' The case of the Barrister and the unquiet skeleton'
            A Barrister who makes claims to have an impeccable reputation conceals one incident that makes this a nonsense as the past comes to haunt him.
            NICHOLAS HOWARD HAMBLIN, Criminal Barrister with Westgate Chambers in Lewes -- the home of The Bar Council.  Some of his colleagues would say if he got away with it in the past, it should stay there, but if we are to consider solicitor James McIntyre who drove without insurance having a warrant for his arrest issued, then this must be exposed for that reason.
            The photo below along with the car in question goes back to the 1980's when he was studying Law to become the Barrister he is now.  Being on the right side of the Law then did not really figure high on his agenda, he was a wannabe musician living in Wembley, third rate, and out to do anything.  One evening he begged to have a go in the Triumph GT Sports car and having no insurance did not stop him driving it around Muswell Hill.  He might have knocked someone down, crashed, but luckily he didn't, neither was he caught by plod.  He still sees it as a Wheeze!!
            The car and the barrister can be seen in the photos below.
            Now, he's the wonderful criminal Barrister with a reputation, but not a squeaky clean one eh?
             
            ' THE CROOKED LAWYER AND POLICE CHIEF '
            SHAHROKH MIRESKANDARI, described as one of London's leading ethnic minority solicitors, has a tainted reputation involving his part in the Hinduja Passport Scandal of seven years ago and was convicted for his role in a consumer fraud in the USA. 
            His qualifications are under scrutiny by the Solicitors Regulation Authority after it was discovered he had a Law Degree from ' a university in Hawaii ' which was found to be a mailing office closed down by the authorities.
            Super rich and influential friend Keith Vaz MP, Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee urged a Judge to delay proceedings against his Lawyer friend Shahrokh Mireskandari in a communicate he sent to the court.  Police Chief Al Dizael another friend of the Lawyer, was suspended after he told the Lawyer how to balk the case and get round the accusations brought by the Metropolitan Police  ---Dazael narrowly escaped corruption charges being proved against him five years previously.
            The Lawyer who earns £750 an hour is named the mastermind behind a race war paralysing Scotland Yard involving the Met. Police Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur's claim of racial discrimination against head Police Chief Sir Ian Blair.
            The whole affair concerning this Lawyer, and there has been plenty of press coverage, suggests corruption at its most deepest level.
             
            ' Conspiracy, Deceit and Conflict of Interest by Lawyers'
            This amazing case concerns the involvement of six lawyers, two firms and the Law Society, all playing their part in a cover-up that left one woman angry and disappointed in the legal profession  -- and why was this?  because they all stood by and some actively cheated her on behalf of a client who fled amid bankruptcy and serious matters of conspiracy to defraud his sister from her inheritance.
            The Lawyers involved were: NEVILLE WATKINS of Bolitho Way, DAVID GRIMSTEAD of Bolitho Way, FRANCIS WORSLEY of Bolitho Way.  Solicitor MICHAEL GREGSON of Littlehampton and Lawyers Mr RAFFERTY, Mr. DARNLEY SMITH and MR. WHITE of Bransdon Childs.
            Our story begins with a will made by Edith May Rushin in 1977 leaving her estate to be shared equally between son Dwight Rushin and Dierdre Rushin absolutely -- prepared and drawn up by BOLITHO WAY in Southsea.  It was witnessed by solicitor Neville Watkins, a name that features throughout this sordid affair.
            The property to be divided was in Craneswater Avenue, and it was made into two separate flats.  Edith May Rushin was to reside in the ground floor flat until her move to an old people's care home.  The will was quite clear and was not changed.  However, in 1988 Edith claimed she had sold the top flat to her son Dwight and this was handled by Neville Watkins using the freehold deeds.  But the flat was on a letting agreement, and the deeds showed two names, and a mortgage was being sought. This unusual transfer and conveyance was followed by the fact that Edith May did not receive an account, nor was their any document of transfer to be found concerning the top flat?  In1997 son Dwight Rushin found himself in severe financial difficulties and along with selling his house in Rowlands Castle, he managed to promote the sale of the top flat, which he would have been entitled to under the will.  This seems okay, but it was apparently sold to him?  i

            (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
          • eRG
            Oh! Alagbaaaaaaaa, You always make my day any time. Don t I love and cherish it when I crave your indulgence for fun? Say hello to madam and have a nice day.
            Message 5 of 28 , Nov 1, 2011
              Oh! Alagbaaaaaaaa,

              You always make my day any time. Don't I love and cherish it when I crave your indulgence for fun?

              Say hello to madam and have a nice day.
               
              eRG
              "God gives, Man hoards and Satan steals" - eRG's Father


              From: Yinka Odumakin <yinkaodumakin@...>
              To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
              Cc: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; OmoOdua@yahoogroups.com; TalkNigeria@yahoogroups.com; NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com; edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com
              Sent: Tuesday, 1 November 2011, 9:03
              Subject: Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] Re: o Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

               
              Okpia:
              Thanks for the updates on:
              1 Walter Lee Blair serving term for his crime.
               2 Emeka ugwuonye who was suspended for 90 days by the state of Maryland and currently standing trial on fraud charges.

              Yinka.
              Sent from my I pad.

              On Nov 1, 2011, at 8:39 AM, eRG <edoregeneration@...> wrote:

               
              Alagba Odumakin:

              Eka ro Sir,

              Your Solicitor Hall of Shame is not comprehensive enough for two main reasons;

              1. I didn't see Emeka Ugwuonye's. Well, may be that's why some people are working overtime strenuously to get him in it.
              2. You forgot to add Walter Lee Blair, Bolaji Aluko's drug-dealing solicitor currently serving jail time.

              You see na, please say "thank you" to me!
               
              eRG
              "God gives, Man hoards and Satan steals" - eRG's Father


              From: Yinka Odumakin <yodumakin@...>
              To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
              Cc: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; OmoOdua@yahoogroups.com; TalkNigeria@yahoogroups.com; NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
              Sent: Tuesday, 1 November 2011, 8:23
              Subject: Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

               
              Buska,Let all the defenders of the indefensible read all the cases of lawyers who tampered with clients accounts in these compilations and show one that was not treated as a crime:
              Bent Lawyers - solicitors, Barristers whatever, they fiddle the system bend the Law and are by any standard -- criminals, and what they do proves this.
              WHAT MAKES MATTERS WORSE ARE BODIES LIKE THE LAW SOCIETY AND BAR COUNCIL, THEY PREVENT THEIR MEMBERS FROM BEING CAUGHT OR FOUND OUT, SO WE BEGIN WITH THE LAW SOCIETY IN ORDER TO SHOW THAT THIS IS INDEED THE CASE.
              ' Law Society fined £1 million'
              Before 2008 THE LAW SOCIETY was fined a staggering one million pounds for its poor service in the investigation of complaints made against corrupt solicitors.  The Solicitors Complaints Bureau have more than 20,000 complaints each year,  The trouble here is, It is staffed by solicitors to investigate solicitors and as we know with the Police, the results will not be good because of this.  The fine bears this out, but sadly, it does not mean that things will get better for the public.  Solicitors are in the main, arrogant and believe themselves to be above the law, and that's what infuriates ordinary people who are forced to use them or come in contact with this profession.
              Complaints were found to take months, and then get referred back to the lawyer with no action taken.  Calls for an Independent body to investigate are always thrown aside by the profession and it' s easy to see why.
              ' Law Society fined £275,000 for a second time'
              In 2008 they were fined yet again for not having an adequate system for dealing with complaints and bent Lawyers, this despite giving assurances in the previous year to improve matters.  They even played down the complaints by halving them to 10,000 --- massaging the figures, not unlike the Government.
              In the nineties, a report revealed that almost £15 million was paid out to clients who had claimed compensation and the bureau admitted that the compensation fund would easily top £58 million.  ' Dishonesty is the principle reason in most cases' said a spokesman for the bureau.  They conceded that in that particular year there had been 17,001 complaints lodged, 45 solicitors struck off, another 32 suspended and 42 were fined. 70 Law firms were shut down, and more were still under some kind of investigation.  ' Stealing from clients seemed to be one of the more serious trends emerging from Law firms.' he said.
              A Ms. Morrison was 'stonewalled' by the Solicitors Complaints Bureau for five years!  which resulted in the Ombudsman being involved.  She said ' The SCB are a Solicitors Protection Bureau in my opinion, no wonder people are reluctant to fight their complaint with them  --- especially as it takes the average person 56 days work to earn enough to pay a solicitor for one day's work.'  The SCB were not prepared to comment on the case.
              Pensioner 77yr-old Peggy Wood battled with the Law society and Solicitors Complaints Bureau for 16 years and sadly lost.  She made a complaint about her solicitors acting under a conflict of interest.  She squared up to The Law Society and that was her mistake.  They knew how to play this case for all it was worth knowing that this frail pensioner could not win.  Delays, more court appearances, more paperwork, new hearings, the legal services ombudsman, more delay and hey presto, 16 years and they win. These are the people who claim the Law is fair.  Rubbish, the Law Society is a club for crooks.
              ' A Law unto themselves '
              Indeed, this says it all and we shall be dealing with cases of  their greed concerning LEGAL AID and plundering the NHS at £800 an hour and amounting to £3 million a week.  This was highlighted by the NHS Litigation Authority -- £114 million a year was paid out.  Legal aid firms such as Allen and Ovry in London were earning in the region of £377,000 a year profit for each solicitor.  Robbery at a Legal level, and theirs for the taking, and they do  --- the Judiciary do alright for themselves, they need stopping.
              ' Cheating Lawyers '
              A survey revealed that Law Students were the worst offenders in cheating, over half broke the rules in exams passing other people's work off as their own.  62 per cent of would-be solicitors plagiarised other's work in connection with fieldwork and essays according to Varsity.  1000 students at Cambridge took part in the survey that revealed this and said they did not have enough time to do things properly.  December 2008.
              Below, we have a selection of cases and Lawyers involved.
               
              'THIEVING SOLICITOR JAILED '
              LAWYER STUART NELSON was found guilty of stealing £179,000 from elderly widows - client accounts.  He worked in the firm, Metcalfe, Copeman and Pettefar in Kings Lynn, Norfolk.  Nelson took on the alias - Stephen Harris for use on Land Registry papers and forged  the signatures of his clients; all who were vulnerable.  He like others in his profession, stole to fund a luxurious life style buying expensive cars.  He received three years behind bars.
               
              ' LAWYER IN DRUGS INCIDENT '
              SOLICITOR SIMON WALKER was arrested after putting cannabis into food for a youngsters cricket team.  Walker who worked in the firm Appleby, Hope and Matthews of Middlesbrough was arrested with another man.
               
              ' SOLICITOR STOLE FROM CLIENTS '
              LAWYER IAN DENNING, who mainly handled divorce cases, pilfered £130,000 from accounts at the Norwich firm of Leathes Prior.  He used the money on holidays and buying luxury goods, which he said was to win back his wife.  He raided eight accounts in all before being caught and was sentenced to two years in jail.
               
              ' THIEVING LAWYER IS STRUCK OFF '
              SOLICITOR DAVID RAWLINGS stole more than £250,000 from client accounts to pay off his debts.  He persuaded his clerk to alter records in order that he was not discovered.  He flew the country and escaped to Thailand because no one took away his passport although he was bailed to appear on theft charges.
               
              ' BARRISTER JAILED FOR INTIMIDATION '
              LAWYER JUSTIN WEBSTER was jailed for two years after being found guilty of conducting a campaign of intimidation against his mistress.  His girlfriend also a Lawyer, said Justin informed her he was a powerful Lawyer who could tear her apart in any courtroom confrontation.  He was arrested five times, ordered to pay £1,500  compensation, breached a restraining order, with an amazing arrogance and ignored all the court orders.  He also threatened to ruin her.  He had treated the Magistrates Court with an air of complete disregard said the judge.
               
              ' CONVICTED SOLICITOR ON PROBATION '
              TOP LAWYER JONATHAN BRIERLEY was sentenced to two years probation for sexual assault on woman.  He also had three previous convictions for assault, one for criminal damage and ordered to pay compensation of £1,000. 
               
              ' BLACKMAILING BARRISTER '
              A female Barrister after being on the run for ten years was finally caught.  LAWYER CAROL LENA WINSTON-CHURCHILL appeared at the Old Bailey to face blackmail charges.  She threatened to tell the employers of a wealthy investment banker that he was a homosexual.  Instead of buying a house he gave her £100,000.  She evaded capture when she was allowed bail and fled the country only to return later and set up a new chambers.
               
              ' TWO LAWYERS IN FUND SCAM '
              WEALTHY SOLICITORS JIM BERESFORD AND DOUGLAS SMITH were struck off for skimming off the fund for sick miners.  £50 million skimmed off and the firm was making £46,000 a day in fees.  They saw the £3.4 billion fund as rich pickings and exploited the situation to the full.
               
              ' SOLICITOR HELPS HIMSELF TO CLIENT'S ACCOUNTS '
              LAWYER DIXIT SHAH conceived an elaborate scheme to get £6 million from the accounts of home-buyers who trusted the firm.  Making himself Senior Manager, he was able to transfer money from accounts to his own.  He fled the country before he could be charged. 
               
              ' VISA SCAM LAWYER IS JAILED '
              SOLICITOR JATINDER KUMAR SHARMA was jailed for seven years for operating the  £1.5 million scam using bogus documents and false identities, conspiracy to defraud and deception.  When police raided his office they found 90,000 documents, 980 visa application files, false University certificates, academic records and bank statements.
               
              ' BARRISTER IN SEX ASSAULT ON TEENAGER '
              LAWYER FAUZ MOHAMMED KHAN told a teenage girl after sexually assaulting her - I was just testing you in case you are ever called as a witness.  He was jailed for four months by Chester Magistrates.
               
              ' COUNCIL LAWYER THREATENS PENSIONER '
              LAWYER MICHAEL SMITH with the Waltham Forest council threatened a vulnerable pensioner in order to suppress a payout of compensation being publicly known.  The arrogant Lawyer defended the mistake by Leytonstone Council Tax collectors as an error after having bailiffs serve a notice of collection concerning money never owed, but went ahead with a court claim despite the pensioner not knowing of these claims.  Representing his council he wanted this affair to be kept secret. Private Investigator John Barrymore found other complaints against the Lawyer when he made enquiries. We had someone phone us and they claimed there was a dark secret in his early days, but sadly they did not ring back. What we do know is that his intimidation of ordinary citizens goes back several years and this is not his first time in using his position to make threats. One questions how many other secrets exist concerning this Lawyer? -- A Lawyer who will go to great lengths to silence any opposition no matter what.
               
              'FRAUD LAWYER JAILED '
              BRISTOL SOLICITOR SAWYER was jailed after attempting to defraud American Express. He used counterfeit cheques to the value of £150,000, it was the  biggest seizures of forged traveller#s cheques.  He was previously fined over mortgage fraud, he was jailed for three years.  His legal clerk, Errol Howell was cleared of conspiracy due to a lack of evidence.
               
              ' SOLICITOR PAYS OUT OVER SUPPRESSION OF FACTS'
              LAWYER MARYLIN LAWSON of  James Eldridge and Son, on the Isle of Wight had to pay a couple £82,000 for not divulging that their new home was to be next to a council refuse tip already planned.  The £112,000 dream house had devalued to a mere £30,000 as a result of the council site.
               
              ' BARRISTER GIVEN SUSPENDED SENTENCE '
              Q.C. JAMES BONNEY was banned from driving for five years and given a suspended four-month prison sentence for his second drink/driving offence.  Selected as a Deputy High Court Judge, he failed to stop for police and was found to be four times over the legal limit.
               
              ' RACE COUNCIL LAWYER VICTIMISED COLLEAGUE '
              SOLICITOR CHRISTOPHER BOOTHMAN decided after knowing the panel applicant had made a complaint against him, manipulated the other members to discount her application. 
               
