- Fimbres, Edmund Eugene Flanders Sonora Mexico. Haplogroup R1b-P312, Most prevalent in Western Europe. See these YDNA 13 of 14 cluster of 13 matches to 6 of 100Message 1 of 55 , Aug 3, 2013View Source
Fimbres, Edmund Eugene Flanders>Sonora Mexico. Haplogroup R1b-P312, Most prevalent in Western Europe. See these YDNA 13 of 14 cluster of 13 matches to 6 of 100 Albania [Albanian], 1 of 587 Buenos Aires, Argentina [Admixed], 1 of 100 Bosnia and Herzegovina [Bosnian], 1 of 115 Rennes, France [French], 1 of 1078 Australia [European], 1 of 220 Central Croatia, Croatia [Croatian], 1 of 220 North Croatia, Croatia [Croatian] & 1 of 220 West Croatia, Croatia [Croatian] in this - YHRD database search. See this YDNA 28 of 29 marker match to a Fimbres in Sonora Mexico and another in an unspecified area of Mexico in this (log in first then click the following link) - SMGF database search. Oldest Ydna ancestor - Juan de Fimbres b. 1625. I've (Edmund Eugene Fimbres) determined that the Fimbres name comes from Juan de Fimbres (circa 1650) a Flamenco (Fleming) silk merchant living in Bilboa Spain (Basque country). The Fimbres name in the americas originates in Sonora where they self identified as Basque as would be expected. They are now in CA, AZ, Sonora and Baja Calfornia. Email Edmund Eugene Fimbres
Mexico DNA Project Admin.
- Thanks Joel, could you please find out what the percentage breakdown is for Euro DNA in the American populations of the North, Central and South as well as theMessage 55 of 55 , Nov 22, 2013View SourceThanks Joel,
could you please find out what the percentage breakdown is for Euro DNA in the American populations of the North, Central and South as well as the Na Dene speakers?
--- In MexicoDNAProject@yahoogroups.com, JOEL SR <hrjoel3@...> wrote:
> I have an email from Willerslev.Â Do you or anyone in the Mexico DNA have any questions they would like to ask Willerslev?
> I want to get input from Dr. Yates, Cherokee DNA Phase II Project, as well.
> Willerslev's research will have a majorÂ influence on the origin and what is used to determine who is Native American past and present.Â
> Joel K. Harris, Sr., Ph.D.
> From: "garyf@..." <garyf@...>
> >To: MexicoDNAProject@yahoogroups.com
> >Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 5:31 AM
> >Subject: [MexicoDNAProject] Re: R1b and the franco-cantabrian refuge
> >Joel SR.
> >here is the link to part of the paper:
> >If anyone has the full text please share it off line.--- In MexicoDNAProject@yahoogroups.com, JOEL SR wrote:>> Gary:> ÃÂ > New information on Native American origin. See copied information. Eurasians and Native Americans the same? Or like the wolf and the dog? The origin for some Native Americans?> ÃÂ > There is still a publication to be done by Science and Nature by Eske Willerslve.> ÃÂ > ÃÂ ÃÂ > > > Below is the link to the article:> http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/fossil-indicates-eurasian-roots-for-native-americans/2013/11/20/2777ac24-51fa-11e3-a7f0-b790929232e1_story.html?tid=pm_pop> > -- > > > Joel K. Harris, Sr., PHD.> > From: "garyf@" garyf@> >To: MexicoDNAProject@yahoogroups.com > >Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:06 AM> >Subject: [MexicoDNAProject] Re: R1b and the franco-cantabrian refuge> >> >ÃÂ > >> You have not provided proof that the people involved in the >archaeological finds, climate change,
> cultures, and geography were >part of the R1b haplogroup in any of the instances older than 5,000 bp. >You only proved that there were people there. Until it can be proven >that those people were R1b it has no bearing on the subject.ÃÂ > >>ÃÂ > >The idea here is not to provide proof since the answer is not definitively known but to provide evidence. For instance the current dispersal of R1b and the archaeological record of the recolonization of Europe show the same pattern.ÃÂ > >> >> >> I agree that there were very few people on the planet. However, they >weren't that isolated because the autosomal DNA of the Mesolothic >remains of people from Gotland, Sweden and the La BraÃÂ±a Cave were >very similar. These are points far from each other but very similar >people. The Neolithic remains of Oetzi and Gok4 has similar aDNA to >each other but they were also found in points far from each other. The >Mesolithic aDNA is different fom the Neolithic
