Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

8361NEWS -- 2013.10.14.Monday -- Columbus Discovered America day

Expand Messages
  • James Martin
    Oct 14, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      The sadness of this day can not be overstated.
      Europeans invading and destroying, murdering entire cultures -- their god given right to do so.
      In the name of god.  And commerce, money. 
      No conflict seen.
      Today our U.S. government, dysfunctional as it has become because of some rightwing tea party christians, continues to lie and bear false witness.  Watch today's show, October 14, http://www.democracynow.org/.
      1) The Perfect Epitaph for Establishment Journalism
      2) Tea Party Terrorists
      3) Self-Professed ‘Bible Scholar’ Makes Explosive Allegation About Jesus That He Believes Could Rock the Christian Faith to Its Core
      4) ‘The price of citizenship’: State court says gay rights trump religious beliefs
      5) Former GOP Latino outreach specialist is now a Democrat
      6) The Four Most Exceptionally Bad Presidents

      The Perfect Epitaph for Establishment Journalism

      By Glenn Greenwald, Guardian UK

      14 October 2013

      'If MI5 warns that this is not in the public interest who am I to disbelieve them?', says the former editor of The Independent.

      Like many people, I've spent years writing and speaking about the lethal power-subservient pathologies plaguing establishment journalism in the west. But this morning, I feel a bit like all of that was wasted time and energy, because this new column by career British journalist Chris Blackhurst - an executive with and, until a few months ago, the editor of the UK daily calling itself "The Independent" - contains a headline that says everything that needs to be said about the sickly state of establishment journalism:


      In other words, if the government tells me I shouldn't publish something, who am I as a journalist to disobey? Put that on the tombstone of western establishment journalism. It perfectly encapsulates the death spiral of large journalistic outlets.

      Lest you think that the headline does not fairly represent the content of the column, Blackhurst, in explaining why he would never have allowed his newspaper to publish any of the documents from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, actually wrote:

      If the security services insist something is contrary to the public interest, and might harm their operations, who am I (despite my grounding from Watergate onwards) to disbelieve them?"

      Most people, let alone journalists, would be far too embarrassed to admit they harbor such subservient, obsequious sentiments. It's one thing to accord some deference or presumption of good will to political officials, but the desire to demonstrate some minimal human dignity, by itself, would preclude most people from publicly confessing that they have willingly sacrificed all of their independent judgment and autonomy to the superior, secret decrees of those who wield the greatest power. Chris Blackhurst has obviously liberated himself from these inhibitions, though not entirely, as he infuses insincere caveats like this into his paean to the virtues of obedience: "I'm cynical about officialdom, having seen too many cover-ups and appalling injustices carried out in our name." One would think that most journalists (particularly those who edit a newspaper called "The Independent") would want to maintain at least a pretense of independent thought and thus refrain from acknowledging such cringe-inducing things about themselves.

      Still, what Blackhurst is revealing here is indeed a predominant mindset among many in the media class. Journalists should not disobey the dictates of those in power. Once national security state officials decree that what they are doing should be kept concealed from the public - once they pound their mighty "SECRET" stamp onto their behavior - it is the supreme duty of all citizens, including journalists, to honor that and never utter in public what they have done. Indeed, it is not only morally wrong, but criminal, to defy these dictates. After all, "who am I to disbelieve them?"

      That this mentality condemns - and would render outlawed - most of the worthwhile investigative journalism over the last several decades never seems to occur to good journalistic servants like Blackhurst. National security state officials also decreed that it would "not be in the public interest" to report on the Pentagon Papers, or the My Lai massacre, or the network of CIA black sites in which detainees were tortured, or the NSA warrantless eavesdropping program, or the documents negating claims of Iraqi WMDs, or a whole litany of waste, corruption and illegality that once bore the "top secret" label. Indeed, one of the best reporters in the UK, Duncan Campbell, works for Blackhurst's newspaper, and he was arrested and prosecuted by the UK government in the 1970s for the "crime" of disclosing the existence of the GCHQ. When Blackhurst sees Campbell in the hallways, does he ask him: "who are you to have decided on your own to disclose that which UK officials had told you should remain concealed?"

      The NSA reporting enabled by Snowden's whistleblowing has triggered a worldwide debate over internet freedom and privacy, reform movements in numerous national legislatures, multiple whistleblowing prizes for Snowden, and the first-ever recognition of just how pervasive and invasive is the system of suspicionless surveillance being built by the US and the UK. It does not surprise me that authoritarian factions, including (especially) establishment journalists, prefer that none of this reporting and debate happened and that we all instead remained blissfully ignorant about it. But it does still surprise me when people calling themselves "journalists" openly admit to thinking this way. But when they do so, they do us a service, as it lays so vividly bare just how wide the gap is between the claimed function of establishment journalists and the actual role they fulfill.

      Lots of comments at the URLs.
      Tea Party Terrorists
      Joel S. Hirschhorn
      Monday 14 October 2013

      By now all conscious people have seen how American Tea Party Republicans, especially those in the House of Representatives and Senate, are widely seen as radical, unreasonable, mad, stupid, extreme, anarchists, delusional and worse.  My view is that the best and most useful way to see these people is this: They are political terrorists.

      They have developed their own form of violence.  They are filled with hatred.  Sure, they see themselves as the only genuine U.S. patriots, but that should not fool anyone.  They can and do twist, undermine and distort provisions in the U.S. Constitution.  The power they now wield has been developed over many years by the actions of more mainstream Republicans, especially manipulating House districts through gerrymandering.

      They are ready and willing to bring down the U.S. government and even the global economy despite rhetoric often used to cloak their real goals with tactical objectives like ending Obamacare.  The biggest mistake people make is not seeing just how fundamental, counter-democratic and nihilistic their real goals are.  Nor should they be seen as legitimate Libertarians.

      --- click on URL to continue ---
      Self-Professed ‘Bible Scholar’ Makes Explosive Allegation About Jesus That He Believes Could Rock the Christian Faith to Its Core
      By Billy Hallowell, The Blaze, Friday 11 October 2013
      On Oct. 19, self-professed Biblical scholar Joseph Atwill is planning to make public some very flammable allegations. At a day-long symposium called "Covert Messiah" in London, England, he's set to unveil purported evidence that Roman aristocrats manufactured Jesus Christ - a claim that, if substantiated, would devalue the core of the Christian faith.

      The only problem? Most Biblical experts disagree with the scholar's pronouncements.

      A press release announcing the purported new evidence claims that Atwill has discovered "ancient confessions" that purportedly prove that Romans invented Jesus Christ in the first century. He has long argued that the faith system was used as a political tool to control the masses -- something he says is still going on today.

      --- click on URL to continue ---

      ‘The price of citizenship’: State court says gay rights trump religious beliefs

      Aug. 23, 2013 10:25am Meredith Jessup
      --- click on URL to read --- Don't miss the comments at the end.
      In case we missed this last May --->

      Former GOP Latino outreach specialist is now a Democrat

      May. 14, 2013 10:55am Meredith Jessup
      ---click on URL to read ---
      The Four Most Exceptionally Bad Presidents
      Paul Bushheit
      Monday 14 October 2013