              ' BARRISTER DEFRAUDS BENEFITS AGENCY '
              LAWYER GRAEME WOOD of London, swindled more than £10.000 in state benefits to pay the monthly rent of £1,350. He concealed his earnings from three London colleges where he acted as a lecturer.  He was jailed for a year by the Knightsbridge Crown Court.
               
              ' LAWYER ARRESTED AND HELD IN CELLS '
              LEADING LAWYER MARK SUTHERLAND FISHER, a main partner in the legal firm of Duncan and Duncan of Dingwall, Easter Ross, was locked up over the weekend and faced charges not specified in court on the Monday.
               
              ' SOLICITOR STEALS FROM CLIENTS '
              KEITH WILSON, SOLICITOR in Jackson and Partners of Colchester was struck 0ff for misappropriating £31,000 from two widowed clients by arranging a will that would name him the beneficiary. 
               
              ' SEX ATTACK SOLICITOR STRUCK OFF '
              TAUNTON SOLICITOR SIMON JACKSON was jailed for 15 months after sex attacks on four teenage girls.  He attacked one girl fifty times, he groped and fondled the girls for his own gratification.  One of his former clients claimed Jackson was one of the best solicitors in Somerset and Taunton would be worse off without him!!!
               
              ' LAWYER STOLE CLIENT'S MONEY FOR SCHOOL FEES '
              SOLICITOR ANDREW LARMAN was jailed for twelve months after admitting nine charges of false accounting and another 111 offences to be taken into consideration.  To fund his son at Public School he took £37,000 of clients cash to pay Winchester College.  Some of the money went on a holiday, hotels and shopping sprees.
               
              ' SOLICITOR STRUCK OFF FOR DECEPTION '
              LAWYER MALCOLM TURNBULL abused the trust of the firm Turnbull Williams of Honiton by taking £185,000 to buy a farm.  Eventually it ran up to £300,000 in debt leaving his partner to repay it.  Mr. Turnbull admitted three charges of misconduct and was ordered to be struck off after a fourth charge was taken into consideration.
               
              ' RAPE CASE LAWYER IN TROUBLE AGAIN '
              SOLICITOR ANGUS DIGGLE  who had served a two year jail term for attempted rape, was arrested for being drunk and disorderly, which landed the abusive Lawyer with being struck off.
               
              ' SOLICITOR TAKES CLIENT'S CASH '
              DEVON LAWYER JOHN OATEN admitted stealing more than £50,000 from accounts held by the practice.  Plymouth Crown Court was found guilty of falsifying accounts and theft.
               
              ' LAWYER IN BRUTAL ASSAULT '
              THUG SOLICITOR KEVIN McCARTHY was fined £3,000 for assaulting Mr. Barry McKendrick at a party.  The assault left the victim with a fractured skull.  There was no order for compensation because the victim could not be in court, he confirmed that a civil case for damages would be launched.
               
              ' SOLICITOR IN DRUGS SUPPLY JAILED '
              GREEDY LAWYER TONY DARNELL was described in court as a calculating, determined scheming criminal.  He was caught supplying drugs and jailed for 11 years by the Chester Crown Court. 
               
              ' DRINK/DRIVE BARRISTER GETS PROBATION '
              LAWYER ROBERT POWELL-JONES crashed into two cars whilst being four times over the legal limit.  Magistrates stunned the public when they let him off a jail sentence considering the seriousness of the crash.  He was given 18 months probation and 75 hours community service.
               
              ' SOLICITOR IN ASSAULT ROW '
              LAWYER ALLEN CHUBB  hurled a woman out into the street in an outrage emanating from a 'disagreement with a client'  Senior partner with Child and Child in Belgravia, he was ordered to pay £1,000 compensation and £40,000 costs.  He was convicted of assault and falsely imprisoning Laura Harold.
               
              ' LAWYER STRUCK OFF FOR DECEPTION '
              SOLICITOR JOHN ANTHONY BRAITHWAITE  deceived clients into thinking he had won cases when in fact he'd neglected them in favour of paying out of his own pocket.  The tribunal ruled that he was motivated by foolishness, which could not really mitigate the deceptive element completely even though there were no losers in the public domain because he wanted his clients to be happy.
               
              ' ARREST WARRANT FOR SOLICITOR '
              LAWYER JAMES McINTYRE  was charged with driving without motor insurance, but he failed to appear in court for the hearing, a warrant was issued for his arrest.
               
              ' MISCONDUCT LAWYER APPEALS AGAINST DISMISSAL'
              SOLICITOR NEWTON FERRERS who faced a disciplinary hearing based on his misconduct in the profession, appealed  for leniency as he was facing a divorce, and being struck off would only make things worse.
               
              'SACKED SOLICITOR CLAIMS DOUBLE-STANDARDS '
              Patricia Durham Hall who worked for Bevan Ashford in Exeter was removed for being drunk.  She denied this and stated that Bevan Ashford Solicitors were frequently on pub crawls and being singled out was deliberate by the firm.  She intends to claim for unfair dismissal.  Bevan Asford refused to comment.
               
              ' LAWYER JAILED FOR STEALING AND MISCONDUCT '
              SOLICITOR PHILLIP HUXTABLEof Bournemouth charged £60,000 an hour in his plan to steal over £3 million from grieving families as he dealt with their wills.  He charged one family £22,700 for just £4,500 of actual work.  Huxtable transferred money out of his client's account and claim it was costs.  He would sometimes charge £1,000 for a phone call.  He charged one client £123,000 when the it should have been just £27,000. He was described as an arrogant liar in court and was jailed for three and a half years.
               
              'JAILED FRAUD LAWYER COMMITS FRAUD AGAIN '
              SOLICITOR NICHOLAS BUTCHER committed the same offence again after being previously jailed for fraud it was revealed as he yet again stood in the dock for a second time.  The struck-off solicitor joined a firm called Willmakers of Distinction set up by a businessman.  The firm had no indemnity nor was it prepared to give an honest deal it was heard.  In court it was heard that they fiddled and stole from people who had arranged wills with them.  Solicitor Nicholas Butcher was sentenced to three and a half years for theft.
               
              ' JAILED BARRISTER TO SUE CHANCELLOR '
              LAWYER FAUZ KHAN a prominent civil rights barrister is suing the Lord Chancellor for £9,000 in legal fees for working on his own defence. The barrister was sentenced to four months in jail for molesting a girl in his chambers, who was the girlfriend of a client. He was convicted by Chester Magistrates in 1999 of indecent assault.  On appeal it was decided that the girl lied and was prone to making false allegations.   The Manchester based lawyer launched an appeal after the sentence only to find that Mold Crown Court upheld the sentence. The Court of Appeal found that the case had not been adequately investigated by the police, and two of the police officers involved were to face disciplinary action. He launched a High Court claim for compensation.
               
               LAWYERS AND THE LEGAL AID SCAM
              Over a 100 LAWYERS have been accused of cheating in Legal Aid claims which cost the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds.  The Lord Chancellor received a list of Barristers suspected of making excessive charges involving criminal trials.  The Bar Council was notified by his department.
              Four QC's MICHAEL HILL, CLARE MONTGOMERY, COLIN NICHOLLS and PHILIP HACKETT had their legal aid fees reduced; these four Barristers were not on the list passed to the bar council.
              Even Mike Mansfield QC had his claim for £22,000 reduced to £12,000 by the House of Lords Committee.
              Mark Stobbs for the Bar Council said they would come down heavily on members whose claims were so excessive as to be unjustifiable and amount to misconduct.  ' Any Barristers who are found guilty of misconduct will be dealt with and publicly named.' he said
              NO LIST OF ANY BARRISTERS APPEARED --- HOW STRANGE?
              We have our own little list here:
              ' LAWYER GETS 5 YEARS FOR £2.25 MILLION LEGAL AID SWINDLE '
              CROOKED SOLICITOR ALAN PRITCHARD used the Legal aid system to 'print money' .  He managed to get people to sign blank legal aid forms and told them it was part of a petition to secure hosing improvements.  He teamed up with legal consultant Peter Lane and Brian O'Connor to make bogus claims which were like a production line set up.  Pritchard's firm abused the 'green form' scheme because the Legal Aid Board relied on honesty rather than proof.
              ' SOLICITOR NETTED OVER £8 MILLION IN LEGAL AID FRAUD '
              LAWYER TIM ROBINSON was jailed for 'master-minding a record £8m legal aid scam.  Robinson's Law Firm milked the legal aid system for six years before being rumbled.   The court heard that his firm was 'riddled with corruption ' and this involved his team of solicitors and clerks.  His personal fortune was well over £3 million.  It took 11 years to complete the investigation. He was jailed for 15 years and 4 months.
              'LEGAL AID SOLICITOR IN £1 MILLION FRAUD '
              BENT LAWYER GARY GROSBERG  along with his staff tricked the poor in order to launch a £1million pound swindle on Legal Aid.  Bogus cases were filed under invented names.  He got strangers to sign the forms saying they had been advised on a legal problem and had received an interview.  The swindle went on for five years at Grosberg & Co. in Leigh.  He was only caught out when someone noticed the similarity of the signatures.  The proceeds were to fund luxury cars and holidays.  He and his firm were charged with conspiracy to defraud.  He was also given Legal Aid for his defence --- and who granted him legal aid?  yes, his fellow lawyers of course, -- how about that??
              ' LAWYER IN LEGAL AID SCAM KEEPS £2MILLION?'
              SOLICITOR BERNARD RISDALE-TOMBLING  who made false legal aid claims managed to outwit CPS Lawyers and keep £2million.  Although he got a 4 year jail sentence after admitting bogus legal claims worth £731,000, he claimed the CPS could not prove all his cash came from the scam.  Nottingham Crown Court overturned the CPS claim for more money.
               
              ' THE LEGAL AID SCANDAL STILL LIVES ON '
              2010, AND LEGAL AID IS BIG BUSINESS FOR LAWYERS.  There was promises of a reform on legal aid, but now we can reveal that in a memo in Government circles shows that the taxpayers are paying over £1 million a month to lawyers who make vain attempts to represent criminal clients.  The report highlighted over five years barristers and solicitors have taken £50 million in legal aid for failed appeals.  £830,000 is spent every month on legal aid lost causes. It certainly shows that the lawyers and legal profession is up to its old tricks -- conning the public at every turn.
               
              THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE MONEY POT & LAWYERS
              Yes, they go from legal aid to skimming off the National Health Service.  Lawyers are taking £1 out of every £2 paid for blunders resulting out of claims.  Lawyers bill the NHS £800 an hour for their services, under a compensation scheme to cover claims for negligence and accidents within the hospital.  In one case in Liverpool, Lawyers tendered a bill for £4.5 million and after a challenge it was reduced to £43,000.  Although the case was referred to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the firm was not rebuked over the matter --- and was not publicly named?
              THE NHS Litigation Authority handles around 9,000 claims for negligence every year, and a claim is likely to take one and a half years.  Lawyers often named 'Ambulance Chasers' claim tens of millions in costs from the scheme.
               
              THE ASYLUM SCAM AND LAWYERS
              Many lawyers play the system to their full advantage with false claims the Immigration Minister claims.  Many cases are unclear and Lawyers misuse the Law to boost the claim payout. 
               
              THE DWP LAWYERS and the corruption that hides within.
              Before exposing the central players, I will mention colleague Martin and his site DWPCORRUPTION.CO.UK who mainly deal with corrupt matters associated with Jobcentreplus, and other departments in this area.  Most of the names are on his list, and on his site you can see a bigger picture of the rot in Government.
              The List of Legal representatives are;
              DANIEL LAVERCOMBE, NIGEL FISHER, SUSAN DEORDON, RICHARD THOMAS, PHILIP ELVY, MRS. M.MORGAN and C. CRICKETTS.
              All the above could be described as a connived conspiracy against public interests.
              DANIEL LAVERCOMBE, solicitor in this litigation department is the main feature here.
              This expose deals with the actions of Daniel Lavercombe and how far he goes (with the help of colleagues) to conceal and suppress public information.
              A public site on the web gave out the information that Daniel Lavercombe had fabricated evidence against jobcentre claimants.  The information was and is supported by Private Detective John Barrymore in Luton, he made several background enquiries which resulted in other information to add to what was already said.  Using his influence, Lavercombe had the page removed on the Yahoo site and to add to this he got Yahoo to suppress all messages to the public domain issued by Richard to be censored, and have him warned off.
              Recently, Deputy District Judge Wiggins said of this page, ' It's not worth worrying about, it proves nothing and one expects this of the Internet.'
              Yet, Lavercombe did see this as a threat and important contrary to the Judge, which lends weight to the fact that it was true and only someone willing to lean on a web provider to suppress it shows its relevance to him and the DWP department.  
              The female Barrister who represented the DWP locally was asked several times if Lavercombe was corrupt, and she ignored this and did not answer.
              Daniel Lavercombe along with Nigel Fisher feature on DWPCORRUPTION.CO.UK, Martin tells me he has been aware of Lavercombe.  Nigel Fisher is connected with fabrication etc, in the same mode as Lavercombe, and that account is fully explored on his website.  Nigel Fisher and Co have tried to silence and shutdown his site three times, which certainly points to something rotten in this little band of Lawyers.
              Daniel Lavercombe cannot silence everybody no matter how powerful he thinks he is, and this site will tell it like it is and expose corrupt Lawyers.
               
              The crumbling integrity of the C.P.S.  -- Lawyers thereof.
              ' The Crown Prosecution Service pay out £600,000 '
              RACISM AND MS.AZIZ, a prosecution Lawyer with the CPS.  She was suspended for telling a joke, and that joke has cost the taxpayer a staggering £1 million after taking into consideration costs at £500,000.  They certainly spend public money freely.
              The CPS has been accused of institutional Racism by three of its own Lawyers. 
              Three Asian Prosecutors - Maria Bamieh, Peter Shah and Dillip Navapurkar, say that discrimination has prevented them from being promoted.  David Calvert-Smith QC was appointed to look into the matter.  Perhaps this might cost the taxpayer another £3 million?
              'THE CROWN PROSECUTOR AND THE LIES SHE TOLD '
              LAWYER PENELOPE SCHOFIELD who worked for the CPS lied for her Police Detective lover when he was arrested on Drink/Driving charges.  Under questioning she told lie upon lie to protect him, she claimed she had driven the the car when in fact he had been driving under the influence of alcohol.  The Lawyer from Hambledon Hampshire said her lover DC. Nigel Phillips was distraught at being breathalysed, so she decided to help him.  Afterwards when it became clear their stories didn't hold together, she said -'I'm ashamed at what I have done.'
              She denied perverting the course of justice and fabricating a false statement with intent to deceive.
              She obviously does not comprehend that lying is exactly within the meaning of ' perverting the course of justice  but neither do the police when it suits them as you can see in BENT COPS LIST on this site.
              CPS GIVE BACK £33 MILLION TO CONVICTED CROOK
              A Roger Cook Programme revealed that convicted crook John Palmer walked away with £33 million pounds of confiscated cash after Lawyers at the CPS failed/bungled the case against him.
              CPS BLUNDERS IN THE MURDER CASE OF TWO FRENCH STUDENTS
              Crown Prosecution Lawyers have been blamed for many of the errors surrounding the case of two French students who were brutally killed by two murderers, one of whom should have been in prison.  Dan O Connex with Nigel Farmer, tortured and killed the two friends who were in the UK on an exchange student plan, for a few pounds, computer games and mobile phones.  The Police did nothing and the Lawyers sat back in their cosy departments oblivious to what their inaction had caused.  Thankfully, the parents of the two boys intend to sue these departments for the lack of care shown to French Nationals.
              THE CROWN PROSTITUTION SERVICE?
              PROSECUTOR KEITH BATCH usually tries vice girls before the court, but, when the court is over he became a male prostitute himself charging £60 for sex services, £20 for a massage.  The Suffolk Branch of the CPS declined to comment over the matter, but former boss Sir Allan Green a Director of Public Prosecutions, resigned after being caught kerb crawling in London's King's Cross.
              CPS LAWYER POSES AS 'EROTIC ACTOR' FOR EXTRA CASH
              LAWYER CLIFFORD ALLISON who concentrates on files concerning the special crime division, advertises for work as a nude model.  This would seem straight-forward if it were not for the fact he was doing this while on sick leave.  He apparently claimed he was under too much stress to continue office work.  Former treasurer with the Bar Council, the £80,000 a year Barrister was on a six month full pay deal while performing as a semi-pro 'erotic model'  Sir Kenneth MacDonald QC was baffled by this and a spokesperson at the CPS wanted clarification of this issue when we contact him they said.
              CPS SLAMMED BY JUDGE OVER TAINTED CASE
               JUDGE OWEN STABLE ATTACKED THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE after acquitting a man brought to court on false charges presented by the police.  Landlord Mr.Davis of The White Hart in Bethnal Green refused entry to several off-duty cops who then engaged in a brawl.  Bullyboy   cops from the nearby station began a vendetta that landed the Pub Owner on several trumped up charges.  The Judge said there was no ounce of a case against the landlord.  ' It is outrageous that the Crown Prosecution Service arranged for Mr. Davis to be prosecuted'  He also told Prosecuting Barrister Mr. John Coffey ' I cannot believe this case went ahead on the advice of counsel as responsible as you are ' He condemned the waste of taxpayers money spent on the two day case.  It was suggested that the CPS concern it's time and money investigating the real culprits -- the Police and wondered if it was the CPS being bias and embarrassed by appearing to justify bent cops in the hope they could work together on good terms.
               
