Re: New MEG patent
- New application copies existing patent
The new application simply copies the verbiage of the existing
patent. What is different are the claims where the patent claimed
a "device and the new application claims a "method". There is no
new information disclosed. To me this is taking advantage of the
patent office without offering anything substantive to the spirit
of the patent law.
IMHO neither provides a complete description of the operation
of the MEG. I have shown in previous postings that the presence
of the magnet enhances the magnetic field within the output coil.
How to tap this increase usefully is of course the real secret.
Possibly a high-frequency sampling method might be part of the
answer: the drawings in the patent labelled "6C" and "6D" show
a 1 MHZ "noise" on the input current and voltage measurements.
This is probably a subtle way for the inventors to claim that
they disclosed the information when there is a future argument
about the patent.
--- In MEG_builders@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Narby" <dnarby@s...> wrote:
> Stefan Sundström on the JLNlabs yahoo group list posted that Magnetic Ene=
rgy Ltd. has a new
> patent application:
> Best regards,
> Dave Narby