David's Non-Fearlessness and Maury's Non-Proof of Claim!
- Our secret one notes and asks:
"I noticed several posts referring to David as fearless. Lack of fear
may be courage or it may be foolishness. What is the provenance of
Please prove your statement 'It is false that Bert doesn't have anything
to do with that letter!'
Rational excogitation denies it."
David has encouraged folk on other lists to be "fearless". I just
figured he might demonstrate what he meant; but he failed in the
Is our poster now claiming to be "Rational Excogitation"? As Rational
Excogitation he wants to deny my claim? I think I like him better as
Dr. William Maury Morris, II.
Let him first prove he is not Dr. William Maury Morris, II; that's my
Perhaps he will do what David did and contact Bert (toll-free) and get
him to join the discussion and we can discuss what he has had to do with
The poster seems to want to deny my claim, implying that it may be true
that Bert doesn't have anything to do with that letter.
Well, let him try to prove Bert didn't have anything to do with that
letter. I think he may get some idea of what I have gone through in
trying to convince folk Bert doesn't have any support for his Maury
The difference is I am right on track concerning Bert's Maury statue
claim and the significance of the letter that I DID NOT WRITE, and his
adventure in trying to get me to pursue the issue of Bert's involvement
in the letter while Bert remains hid out is rather misguided.