10954Re: More "thermodynamics" pseudoscience from Don DeLong - by Don
- Jul 2, 2007Todd, you wrote:
> I can't take the time to addressHere's my comments and proposal for completing the demonstration that
> Don's comments right now, so I'll
> get to it later. Of course, anyone
> else can respond to him as well.
Don DeLong is merely setting himself up to again run off and hide:
David P. Brown has already noticed how folks like Don DeLong are
unable to formulate an argument and/or respond to one when it
If Don DeLong really believes he's onto something with his bantering
about thermodynamics and the substance of the issues we've
been "pleading" with him and his to deal with, then I would encourage
him to make the public committment here and now to "come out", "stand
his ground" and "reason TOGETHER" with at least one of us regarding
Todd, you're elected on this side of the issue! :o)
If Don DeLong will quit himself like the man he claims to be
and "come out" committed to dealing with his thermodynamics claim as
it relates to the substance of the issues we've attempted to deal
with, then the negotiations should proceed to formalize a discussion,
in writing, and for the record.
Don DeLong is welcome to present for consideration his proposition(s)
Todd, you would then be expected to accept the proposals or make
The discussions should continue until one or more propositions was
After that, the negotiations would involve the logistical details of
the formal, in writing, for the record discussion.
Hey, Don DeLong could even substitute his own surrogate for the
Will Don DeLong quit himself like the man he claims to be instead of
the "girlie-man" described by Donald Canny?
My guess is we'll see the "girlie-man" run!
Which is it, Don DeLong?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>