117Re: $250K for Mystic Crossing!!!!!!!
- Feb 2 5:41 PMThe EPA staff (Steven Viggiani and Catherine Smith) deserve a lot of
credit here, and a hearty thanks. It is their job to work on such
settlements, sure, but I know they've put in an effort above and
beyond a simple execution of their jobs. I am proud to have helped,
as I could, from the citizen side.
As I leared when it all became public, this was a complex multi-party
deal, and not a small one. The projects had to be likely to generate
good press. The powerplant, EPA adminstrators, commuter rail
operations, DCR, school district and towns all had to agree. The deal
could easily have unraveled. The powerplant actually paid a higher
effective fine by voluntarily choosing to support these worthy
You can learn more about the type of settlement that was reached at:
And you can suggest other projects for future consideration. In our
case bringing people down to the banks helps create a constiuency to
help clean up the river. And the dam crossing makes a lot of "smart
growth" sense, in that it will create destinations best walked or
-Bryce "quite pleased" Nesbitt
--- In MysticCrossing@yahoogroups.com, smith.catherine@e... wrote:
> You owe Bryce Nesbitt a great big thanks for his quiet advocacy with the
> EPA. Janet Kovner of the Mystic River Watershed Association and Dan
> Driscoll of the DCR also have been great advocates for expanding the
> network of Mystic River paths -- and this piece in particular. Sorry we
> had to keep it so secret, but enforcement settlements are confidential
> until lodged with the court. I was working with Bryce on another
> project when he brought the Mystic crossing project to EPA's attention.
> Steven Viggiani is the EPA attorney who negotiated the Mystic Exelon
> case with the Mystic Exelon attorneys (who, to their credit, were very
> enthusiastic about the project). It was crucial to know that there was
> a lot of community support for the project, so we have been reading your
> emails for the last few months with glee!
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>