Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Analysis of the MEG-2 pictures, error pointed out...

Expand Messages
  • overunity2001
    Sorry. I had again a closer look and now saw, that the RMS current of the input circuit is around 4.3 Amperes all the time. First I did not see the groundline
    Message 1 of 1 , May 1, 2004
      Sorry. I had again a closer look and now saw, that
      the RMS current of the input circuit is around 4.3 Amperes all the
      time. First I did not see the groundline of channel 2, cause I am
      not so familar with these digital scopes....but now I saw it...
      Anyway, it seems the input pulse to the coils is also
      an about 50:50 duty cycle square wave, so the input coils
      switch the flux back and forth from one leg to the other and stay on
      for the whole time.
      The 2 input coils are probably put in series and the 4 control
      transistors are in a bridge circuit.
      Or each input coil is switched seperately into the other polarity, so
      that always after the ringing is gone a current of about 4.3 Amperes
      is flowing.

      Thus the input coil has an impedance of about 7 Ohms at this frequency
      of about 15 Khz.
      As one can see in the background the wire size of the input coil a bit
      it seems the input wire size diameter is at least 1 to 2 mm thick.

      Well anyway, it seems somehow the normal transformer counterEMF and
      dragback effect is
      reduced in this design and the output power is much bigger than the
      input power.

      Regards, Stefan.

      --- In free-energy@yahoogroups.com, "overunity2001" <harti@h...>
      > Hi All,
      > I had now a closer look to the picture and thanks to the high
      > resolution of it, one really can see a lot !
      > The input scope picture shows at the upper trace the battery
      voltage !
      > There it is seen, that only small voltage spikes occur, otherwise
      > is the constant voltage of the 3 in series connected batteries
      > is shown.
      > As the current is measured at a shunt directly at the battery, we
      > also only see pulse currents here.( ringing down quite quickly !)
      > The third trace is the calculated input power by the scope !
      > So my guess is:
      > The 2 input coils are just only shortly energized !
      > This was also told by Steven Sullivan to me, when he
      > tried to describe his MEG to me.
      > As you can see in the input scope shots, the voltage to the coils
      > must only be very shortly of the whole period ON , otherwise we
      > see a longer duration input current !
      > It seems with a pulse all the magnetic flux is transfered from one
      > leg to the other and then the magnetic flux is just only slowly
      > transfered back to the other side while the input coils are already
      > off !
      > Maybe it really depends on the sizes of the coils, that are
      > wound around the core !
      > The input coils have only a very short width, while the output coils
      > are pretty wide each !
      > So could this be the conclusion, that the counter EMF then also
      > affects the output coils much more, so it hinders the flux to flow
      > back to the center much more because the counter EMF from the
      > driving the bulbs will hinder the flux going back to the center ?
      > As the input coils are switched already off during this time, there
      > is no induction back to the input circuit, so the only time
      > the input circuit has to apply energy is when then flux is
      > switched over to the other leg via a short pulse !
      > So is the trick the widthness difference of the output coils versus
      > the input coils ?
      > I wonder, why the flux takes so long to flow back to the center,
      > when no input power to the input coils is applied ?
      > Hmm, it seems to be an amazing device and Bearden might be right,
      > the A-Field difference of the widthness of the coils plays the most
      > important role in this MEG.
      > Regards, Stefan.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.