Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [M & B] But where are the rabbit fossils?

Expand Messages
  • Charles Weston
    Those elusive little cud-chewers! Charles Weston ... From: Todd Greene Subject: [M & B] But where are the rabbit fossils? To:
    Message 1 of 2 , Jun 29, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      Those elusive little cud-chewers!
      Charles Weston

      --- On Wed, 6/29/11, Todd Greene <greeneto@...> wrote:

      From: Todd Greene <greeneto@...>
      Subject: [M & B] But where are the rabbit fossils?
      To: Maury_and_Baty@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Wednesday, June 29, 2011, 6:47 PM
















       









      Now if creationists (both kinds) could just come up with some rabbit fossils, or, say, turtle fossils, from the same part of the geologic column, we'd have a huge "smoking gun" for creationism!



      Of course, there is no such thing. Creationism is religion, not science.



      - Todd Greene



      ================================================================



      New Fossils Demonstrate That Powerful Eyes Evolved in a Twinkling

      (ScienceDaily, 6/29/2011)

      http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110629132546.htm

      [go to link for full article]



      Excerpt:



      Palaeontologists have uncovered half-a-billion-year-old fossils demonstrating that primitive animals had excellent vision. An international team led by scientists from the South Australian Museum and the University of Adelaide found the exquisite fossils, which look like squashed eyes from a recently swatted fly.



      This discovery will be published on June 30, 2011) in the journal Nature. The lead author is Associate Professor Michael Lee from the South Australian Museum and the University of Adelaide's School of Earth & Environmental Sciences.



























      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.