> aDNA.ÃÂ >ÃÂ > >> >> >> >Yes of course the Mesolithic people were related and the Neolithic people were related but they were separated by many thousands of years of isolation and then expansion. What is the point here? Europe is relatively small place and there were migrations but numerical disadvantages is not going to leave a haploid DNA trail.ÃÂ > >> >> >> There is no proof that R1b people did not have boats. R1b seems to >have multiplied at a high rate about 4,000 years ago which is after the >arrival of the Neolithic farmers arrived. The R1b people would have >had metallurgy and boats 4,000-3,000 years ago to help them multiply >and travel at a faster rate than the non-R1b haplogroups in Iberia. >They easily could have used small boats to navigate rivers and >coastlines. Once they obtained chariots their spread and dominance >would have grown.> >> >> >How do Metallurgy and boats help you multiply and what makes you think R1b only had these
> advantages?> >> >> >> They easily could have used small boats to navigate rivers and >coastlines. Once they obtained chariots their spread and dominance >would have grown.> >> >> >This is what I meant by the idea that one mans DNA is better than anothers. What selective advantage did R1b have over other haplogroups?> >> >> >You have referenced peoples beliefs and that is not evidence.> >> >> >Spencer Wells has reiterated his support for the France Cantabrian Refugium recently and he is the one with the data from the genographic project.ÃÂ > >> >> >ÃÂ >Spaniards did not have better DNA but they were able to defeat the >Aztecs, even before disease devastated them, because they had >advantages. There were similar circumstances with R1b overtaking >G2a, G2a3, I2a, F, and E1bibi.> >> >> >There is a common misconception that the a few hundred Spaniards defeated the Meshica. ÃÂ I have read many books on the conquest from eye witness accounts and Native
> Americans defeated Native Americans with massive casualties due to disease. ÃÂ Cortes lived among the Meshica for 2 years before the effects of disease made it easy for Cortes and his Native American allies to come in and take over Tenochtitlan. ÃÂ If you go to the Coat of Arms page on my website you will see the crown awarded COA's to their Native American allies for their support in the conquest. The conquistadors found that the metal suits of armor were more of a hindrance after the Noche Triste. ÃÂ > >> >> >ÃÂ ÃÂ > >Gary> >Mexico DNA Project Admin.> >> >> >> >> >--- In MexicoDNAProject@yahoogroups.com, "mexr1b@" wrote:>> > > You have not provided proof that the people involved in the archaeological finds, climate change, cultures, and geography were part of the R1b haplogroup in any of the instances older than 5,000 bp. You only proved that there were people there. Until it can be proven that those people were R1b it has no bearing on the
> subject. > > > > > I agree that there were very few people on the planet. However, they weren't that isolated because the autosomal DNA of the Mesolothic remains of people from Gotland, Sweden and the La BraÃÂ±a Cave were very similar. These are points far from each other but very similar people. The Neolithic remains of Oetzi and Gok4 has similar aDNA to each other but they were also found in points far from each other. The Mesolithic aDNA is different fom the Neolithic aDNA. > > http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2012/07/bronze-age-indo-european-invasion-of.html> >> http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2012/10/assessment-of-ancient-european-dna-with.html> > Therefore, even in the Mesolithic there was plenty of travel and that has continued throughout history. There are other pieces of evidence that show for multiple waves of migration from east to west. Farming, dairy farming, different types of pottery, Copper Age items, Bronze Age items, changes in Y-DNA and
> mtDNA.> > There is no proof that R1b people did not have boats. R1b seems to have multiplied at a high rate about 4,000 years ago which is after the arrival of the Neolithic farmers arrived. The R1b people would have had metallurgy and boats 4,000-3,000 years ago to help them multiply and travel at a faster rate than the non-R1b haplogroups in Iberia. They easily could have used small boats to navigate rivers and coastlines. Once they obtained chariots their spread and dominance would have grown. Also, areas where PIE languages exist they are high in R1b and R1a> regions. Maps of the two overlap nicely. Metallurgy and Indo-European languages spread from the east to the west as did the R1b haplogroups. The topics of R1 haplogroups, metallurgy, and Indo-European languages are written about in Ancestral Journeys by Jean Manco. They were also were written about by Dienekes back in August 2012.
