Re: [M & B] Gil Yoder's evolution falsification!
- I find these rhetorical arguments exhausting in their convoluted and earnest
avoidance of common sense. Without commenting on the argument itself, I can
say this: I have listened to and read a great many scientists, teachers, etc.,
discussing the now-apparent close relationship between dinosaurs and birds,
and the tone has been one of wonder and excitement rather than dismay and shock
that the entire evolutionary theory has now crumbled. So I doubt if the way
to disproving evolution as creator lies in the implications of this particular
argument about a reptile and a bird.
Just a thought...if the lack of an expected close relationship between
certain species could disprove evolutionary theory, then does the proven existence
of other close relationships among different species support evolutionary
theory? After all, the fact that one relationship differed from the expected does
not explain away the hundreds of other relationships that *have* been found.
Amino acids just aren't where my faith hangs its hat.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]