              CPS FLAWED BY ITS OWN SELF-SERVING SYSTEM
              The idea was to prevent miscarriages of justice when the police brought their own prosecutions,  Lawyers were supposed to do it better and do it right.  This is not so these days, they have got too comfortable and are making many mistakes.  Ever since, the number of forms required to be filled in for each offence has proliferated .  Many of these forms consist of 'tick boxes,; and often the CPS and police disagree over which box should be ticked.  The file is then sent back and forth between the two services, with the result that some of these forms are lost or mislaid.  In these instances, the case is often dropped.  Police Officers are not specifically required to keep copies of the files but have found they must do so to cover the loss of forms in transit.  Many of these forms are of no value to anyone except statisticians, and the Lawyers know that.  The taxpayer could be spared the huge legal fees if the lower courts were allowed police prosecutions -- the safeguards could easily be observed by the aid of an Ombudsman, and if there was some dispute it could be referred up to a higher court or Judge.
               
              CORRUPTION INQUIRY LOOKS AT THE CPS
              A MAJOR CORRUPTION INQUIRY HAS BEEN LAUNCHED INTO THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE, yes indeed, and that was launched after a series of criminal investigations were compromised. A list of police informers was passed to criminals from within the lawyers at the CPS.  The information was believed to be accessed from CPS computer files.  The National Crime Squad raided the CPS and arrested three men.  The Senior Administration Officer at the CPS Mark Herbert was arrested at his home in Twickenham.  Attorney General John Morris failed in his bid to have details of the corruption allegations suppressed.
               
              ' CPS - A Pathetic bunch of liars '
              A SPEEDING DRIVER, NOT JUST ANY DRIVER, DRIVER TO JACK STRAW MP.  And that is the difference.  Lawyers at The Crown Prosecution Service claimed ' insufficient evidence -- and passenger security at risk ' yet he was caught ' red-handed '  -- the driver admitted putting his foot down to avoid an accident?  -- he drove at 103 mph.  In cases involving the public, the whole matter goes before a court -- it is not for the police and the CPS to decide innocence or guilt, but to collect evidence and prepare a case.  They let him get away with it because of privilege and the MP involved -- and it stinks to high heaven.
              The following members of the public voiced these opinions -  John Stevens of Woodley, Berks.  M. Danvers of Lutterworth, Leicester.  Bryn Jones of Colwyn Bay, Clwyd.  T. Brennan of Hastings, E. Sussex.  E. Rowley, Lytham-St Anne's.  Andrew Maggs, Bury, Lancs.  Alan Riley, Radford, Nottinghamshire.  E. T. Broderick, Derby.
               
              ' Man on false charges threatens to sue the CPS '
              Welder Kurt Peterman of Wellington, Somerset, was wrongly accused of attacking a man and charged with grievous bodily harm, and other offences.  After ruining his life and putting him through hell, the case was suddenly discontinued because the man who accused him was well known to the police already.  Solicitor Brian Pixton of the CPS offered nothing but the usual rhetoric.  It is hoped that that Peterman did sue the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE and apply for legal aid too.
               
              ' CPS LAWYER APPEARS IN COURT OVER BRIBE CHARGES '
              LAWYER SARFRAZ IBRAHIM from Cardiff, a senior lawyer with the South Wales Crown Prosecution Service, appeared before Swansea Crown Court on Corruption charges and Perverting the course of justice.  In a sting operation mounted by the police, Ibrahim told a undercover cop that he could drop an assault case if he were offered £20,000.  The police carried out the operation due to an informant who claimed the upcoming trial of a man might be about to be rigged.  Ibrahim accepted the bribe and was arrested.  The case continues.
               
              ' CPS Accountability just a calculated lie '
              A SENIOR PROSECUTOR PUBLICLY SAID - ' WE ARE EXTREMELY ACCOUNTABLE ' -- ' Decisions have to be justified in our management reports ' he said.  This admission clearly shows that accountability is internal and not for public consumption or a matter for public.  The management report is a published annual report which means very little because it's a manufactured and carefully crafted item released to the public after it is only safe to do so.  This is amplified by the way the CPS acts towards any scrutiny from outside its little kingdom - a report said it acts secretively and unbelievably slow when asked to provide information.  The CPS is only answerable to the Attorney General, who in turn answers to government.
              One appalling fact is that Prosecution Barristers often receive the case brief the night before a trial or hearing or even on the very morning of the case according to the Royal Commission Crown Court Study.  A third of conferences between client and lawyer last less than fifteen minutes, and 70 per cent less than half an hour.
              Everyday in a Crown Court prosecutors who barely know the facts of a case will open a trial with a standard off-the-peg reading from the file of documents because they fail to observe the case in real terms thus leading to the missing of obvious points and cross-examinations that are completely ludicrous and time-wasting. Because they don't know, neither do the jury who are often completely baffled by the whole thing.
              A Detective Sergeant was quoted as saying ' The Prosecutors act and behave so high and mighty -- and consider everyone else in the law beneath them.  Yet they often screw up cases because they haven't prepared it properly.  You see both prosecutor and defence lawyers in the bar at lunch break having wine together like 'the Bar Old Boy Network' -- looking after themselves as usual.'  -- ' you feel like spanking them! '
              Funny he mentions spanking, we mention quite a few of them into that on this site!
               
              ' CPS and Police blame each other in fiasco trial '
              AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE blamed the Crown Prosecution Service over case of villager who was put in a cell, DNA - tested and finger-printed and taken to court over trimming a hedge?  The case cost the taxpayer well over £5,000.  It took seven months while the case was being prepared for the CPS to finally admit that Mr. Brian Lenthall had done nothing illegal, which ended abruptly by all charges being dropped.  The Police said ' Any questions as to why a decision was brought to prosecute this case should be directed at the CPS '  A spokesman for the CPS said ' The police were given several opportunities to provide further evidence '  But villager Mr. Lenthall believes someone acted maliciously and they decided to pursue the matter knowing how weak it was hoping that I would be convicted because lawyers were backing the charge.
               
              ' CPS take Eight Months to drop insufficient case '
              THE CPS and HAMPSHIRE POLICE paraded Matthew Price before the magistrates court and each time it was adjourned until the CPS lawyers decided to discontinue with the case.  They claimed insufficient evidence after eight months and supposedly preparing a case.  INSPECTOR PAUL SAVILL of the Hampshire Police made the decision to hound Matthew Price until he decided to post the entire story on you-tube for millions of people to see.  The Crown Prosecution Service wasted resources and public money yet remained unsympathetic and unmoved on how they had squandered taxpayers money.
               
              ' CPS Deliberately withheld evidence - three judges decide '
              THREE APPEAL COURT JUDGES came to the conclusion that the Crown Prosecution Service deliberately withheld evidence from the defence counsel. The judges quashed the sentences given out to environmental activists who were accused of conspiracy to commit aggravated trespass at the Ratcliffe-on-Soar Power Station. The judges made it quite clear to the CPS that this kind of behaviour was not acceptable.
               
              ' Judge outraged by CPS Decision to prosecute man '
              At Snaresbrook Crown Court, JUDGE OWEN STABLE QC turned to the court and said ' There is not a scintilla of a case here, I am totally baffled.  What the accused Mr.Davis did, cannot be remotely regarded as engaging in an affray -- he was the victim ' said the judge angrily. ' It's outrageous that the Crown Prosecution Service arranged for him to be prosecuted; there seems to have been no police investigation whatsoever into how the alleged fracas began'  He then paused and faced CPS Prosecuting Barrister John Coffey. ' I cannot believe this case went ahead on the advice of counsel as responsible as you are.'      Mr.Coffey said that the police insisted on it because they had 'history' with the defendant.    The judge snapped back, ' Then it is outrageous this case has gone to court and that we have spent two days on it, it has been a complete waste to the taxpayer.'
              Mr Davis the defendant, and Landlord, said the police had waged a vendetta against him because they couldn't bully or intimidate him.  he has now been given the go-ahead to sue the police.
               
              QC Pontificates about rooting out corruption and leaves out lawyers
              Eminent Barrister Steven Silber urged The Law Commission to have new definitions to root out corruption. He said corruption was a national and international problem.  Although ' Acting corruptly ' is used in current legislation, it is not defined and in case law the meaning is also confused.  He recommended that a person or persons acting corruptly - a person who confers an advantage should be regarded in law as doing so 'corruptly' if he or she intends that an agent should do (or omit to do) something and believes that, if the agent so acts, it would probably be primarily in return for gaining the advantage rather than for some legitimate reason. This would also apply to ' performing functions corruptly' in that the agent's conduct was motivated by the hope of a corrupt reward , whether or not there was any agreement to that effect. 'agent' being defined in terms of anyone who has agreed to perform functions , whether for another person or for the public (or both).  -- corruptly conferring, or offering or agreeing to confer, an advantage; corruptly obtaining, soliciting or agreeing to obtain an advantage; corrupt performance by an agent of his or her functions as an agent; and receipt by an agent of a benefit which consists of, or is derived from, an advantage which the agent knows or believes to have been corruptly obtained.
              LAWYERS SHOULD READ THE ABOVE SO THAT THEY KNOW AND UNDERSTAND WHAT CORRUPTION IS, BECAUSE MANY OF THEM FALL INTO THOSE DEFINITIONS AND DENY WRONGDOING AND RELY ON QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE TO ESCAPE JUSTICE -- LAWYERS WERE LEFT OUT OF THE COMMISSION'S DEFINITIONS.  SILBER PROBABLY THOUGHT IT DIDN'T APPLY TO THE BROTHERHOOD AND MEMBERS OF THE BAR COUNCIL.
               
              More Lawyers -- More fiddling on an old tune
              '60 SOLICITORS UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE SERIOUS FRAUD SQUAD'
              A property housing scam concerning MORRIS PROPERTIES revealed that sixty solicitors were being investigated for irregularities and deals with the company.  The Serious Fraud Squad said that the scam was a complex one involving great sums of money.  Solicitors WATSON & BROWN were the subject of a TV Expose programme that was looking into the dodgy property deals and disappearing cash that was going into the pockets of unscrupulous Lawyers and the like.  The Solicitors Regulation Board was said to be looking into the activities of the Lawyers involved.
               
              ANOTHER LIST OF DREADFUL LAWYERS:
              F.D.SACHS & C0.
              FIELD, FISHER & WATERHOUSE.
              DAVID & SNAPE.
              WOODFINES.
              DAVENPORT LYONS.
              WRAGGE & CO.
              ALLETSONS.
              TURBERVILLES.
              ALMS & YOUNG.
              BRODIES.
              GRAHAM WHITE
              Solicitors --  David Hudson, Hannah Newbury, Peter Garsden, Francis Sachs, Kevin Dooley, Chris Duggans, Tony Hodgkiss and barrister Stuart Stevens.
               
              ' The case of the Barrister and the unquiet skeleton'
              A Barrister who makes claims to have an impeccable reputation conceals one incident that makes this a nonsense as the past comes to haunt him.
              NICHOLAS HOWARD HAMBLIN, Criminal Barrister with Westgate Chambers in Lewes -- the home of The Bar Council.  Some of his colleagues would say if he got away with it in the past, it should stay there, but if we are to consider solicitor James McIntyre who drove without insurance having a warrant for his arrest issued, then this must be exposed for that reason.
              The photo below along with the car in question goes back to the 1980's when he was studying Law to become the Barrister he is now.  Being on the right side of the Law then did not really figure high on his agenda, he was a wannabe musician living in Wembley, third rate, and out to do anything.  One evening he begged to have a go in the Triumph GT Sports car and having no insurance did not stop him driving it around Muswell Hill.  He might have knocked someone down, crashed, but luckily he didn't, neither was he caught by plod.  He still sees it as a Wheeze!!
              The car and the barrister can be seen in the photos below.
              Now, he's the wonderful criminal Barrister with a reputation, but not a squeaky clean one eh?
               
              ' THE CROOKED LAWYER AND POLICE CHIEF '
              SHAHROKH MIRESKANDARI, described as one of London's leading ethnic minority solicitors, has a tainted reputation involving his part in the Hinduja Passport Scandal of seven years ago and was convicted for his role in a consumer fraud in the USA. 
              His qualifications are under scrutiny by the Solicitors Regulation Authority after it was discovered he had a Law Degree from ' a university in Hawaii ' which was found to be a mailing office closed down by the authorities.
              Super rich and influential friend Keith Vaz MP, Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee urged a Judge to delay proceedings against his Lawyer friend Shahrokh Mireskandari in a communicate he sent to the court.  Police Chief Al Dizael another friend of the Lawyer, was suspended after he told the Lawyer how to balk the case and get round the accusations brought by the Metropolitan Police  ---Dazael narrowly escaped corruption charges being proved against him five years previously.
              The Lawyer who earns £750 an hour is named the mastermind behind a race war paralysing Scotland Yard involving the Met. Police Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur's claim of racial discrimination against head Police Chief Sir Ian Blair.
              The whole affair concerning this Lawyer, and there has been plenty of press coverage, suggests corruption at its most deepest level.

              (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
            • franklyne ogbunwezeh
              Iyke Ajitona, In your world, one party makes an accusation and he is right? What happened to the principle of audi alterem partem? Is the EFCC a court of law?
              Message 6 of 28 , Nov 1, 2011
                Iyke Ajitona,

                In your world, one party makes an accusation and he is right? What happened to the principle of audi alterem partem? Is the EFCC a court of law? Is the EFCC legally empowered to assume jurisdiction of a civil case that allegedly took place in the US?

                Hatred for Emeka Ugwuonye is blinding you to what is right and wrong.

                Let Emeka have his day in court.

                I wonder why EFCC should be ambushing a guy who wants to prove before a court of law that he is innocent. He was granted bail, and he never absconded. He flew all the way from the US to keep his court date, and he is being arrested over an allegation that was part of the first allegations proffered against him.

                Does this not smell foul in your nostrils?

                Hatred blows out the light of reason. EFCC and the goons they represent thinks that this is the last word on this case. They are seriously mistaken. Now the battle is on. We would see whether right, justice and dignity of the human person would be defeated by nepotistic gangsterism.

                Franklyne Ogbunwezeh

                * ************** *************** ****************** *************** ***********
                What constitutes a disservice to our faculty of judgment, however, is to place obstacles in the way of assembling truth's fragments, remaining content with a mere one- or two-dimensional projection where a multidimensional and multifaceted apprehension remains open, accessible and instructive.

