Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

#5030 - Sat/Sun September 21/22, 2013 - Editor: Dustin LindenSmith

Expand Messages
  • dustin999
    #5030 - Sat/Sun September 21/22, 2013 - Editor: Dustin LindenSmith The Nonduality Highlights • http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NDhighlights/
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 22, 2013
      #5030 - Sat/Sun September 21/22, 2013 - Editor: Dustin LindenSmith

      The Nonduality Highlights • http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NDhighlights/ 

      Some of the world's celebs have been slipped something in their water. Last week it was Russell Brand, and this week it's comedian Louis C.K., in this 4-min clip from Conan which unexpectedly went very deep in response to a question about why he doesn't let his kids own smartphones:


      He asserts that smartphones are toxic for kids because he thinks they don't allow them to build empathy and interpersonal skills; he objects to kids communicating with each other via their smartphones more often than face-to-face, person-to-person, and in real life, where they can see the immediate consequences of their actions if they insult a kid or say mean things to them.

      However, he soon slips into a sort of quiet place when he describes how smartphones essentially prevent you from experiencing the present moment, just as it is. He has a darkly comedic way of looking at it (and it comes across funnier when you hear him say it in the interview), but it came across to me like a pretty nice definition of nonduality in practice, as it were; I think even the gifted Conan O'Brien was a little reticent about letting him go into such abstract philosophical territory for a late-night talk show like his:
      You need to build an ability to just be yourself and not be doing something. That's what the phones are taking away, is the ability to just sit there. That's being a person. Because underneath everything in your life there is that thing, that emptyâ€"forever empty. That knowledge that it's all for nothing and that you're alone. It's down there.
      A long-form interview I heard with Louis C.K. on comedian Marc Maron's WTF podcast a couple years ago underlined the impression for me that Louis C.K. has a more enlightened worldview than some of the other celebrities I'm aware of. There's something in his constitution that makes him, and probably the world's best stand-up comics along with him, look more deeply inward than regular folks. If you've ever watched his stand-up comedy, it's also evident that Louis is utterly unafraid to look deeply at the dirtiest, saddest parts of him that he can find, and then dredge them up on stage to work them out in front of his audience. A peculiar gift, that. But one which I appreciate deeply.

      ​This next bit comes from Dan, who's building up a nice little following on Facebook and YouTube with his irreverent, funny take on the modern nonduality scene. His stage name needs to be said aloud to understand the joke of it. ​
      The people harboring the “I need to attain Enlightenment to escape suffering” delusion seek help from the people harboring the “I’ve Awakened and attained Enlightenment” delusion. The people harboring the “I’ve Awakened and attained Enlightenment” delusion feel the desire to help those harboring the “I need to attain Enlightenment to escape suffering” delusion.

      So they gather together and those harboring the “I’ve Awakened and attained Enlightenment” delusion sit in front of the people harboring the “I need to attain Enlightenment to escape suffering” delusion and the person sitting in front, the one harboring the “I’ve Awakened and attained Enlightenment” delusion, talks about how their delusion is superior to the delusion of the people harboring the “I need to attain Enlightenment to escape suffering” delusion.

      Then the people sitting in the audience, the ones harboring the “I need to attain Enlightenment to escape suffering” delusion ask questions of those sitting in front, the ones harboring the “I’ve Awakened and attained Enlightenment” delusion, until they all come to an agreement on the most desirable delusion to harbor.

      ~From “Satsangs for Dummies” by Braying Jack Cass (via Facebook)​

      If you're interested in hearing more from Dan/Jack, you can hear an interview Jerry did with him in late 2012 + access his YouTube channel through the following link:


      F​or my official "Highlights of the Highlights" today, I've selected an interesting article by Deepak Chopra from a close-to-New-Year's edition in 2012 compiled by Jerry. In it, Chopra describes ​how modern worldviews are not supporting a dualistic outlook as much as they used to, particularly around the division between body and mind in medical and other contexts. Jerry points out that Chopra's use of the word "non-dual" is reflective of how mainstream the term has become, especially within the past 10-15 years. ​

      I hope anyone who has been around us since the 90s recognizes what incredibly cool, leading-edge​ early-adopter​s ​you and ​we all were with this stuff.


      #4474 - Friday, January 6, 2012 - Editor: Jerry Katz
      The Nonduality Highlights - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NDhighlights

      This new article in the Huffington Post may be the first time Deepak Chopra has used the term "non-dual" in a high profile manner. Rather than the terms "nonduality" or "nondualism", he speaks of "non-dual consciousness." He realizes the term "non-dual" is non-friendly to most people, but that "consciousness" is familiar and vague enough to allow the reader to go to a comfortable and acceptable place "inside."
      This is why Chopra is a brilliant communicator to the general populace. He knows how to fuse the new and strange to the old and familiar. He knows how to lead people from the old to the new. Rather than present the starkness/fullness of nonduality, about which nothing is granular, his teaching rests in what people can read about, learn about, feel, experience, get involved in, even worry about for gosh sakes, namely science, namely mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being.
      By presenting the unknowable through the rungs of the known, he leads people to an understanding of nonduality. Few may know the falling down of the ladder that brings them to that understanding. Yet Chopra does what he is called to do, what any of us are called to do, which is to talk about what we can't help talking about, which is Truth (or whatever you want to call it). We each talk about Truth in our own silly way, whether through essays, poetry, art, science, dance, sculpture, raising a family, selling insurance, etc.
      Perhaps Chopra sees 2012 as the year of non-dual consciousness for the spirituality mass populace. Longtime readers of the Highlights have not only known about non-dual consciousness for quite a while, we've even had a nonduality community online and in person since 1998. But Chopra isn't talking about community. He's speaking to individuals.
      I wrote on nonduality.com http://nonduality.com/lrn.htm that 2011 would be the year nonduality hits the mainstream: "Nonduality is headed to the major mainstream. When? I'm writing this in late 2010. It could be any day, literally. It wouldn't surprise me to see the major mainstreaming of nonduality in 2011. "
      Gimme a break. So I was off by like four days.
      Here's Chopra's article:

