267Re: [MexicoDNAProject] Census data vs. oral family history
- Jul 24 7:43 AMHola Teresa:Siyo tohiju Cherokee. The Cherokee occupied a large section of now Texas then Mexico with acceptance of the Mexican government. The Cherokee started a self removal to get away from the federal government in the early 1800's. The Cherokee also took there slaves with them. There is an argument within the current Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma over what is called "Freeman" enrolled members of the tribe. Slaves after the civil war. The Cherokee Nation fought on the side of the Confederacy. General Watty was the last Confederate general to surrender. They sided with the Confederacy to eliminate the use of reservations and have there own country.I have Mexican Indians in my Family Finder as Flores, Montoya, Amador, Torres, Valdez etc.. and with my new Y DNA 12 I have Spaniards as Sandoval and Lopez from Spain.My great grandfather on my grandmothers side was Peter Beard B 1850, Cherokee, from Louisiana. There was a great mixture of African and Indian and European who were mainly French. There was no biological/scientific means to prove the degree of blood for anyone in those days and now they still use a paper system with the BIA to reference someone that has not been proven to be "Indian" "African" etc. on the rolls.I had my mt DNA H evaluated Genex Diagnostics in Canada through Cherokee DNA Phase II which took over 5 months found the DNA to be Euroasin or Native American. In the narrative it sated "most likely" Native American. Our mixture since 1700's with European has changed the majority indigenous DNA for ever. Now tribes will only do Family Finder for immediate family members. The Eastern Band of Cherokee does a DNA on all new born and the parents for tribal enrollment. The Seminole Tribe of Florida does the same thing. All about money. Tribes pay money to each family member.A mother with five children could get 50,000 a year per child. How many children would you want?Joel K. Harris, Sr., Ph.D.From: tsmith53us <teresalovesla@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:37 AM
Subject: [MexicoDNAProject] Census data vs. oral family historyThe word I found on 1910 census for my GreatGreatgrandmother was "Octoroon" which means 1/8th African American....none found in my DNA
Our family oral history is that she was born in Texas before Texas became a State...her birth date is 1838. so it would be considered Mexico technically. Same for a lot of the other family members.
I think that the census takers did not really clarify....just like the spelling of the names. her name was Victoria...sounds like Bictoria when spoken with a accent so that is what was written. My Grandmothers sex was put down as Male on one census probably because she was wearing overalls because they picked cotton, did they bother to ask or just made assumptions....
the family oral history was that they were Apache but do you say you are Apache when they are still hunting down Apaches for a bounty?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>