Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

As more Americans die in Iraq, The Toronto Star says, "Pentagon keeps dead out of sight"

Expand Messages
  • Tarek Fatah
    Friends, Today s downing of a Chinook Helicopter near Fallujah and the death of 15 GIs coincides with a Toronto Star report carrying the pictures of other US
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 2, 2003

      Today's downing of a Chinook Helicopter near Fallujah and the death of 15
      GIs coincides with a Toronto Star report carrying the pictures of other US
      soldiers, including two Colonels, who died in Iraq. It is a full page
      front-page report on how the Bush team is trying to hide US casualties from
      the American people.

      Excellent expose of the deceit and fraud that is the hallmark of the war on

      Tarek Fatah
      Nov. 2, 2003. 01:00 AM

      America's Unknown Soldiers: Pentagon keeps dead out of sight
      Bush team doesn't want people to see human cost of war. Even body bags are
      now sanitized as `transfer tubes'

      The Toronto Star

      WASHINTON--Charles H. Buehring came home last week. He arrived at the air
      force base in Dover, Del., in the middle of the night, in an aluminum
      shipping case draped in an American flag. When the military truck drove his
      remains across the tarmac, workers paused and removed their hats.

      He was met by a six-member honour guard acting as pallbearers, to allow a
      "dignified transfer" to the Charles C. Carson mortuary, where he became one
      of an estimated 60,000 American casualties of war that have been processed
      there over almost five decades.

      "It reminds us we are at war," says Lt.-Col. Jon Anderson, who describes
      business at the Dover mortuary as "steady."

      But America never saw Lt.-Col. Buehring's arrival, days after a rocket from
      a homemade launcher ended his life at age 40 in Baghdad's heavily fortified
      Rasheed Hotel last Monday.

      Americans have never seen any of the other 359 bodies returning from Iraq.
      Nor do they see the wounded cramming the Walter Reed Army Medical Centre in
      Washington or soldiers who say they are being treated inhumanely awaiting
      medical treatment at Fort Stewart, Ga.

      In order to continue to sell an increasingly unpopular Iraqi invasion to the
      American people, President George W. Bush's administration sweeps the messy
      parts of war - the grieving families, the flag-draped coffins, the soldiers
      who have lost limbs - into a far corner of the nation's attic.

      No television cameras are allowed at Dover. Bush does not attend the
      funerals of soldiers who gave their lives in his war on terrorism.

      Buehring of Winter Springs, Fla., described as "a great American" by his
      commanding officer, had two sons, 12 and 9, was active in the Boy Scouts and
      his church and had served his country for 18 years. No government official
      has said a word publicly about him. If stories of wounded soldiers are told,
      they are told by hometown papers, but there is no national attention given
      to the recuperating veterans here in the nation's capital.

      More than 1,700 Americans have been wounded in Iraq since the March

      "You can call it news control or information control or flat-out
      propaganda," says Christopher Simpson, a communications professor at
      Washington's American University. "Whatever you call it, this is the most
      extensive effort at spinning a war that the department of defence has ever
      undertaken in this country." Simpson notes that photos of the dead returning
      to American soil have historically been part of the ceremony, part of the
      picture of conflict and part of the public closure for families - until now.

      "This White House is the greatest user of propaganda in American history and
      if they had a shred of honesty, they would admit it. But they can't."

      Lynn Cutler, a Democratic strategist and former official in Bill Clinton's
      White House, says this is the first time in history that bodies have been
      brought home under cover of secrecy. "It feels like Vietnam when Lyndon
      Johnson was accused of hiding the body bags ....

      "This is a big government and a big Pentagon and they could have someone
      there to meet these bodies as they come back to the country."

      But today's military doesn't even use the words "body bags" - a term in
      common usage during the Vietnam War, when 58,000 Americans died. During the
      1991 Persian Gulf War, the Pentagon began calling them "human remains
      pouches" and it now refers to them as "transfer tubes."

      One term that has crept into the U.S. military lexicon, however, is the
      "Dover test," shorthand for the American public's tolerance for wartime
      fatalities. The policy of banning cameras at Dover dates back to the 1991
      Gulf War, under Bush's father, Pentagon officials say.

      But it has been unevenly applied: You can see photos of soldiers' bodies
      returning in coffins from Afghanistan at Ramstein airbase in Germany.

      Clinton met returning coffins from Kosovo and, in an elaborate ceremony, was
      on hand for the arrival of the bodies of his former commerce secretary
      Ronald Brown 32 others killed in a 1996 plane crash. Pictures were allowed
      of incoming caskets after the terrorist attack on the USS Cole in 2000 and
      President George H.W. Bush helped eulogize Americans killed in Panama and

      But last March, a directive came down reaffirming the banning of cameras,
      likely in anticipation of the sheer volume of casualties being repatriated.

      At Dover, Lt.-Col. Anderson says the policy is strictly in place to respect
      the privacy of the families, although he is well aware that there are those
      who think it was a political decision. "The administration has clearly made
      an attempt to limit the attention that would build up if they were showing
      Dover every day," says Joseph Dawson, a military historian at Texas A & M

      The White House policy works - to a point. If there are no pictures of
      caskets being delivered to U.S. airbases, citizens don't think of them,
      analysts say.

