> From: Daniel Coe
> To: ChristianEvidences list
> Date: April 30, 2007
> Re: Debate proposition
> It is sad indeed that the thinking
> and logic of some men is so warped.
> (T)his list is for discussion, not
> personal attacks.
Daniel would have done well to deal explicitly with his own brethren
regarding their specific, repeated personal attacks on me and in the
context of their refusal to actually deal with their failure to be
able to handle my "Goliath of GRAS" and/or the proposal for a
discussion on the evidence of age.
I wonder if Daniel is open and honest enough to explain who the "some
men" are of which he speaks and what the "so warped" has reference to.
Inasmuch as I recently posted there my "Goliath of GRAS" and the
invitation for a discussion on the evidence of age, without any
personal attacks, one might get to thinking that Daniel is accusing
me of having warped thinking and logic.
See following link for a copy of my "Testing a fundamental position!"
thread that, before being deleted, was posted to the
Let Daniel Coe deny he had reference to me, and let him accept the
simply, logical validity that stands, despite repeated attempts from
some of the best around, undefeated as to my "Goliath of GRAS".
Let him deny it and stand with me and many others in accepting
my "Goliath of GRAS" as being just as I have represented it.
If not, let him be open and honest and come out of hiding to deal
with his false impressions of my "Goliath of GRAS" and my thinking
and logic on the matter.
Will Daniel Coe come forth or remain in hiding?
We will see!