Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

AP Today: Analogy - Jeff Miller, Ph.D. = Chad Elliott!

Expand Messages
  • rlbaty50
    http://www.apologeticspress.org/apPubPage.aspx?pub=1&issue=1103&article=2072 The Laws of Science - by God by Jeff Miller, Ph.D. Monday, December 3, 2012
    Message 1 of 1 , Dec 3, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      http://www.apologeticspress.org/apPubPage.aspx?pub=1&issue=1103&article=2072

      The Laws of Science - by God

      by Jeff Miller, Ph.D.
      Monday, December 3, 2012

      (excerpts)

      The laws of nature have been discovered through extensive scientific investigation-gathering mounds and mounds of evidence, all of which has proven consistently to point to one conclusion.

      They are, by definition, a concluding statement that has been drawn from the scientific evidence, and therefore, are in keeping with the rule of logic known as the Law of Rationality (Ruby, 1960, pp. 130-131).

      If anything can be said to be "scientific," it is the laws of science, and to hold to a view or theory that contradicts the laws of science is, by definition, irrational, since such a theory would contradict the evidence from science.

      (Doesn't that sound like something Chad is promoting? - RLBaty)

      There are no exceptions to a law of science.

      Wherever a law is applicable, it has been found to be without exception.

      Evolutionists endorse wholeheartedly the laws of science.

      According to Hawking, the laws of nature exist, are unbreakable (i.e., without exception), and apply to the entire Universe¬ónot just to the Earth.

      Again, the atheistic evolutionary community believes in the existence of and highly respects the laws of science (i.e., when those laws coincide with the evolutionist's viewpoints) and would not wish to consciously deny or contradict them.

      Sadly, they do so, and often, when it comes to their beloved atheistic, origin theories. But that admission by the evolutionary community presents a major problem for atheism.

      Even if Big Bang cosmology were correct (and it is not), you still can't have a law without a law writer.

      Just as the evidence says that you cannot have a poem without a poet, a fingerprint without a finger, or a material effect without a cause, a law must be written by someone.

      But the atheistic community does not believe in the "Someone" Who alone could have written the laws of nature.

      So the atheist stands in the dark mist of irrationality-holding to a viewpoint that contradicts the evidence.

      (There it is again, the analogical connection to Chad Elliott.-RLBaty)

      According to the Creation model and in keeping with the evidence, that Supreme Being is the God of the Bible, Who created everything in the Universe in six literal days, only a few thousand years ago.

      (That last line is a further, implicit endorsement of the accuracy of the way I represent the fundamental issue and my opposition. - RLBaty)

      -----------------------------------------------
      -----------------------------------------------
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.