Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [Michalak] Re: Tight Squeeze

Expand Messages
  • David Calloway
    I would think the bow is needed for wave piercing, but I m no expert. I recommend that you contact Jim before making changes..... I did and luckily he
    Message 1 of 5 , Nov 24, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      I would think the bow is needed for wave piercing, but I'm no expert. I
      recommend that you contact Jim before making changes..... I did and luckily
      he approved.

      dc
      On Nov 24, 2012 11:00 AM, "JeffreyM" <JMichalsbr@...> wrote:

      > **
      >
      >
      > I look at all Jim's Toto-inspired boats (Caprice has been in the news,
      > since one's for sale) and think it has a lot of wasted length. That
      > tremendous bow overhang seems like it wouldn't be hurt by knocking off a
      > foot, well above the waterline. I suppose it would be major ugly. But then
      > I'm all about the maximum of boat in the smallest package.
      >
      > --- In Michalak@yahoogroups.com, "okiebobby@..." <okiebobby@...> wrote:
      > >
      > > I received the Caroline plans in the mail today. It looks like she is
      > all of 18' feet not counting the rudder.
      > >
      > > I was sorta expecting her to be 18' including the rudder, so I was
      > thinking she would be about 17' without the rudder. Wrong! Like I said, I
      > assumed wrong (not the first time [or the last]). And to top it off, I
      > thought her beam was 5.5' instead of 6'; where I got that I don't have a
      > clue. Then to make things worse, I was thinking my current boat stored at
      > 5' wide, but I measured today and she is only taking up 4' of width in the
      > garage.
      > >
      > > The garage is where I'm going with this. And it looks like Caroline
      > would fit there, but snuggly. Snugger by a foot in each direction from my
      > initial ballpark estimations.
      > >
      > > So I still haven't decided if I lucked out or screwed-up.
      > >
      > > I like to keep the boat in the garage, and for a number of reasons, but
      > mostly since it is convenient to mess with. I've debated for a number of
      > years whether or not I should go with as much boat as the garage will hold,
      > or to go as small as I'm willing accept. I had come to the conclusion that
      > actually I want the longest boat the garage will hold, while going with the
      > narrowist boat I'm willing to accept. I've been homing in on about 5.5' of
      > beam, and at least 17' LOA.
      > >
      > > This may be just right, but I'm curious if building her at 95% might be
      > better for me. Surely 5% wouldn't cause too much trouble??? I could even
      > chop the end of the pointed nose off some, resulting in a pram look; that
      > bow looks like the nose would never touch water anyway? I sure don't like a
      > bow to bury.
      > >
      > > If I had any sense, I would just build it to spec and enjoy myself.
      > Yeah, that's what I need to do.
      > >
      > > Thanks guys for talking me through this.
      > >
      >
      >
      >


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.