Re: Michael again refuses to provide a single reference
- Hi, everyone.
More empty bluster. Still no reference.
--- In Maury_and_Baty, Michael <dokimadzo@c...> wrote (post #1584):
> [The thing is I'm
> actually fairly certain that I *do* know what Michael was
> referring to, because I have discussed that specific subject
> Then, what are you in fear of?
- ---Our polemic friend Michael remarks:
> I have repeatedly asked you to a debate. Both have beenMichael correctly draws some boundaries around his
> unanswered. I wonder if you truly wish to discover those
discussion. He has made it clear he prefers a more formal
debate. If he expects to obtain an agreement for such a
debate then he should not reveal his arguments now.
From what I have learned of his major targets as potential
debate opponents, Michael has slim chance of convincing one
of this list to any contest containing rules. If he were to
get an agreement to examine a proposition in a formal
setting, it is even less likely that those rules (whatever
they might be) would be followed.