28972Re: [Michalak] Oarlock question
- Jan 21, 2014I think it probably would; however I think I'd have to remove the motor in order to get it to fit. Not something I want to have to do if I'm just trying to get ashore.—
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:36 AM, john colley <Helliconia54@...> wrote:would a Yulloh (sweep oar) work on that design?http://wavepropulsion.blogspot.com.au/p/how-to-do-yulloh-remo-chino-tradicional.html"There is magic in the feel of a paddle and the movement of a canoe, a magic compounded of distance, adventure, solitude, and peace."
-Sigurd OlsonOn Monday, 20 January 2014 12:53 PM, Curran Bishop <curranb79@...> wrote:It's time to mount oarlocks on the AF4--as an emergency backup only--and I'm going to put oarlock sockets into the combing on the cockpit sides for standing rowing. I like the look of angle mount sockets (http://www.duckworksbbs.com/hardware/oarlocks/sd580620/index.htm), but that would require that the sockets sit at a slight angle to rearward. Were I to go with side mount sockets (http://www.duckworksbbs.com/hardware/oarlocks/sd580610/index.htm) I could fasten them to the combing closer to level (i.e. not run them parallel to the top face of the combing as the angle sockets would have to--of course this would break up the lines further, adding to my aesthetic preference for the angle sockets...). In trying to pantomime the rowing motion with a slightly angled oarlock I don't think it will be a problem, but wanted to check if anyone had tried it and found a slight angle to be a problem.
--Curran BishopPastor, Grace Presbyterian Church, Carbondale624 N. Oakland St.Carbondale, IL 62901
phone: 70.pastor.10 or 618.305.5725
" 'Round our boat be God's aboutness,
'er we try the depth of sea,
egg-shell frail for all her stoutness
unless Thou her helmsman be."
-- Old Scottish Prayer
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>