                Wole Soyinka, Between Truth and Indulgences

                --- On Mon, 10/31/11, Iyke Ajitona <ajitonaiyke@...> wrote:

                From: Iyke Ajitona <ajitonaiyke@...>
                Subject: Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                To: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                Cc: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
                Date: Monday, October 31, 2011, 4:35 PM

                 

                And all Emeka needs to do is return the guy's $95,000. That will end the case. All these ethnic accusations are irrelevant to the core issue of his wrongdoing. Cough up the money and EFCC will have no reasons to hold him. Period. 
                Iyke


                Sent from my iPad

                On Oct 31, 2011, at 7:04 PM, "bob olukoya" <bobolukoya@...> wrote:

                 

                Uzoma KLN,

                I have also kept mute on this story until now.

                Few months ago, Emeka posited that EFCC is populated by men and women of Northern extraction and that they and they wield all the influence.

                Now you are of the opinion that its a Yoruba witch-hunt!!!

                Where is the consistency in thoughts and positions???

                Help!!!!!

                Bob

                BOB OLUKOYA ESQ

                From: kingsley Nnabuagha <kingsnna@...>
                Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
                Subject: Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                 

                Folks,
                 
                I am yet to see one, just one Yoruba guy come out in open and speak objectively on this Emeka Ugwuonye's matter. I have deliberately kept silence, following all comments and responses on this matter, hoping that one person would make my day and show one reason to halt the concern we have about lack of individual opinion.
                 
                As for Buhari and his team, I have my HUGE problem with them. None, not even one could speak objectively. One begins to wonder how such person would lead a country in the 21st century.
                 
                Nigeria is steps behind, both in globalization and development and we all know what and what need to be done but either fears of fear or afraid of the inevitable seem to be hindering and inhibiting us from acting. I am challenging one Yoruba man/woman to act independently like a liberal mind and speak truth. If one Yoruba man can do that, others will follow and soon, we may have a democratic and liberated South-West.
                 
                Let truth be told, Emeka Ugwuonye's case is now a human rights case and it has exposed the weakness in EFCC's structure and how the officials can easily be manipulated. The Yoruba people have spotted the laxity in EFCC structure and now pesting on her.
                And for those thinking differently should check this: How do we analyse this? A Yoruba Ambassador had an issue with Emeka, another Yoruba wanted Emeka's job and later got it, another Yoruba took Emeka to court in the US and Emeka won him, another Yoruba Ambassador heard that Emeka went home and chased him to Nigeria, a Yoruba EFCC official arrested him, he was beaten black and blue, detained, and later released, he has returned home for court appointment, news came that another Yoruba person has written another allegation against Emeka, and another Yoruba EFCC official and partner picked him up from Abuja and took him to Lagos, a Yoruba State. The Yoruba spokes person of EFCC has announced many terrible things about Emeka and majorities of all Yoruba contributors in these fora have found Emeka Ugwuonye guilt even before going to court.
                 
                WHERE ARE NOLLYWOOD PRODUCERS AND DIRECTOR? This will make the best comedy of the decade. Possible name for movie: Nigeria Must Survive
                 
                 
                Regards
                 
                 
                Uzoma KLN
                [Life is simple, do not make it difficult]

                From: Ike Agbor <ikeagbor@...>
                To: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
                Cc: "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>; "igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com" <igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>
                Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 10:36 PM
                Subject: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                 
                "If you have any morals,you would have been able so see something wrong in a lawyer stealing his client's fund." Yinka
                 
                This is the problem I have with you guys and your inchoate aspiration for national spotlight cum leadership; you have already come to the conclusion that a lawyer stole his client's funds.
                My brother you are depraved and lack the capacity for leadership and anyone that thinks otherwise should go ahead and prop you up as his or her leader; you have already called Emeka Ugwuonye a thief right.
                I hope no one puts you at the head of catching rabbits in Nigeria or else you couldn't differentiate between rabbits and rats; it is a sad day to call yourself a spokesman for Buhari.
                Lead your pack and good luck.
                 
                Ike

                 
                From: yinka odumakin <yodumakin@...>
                To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; "IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
                Cc: "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>; "igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com" <igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>
                Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:06 PM
                Subject: Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                 
                Ike:
                If you have any morals,you would have been able so see something wrong in a lawyer stealing his client's fund.
                You have no condemnation fir the thief but accuse the owner of keeping his stuff where a thief can see it.
                Moral depravity!
                Yinka.
                "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                From: Ike Agbor <ikeagbor@...>
                Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
                Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                 
                "You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail." Yinka odumakin.
                And that was from the man priming himself as a Minister/spokesperson for a President Buhari.
                And you are also right; to go to jail or not is now based on the whims and caprices of the judge who would want to send an Emeka to jail because we are cheering him on and then on the other hand were we not to cheer him on, the judge would demur on incarcerating an Emeka.
                 
                Well Yinka is one of the people trumping himself up as a change agent showing himself here and there and then you wonder why Nigeria is going backwards with each generation.
                 
                Yinka went on, "I'm shocked you were asking why Adeeyo did not report Emeka to Maryland Bar. The Attorney Grievance Commission would have de barred him long time ago. If you doubt this, Adeeyo still has that option though."
                 
                Who would hire anyone that reasons this way as a dog-catcher; well only in Nigeria could that happen!
                If Yinka Odumakin is imbibed with any scintilla of ratiocination to even aspire to lead a team of dog catchers, he would explain to us why an Adeeyo who was at some point or still is a denizen of Maryland in the U.S would hesitate to report Emeka Ugwuonye to the Maryland Bar to one, get his money back with interest and two teach Emeka lesson; to resort to the services of thugs in Nigeria where dog-catchers would want to cheer him on and this "Adeeyo still has that option though."
                 
                By gosh at the beginning some of thought that we were dealing with reasonable people aspiring for leadership here and then they write and you see the emptiness in them…
                 
                Ike

                 
                From: Igboka Uwadiegwu <igboka.uwadiegwu@...>
                To: "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
                Cc: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "igboworldforum@yahoogroups.com" <igboworldforum@yahoogroups.com>; "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>
                Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 1:35 PM
                Subject: [IgboWorldForum] Re1 : To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                 
                "You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail." outed bigot odumakin.

                The above is from a man who thought he could fly like a butterfly and perch INSIDE Aso Rock along with Buhari.
                The above is from a self-qualified moral crusader and "progressive"...

                And U wonder why this nation is FUCKED FOREVER. A 3rd world nation with 3rd rate progressives and 3rd rate values.
                Too many MASKED hypocrites swaggering around thinking they are sweetly fooling their world.
                Too many BASTARDS who do not believe in ANYTHING but their freaking interests and their thirst for power...even for a minimally ridiculous power.

                What has "cheering" somebody...anybody, got to do with REAL justice if that justice is worth its SALT ?  Should a respectable justice be so fragile and so shaky that some "cheering" (whatever that means) could destabilize it and INFLUENCE its course ? If this were to happen, then such a justice is a FUNNY one, a gutter one, a worthless one, a CONTEMPTIBLE one...

                And when a nation, any nation, has such a vile justice, then such a nation is downright contemptible as well.

                odumakin, you bleeding motherfuckers are playing with the institutions of this nation as if they aren't worth any more than a piece of a dog shit...yet the NEXT moment you will be presenting your worthless bigoted selves as some possible saviors of the same nation. A nation, you rascal animals MORALLY crashed.

                All a worthy nation has is her institutions. You fuck with those institutions for some temporary conveniences, you "useless" that nation and you may as well piss on her.
                When the burst happens, as it surely would, it's precisely wet-ass hypocrites like you who will be pointing accusing fingers elsewhere.

                Igboka





                De : "mikeogarasu@..." <mikeogarasu@...>
                À : NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com; "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com" <edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com>
                Envoyé le : Lundi 31 Octobre 2011 17h24
                Objet : Re: ||NaijaObserver|| To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                 
                Erg,
                I know an adage - once something is lost, you look for it any which way. I will have to do a little googling to establish what EFCC was created to do. I happen to know sola adeeyo personally too and I recall he was Dr Gambaris pa of some sort back in the mid 80s fresh from his sojourn in the United States.
                Would he go to the FBI or the CIA with a petition if he has personal dealings with another person and expect the FBI/CIA or would he go to court. Moreso when he is dealing with a lawyer validly in practise in the US?
                Please clarify.
                MA
                Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria.
                Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:36:33 +0000 (GMT)
                Subject: ||NaijaObserver|| To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                 
                Pastor Joe,

                You've done well on this matter and I thank you for your patience in putting the feet of our so-called human rights activist to the fire.
                That was a poser you threw out there; Sola Adeeyo's kind-heartedness didn't want to get Emeka disbarred but was prepared to get "Hammed" administer MKO's treatment to Emeka in EFCC's custody.
                I have learnt some new things today; in times of crisis, truth is so sacrosanct that you need a body guard of lies to protect it.
                 
                eRG
                "God gives, Man hoards and Satan steals" - eRG's Father

                From: Joe Attueyi <topcrestt@...>
                To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                Sent: Monday, 31 October 2011, 15:20
                Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                 
                Yinka
                Once again you deviate from substantive issues.

                I cannot be defending or cheering Emeka on an issue I have no details. Unlike you, I will not come to a conclusion based ONLY on Sola Adeeyo's version. So Sola Adeeyo, out of the kindness of his heart, does not want Emeka disbarred? That is why he refused to report him to his local bar. Hmm!

                Anyway back to the substance of my position. Anybody accused of a crime ought to be charged before a judge within 48 hours. Only a judge has the right to hold a Nigerian in custody beyond 48 hours. This is basic human rights. That the accused sued your friend for libel does NOT abridge his rights. Like the lesson Dr Idowu taught the other day: even if you are not able to do anything about it you can at least speak against it.

                I thought you guys are the human rights activists? Abi these rights are they relative?

                Joe

                --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@...> wrote:
                >
                > Joe:
                > You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail.
                > I'm shocked you were asking why Adeeyo did not report Emeka to Maryland Bar.The Attorney Grievance Commission would have de barred him long time ago.
                > If you doubt this,Adeeyo still has that option though.
                > Of all the libel cases you guys encouraged him to file,how many has he won?
                > But what baffles me most is that none of you sees anything wrong in an attorney criminally converting his client funds to his own!
                > Where is "moral compass?"
                > Yinka.
                >
                > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                >
                > -----Original Message-----
                > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@...>
                > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:38:30
                > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                >
                > Razak
                > Interesting you call me pro Emeka because Emeka himself will not agree with you
                >
                > I have been around long enough to know that Emeka's travails is a power fight underlined by our normal ethnic warfare. This fight goes way back to rag tag ambassador. Yinka trying to tell me otherwise was what I refused to accept.
                >
                > BTW Yinka self nominated as our contact to EFCC Hopefully he will help us determine who is lying between EFCC and Elombah.com.
                >
                > IF Emeka has been held by EFCC since last Wednesday without being brought before a judge then I expect you and Yinka to mount the barricades on his behalf. No?
                >
                > Joe
                >
                > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, Razaq Oladosu <alaremu2007@> wrote:
                > >
                > >
                > > Joe and every other pro- Emeka folks on this fora should please be dignifying enough to answer some very simple but fundamental questions as follows: Did Emeka actually collect the said money on behave of his client?,if yes, did he made appropriate remittance as at when due? If NO, then why?,
                > > Is this a norm for attorney to refuse to remit fund collected in trust for clients? That is all we need to know for now
                > > All these our Iyanminrin brothers seems to be acting true to type, because we know that events where and when their brothers are caught in the act of armed robbery in the past, they will tell you "NA BUSINESS E DO", so, is this another case of "NA BUSINESS EMEKA DO"
                > > On whether the EFCC is right or wrong, my people, all of you knows I am not a fan of the anti corruption out fit, but on this Emeka case, he should be used as an example to all that "NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW" , if Governors could be made to forfeit properties and are given very stringent bail conditions to boot,please who is Mr AMERICAN SCAMMER Emeka to think that he deserves a slap on the wrist in this case
                > > And to all of you that cares to know, YINKA is not representing EFCC, here or any where,so do direct your enquiries to the appropriate quarters
                > >
                > > BUSKA
                > >
                > >
                > > Sent from my iPad
                > >
                > > On Oct 31, 2011, at 1:44 PM, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                > >
                > > > Joe:
                > > > The EFCC offered Emeka bail which he rejected and they said they charged him to court within 24 hours.
                > > > The moment Emeka was charged,the rest is between him and the court.
                > > > Yinka.
                > > >
                > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:39:05 -0000
                > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                > > > ReplyTo: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                > > >
                > > >
                > > > Yinka
                > > > You are diverting the conversation away from it's key issues. And Olu Ojedokun seems to want to help both of us understand the legal issues.
                > > >
                > > > The key things I want to understand are:
                > > >
                > > > 1) if Emeka refused EFCC admin bail then EFCC should be able to hold him for 48 hours. After that they MUST charge him to court. AFTER 48 HOURS, Only a court should be able to remand a Nigerian citizen in custody.
                > > >
                > > > Is your understanding of this different?
                > > >
                > > > Can the police arrest Yinka Odumakin the activist and once he rejects the terms under which they are offering him admin bail, "file charges" against him and then hold him indefinitely until such a time "the court gives him a date"?
                > > >
                > > > I have asked Olu Ojedokun, a lawyer , to also educate me.
                > > >
                > > > Joe
                > > >
                > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                > > > >
                > > > > Joe:
                > > > > The EFCC complied with the law by offering Emeka bail the day he was arrested.But that was inchoate because he refused to surrender his passport as demanded by the bond,even when former governors complied with such.
                > > > > Special citizen Emeka above the law?
                > > > > You also want the law modified for Emeka so that he can be in court when charges are filed?He should be able to draft the charges too.
                > > > > Yinka.
                > > > >
                > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                > > > >
                > > > > -----Original Message-----
                > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                > > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:06:13
                > > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                > > > >
                > > > > Yinka
                > > > > Thanks for the clarification.
                > > > >
                > > > > My previous understanding was that a detainee could not be held for more than 48 hours without being charged to court. Only the court could then either grant him bail or remand him in custody.
                > > > >
                > > > > I was not aware that by simply "filing charges" against an accused, EFCC could hold an accused in custody until such a time, indeterminate, when the court "gives the accused a date"!
                > > > >
                > > > > We learn every day.
                > > > >
                > > > > BTW could you ascertain from your EFCC contact whether Emeka was in court when his case was filed before the judge?
                > > > >
                > > > > Joe
                > > > >
                > > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                > > > > >
                > > > > > Joe:
                > > > > > Read me carefully.
                > > > > > The EFCC said they have filed charges against him and it is the court that has to give him a date.
                > > > > > The case is with the Lagos High Court and once charges are filed,an accused is technically in the custody of the court.
                > > > > > Yinka.
                > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                > > > > >
                > > > > > -----Original Message-----
                > > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                > > > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:17:38
                > > > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                > > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                > > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                > > > > >
                > > > > > Yinka
                > > > > > Could you kindly provide the details of the court to which Emeka was charged, which then remanded him in custody
                > > > > >
                > > > > > Joe
                > > > > >
                > > > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > Okpia:
                > > > > > > You are a master of obfuscation no be small!How has the way Emeka being holding Adeeyo money become the bigger issue over the fact that money due was not paid.
                > > > > > > Adeeyo has nothing to convince Attueyi on having convinced EFCC that his money is with Emeka.
                > > > > > > You are not telling the truth that EFCC is holding Emeka without charges.
                > > > > > > I called the EFCC and this is what I got:
                > > > > > > 1 Emeka was offered administrative bail the day he was arrested but he "rejected" it by refusing to surrender his passport as required by the bail bond.
                > > > > > > 2.Charges were proffered against him the following day and it is the court that is now expected to give him a date.Technically he is in the custody of the court.
                > > > > > > If you have nothing to contradict the above,it is your mouth that needs a big padlock.
                > > > > > > Yinka.
                > > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
                > > > > > > From: eRG <edoregeneration@>
                > > > > > > Sender: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
                > > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:07:23
                > > > > > > To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com<NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com<NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com>; edo-ciao@yahoogroups.com<edo-ciao@yahoogroups.com>
                > > > > > > Reply-To: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
                > > > > > > Subject: [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > Alagba Odumakin:
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > You're trying to play smart here with this your line of enquiry. Why don't you ask Sola Adeeyo to tell us why and how Emeka has been holding on to his money for 4 years with no recourse to justice even in the land of opportunity in the US of A where the transaction took place.
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > I've refrained from responding to any of the ongoing cyber ethnic war on this issue until I saw your mail.
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > Now, let's cut to the chase, you have my number right? Go and ask Sola Adeeyo to come out and convince Joe Attueyi since I'm not an accountant on this issue. If we find his story plausible, I guarantee to organise the payment of $94,000 to him within 7 days.
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > And while you're at it, tell me which law forbids EFCC from arraigning Emeka after arresting him for over 5 days? You should have kept your mouth shut anyway. Is your madam a foremost human right activist proud of your stance on this matter given the fact you've spoken to Sola Adeeyo?
                > > > > > > Â
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > eRG
                > > > > > > "God gives, Man hoards and Satan steals" - eRG's Father
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > ________________________________
                > > > > > > From: yinka odumakin <yodumakin@>
                > > > > > > To: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com; nigerianworldforum@yahoogroups.com
                > > > > > > Sent: Monday, 31 October 2011, 10:29
                > > > > > > Subject: Re: [NaijaPolitics] [NIgerianWorldForum] Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > Â
                > > > > > > Joe:
                > > > > > > 1 It is out of fair-mindedness that I asked Dan to inquire from Emeka why he is holding on to Adeeyo's money for over 4years,since I don't have access to him.
                > > > > > > 2 Why must you dictate to Adeeyo the option he must use to collect his money after breach of trust by the attorney?You have beaten a child and you are telling him how to cry mildly!
                > > > > > > 3 I don't see the "ethnic" bit in all this.Emeka converted Adeeyo's money illegally and the cheated reports to EFCC headed by FARIDA WAZIRI in Nigeria where EBELE AZIKIWE Jonathan is President!
                > > > > > > Where is the tribal angle?
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > Yinka.
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                > > > > > > ________________________________
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                > > > > > > Sender: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
                > > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:06:08 -0000
                > > > > > > To: <NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com>
                > > > > > > ReplyTo: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
                > > > > > > Subject: [NaijaPolitics] [NIgerianWorldForum] Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                > > > > > > Â
                > > > > > > Yinka
                > > > > > > You are doing selective reading.
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > 1) you should NOT determine who or what is wrong simply by hearing Sola Adeeyo's version. Any fair minded person knows to hear the two sides of the story
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > 2) my views in (1) above is reinforced by my knowledge that Sola is an accomplished banker of repute. I will like to know why in 4 years the bar association Emeka belongs to has not been petitioned by Sola. Anybody familiar with the legal community will confirm that that approach would have gotten Sola his money faster and created professional problems for Emeka. Do you know why this approach has not been followed in 4 years?
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > 3) I hope you are not trying to convince me that there is no tribal angle to Emeka's woes with EFCC. That would be akin to saying that ragtag ambassador was fired for professional reasons it may be a power play but underlying it is our usual ethnic warfare. Let's not play the ostrich here.
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > Joe
                > > > > > >
                > > > > > > --- In NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                > > > > > > >
                > > > > > > > Joe:
                > > > > > > > Your position on EFCC not being a debt collection agency is really debatable.Emeka did not borrow money from Adeeyo here,what has happened is more of criminal conversion of clients funds-in the realm of 419 really.
                > > > > > > > But as a man with "moral compass",what is the justification for a lawyer holding his client's fund for over four years?
                > > > > > > > I need your honest answer bearing in mind your admonition to Prof Adeboye on "wrong is wrong until it is my brother who is involved"
                > > > > > > >
                > > > > > > > Yinka.
                > > > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                > > > > > > >
                > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
                > > > > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                > > > > > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                > > > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:22:35
                > > > > > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                > > > > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                > > > > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                > > > > > > >
                > > > > > > > Yinka,
                > > > > > > > Emeka Ugwuonye's case(s) is part of an elite power tussle of who-pass-who. Rag tag ambassador lost round 1 and round 2 is being played in Emeka's court. Iin Nigeria, every instrument from the ethnic to the religious is fair in the power war.
                > > > > > > >
                > > > > > > > Sola Adeeyo is an accomplished finance professional. If what you wrote below is all there is to the matter then I am sure Sola would have petitioned the bar association that Emeka belong's to and Sola would have gotten his money by now ( and Emeka reprimanded). there are always 2 sides to any story
                > > > > > > >
                > > > > > > > EFCC is not supposed to be a debt collection agency. it becomes one when those with temporary upperhand use it as an instrument in an ongoing power struggle.
                > > > > > > >
                > > > > > > > Joe
                > > > > > > >
                > > > > > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, yinkaodumakin@ wrote:
                > > > > > > > >
                > > > > > > > > Dan:
                > > > > > > > > You need to do more work on this report.
                > > > > > > > > Sola Adeeyo,MR and not Mrs is somebody I know very well.
                > > > > > > > > I asked him yesterday about this issue with Emeka and he explained how a friend introduced him to Emeka when his money was tampered with in the bank by some fellows who were intercepting his mails.
                > > > > > > > > Contrary to the ethnic dimension being introduced by some people into a deal gone awry,the fellow who introduced Emeka to Adeeyo is a Yoruba who knows countless Yoruba lawyers in America.But he recommended Emeka because he recognized his strength in such briefs.
                > > > > > > > > Emeka handled the brief successfully and the bank paid the money into a client's account in Emeka's custody and Adeeyo thought his problem was over.
                > > > > > > > > But not so fast.Anytime he called Emeka to transfer his money,it was either he was in Hong Kong or Honolulu.This went on for years.
                > > > > > > > > At a point he cornered Emeka in Nigeria,he made an undertaking to repay the money with 15% interest.
                > > > > &g