      Dawson says television pictures of the wounded at Walter Reed would be a
      jolt to Americans as they head out to dinner or are thinking of the week's
      NFL matchups. Right now, he says, they likely equate war casualties with
      highway accidents: They know both kill and don't need to see graphic photos.

      "The administration may have to come to grips with this in the months to
      come. This strategy depends on how long this war goes on. I have to wonder
      whether it might be a good idea to have a monthly remembrance to reflect on
      how this campaign is going." The need for reflection in America is
      important, Dawson says, because the country seems to have lapsed back into a
      state of complacency. "The country should be asking whether these men and
      women are putting their lives on the line for a justifiable purpose."

      The Bush strategy, he says, is to divert focus from the dead and the wounded
      until - or if - his administration's policy can be judged a winner, then
      laud the men and women who gave their lives for freedom. But it is really
      rooted in the perception in some quarters that the media cost the U.S. the
      Vietnam War.

      There are parallels between Vietnam and Iraq in the words used by the
      president and in media coverage, even if there is so far no comparison in
      duration or casualties.

      Whereas Lyndon Johnson and his top general, William Westmoreland, spoke of
      "steady and encouraging success" in Vietnam when they knew differently, Bush
      last week said the car bombing of the Red Cross showed the "progress" of the
      American campaign because insurgents were becoming more desperate.

      Johnson called U.S. bombing missions "limited in scale" or "commensurate
      with need" and groused about news coverage. Bush also says the national
      media are not telling the truth and keeps implying the war in Iraq is needed
      to prevent another attack on U.S. soil.

      Also like the Vietnam era, more attention is being given to U.S. victims the
      longer the conflict drags on. The Associated Press last week ran the names
      and hometowns of all victims since the Iraq invasion began. In 1969, Life
      magazine published a famous, black-covered edition consisting entirely of
      portraits of 250 young Americans who died in Vietnam in one routine week.

      Dawson remembers, because his parents cancelled their subscription.

      Television images of American soldiers in combat interrupted Americans'
      dinners nightly during the Vietnam War. Clinton took his troops out of
      Somalia after a photo by the Toronto Star's Paul Watson, showing crowds
      cheering as a dead American soldier was dragged through the streets of
      Mogadishu, was beamed around the world on news wires. Increasing casualties
      in Iraq have had no such dramatic effect on Bush, but that could change if
      more attention is paid to the wounded coming home and the way they are being

      Walter Reed officials did not return calls seeking comment, but the crush of
      casualties in late summer was such that outpatients had to be referred to
      hotels in nearby Silver Spring, Md., because the hospital was full.

      The Washington Times said the hospital had treated about 1,700 patients from
      Operation Iraqi Freedom. "Rarely have we seen so many young patients at one
      time," a spokesperson said.

      Montana soldier Adam McLain, recovering from injuries when a military Humvee
      drove over his leg and head in Baghdad, told the newspaper from his hospital
      bed: "I didn't realize how many people were without limbs or without eyes.
      It's just depressing. I feel lucky. I have all my limbs."

      The situation at Walter Reed and the administration's perceived indifference
      were highlighted last week by Cher, who visited troops there, then called an
      open-line show on C-SPAN, the U.S. network that broadcasts congressional
      debates and other political events.

      She did not initially identify herself. "Why are Cheney, Wolfowitz, Bremer,
      the president - why aren't they taking pictures with these guys?" she
      demanded, referring to Vice-President Dick Cheney, Deputy Defence Secretary
      Paul Wolfowitz and the civilian administrator in Iraq, L. Paul Bremer. "I
      don't understand why these guys are so hidden, why there are no pictures of

      Cher also criticized the media for ignoring the "devastatedly wounded."

      "Don't hide them," she said. "Let's have some news coverage where people are
      sitting and talking to these guys and seeing their spirit."

      For every Jessica Lynch, the wounded soldier who returned to a hero's
      welcome and a book and movie deal, there is a Shoshana Johnson. Johnson,
      shot through both legs and held prisoner in Iraq for 22 days, will receive
      30 per cent disability benefits, about $700 per month less than her
      colleague Lynch. Johnson is black, Lynch is white and the Johnson family
      says that is the difference.

      There is also an ongoing investigation into the condition of patients
      awaiting treatment at Fort Stewart, Ga., where hundreds of sick and wounded
      soldiers say they are languishing in dirty barracks waiting months for
      needed medical treatment. They say they must hobble across sand to the use
      the bathroom, are housed 60 to a barracks and must pay for their own toilet

      Only recently did the Senate successfully demand the White House stop
      charging wounded soldiers $8.10 per day for their hospital meals. Congress
      also had to step in to increase danger pay and separation pay for soldiers,
      as it appeared the Bush administration was set to let them expire on Sept.

      When Congress formally approved funding for military operations and
      reconstruction in Iraq, it carved Bush's request for $87 billion by about $2

      Much of that money will instead be spent - over White House objections - on
      improved health-care benefits for those in the military reserve and National
      Guard who are serving in Iraq.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.