Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Messages List

1381

MEG_Builders is closing down

Dear MEG_Builders member, This message is to let you know that on Oct. 7, 2010 the Yahoo MEG_Builders group will be closed down. The reasons for this are many
mayerstan
Oct 7, 2010
#1381
 
1380

Re: secondary problem

... From: "gufo_rosso@..." To: Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 10:38 PM Subject: [MEG_builders]
Gufo Rosso
Feb 22, 2010
#1380
 
1379

secondary problem

I have a problem on the secondary leakage current I thought I put the tape (the black one) between a secondary winding and another to evid losses. I do not
gufo_rosso@...
Feb 22, 2010
#1379
 
1378

Re: Info about the MEG core's hysteresis curve

This is not necessarily new news to some people. If you really think the critical factor is the B/H curve then get a bunch of small strip wound toroidal cores
jules4060
Feb 16, 2010
#1378
 
1377

Info about the MEG core's hysteresis curve

Group, Recently I had a phone conversation with a serious MEG experimenter who shared with me some information about the MEG core that apparently comes from a
mayerstan
Feb 6, 2010
#1377
 
1376

Re: Meg Project

Hi Congratulations for your work. If you could include a drawing with your data, it would be greatly appreciated. I notice time plays the same tricks on you as
magn0mite
Jan 15, 2010
#1376
 
1375

Re: problem with the MEG as described in the patent

I haven't posted in a long time because not much has happened with my AMCC1000 core. After meeting Don Smith in 2007, it became a possibility that operation of
Norman
Jan 15, 2010
#1375
 
1374

Re: Meg Project

... may the Force be with you. Best wishes, think positive, please. - Vince
Vincent J Cataldi
Dec 8, 2009
#1374
 
1373

Meg Project

As a new group member, with a Metglas AMCC 320 core 1) With a plug in transformer (15.23 DC volts 1.5 amps) to the input board tuned to 12.43k we read.... 2)
goreggie951
Dec 6, 2009
#1373
 
1372

Re: problem with the MEG as described in the patent

... LES, MY REPLIES ARE EMBEDDED IN ALL CAP TEXT WITHIN YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE BELOW. STAN MAYER ... PLEASE ELABORATE ON "CERTAIN CHANGES" AS I HAVE SEEN
mayerstan
Sep 10, 2009
#1372
 
1371

Re: problem with the MEG as described in the patent

***** PREFACE BY GROUP MODERATOR ******* I am approving this posting with some trepidation that it might spur a round of THEORY discussion. What's the problem
leskraut
Sep 10, 2009
#1371
 
1370

Re: MEG Redesign

Keep in mind that many of the original MEG experiments used materials like metglass OR orthonol that have a nearly othogonal hysterisis curve. These materials
jules4060
Jul 18, 2009
#1370
 
1369

MEG Redesign

Considering that no one seems to be able to get any O/U from the MEG, maybe we should try to redesign it a bit. Bearden talked about barium in BaFe magnets
starraider25
Jul 16, 2009
#1369
 
1368

permanent magnet generator utilizing a rotating field

US Patent # 5,221,892 discloses a permanent magnet generator which incorporates solid state flux control valves and a rotating field across inductive elements
emc3_llc
Jul 12, 2009
#1368
 
1367

Re: Permanent magnet flip-flop: Theories have been offered, please p

... Vince, Your posting has gotten a lot of potential answers to your question about magnet reversal and I hope that you find your answer within them. I
Stan Mayer
Mar 27, 2009
#1367
 
View First Topic Go to View Last Topic