                (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
              • femi oyesanya
                Rasaki: Do you have tribal marks ?   Se o ko ila ?   ________________________________ From: Razaq Oladosu To:
                Message 7 of 28 , Nov 1, 2011
                  Rasaki:

                  Do you have tribal marks ?   Se o ko ila ?  


                  From: Razaq Oladosu <alaremu2007@...>
                  To: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; OmoOdua@yahoogroups.com; TalkNigeria@yahoogroups.com; NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
                  Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 12:12 AM
                  Subject: Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                   
                  Weresanya the scion of the Sunday Gbokugboku clan, you no get work, you for write Odumejibiti GBURUGBURU and all other dead head Ragtag Biafra Boy-scout to come to Emeka's aide, it will be sweeter if they can spring him out of the EFCC jail house
                  It is quite unfortunate that the  Iyanminrins  put up their usual ungrateful traits on  this fora always, it is on record that some of us never spared the leadership of the Anti-Graft agency including their spokes person, FEMI BABAFEMI, who we all know is a Yorubaman because of what we considered as the Agency's highhandedness in the Emeka/ Naija Embassy saga
                   If not for the headlessness of all these Iyanminrin who have been talking anyhow,they should know that the petition against the Perceived infringement of Emeka's human right by EFCC was spearheaded by a Yoruba man (ALAGBA IBK) with more Yoruba signatories than all these AJOKUTAMAMOMIS keeping a safe distance 
                  Now that he, EMEKA has taken his sacrifice beyond MOSALASI by scamming an innocent man " HIS OWN CLIENT's  hard earned money, we all owe it a duty to cry out before Emeka will claim the money is taken in lieu of a service" NOT RENDERED" as usual
                  As we all know you Iyanminrins  have made a SUYA of your conscience,while I close my case on this case I shall hand you over to the ALAALEES AND IRUNMOLES as follows: Who ever sees this truth and pretend not to see it, may SONPONNA visit such's  sight with INCURABLE blindness and rabies, may he pound his yam on earth and receive the soup in the throe of death
                  What a callous   and ungodly race, to have subjected a man to such trauma over his legitimate property, haba,it is most painful that nobody is even considering what the other man must have suffered in the hand  of this unthinking money monger
                  BUSKA

                      
                  Sent from my iPad

                  On Nov 1, 2011, at 12:49 AM, femi oyesanya <yeyerolling@...> wrote:

                   
                  Do you have evidence that he owes the guy money ?


                  From: Iyke Ajitona <ajitonaiyke@...>
                  To: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                  Cc: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
                  Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 6:35 PM
                  Subject: Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                   
                  And all Emeka needs to do is return the guy's $95,000. That will end the case. All these ethnic accusations are irrelevant to the core issue of his wrongdoing. Cough up the money and EFCC will have no reasons to hold him. Period. 
                  Iyke


                  Sent from my iPad

                  On Oct 31, 2011, at 7:04 PM, "bob olukoya" <bobolukoya@...> wrote:

                   
                  Uzoma KLN,

                  I have also kept mute on this story until now.

                  Few months ago, Emeka posited that EFCC is populated by men and women of Northern extraction and that they and they wield all the influence.

                  Now you are of the opinion that its a Yoruba witch-hunt!!!

                  Where is the consistency in thoughts and positions???

                  Help!!!!!

                  Bob
                  BOB OLUKOYA ESQ

                  From: kingsley Nnabuagha <kingsnna@...>
                  Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
                  Subject: Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                   
                  Folks,
                   
                  I am yet to see one, just one Yoruba guy come out in open and speak objectively on this Emeka Ugwuonye's matter. I have deliberately kept silence, following all comments and responses on this matter, hoping that one person would make my day and show one reason to halt the concern we have about lack of individual opinion.
                   
                  As for Buhari and his team, I have my HUGE problem with them. None, not even one could speak objectively. One begins to wonder how such person would lead a country in the 21st century.
                   
                  Nigeria is steps behind, both in globalization and development and we all know what and what need to be done but either fears of fear or afraid of the inevitable seem to be hindering and inhibiting us from acting. I am challenging one Yoruba man/woman to act independently like a liberal mind and speak truth. If one Yoruba man can do that, others will follow and soon, we may have a democratic and liberated South-West.
                   
                  Let truth be told, Emeka Ugwuonye's case is now a human rights case and it has exposed the weakness in EFCC's structure and how the officials can easily be manipulated. The Yoruba people have spotted the laxity in EFCC structure and now pesting on her.
                  And for those thinking differently should check this: How do we analyse this? A Yoruba Ambassador had an issue with Emeka, another Yoruba wanted Emeka's job and later got it, another Yoruba took Emeka to court in the US and Emeka won him, another Yoruba Ambassador heard that Emeka went home and chased him to Nigeria, a Yoruba EFCC official arrested him, he was beaten black and blue, detained, and later released, he has returned home for court appointment, news came that another Yoruba person has written another allegation against Emeka, and another Yoruba EFCC official and partner picked him up from Abuja and took him to Lagos, a Yoruba State. The Yoruba spokes person of EFCC has announced many terrible things about Emeka and majorities of all Yoruba contributors in these fora have found Emeka Ugwuonye guilt even before going to court.
                   
                  WHERE ARE NOLLYWOOD PRODUCERS AND DIRECTOR? This will make the best comedy of the decade. Possible name for movie: Nigeria Must Survive
                   
                   
                  Regards
                   
                   
                  Uzoma KLN
                  [Life is simple, do not make it difficult]

                  From: Ike Agbor <ikeagbor@...>
                  To: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
                  Cc: "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>; "igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com" <igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>
                  Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 10:36 PM
                  Subject: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                   
                  "If you have any morals,you would have been able so see something wrong in a lawyer stealing his client's fund." Yinka
                   
                  This is the problem I have with you guys and your inchoate aspiration for national spotlight cum leadership; you have already come to the conclusion that a lawyer stole his client's funds.
                  My brother you are depraved and lack the capacity for leadership and anyone that thinks otherwise should go ahead and prop you up as his or her leader; you have already called Emeka Ugwuonye a thief right.
                  I hope no one puts you at the head of catching rabbits in Nigeria or else you couldn't differentiate between rabbits and rats; it is a sad day to call yourself a spokesman for Buhari.
                  Lead your pack and good luck.
                   
                  Ike

                   
                  From: yinka odumakin <yodumakin@...>
                  To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; "IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
                  Cc: "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>; "igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com" <igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>
                  Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:06 PM
                  Subject: Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                   
                  Ike:
                  If you have any morals,you would have been able so see something wrong in a lawyer stealing his client's fund.
                  You have no condemnation fir the thief but accuse the owner of keeping his stuff where a thief can see it.
                  Moral depravity!
                  Yinka.
                  "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                  From: Ike Agbor <ikeagbor@...>
                  Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
                  Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                   
                  "You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail." Yinka odumakin.
                  And that was from the man priming himself as a Minister/spokesperson for a President Buhari.
                  And you are also right; to go to jail or not is now based on the whims and caprices of the judge who would want to send an Emeka to jail because we are cheering him on and then on the other hand were we not to cheer him on, the judge would demur on incarcerating an Emeka.
                   
                  Well Yinka is one of the people trumping himself up as a change agent showing himself here and there and then you wonder why Nigeria is going backwards with each generation.
                   
                  Yinka went on, "I'm shocked you were asking why Adeeyo did not report Emeka to Maryland Bar. The Attorney Grievance Commission would have de barred him long time ago. If you doubt this, Adeeyo still has that option though."
                   
                  Who would hire anyone that reasons this way as a dog-catcher; well only in Nigeria could that happen!
                  If Yinka Odumakin is imbibed with any scintilla of ratiocination to even aspire to lead a team of dog catchers, he would explain to us why an Adeeyo who was at some point or still is a denizen of Maryland in the U.S would hesitate to report Emeka Ugwuonye to the Maryland Bar to one, get his money back with interest and two teach Emeka lesson; to resort to the services of thugs in Nigeria where dog-catchers would want to cheer him on and this "Adeeyo still has that option though."
                   
                  By gosh at the beginning some of thought that we were dealing with reasonable people aspiring for leadership here and then they write and you see the emptiness in them…
                   
                  Ike

                   
                  From: Igboka Uwadiegwu <igboka.uwadiegwu@...>
                  To: "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
                  Cc: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "igboworldforum@yahoogroups.com" <igboworldforum@yahoogroups.com>; "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>
                  Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 1:35 PM
                  Subject: [IgboWorldForum] Re1 : To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                   
                  "You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail." outed bigot odumakin.

                  The above is from a man who thought he could fly like a butterfly and perch INSIDE Aso Rock along with Buhari.
                  The above is from a self-qualified moral crusader and "progressive"...

                  And U wonder why this nation is FUCKED FOREVER. A 3rd world nation with 3rd rate progressives and 3rd rate values.
                  Too many MASKED hypocrites swaggering around thinking they are sweetly fooling their world.
                  Too many BASTARDS who do not believe in ANYTHING but their freaking interests and their thirst for power...even for a minimally ridiculous power.

                  What has "cheering" somebody...anybody, got to do with REAL justice if that justice is worth its SALT ?  Should a respectable justice be so fragile and so shaky that some "cheering" (whatever that means) could destabilize it and INFLUENCE its course ? If this were to happen, then such a justice is a FUNNY one, a gutter one, a worthless one, a CONTEMPTIBLE one...

                  And when a nation, any nation, has such a vile justice, then such a nation is downright contemptible as well.

                  odumakin, you bleeding motherfuckers are playing with the institutions of this nation as if they aren't worth any more than a piece of a dog shit...yet the NEXT moment you will be presenting your worthless bigoted selves as some possible saviors of the same nation. A nation, you rascal animals MORALLY crashed.

                  All a worthy nation has is her institutions. You fuck with those institutions for some temporary conveniences, you "useless" that nation and you may as well piss on her.
                  When the burst happens, as it surely would, it's precisely wet-ass hypocrites like you who will be pointing accusing fingers elsewhere.