> http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2012/08/proto-indo-european-homeland-in.html> > < These studies were looking for the remains of farmers. The Mesolithic buried their dead on the open plain and in shallow graves. It should be self evident that one R-P312 man's Ydna would not survive in a population of I2 and G2 farmers.>> > Dienekes Pontikos pointed out the lack of R1 remains in blogpost I just referenced. http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2012/08/proto-indo-european-homeland-in.html> > Jean Manco, who has been a professor of history at Plymouth and Bristol universities, points out the lack of R1 remains in her Ancestral Journeys book> and has a site with a list of all ancient remains that have been tested for DNA. > http://www.ancestraljourneys.org/ancientdna.shtml> > She believes R1b arrived in western Europe in the Copper Age.> > Maciamo Hays of Eupedia has a map showing P312 first appearing somewhere near the Alps and mentions the lack of ancient R1b remains
> on his site. http://www.eupedia.com/images/content/R1b-migration-map.jpg> > In a recent conference that you might have attended Dr. Michael Hammer of FamilyTreeDNA said "he thought that if P311 is so frequent and widespread in Europe it must have been there a long time. However, it appears that he and most everyone else, was wrong. The hypothesis to be tested is if P311 originated prior to the Neolithic wave, it would predict higher diversity it the near east, closer to the origins of agriculture. If P311 originated after the expansion, would be able to see it migrate across Europe and it would have had to replace an existing> population."> > "Because we now have sequences the DNA of about 40 ancient DNA specimens, Michael turned to the ancient DNA literature....This evidence supports a recent spread of haplogroup R lineages in western Europe about 5K years ago. This also supports evidence that P311 moved into Europe after the Neolithic agricultural
> transition and nearly displaced the previously existing western European Neolithic Y, which appears to be G2a."> http://dna-explained.com/2013/11/12/2013-family-tree-dna-conference-day-2/> > Dr. Michael Hammer of FamilyTreeDNA put up a map similar to that of the map by Maciamo Hays.> http://www.ancestorcentral.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/8037.jpg> If the lack of R1b remains stands out as being important to these people I take it as being important myself. They surely feel, that until evidence of R1b haplogroups in western Europe prior to 5,000 year ago, the available data goes against the Franco-Cantabrian refugium theory.> > <> Tell us how one R-P312 Ydna man comes to dominate the Ydna that had been there for thousands of years since you are talking about large populations when you speak of technology, startegies, trade, diseases, religion etc.? The concept here is that one man's dna is better than anothers and this is hard to believe unless you are
> saying disease. >> > No, I never wrote that one man's DNA is better than others'. You have misinterpreted what I wrote. I am stating that a person with certain DNA happened to have things at his disposal that allowed him to have an advantage. I explained two advantages above Ã¢â¬" metallurgy and boats. An example, Spaniards did not have better DNA but they were able to defeat the Aztecs, even before disease devastated them, because they had advantages. There were similar circumstances with R1b overtaking G2a, G2a3, I2a, F, and E1bibi. > > > This is the prevailing theory:> https://www.23andme.com/you/haplogroup/paternal/> Locations of> haplogroup R1b circa 500 years ago, before the era of intercontinental travel.>> > I am sure Dr. Michael Hammer has had conversations with Spencer Wells and even so Dr. Michael Hammer no longer agrees with the Franco Iberian R1b theory proposed by Luigi Cavalli Sforza. I doesn't seem that it will be the prevailing theory
> for long.>> >>