Re: ATTN: Naudin - Question re: MEG3.3 ... MOV is better
- --- In MEG_builders@y..., jnaudin509@a... wrote:
> Dans un e-mail daté du 09/07/01 17:08:41 Paris, Madrid (heured'été),
> Dear Stan,the
> GOOD ANALYSIS of the picture... You have done the good scheme, see
> attached diagram with the parts that I have used...Thank you so much(merci bo cou?)for the prompt answer!!!!
> Best Regards
> Jean-Louis Naudin
You say that a MOV is better but as I understand it you haven't used
a MOV as a load. True? If this is true, could you guess at what the
characteristics of what the MOV should be? My guess is that it
should have a clamp or trigger voltage of something like +/- 600VDC
or a very high value in order to let the MEG establish its EM field
and "magic" before the MOV connects the output to the load resistor.
I also guess that it should have a relatively low capacitance. I
have tried to find the specs for the Panasonic MOV that Jon
Flickinger has used but no luck so far.
I eagerly await your reply to these questions and any other load
observations that you may have.