                  Igboka





                  De : "mikeogarasu@..." <mikeogarasu@...>
                  À : NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com; "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com" <edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com>
                  Envoyé le : Lundi 31 Octobre 2011 17h24
                  Objet : Re: ||NaijaObserver|| To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                   
                  Erg,
                  I know an adage - once something is lost, you look for it any which way. I will have to do a little googling to establish what EFCC was created to do. I happen to know sola adeeyo personally too and I recall he was Dr Gambaris pa of some sort back in the mid 80s fresh from his sojourn in the United States.
                  Would he go to the FBI or the CIA with a petition if he has personal dealings with another person and expect the FBI/CIA or would he go to court. Moreso when he is dealing with a lawyer validly in practise in the US?
                  Please clarify.
                  MA
                  Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria.
                  Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:36:33 +0000 (GMT)
                  Subject: ||NaijaObserver|| To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                   
                  Pastor Joe,

                  You've done well on this matter and I thank you for your patience in putting the feet of our so-called human rights activist to the fire.
                  That was a poser you threw out there; Sola Adeeyo's kind-heartedness didn't want to get Emeka disbarred but was prepared to get "Hammed" administer MKO's treatment to Emeka in EFCC's custody.
                  I have learnt some new things today; in times of crisis, truth is so sacrosanct that you need a body guard of lies to protect it.
                   
                  eRG
                  "God gives, Man hoards and Satan steals" - eRG's Father

                  From: Joe Attueyi <topcrestt@...>
                  To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                  Sent: Monday, 31 October 2011, 15:20
                  Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                   
                  Yinka
                  Once again you deviate from substantive issues.

                  I cannot be defending or cheering Emeka on an issue I have no details. Unlike you, I will not come to a conclusion based ONLY on Sola Adeeyo's version. So Sola Adeeyo, out of the kindness of his heart, does not want Emeka disbarred? That is why he refused to report him to his local bar. Hmm!

                  Anyway back to the substance of my position. Anybody accused of a crime ought to be charged before a judge within 48 hours. Only a judge has the right to hold a Nigerian in custody beyond 48 hours. This is basic human rights. That the accused sued your friend for libel does NOT abridge his rights. Like the lesson Dr Idowu taught the other day: even if you are not able to do anything about it you can at least speak against it.

                  I thought you guys are the human rights activists? Abi these rights are they relative?

                  Joe

                  --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@...> wrote:
                  >
                  > Joe:
                  > You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail.
                  > I'm shocked you were asking why Adeeyo did not report Emeka to Maryland Bar.The Attorney Grievance Commission would have de barred him long time ago.
                  > If you doubt this,Adeeyo still has that option though.
                  > Of all the libel cases you guys encouraged him to file,how many has he won?
                  > But what baffles me most is that none of you sees anything wrong in an attorney criminally converting his client funds to his own!
                  > Where is "moral compass?"
                  > Yinka.
                  >
                  > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                  >
                  > -----Original Message-----
                  > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@...>
                  > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                  > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:38:30
                  > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                  > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                  > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                  >
                  > Razak
                  > Interesting you call me pro Emeka because Emeka himself will not agree with you
                  >
                  > I have been around long enough to know that Emeka's travails is a power fight underlined by our normal ethnic warfare. This fight goes way back to rag tag ambassador. Yinka trying to tell me otherwise was what I refused to accept.
                  >
                  > BTW Yinka self nominated as our contact to EFCC Hopefully he will help us determine who is lying between EFCC and Elombah.com.
                  >
                  > IF Emeka has been held by EFCC since last Wednesday without being brought before a judge then I expect you and Yinka to mount the barricades on his behalf. No?
                  >
                  > Joe
                  >
                  > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, Razaq Oladosu <alaremu2007@> wrote:
                  > >
                  > >
                  > > Joe and every other pro- Emeka folks on this fora should please be dignifying enough to answer some very simple but fundamental questions as follows: Did Emeka actually collect the said money on behave of his client?,if yes, did he made appropriate remittance as at when due? If NO, then why?,
                  > > Is this a norm for attorney to refuse to remit fund collected in trust for clients? That is all we need to know for now
                  > > All these our Iyanminrin brothers seems to be acting true to type, because we know that events where and when their brothers are caught in the act of armed robbery in the past, they will tell you "NA BUSINESS E DO", so, is this another case of "NA BUSINESS EMEKA DO"
                  > > On whether the EFCC is right or wrong, my people, all of you knows I am not a fan of the anti corruption out fit, but on this Emeka case, he should be used as an example to all that "NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW" , if Governors could be made to forfeit properties and are given very stringent bail conditions to boot,please who is Mr AMERICAN SCAMMER Emeka to think that he deserves a slap on the wrist in this case
                  > > And to all of you that cares to know, YINKA is not representing EFCC, here or any where,so do direct your enquiries to the appropriate quarters
                  > >
                  > > BUSKA
                  > >
                  > >
                  > > Sent from my iPad
                  > >
                  > > On Oct 31, 2011, at 1:44 PM, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                  > >
                  > > > Joe:
                  > > > The EFCC offered Emeka bail which he rejected and they said they charged him to court within 24 hours.
                  > > > The moment Emeka was charged,the rest is between him and the court.
                  > > > Yinka.
                  > > >
                  > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                  > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                  > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                  > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:39:05 -0000
                  > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                  > > > ReplyTo: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                  > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                  > > >
                  > > >
                  > > > Yinka
                  > > > You are diverting the conversation away from it's key issues. And Olu Ojedokun seems to want to help both of us understand the legal issues.
                  > > >
                  > > > The key things I want to understand are:
                  > > >
                  > > > 1) if Emeka refused EFCC admin bail then EFCC should be able to hold him for 48 hours. After that they MUST charge him to court. AFTER 48 HOURS, Only a court should be able to remand a Nigerian citizen in custody.
                  > > >
                  > > > Is your understanding of this different?
                  > > >
                  > > > Can the police arrest Yinka Odumakin the activist and once he rejects the terms under which they are offering him admin bail, "file charges" against him and then hold him indefinitely until such a time "the court gives him a date"?
                  > > >
                  > > > I have asked Olu Ojedokun, a lawyer , to also educate me.
                  > > >
                  > > > Joe
                  > > >
                  > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                  > > > >
                  > > > > Joe:
                  > > > > The EFCC complied with the law by offering Emeka bail the day he was arrested.But that was inchoate because he refused to surrender his passport as demanded by the bond,even when former governors complied with such.
                  > > > > Special citizen Emeka above the law?
                  > > > > You also want the law modified for Emeka so that he can be in court when charges are filed?He should be able to draft the charges too.
                  > > > > Yinka.
                  > > > >
                  > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                  > > > >
                  > > > > -----Original Message-----
                  > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                  > > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                  > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:06:13
                  > > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                  > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                  > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                  > > > >
                  > > > > Yinka
                  > > > > Thanks for the clarification.
                  > > > >
                  > > > > My previous understanding was that a detainee could not be held for more than 48 hours without being charged to court. Only the court could then either grant him bail or remand him in custody.
                  > > > >
                  > > > > I was not aware that by simply "filing charges" against an accused, EFCC could hold an accused in custody until such a time, indeterminate, when the court "gives the accused a date"!
                  > > > >
                  > > > > We learn every day.
                  > > > >
                  > > > > BTW could you ascertain from your EFCC contact whether Emeka was in court when his case was filed before the judge?
                  > > > >
                  > > > > Joe
                  > > > >
                  > > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                  > > > > >
                  > > > > > Joe:
                  > > > > > Read me carefully.
                  > > > > > The EFCC said they have filed charges against him and it is the court that has to give him a date.
                  > > > > > The case is with the Lagos High Court and once charges are filed,an accused is technically in the custody of the court.
                  > > > > > Yinka.
                  > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                  > > > > >
                  > > > > > -----Original Message-----
                  > > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                  > > > > > Sender:
                • femi oyesanya
                  The issue here is due process.   Regardless, EFCC should follow the letter of the law  ________________________________ From: Ezeana Igirigi Achusim
                  Message 8 of 28 , Nov 1, 2011
                    The issue here is due process.   Regardless, EFCC should follow the letter of the law 


                    From: Ezeana Igirigi Achusim <igirigiachusim@...>
                    To: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                    Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 6:54 PM
                    Subject: Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                     
                    Lyke:

                    I have not read anyone argue that Emeka should not pay the money if he owes it. We have an issue with the process. 
                    I bet some one has owed you money at one time or the other. Did you enlist EFCC to arrest and jail who ever you fingered as owing you? 

                    And I am

                    Ezeana Achusim

                    Sent from my iPhone

                    On Oct 31, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Iyke Ajitona <ajitonaiyke@...> wrote:

                     
                    And all Emeka needs to do is return the guy's $95,000. That will end the case. All these ethnic accusations are irrelevant to the core issue of his wrongdoing. Cough up the money and EFCC will have no reasons to hold him. Period. 
                    Iyke


                    Sent from my iPad

                    On Oct 31, 2011, at 7:04 PM, "bob olukoya" <bobolukoya@...> wrote:

                     
                    Uzoma KLN,

                    I have also kept mute on this story until now.

                    Few months ago, Emeka posited that EFCC is populated by men and women of Northern extraction and that they and they wield all the influence.

                    Now you are of the opinion that its a Yoruba witch-hunt!!!

                    Where is the consistency in thoughts and positions???

                    Help!!!!!

                    Bob
                    BOB OLUKOYA ESQ

                    From: kingsley Nnabuagha <kingsnna@...>
                    Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
                    Subject: Re: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                     
                    Folks,
                     
                    I am yet to see one, just one Yoruba guy come out in open and speak objectively on this Emeka Ugwuonye's matter. I have deliberately kept silence, following all comments and responses on this matter, hoping that one person would make my day and show one reason to halt the concern we have about lack of individual opinion.
                     
                    As for Buhari and his team, I have my HUGE problem with them. None, not even one could speak objectively. One begins to wonder how such person would lead a country in the 21st century.
                     
                    Nigeria is steps behind, both in globalization and development and we all know what and what need to be done but either fears of fear or afraid of the inevitable seem to be hindering and inhibiting us from acting. I am challenging one Yoruba man/woman to act independently like a liberal mind and speak truth. If one Yoruba man can do that, others will follow and soon, we may have a democratic and liberated South-West.
                     
                    Let truth be told, Emeka Ugwuonye's case is now a human rights case and it has exposed the weakness in EFCC's structure and how the officials can easily be manipulated. The Yoruba people have spotted the laxity in EFCC structure and now pesting on her.
                    And for those thinking differently should check this: How do we analyse this? A Yoruba Ambassador had an issue with Emeka, another Yoruba wanted Emeka's job and later got it, another Yoruba took Emeka to court in the US and Emeka won him, another Yoruba Ambassador heard that Emeka went home and chased him to Nigeria, a Yoruba EFCC official arrested him, he was beaten black and blue, detained, and later released, he has returned home for court appointment, news came that another Yoruba person has written another allegation against Emeka, and another Yoruba EFCC official and partner picked him up from Abuja and took him to Lagos, a Yoruba State. The Yoruba spokes person of EFCC has announced many terrible things about Emeka and majorities of all Yoruba contributors in these fora have found Emeka Ugwuonye guilt even before going to court.
                     
                    WHERE ARE NOLLYWOOD PRODUCERS AND DIRECTOR? This will make the best comedy of the decade. Possible name for movie: Nigeria Must Survive
                     
                     
                    Regards
                     
                     
                    Uzoma KLN
                    [Life is simple, do not make it difficult]

                    From: Ike Agbor <ikeagbor@...>
                    To: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
                    Cc: "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>; "igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com" <igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>
                    Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 10:36 PM
                    Subject: [IGBO_FORUM] Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                     
                    "If you have any morals,you would have been able so see something wrong in a lawyer stealing his client's fund." Yinka
                     
                    This is the problem I have with you guys and your inchoate aspiration for national spotlight cum leadership; you have already come to the conclusion that a lawyer stole his client's funds.
                    My brother you are depraved and lack the capacity for leadership and anyone that thinks otherwise should go ahead and prop you up as his or her leader; you have already called Emeka Ugwuonye a thief right.
                    I hope no one puts you at the head of catching rabbits in Nigeria or else you couldn't differentiate between rabbits and rats; it is a sad day to call yourself a spokesman for Buhari.
                    Lead your pack and good luck.
                     
                    Ike

                     
                    From: yinka odumakin <yodumakin@...>
                    To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; "IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
                    Cc: "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>; "igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com" <igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>
                    Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:06 PM
                    Subject: Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                     
                    Ike:
                    If you have any morals,you would have been able so see something wrong in a lawyer stealing his client's fund.
                    You have no condemnation fir the thief but accuse the owner of keeping his stuff where a thief can see it.
                    Moral depravity!
                    Yinka.
                    "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                    From: Ike Agbor <ikeagbor@...>
                    Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:51:13 -0700 (PDT)


                  • femi oyesanya
                    You can t use material here for your Phd.   The forum is not a credible journal.  ________________________________ From: Oliver Anam
                    Message 9 of 28 , Nov 1, 2011
                      You can't use material here for your Phd.   The forum is not a credible journal. 


                      From: Oliver Anam <oanam@...>
                      To: NIJA <nigerianworldforum@yahoogroups.com>; Igbo World <igboworldforum@yahoogroups.com>; naijaobserver@yahoogroups.com
                      Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:40 PM
                      Subject: RE: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                       
                       
                       
                       Fire on guys, by the time you are all done I'll have enough "academic materials" for my PhD. thesis on "Fourth World Jurisprudence, Nigeria EFCC et al."
                       

                      Remember this is my Final Year towards my post doctoral degree... LL.D, I mean JD PhD. from La Salle Univeristy (LSU)..Internet Campus Abuja, Nigeria 

                      Anam/OO, LL.B; LL.M, JD ( JD-PhD Candidate)
                      LSU, Internet Campus Asokoro,Abuja, Nig.
                      PMB 419,
                      Asokoro-Suleja, Abuja
                      www.lsuinternet.abj.ng.edu
                       

                      To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com
                      CC: Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com; NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com; igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com
                      From: yodumakin@...
                      Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:06:59 +0000
                      Subject: Re: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                       
                      Ike:
                      If you have any morals,you would have been able so see something wrong in a lawyer stealing his client's fund.
                      You have no condemnation fir the thief but accuse the owner of keeping his stuff where a thief can see it.
                      Moral depravity!
                      Yinka.
                      "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.

                      From: Ike Agbor <ikeagbor@...>
                      Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
                      To: IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com<IgboWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com<NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
                      ReplyTo: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      Cc: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com<NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com<Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com<NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>; igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com<igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com>
                      Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] To Pastor Joe- EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                       
                      "You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail." Yinka odumakin.
                      And that was from the man priming himself as a Minister/spokesperson for a President Buhari.
                      And you are also right; to go to jail or not is now based on the whims and caprices of the judge who would want to send an Emeka to jail because we are cheering him on and then on the other hand were we not to cheer him on, the judge would demur on incarcerating an Emeka.
                       
                      Well Yinka is one of the people trumping himself up as a change agent showing himself here and there and then you wonder why Nigeria is going backwards with each generation.
                       
                      Yinka went on, "I'm shocked you were asking why Adeeyo did not report Emeka to Maryland Bar. The Attorney Grievance Commission would have de barred him long time ago. If you doubt this, Adeeyo still has that option though."
                       
                      Who would hire anyone that reasons this way as a dog-catcher; well only in Nigeria could that happen!
                      If Yinka Odumakin is imbibed with any scintilla of ratiocination to even aspire to lead a team of dog catchers, he would explain to us why an Adeeyo who was at some point or still is a denizen of Maryland in the U.S would hesitate to report Emeka Ugwuonye to the Maryland Bar to one, get his money back with interest and two teach Emeka lesson; to resort to the services of thugs in Nigeria where dog-catchers would want to cheer him on and this "Adeeyo still has that option though."
                       
                      By gosh at the beginning some of thought that we were dealing with reasonable people aspiring for leadership here and then they write and you see the emptiness in them…
                       
                      Ike

                       
                      From: Igboka Uwadiegwu <igboka.uwadiegwu@...>
                      To: "NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>
                      Cc: "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "igboworldforum@yahoogroups.com" <igboworldforum@yahoogroups.com>; "Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <Anambra-WorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaElections@yahoogroups.com>
                      Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 1:35 PM
                      Subject: [IgboWorldForum] Re1 : To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                       
                      "You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail." outed bigot odumakin.