      A New Year, and Possibly a New World
      by Deepak Chopra

      Posted: 1/4/12 09:10 AM ET

      It's fascinating, as time turns another small corner, to think of how worlds shift and collide. There is no evidence that a person as brilliant as Shakespeare understood that Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo had already revolutionized the human mind. The same thing may be happening now, and many brilliant people seem unaware of how our present-day world -- meaning our conception of reality -- may undergo a seismic shift.
      I'm not thinking of fossil fuels and Arab uprisings, not even of the 99 percent as against the 1 percent. Upheavals in the outer world are secondary, in the long sweep of history, to inner revolutions. We may be on the verge of such a one. What makes me think so is a trickle of medical articles, now greatly expanding, that are proving troublesome to mainstream medicine. These articles sometimes deal with cancer, sometimes with antidepressants, sometimes with the dashed hopes for gene therapies that seem constantly out of reach.
      What these articles have in common is that treating the body like a machine isn't panning out. The next breakthrough in cancer or psychotherapy or genetically-related disorders may come from an entirely different angle than the workaday materialism that "of course" looks at our bodies as physical objects like any other. That "of course" is the mark of a settled worldview. God "of course" created the world in seven days and the soul "of course" was more important than the body, which was a temporary shell while the soul worked its way through this vale of tears.
      When settled worldviews crumble, we have to reinvent the world. So far, there have been only three categories from which to construct reality from the ground up.
      1. Dualism, which separates mind and body.
      2. Non-dual materialism, which considers only physical things and excludes the spiritual, mystical and supernatural.
      3. Non-dual consciousness, which traces reality back to mind and beyond mind to the very potential for mind.
      Dualism no longer satisfies professional thinkers. Putting mind in one box and the body in another settles no questions about either. We are left with half a loaf, unable to say anything reliable about pure mind but also unable to connect the subtle way that the body responds to thoughts and feelings. Yet curiously, the average person is a flaming, if secret, dualist. We compartmentalize our lives in countless ways. God belongs on Sunday, the material world dominates the rest of the week. We treat our bodies sensibly, yet when a mortal illness threatens, it's time to pray. This kind of compartmentalism is understandable, but in the long run it's frustrating, as witness the countless people who feel anxious and empty in their search for higher meaning.
      The same complaint could be aimed at non-dual materialism, but science, which is totally materialistic, has won a resounding victory on many fronts. Therefore, it's an easy slide into believing that the scientific worldview must be correct. Non-dual materialism leaves no room for anything that cannot be turned into data. So it is incompatible with God, spirit, the soul and even the mind. The average person has bought into the notion, publicized constantly by the media, that the mind is the brain. After all, we can now watch the brain in real time as a person experiences love, faith, compassion and all other "higher" experiences that once belonged to the mind and the soul. But watching the brain at work is like watching an old tube radio light up when Beethoven is played. It would be naive to say that the radio composed Beethoven's music. Yet just as naively non-dual materialists see no reason to look beyond the brain for an invisible thing labeled as mind.
      This is the worldview that is crumbling while seeming to rise victoriously higher. Termites are silently chewing at the timbers. One notices this by being attuned to articles about the failures of the materialistic approach. Contrary to popular hopes, materialism cannot explain cancer or depression. It cannot tell you why talking to somebody can help your free-floating anxiety while tranquilizers may fail. Materialism sidesteps the mounting problem of side effects and the long-term damage to the brain from decades of taking psychotropic drugs. Materialism cannot explain what memory is, where it is stored on the cellular level, or why memories haunt us. There are many, many failures of this kind, and even in a field far removed from medicine like physics, peering into the void that gave rise to the physical universe has posed huge explanatory problems.
      Which leaves the third worldview, non-dual consciousness, that is all but invisible on the scene. It has been invisible for a long time, certainly in the Judeo-Christian West, where only a handful of obscure names like Spinoza, Giordano Bruno, and Meister Eckhart flirted with the idea that all is one, and that "one" is consciousness. Today, some farseeing speculative thinkers in physics are coping with the possibility that we live in a conscious universe. A tiny handful of neuroscientists are grappling with the possibility that the mind controls the brain and not vice versa. It's exciting fun to be part of this splinter group, especially if you relish the scorn of experts who inform you that "of course" you are completely off your rocker, a charlatan or a crypto religionist.
      What the scorn masks is that "of course" will be thrown out the window if a new worldview takes hold. That's what happened to the idea that "of course" God created the world according to Genesis. But the non-dual consciousness that was dominant 3,000 years ago in Vedic India cannot return as it once was formulated. The modern world isn't about to throw science out the window. Instead, science must expand, so that we look at cancer, depression or the Big Bang and say, "Now I see." (In particular, the mind-body connection with cancer needs exploring, as we will do in a later post.) A worldview succeeds when it explains more than the old one, when it opens people's eyes and when it achieves practical results. In the next post, we'll touch on how non-dual consciousness can do all those things.
      To be continued
      For more by Deepak Chopra, click here:
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.