Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [LoadRunner] Can I use other protocol to test siebel system

Expand Messages
  • Matthew Stephenson
    Row IDs Form IDs - if you want any chance your scripts will survive across SRFs SWEC counts Session IDs Dynamic data that has to carry across steps and views.
    Message 1 of 18 , Aug 23 6:27 AM
    • 0 Attachment
      Row IDs
      Form IDs - if you want any chance your scripts will survive across SRFs
      SWEC counts
      Session IDs
      Dynamic data that has to carry across steps and views.
      Character counts if that is enabled on the server

      That's the bulk, I am sure I forgot something.

      Good Luck!



      On Aug 22, 2013, at 4:43 AM, Peter Xu wrote:

      > I mean the correlation part, want some details about how to correlate siebel 8.1, it is tough to me.
      >
      > Thanks
      > Peter
      >
      > ________________________________
      > From: James Pulley <loadrunner-lists@...>
      > To: LoadRunner@yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 1:33 PM
      > Subject: RE: [LoadRunner] Can I use other protocol to test siebel system
      >
      >
      > For mechanical (tool) based item, See VUGEN guide, index and Table of Contents related to Siebel
      >
      > For process and reporting, see standard documentation for reporting against requirements which would be similar to any performance testing project
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter Xu
      > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:22 PM
      > To: mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: Re: [LoadRunner] Can I use other protocol to test siebel system
      >
      > Dear Experts,
      >
      > Could you give me some documents about how to use LR 11.5 to test siebel 8.1, the better one is the document you write after a siebel 8.1 project, thanks in advanced
      >
      > thanks
      > Peter
      >
      > ________________________________
      > From: James Pulley <mailto:loadrunner-lists%40jamespulley.com>
      > To: mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 10:23 AM
      > Subject: RE: [LoadRunner] Can I use other protocol to test siebel system
      >
      > To establish value will require a measure of affirmative value, not just a negative statement. Take one business process. Measure how long it takes to achieve the same level of functionality for your existing solution set and one for the proposed solution set. Once you understand the differences in labor for a script which accommodates all best practices then you can make a value judgement as to the benefit or detriment of the existing and proposed solutions.
      >
      > "...not good..." will result in a permanent mark you will not want.
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter Xu
      > Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:48 PM
      > To: mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: Re: [LoadRunner] Can I use other protocol to test siebel system
      >
      > Thanks James,
      >
      > I will tell them it is not good to use this protocol to test siebel.
      > thanks
      > peter
      >
      > ________________________________
      > From: James Pulley <mailto:loadrunner-lists%40jamespulley.com>
      > To: mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:42 AM
      > Subject: RE: [LoadRunner] Can I use other protocol to test siebel system
      >
      > Now is the time to communicate the VALUE of this solution to your management so they can make an appropriate decision on whether the VALUE of the retained work product and increased efficiency of a dedicated protocol type is worth the PRICE. If you are not able to establish value with your management on this issue then you would be wise to ask about the level of value that is assigned to your output, for the output is only as good as the inputs...and if the inputs have the perception of no to low value....well, you can see where the writing on the wall heads.
      >
      > 'Pulley
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter Xu
      > Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 8:36 PM
      > To: mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: Re: [LoadRunner] Can I use other protocol to test siebel system
      >
      > our siebel license will not continue.
      >
      > ________________________________
      > From: Matthew Stephenson <mailto:cneisme%40yahoo.com>
      > To: mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 8:41 PM
      > Subject: Re: [LoadRunner] Can I use other protocol to test siebel system
      >
      > Thick client you could use ODBC, but I would not recommend it. The scripts will be massive and require more correlation's than you would be willing to do.
      >
      > The answer to your question is "yes", but I want to ask why?
      >
      > On Aug 15, 2013, at 11:15 PM, James Pulley wrote:
      >
      > > GUI
      > > Citrix
      > > RDP
      > > Winsock
      > >
      > > -----Original Message-----
      > > From: mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com
      > > [mailto:mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter Xu
      > > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 8:39 PM
      > > To: mailto:LoadRunner%40yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: [LoadRunner] Can I use other protocol to test siebel system
      > >
      > > Dear Expert,
      > >
      > > Did you try to using other protocol to test siebel system, does this
      > > can work, If anyone know this, please do me a favour to tell me.
      > > thanks
      > >
      > > thanks
      > > Peter
      > >
      > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > >
      > > ------------------------------------
      > >
      > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      > >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >



      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.