                      The above is from a man who thought he could fly like a butterfly and perch INSIDE Aso Rock along with Buhari.
                      The above is from a self-qualified moral crusader and "progressive"...

                      And U wonder why this nation is FUCKED FOREVER. A 3rd world nation with 3rd rate progressives and 3rd rate values.
                      Too many MASKED hypocrites swaggering around thinking they are sweetly fooling their world.
                      Too many BASTARDS who do not believe in ANYTHING but their freaking interests and their thirst for power...even for a minimally ridiculous power.

                      What has "cheering" somebody...anybody, got to do with REAL justice if that justice is worth its SALT ?  Should a respectable justice be so fragile and so shaky that some "cheering" (whatever that means) could destabilize it and INFLUENCE its course ? If this were to happen, then such a justice is a FUNNY one, a gutter one, a worthless one, a CONTEMPTIBLE one...

                      And when a nation, any nation, has such a vile justice, then such a nation is downright contemptible as well.

                      odumakin, you bleeding motherfuckers are playing with the institutions of this nation as if they aren't worth any more than a piece of a dog shit...yet the NEXT moment you will be presenting your worthless bigoted selves as some possible saviors of the same nation. A nation, you rascal animals MORALLY crashed.

                      All a worthy nation has is her institutions. You fuck with those institutions for some temporary conveniences, you "useless" that nation and you may as well piss on her.
                      When the burst happens, as it surely would, it's precisely wet-ass hypocrites like you who will be pointing accusing fingers elsewhere.

                      Igboka





                      De : "mikeogarasu@..." <mikeogarasu@...>
                      À : NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com; "NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com" <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; "edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com" <edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com>
                      Envoyé le : Lundi 31 Octobre 2011 17h24
                      Objet : Re: ||NaijaObserver|| To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                       
                      Erg,
                      I know an adage - once something is lost, you look for it any which way. I will have to do a little googling to establish what EFCC was created to do. I happen to know sola adeeyo personally too and I recall he was Dr Gambaris pa of some sort back in the mid 80s fresh from his sojourn in the United States.
                      Would he go to the FBI or the CIA with a petition if he has personal dealings with another person and expect the FBI/CIA or would he go to court. Moreso when he is dealing with a lawyer validly in practise in the US?
                      Please clarify.
                      MA
                      Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria.
                      From: eRG <edoregeneration@...>
                      Sender: NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com
                      Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:36:33 +0000 (GMT)
                      To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com<NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com<NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com>; edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com<edo-nationality@yahoogroups.com>
                      ReplyTo: NaijaObserver@yahoogroups.com
                      Subject: ||NaijaObserver|| To Pastor Joe - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                       
                      Pastor Joe,

                      You've done well on this matter and I thank you for your patience in putting the feet of our so-called human rights activist to the fire.
                      That was a poser you threw out there; Sola Adeeyo's kind-heartedness didn't want to get Emeka disbarred but was prepared to get "Hammed" administer MKO's treatment to Emeka in EFCC's custody.
                      I have learnt some new things today; in times of crisis, truth is so sacrosanct that you need a body guard of lies to protect it.
                       
                      eRG
                      "God gives, Man hoards and Satan steals" - eRG's Father

                      From: Joe Attueyi <topcrestt@...>
                      To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      Sent: Monday, 31 October 2011, 15:20
                      Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?

                       
                      Yinka
                      Once again you deviate from substantive issues.

                      I cannot be defending or cheering Emeka on an issue I have no details. Unlike you, I will not come to a conclusion based ONLY on Sola Adeeyo's version. So Sola Adeeyo, out of the kindness of his heart, does not want Emeka disbarred? That is why he refused to report him to his local bar. Hmm!

                      Anyway back to the substance of my position. Anybody accused of a crime ought to be charged before a judge within 48 hours. Only a judge has the right to hold a Nigerian in custody beyond 48 hours. This is basic human rights. That the accused sued your friend for libel does NOT abridge his rights. Like the lesson Dr Idowu taught the other day: even if you are not able to do anything about it you can at least speak against it.

                      I thought you guys are the human rights activists? Abi these rights are they relative?

                      Joe

                      --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@...> wrote:
                      >
                      > Joe:
                      > You guys cheering Emeka on will eventually send him to jail.
                      > I'm shocked you were asking why Adeeyo did not report Emeka to Maryland Bar.The Attorney Grievance Commission would have de barred him long time ago.
                      > If you doubt this,Adeeyo still has that option though.
                      > Of all the libel cases you guys encouraged him to file,how many has he won?
                      > But what baffles me most is that none of you sees anything wrong in an attorney criminally converting his client funds to his own!
                      > Where is "moral compass?"
                      > Yinka.
                      >
                      > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                      >
                      > -----Original
                      Message-----
                      > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@...>
                      > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:38:30
                      > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                      > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                      >
                      > Razak
                      > Interesting you call me pro Emeka because Emeka himself will not agree with you
                      >
                      > I have been around long enough to know that Emeka's
                      travails is a power fight underlined by our normal ethnic warfare. This fight goes way back to rag tag ambassador. Yinka trying to tell me otherwise was what I refused to accept.
                      >
                      > BTW Yinka self nominated as our contact to EFCC Hopefully he will help us determine who is lying between EFCC and Elombah.com.
                      >
                      > IF Emeka has been held by EFCC since last Wednesday without being brought before a judge then I expect you and Yinka to mount the barricades on his behalf. No?
                      >
                      > Joe
                      >
                      > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, Razaq Oladosu <alaremu2007@> wrote:
                      > >
                      > >
                      > > Joe and every other pro- Emeka folks on this fora should please be dignifying enough to answer some very simple but fundamental questions as follows: Did Emeka
                      actually collect the said money on behave of his client?,if yes, did he made appropriate remittance as at when due? If NO, then why?,
                      > > Is this a norm for attorney to refuse to remit fund collected in trust for clients? That is all we need to know for now
                      > > All these our Iyanminrin brothers seems to be acting true to type, because we know that events where and when their brothers are caught in the act of armed robbery in the past, they will tell you "NA BUSINESS E DO", so, is this another case of "NA BUSINESS EMEKA DO"
                      > > On whether the EFCC is right or wrong, my people, all of you knows I am not a fan of the anti corruption out fit, but on this Emeka case, he should be used as an example to all that "NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW" , if Governors could be made to forfeit properties and are given very stringent bail conditions to boot,please who is Mr AMERICAN SCAMMER Emeka to think that he deserves a slap on the wrist in this
                      case
                      > > And to all of you that cares to know, YINKA is not representing EFCC, here or any where,so do direct your enquiries to the appropriate quarters
                      > >
                      > > BUSKA
                      > >
                      > >
                      > > Sent from my iPad
                      > >
                      > > On Oct 31, 2011, at 1:44 PM, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                      > >
                      > > > Joe:
                      > > > The EFCC offered Emeka bail which he rejected and they said they charged him to court within 24 hours.
                      > > > The moment Emeka was charged,the rest is between him and the court.
                      > > > Yinka.
                      > > >
                      > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                      > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                      > > > Sender:
                      href="mailto:NIgerianWorldForum%40yahoogroups.com">NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:39:05 -0000
                      > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                      > > > ReplyTo: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                      > > >
                      > > >
                      > > > Yinka
                      > > > You are diverting the conversation away from it's key issues. And Olu Ojedokun seems to want to help both of us understand the legal issues.
                      > > >
                      > > > The key things I want to understand are:
                      > > >
                      > > > 1) if Emeka refused EFCC admin bail then EFCC should be able to hold him for 48 hours. After that they MUST charge him to court. AFTER 48 HOURS, Only a court should be able to remand a Nigerian citizen in custody.
                      > > >
                      > > > Is your understanding of this different?
                      > > >
                      > > > Can the police arrest Yinka Odumakin the activist and once he rejects the terms under which they are offering him admin bail, "file charges" against him and then hold him indefinitely until such a time "the court gives him a date"?
                      > > >
                      > > > I have asked Olu Ojedokun, a lawyer , to also educate me.
                      > > >
                      > > > Joe
                      > > >
                      > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin"
                      <yodumakin@> wrote:
                      > > > >
                      > > > > Joe:
                      > > > > The EFCC complied with the law by offering Emeka bail the day he was arrested.But that was inchoate because he refused to surrender his passport as demanded by the bond,even when former governors complied with such.
                      > > > > Special citizen Emeka above the law?
                      > > > > You also want the law modified for Emeka so that he can be in court when charges are filed?He should be able to draft the charges too.
                      > > > > Yinka.
                      > > > >
                      > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                      > > > >
                      > > > > -----Original Message-----
                      > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                      > > > > Sender:
                      ymailto="mailto:NIgerianWorldForum%40yahoogroups.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:NIgerianWorldForum%40yahoogroups.com">NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:06:13
                      > > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                      > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                      > > > >
                      > > > > Yinka
                      > > > > Thanks for the clarification.
                      > > > >
                      > > > > My previous understanding was that a detainee could not be held for
                      more than 48 hours without being charged to court. Only the court could then either grant him bail or remand him in custody.
                      > > > >
                      > > > > I was not aware that by simply "filing charges" against an accused, EFCC could hold an accused in custody until such a time, indeterminate, when the court "gives the accused a date"!
                      > > > >
                      > > > > We learn every day.
                      > > > >
                      > > > > BTW could you ascertain from your EFCC contact whether Emeka was in court when his case was filed before the judge?
                      > > > >
                      > > > > Joe
                      > > > >
                      > > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                      > > > > >
                      > > > > > Joe:
                      > > > > > Read me carefully.
                      > > > > > The EFCC said they have filed charges against him and it is the court that has to give him a date.
                      > > > > > The case is with the Lagos High Court and once charges are filed,an accused is technically in the custody of the court.
                      > > > > > Yinka.
                      > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                      > > > > >
                      > > > > > -----Original Message-----
                      > > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                      > > > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:17:38
                      > > > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                      > > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                      > > > > >
                      > > > > > Yinka
                      > > > > > Could you kindly provide the details of the court to which Emeka was charged, which then remanded him in custody
                      > > > > >
                      > > > > > Joe
                      > > > > >
                      > > > > > --- In
                      href="mailto:NIgerianWorldForum%40yahoogroups.com">NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > Okpia:
                      > > > > > > You are a master of obfuscation no be small!How has the way Emeka being holding Adeeyo money become the bigger issue over the fact that money due was not paid.
                      > > > > > > Adeeyo has nothing to convince Attueyi on having convinced EFCC that his money is with Emeka.
                      > > > > > > You are not telling the truth that EFCC is holding Emeka without charges.
                      > > > > > > I called the EFCC and this is what I got:
                      > > > > > > 1 Emeka was offered administrative bail the day he was arrested but he "rejected" it by refusing to surrender his passport as required by the bail bond.
                      > > > > > > 2.Charges were proffered against him
                      the following day and it is the court that is now expected to give him a date.Technically he is in the custody of the court.
                      > > > > > > If you have nothing to contradict the above,it is your mouth that needs a big padlock.
                      > > > > > > Yinka.
                      > > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
                      > > > > > > From: eRG <edoregeneration@>
                      > > > > > > Sender: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:07:23
                      > > > > > > To:
                      ymailto="mailto:NIgerianWorldForum%40yahoogroups.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:NIgerianWorldForum%40yahoogroups.com">NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com<NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com<NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com>; edo-ciao@yahoogroups.com<edo-ciao@yahoogroups.com>
                      > > > > > > Reply-To: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > > > Subject: [NaijaPolitics] To Yinka - Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > Alagba Odumakin:
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > You're trying to play smart here with this your line of enquiry. Why don't you ask Sola Adeeyo to tell us why and how Emeka has been holding on to his money for 4 years with no recourse to justice even in the land of opportunity in the US of A where the transaction took place.
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > I've refrained from responding to any of the ongoing cyber ethnic war on this issue until I saw
                      your mail.
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > Now, let's cut to the chase, you have my number right? Go and ask Sola Adeeyo to come out and convince Joe Attueyi since I'm not an accountant on this issue. If we find his story plausible, I guarantee to organise the payment of $94,000 to him within 7 days.
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > And while you're at it, tell me which law forbids EFCC from arraigning Emeka after arresting him for over 5 days? You should have kept your mouth shut anyway. Is your madam a foremost human right activist proud of your stance on this matter given the fact you've spoken to Sola Adeeyo?
                      > > > > > > Â
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > eRG
                      > > > > > > "God gives, Man hoards and Satan steals" - eRG's Father
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > ________________________________
                      > > > > > > From: yinka odumakin <yodumakin@>
                      > > > > > > To: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com; nigerianworldforum@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > > > Sent: Monday, 31 October 2011, 10:29
                      > > > > > > Subject: Re: [NaijaPolitics] [NIgerianWorldForum] Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > Â
                      > > > > > > Joe:
                      > > > > > > 1 It is out of fair-mindedness that I asked Dan to inquire from Emeka why he is holding on to
                      Adeeyo's money for over 4years,since I don't have access to him.
                      > > > > > > 2 Why must you dictate to Adeeyo the option he must use to collect his money after breach of trust by the attorney?You have beaten a child and you are telling him how to cry mildly!
                      > > > > > > 3 I don't see the "ethnic" bit in all this.Emeka converted Adeeyo's money illegally and the cheated reports to EFCC headed by FARIDA WAZIRI in Nigeria where EBELE AZIKIWE Jonathan is President!
                      > > > > > > Where is the tribal angle?
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > Yinka.
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                      > > > > > >
                      ________________________________
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                      > > > > > > Sender: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:06:08 -0000
                      > > > > > > To: <NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com>
                      > > > > > > ReplyTo: NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > > > Subject: [NaijaPolitics] [NIgerianWorldForum] Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                      > > > > > >
                      Â
                      > > > > > > Yinka
                      > > > > > > You are doing selective reading.
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > 1) you should NOT determine who or what is wrong simply by hearing Sola Adeeyo's version. Any fair minded person knows to hear the two sides of the story
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > 2) my views in (1) above is reinforced by my knowledge that Sola is an accomplished banker of repute. I will like to know why in 4 years the bar association Emeka belongs to has not been petitioned by Sola. Anybody familiar with the legal community will confirm that that approach would have gotten Sola his money faster and created professional problems for Emeka. Do you know why this approach has not been followed in 4 years?
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > 3) I hope you are not trying to convince me that there is no tribal
                      angle to Emeka's woes with EFCC. That would be akin to saying that ragtag ambassador was fired for professional reasons it may be a power play but underlying it is our usual ethnic warfare. Let's not play the ostrich here.
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > Joe
                      > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > --- In NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com, "yinka odumakin" <yodumakin@> wrote:
                      > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > Joe:
                      > > > > > > > Your position on EFCC not being a debt collection agency is really debatable.Emeka did not borrow money from Adeeyo here,what has happened is more of criminal conversion of clients funds-in the realm of 419 really.
                      > > > > > > > But as a man with
                      "moral compass",what is the justification for a lawyer holding his client's fund for over four years?
                      > > > > > > > I need your honest answer bearing in mind your admonition to Prof Adeboye on "wrong is wrong until it is my brother who is involved"
                      > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > Yinka.
                      > > > > > > > "I freed a thousand slaves and i could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves".....Harriet Tubman.
                      > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
                      > > > > > > > From: "Joe Attueyi" <topcrestt@>
                      > > > > > > > Sender: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > > > > Date:
                      Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:22:35
                      > > > > > > > To: <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>
                      > > > > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] Re: EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                      > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > Yinka,
                      > > > > > > > Emeka Ugwuonye's case(s) is part of an elite power tussle of who-pass-who. Rag tag ambassador lost round 1 and round 2 is being played in Emeka's court. Iin Nigeria, every instrument from the ethnic to the religious is fair in the power war.
                      > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > Sola Adeeyo is an accomplished finance professional. If what you wrote below is all there is to the matter then I am sure Sola would have petitioned the bar association that Emeka belong's to and Sola would have gotten his money by now ( and Emeka reprimanded). there are always 2 sides to any story
                      > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > EFCC is not supposed to be a debt collection agency. it becomes one when those with temporary upperhand use it as an instrument in an ongoing power struggle.
                      > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > Joe
                      > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > --- In NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, yinkaodumakin@ wrote:
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > Dan:
                      > > > > > > > > You need to do more work on this report.
                      > > > > > > > > Sola Adeeyo,MR and not Mrs is somebody I know very well.
                      > > > > > > > > I asked him yesterday about this issue with Emeka and he explained how a friend introduced him to Emeka when his money was tampered with in the bank by some fellows who were intercepting his mails.
                      > > > > > > > > Contrary to the ethnic dimension being introduced by some people into a deal gone awry,the fellow who introduced Emeka to Adeeyo is a Yoruba who knows countless Yoruba lawyers in America.But he recommended Emeka because he recognized his strength in such briefs.
                      > > > > > > > > Emeka handled the brief successfully and the bank paid the money into a client's account in Emeka's custody and
                      Adeeyo thought his problem was over.
                      > > > > > > > > But not so fast.Anytime he called Emeka to transfer his money,it was either he was in Hong Kong or Honolulu.This went on for years.
                      > > > > > > > > At a point he cornered Emeka in Nigeria,he made an undertaking to repay the money with 15% interest.
                      > > > > > > > > It all remained a promise until Adeeyo petitioned the EFCC three months ago.
                      > > > > > > > > The straightforward question to ask Emeka is :why hold on to your client's funds for over 4 years?
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > Yinka.
                      > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
                      > > > > > > > > From: hammed hassan <olijek@>
                      > > > > > > > > Sender:
                      ymailto="mailto:NIgerianWorldForum%40yahoogroups.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:NIgerianWorldForum%40yahoogroups.com">NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > > > > > Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:13:38
                      > > > > > > > > To: <nigerianworldforum@yahoogroups.com>
                      > > > > > > > > Reply-To: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
                      > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: [NIgerianWorldForum] EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > Mr. Odera,
                      > > > > > > > > You are going to do a lot of help to Emeka when you mellow down on this type of internet report.
                      > > > > > > > > Your explosive and sometimes framed up reports on EFCC and Emeka is not going to help your man at all.
                      > > > > > > > > Have you checked the roster of EFCC to see who and who that are there. You wold have found that MAJORITY of the officers are LAWYERS. So they know what they are doing. You don't have to take to my advice, if you choose you can keep on and let us see the end. The case of MKO is still very fresh.
                      > > > > > > > > Good luck and Good night.
                      > > > > > > > > Hammed
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > To:
                      href="mailto:NaijaPolitics%40yahoogroups.com">NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com; NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; naijaobserver@yahoogroups.com; OmoOdua@yahoogroups.com; naijaintellects@...; talknigeria@yahoogroups.com; wic_open_forum@yahoogroups.com; worldigbocongress@yahoogroups.com; igbo_forum@yahoogroups.com; igboevents@yahoogroups.com; igboworldforum@yahoogroups.com; republicreport@; Emekaugwuonye@
                      > > > > > > > > From: odera.igbo@
                      > > > > > > > > Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011
                      16:36:22 -0700
                      > > > > > > > > Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] EFCC THUGS OR LAW ?
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > EFCC vs Emeka Ugwuonye â€" The Facts, The Latest Intrigues
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > '''We arrested four former governors and they are not talking, Emeka was arrested and released in May and he started attacking us. By the time we keep him here for two years we will know how he will get the money to pay his lawyers�, the source fumed. Adding: â€Å"we will stop him from talking.'
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > Written by Daniel Elombah
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > Saturday, 29 October 2011 15:57
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > Is EFCC a corrupt incompetent organisation that simply arrests people for propaganda purposes, and to simply re-assure foreign donors that "we are working"? Has Nigeria’s primary anti-corruption agency been turned into a debt collection agency? Or are they a willing tool for the powerful to oppressor the weak in the Nigeria society? Is the EFCC a tool for whichever government in power to muzzle the opposition? Is Francis Nzeribe
                      > > > > > > > > correct when he said: "What I quarrel with EFCC and ICPC's operation, is that these bodies are terribly incompetent, docile, compromised and almost as corrupt as the corruption they should fight."
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > Let me start this analysis by quoting, Kola Dafe, a commentator on Elombah.com:
                      > > > > > > > > He said: â€Å"EFCC have no reason to re-arrest Attorney Emeka Ugwuonye on the basis of the complaint alleged to have been made by a client of Emeka's law firm based in the U.S. If EFCC were to be helpful to the complainant, they should have advised him/her to seek redress through the American Bar Association�.
                      > > > > > > > > As a Lawyer in the UK, I am quite aware that if any client of mine feels that I have dealt inappropriately with any funds paid into a client account, he has the Solicitors Regulation Authority to run to, and the SRA always looking for opportunity to deal with African lawyers will only be too happy to strike my name of the rolls if I am found liable, and the UK Police will not
                      hesitate to jail me if any crime was found to have been committed.
                      > > > > > > > > Kola also said: â€Å"But because EFCC is an "instrument of intimidation", it was tempted (I will say co-opted) to put its dirty nose into the matter over which the whole of Nigeria has no jurisdiction. With the heavy workload that EFCC has to cope with, it is unbelievable it has time to act as a private debt collector. Didn’t the Attorney-General of the Federation recently decide that EFCC should drop some high profile cases of corruption, looting and bank robberies purely on cost grounds. Even the $1.5M case for which EFCC has been "hunting" Emeka here and everywhere could easily have been dealt with inside the U.S. If the Nigerian Embassy has a case, why didn't they prosecute it within U.S. jurisdiction?�
                      > > > > > > > > I
                      say to Kola, EFCC has effectively turned themselves into high-handed debt collectors in Nigeria. I have heard stories of debtors inarcerated in EFCC gulag for years - some have even died in EFCC cells - because they were unable to pay either debt, or bribes demanded by EFCC operatives. But that is a story for another day, I am still gathering my facts on this issue.
                      > > > > > > > > Evidently, Kola is also unaware that the Nigerian Embassy had lodged a complaint on this same issue with the Washington DC Bar and lost. The Council threw out their petition, saying they were unable to meet neither the minimum nor intermediate ethical standard that would prompt them to take action.
                      > > > > > > > > The Bar Council advised the Embassy to seek remedies in the US civil court where the required onus; civil preponderance of evidence may avail them. The Council further advised that it would be futile to seek
                      remedies in a criminal court where the standard of proof would be â€Å"beyond reasonable doubt�.
                      > > > > > > > > The Embassy took the advice and too Emeka to a Maryland Court, where the civil matter is still pending.
                      > > > > > > > > I saw a copy of the DC Bar Council decision with my own eyes.
                      > > > > > > > > Kola continued: â€Å"Apparently, they need a bully and the typical Nigerian brutal system of justice to deal with Emeka. It is time to let modern legal process prevail. The amount of dollars involved is so insignificant compared to the Billions in US Dollars and Naira that EFCC was set up to recover for Nigeria from the Serial Looters of Treasuries and Banks who run the "Show" in Abuja�.
                      > > > > > > > > EFCC vs Emeka Ugwuonye:
                      Latest Intrigues
                      > > > > > > > > The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, again Friday failed to arraign American Lawyer re-arrested on Wednesday after he attended the Federal High Court, Abuja. They also refused to release him because he refused to surrender his passport. Attorney Ephraim Emeka Ugwuonye flew in from his base in the United States last week to defend himself in the two charges previously preferred against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC in two different courts.
                      > > > > > > > > Emeka would have been released yesterday if he had surrendered his passport. Told that the EFCC told Emeka to surrender his passport before they could release him, His counsel wondered why, and for what purpose should he release his passport?
                      > > > > > > > > If EFCC want to seize his passport, they should apply to the courts, he said.
                      > > > > > > > > EFCC sources speaking anonymously told Elombah.com they wanted to teach Emeka a lesson for â€Å"making noise�.
                      > > > > > > > > â€Å"We arrested four former governors and they are not talking, Emeka was arrested and released in May and he started attacking us. By the time we keep him here for two years we will know how he will get the money to pay his lawyers�, the source fumed. Adding: â€Å"we will stop him from talking.
                      > > > > > > > > Asked why they brought Emeka down to Lagos, the EFCC source said that is â€Å"where we have friendly judges.�
                      > > > > > > > > â€Å"We own Lagos judges and we own the courts in
                      Lagos�, he said
                      > > > > > > > > â€Å"We will stop him from talking...now we have succeeded in keeping him here over the weekend, and next week there will probably be a public holiday, so he will stay with us for some more time...why didn't he surrender his passport as he agreed to do yesterday?�.
                      > > > > > > > > Ugwuonye was re-arrested Wednesday in Abuja and taken to Lagos. On Wednesday, Elombah.com asked EFCC Spokesman, Femi Babafemi why Emeka is being taken to Lagos, we were told it's because they intend to arraign him in Lagos. EFCC assured Emeka will be arraigned in court "next morning" (Thursday), but that failed to happen.
                      > > > > > > > > Again, Femi could not explain why the arraignment failed to hold Thursday and Friday as promised. Emeka's lawyers say the implication is
                      their client will now be held beyond the constitutional 24 hours, making his detention henceforth, illegal.
                      > > > > > > > > Speaking to elombah.com on Friday, Emeka’s legal counsel wondered why EFCC â€Å"is harassing this young man� after promising to release him yesterday!
                      > > > > > > > > â€Å"What happened yesterday with them arresting Emeka after he was told that they needed to interview him was a blatant and senseless act of intimidation," His aide said.
                      > > > > > > > > "Seizing his passport while releasing him is meaningless because Emeka lives in the United States. they knew he was coming to court this wee, why didn't they prepare an arrest warrant, or charge him to court immediately?", he queried.
                      > > > > > > > > Nigerian
                      Lawyers speaking to elombah.com wondered why EFCC should arrest the lawyer again when two Courts in Nigeria has already granted him bail in May this year and allowed him to return to America.
                      > > > > > > > > Emeka was in court Tuesday to defend himself against a charge of failing to declare his assets to the EFCC. He was in court again Wednesday to defend himself against the $1.5m charge. It was after the court session Wednesday morning that he was re-arrested.
                      > > > > > > > > The American based lawyer was accused of withholding $1.5 million belonging to Nigerian Embassy in the United States.
                      > > > > > > > > He had always maintained his innocence claiming the Embassy officials are merely using the EFCC to with-hunt him for refusing to give a $500,000 bribe demanded by the Embassy officials.
                      > > > > > > > > Speaking to elombah.com, EFCC
                      Spokesman, Femi Babafemi said EFFC rearrested Mr Ugwuonye on because of a petition filed against Mr Ugwuonye by one Mrs Sola Adeeyo over alleged diversion of $94,000 kept in a â€Å"Client Trust Account� in Ugwuonye’s Law Firm.
                      > > > > > > > > But sources close to Emeka Ugwuonye said the new charge reflects desperation on the part of the EFCC. â€Å"They have realised they cannot us the government charge of the $1.5m to get him, so they fabricated this spurious charge of $94,000 to make it appear as if Emeka has a case with private individuals and not the government�, they said.
                      > > > > > > > > In February this year, EFCC leaked information to the Press, that Emeka need to be held for 2 months without charge because of several petitions coming up
                      against him. This petition by Sola Adeeyo was mentioned among the â€Å"several petitions�.
                      > > > > > > > > It was widely reported in local dailies, including on Elombah.com
                      > > > > > > > > Observers wonder why this same Adeeyo's petition was not added in the original charge if there is any substance to it.
                      > > > > > > > > The Nigeria authorities "desperately want to subdue and silence him using the same desperate and discredited methods....They ratcheted up the rumor about him stealing some 94,000USD�, Emeka’s friends claim.
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > EFCC Press Statement: US Based Lawyer, Ugwuonye Faces Fresh Fraud Charges …As Trial Begins In $1.5 Million
                      Scam Case â€" By Femi Babafemi, Head, Media & Publicity - 26 October 2011
                      > > > > > > > > A US based Nigerian lawyer, Emeka Ugwuonye who is facing a criminal charge of diverting $1.5 million USD federal government funds has been arrested by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC over fresh charges of stealing and diverting funds belonging to his client.
                      > > > > > > > > The embattled lawyer who is already facing two criminal cases before a Federal High Court and an FCT High Court, Abuja is to be arraigned before a Lagos High Court, Lagos on a two count criminal charge tomorrow, Thursday.
                      > > > > > > > > According to a petition which is the basis of the lawyer’s latest trouble, Ugwuonye was said to have sometime in 2007 collected the sum of $94,948.00 (Ninety Four thousand, Nine Hundred and Forty eight
                      US Dollars) on behalf of his client then, Sola Adeeyo . Rather than remit the funds to Adeeyo, he was said to have converted the said amount to personal use while all efforts to make him refund the money to his client proved abortive.
                      > > > > > > > > Meanwhile the EFCC on Tuesday opened one of its cases against Ugwuonye before a federal high court over failure to declare his assets during investigations into the alleged diversion of $1.5 million USD federal government fund.
                      > > > > > > > > At the resumed hearing of the case, prosecution counsel, Festus Keyamo called the first and only prosecution witness Abdullahi Idris Alaiya to the dock to give evidence through which the prosecution tendered three documents namely: the petition from the Nigerian Ambassador to the US, Prof Ade Adefuye, the voluntary statement the accused wrote while in the custody of the EFCC and the blank declaration of assets form
                      which the accused refused filling while in custody.
                      > > > > > > > > The trial judge, Justice Adamu Bello admitted all the documents as exhibits in the case and adjourned the matter to the 16th of December,2011 for cross examination of the witness by the defence.When the $1.5 million fraud case came up at the FCT high court on Wednesday, the matter was adjourned to January 26th 2012 for hearing .
                      > > > > > > > >
                      > > > > > > > > EFCC vs UGWUONYE: THE KNOWN FACTS
                      > > > > > > > > The US Embassy Claim
                      > > > > > > > > On November 9, 2010, the Embassy of the Government of Nigeria filed a federal law suit in the United States District Court against Attorney Ugwuonye and other lawyers asserting that he illegally converted approximately $1.6 million from an IRS refund related to the sale of a $26 million dollar property on 16th
                      Street in Northwest Washington, D.C.
                      > > > > > > > > Prior to that, the embassy has laid a malpractice complaint against Emeka Ugwunye before the DC Bar Council. But the Council ruled that the charge of legal malpractice was not proved.
                      > > > > > > > > In February 2011, Nigeria’s Ambassador to the United States (US) Prof. Ade Adefuye presented the EFCC with documents relating to the sale of five houses belonging to the Nigerian Mission and the diversion of $1.35million allegedly paid as tax.
                      > > > > > > > > Adefuye told the EFCC that he â€Å"inherited the case and reported it to the EFCC to avoid any legal web for the nation.� and he has also made some useful documents available to the EFCC.
                      > > > > > > > > â€Å"He (Adefuye) gave
                      in-depth details of how the business was transacted and the issues emanating from it.
                      > > > > > > > > From documents made available by Adefuye, the houses which were located in Maryland and Washington DC, were sold between 2005 and 2007.
                      > > > > > > > > Adefuye insists that â€Å"So far, it has been difficult to ascertain how much was the total sum realized from the sale and what was remitted to the Nigerian Embassy in the US or the Federal Government.
                      > > > > > > > > â€Å"And even what the suspect claimed he gave to the Embassy or the Federal Government was less tax of $1.350, 000.
                      > > > > > > > > â€Å"But the Embassy later found out that diplomatic missions do not pay tax. And when this fact was made available to the suspect, he said he would fight for the refund of the
                      tax.
                      > > > > > > > > â€Å"When the suspect got the tax refund, he failed to remit it to the Embassy or the Federal Government. This is where the suspect’s pr

                      (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
                    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
                    »
                    «