Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

OPINION RELEASE: Flight 93 Lawsuit Filed

Expand Messages
  • We The People Constitutional Activism
    Rick Stanley Constitutional Activist E-mail: rick@stanley2002.org We the People Scoop 09/30/06
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 30, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Rick Stanley
      Constitutional Activist
      E-mail: rick@...


      We the People Scoop 09/30/06

      ========================================================================
      WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE!
      ** Visit the website: http://www.stanley2002.org
      ** OR Our NEW Offshore Site at http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
      ** Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know!
      ========================================================================

      OPINION RELEASE: Flight 93 Lawsuit Filed

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Pastor Butch Paugh" <ctdm@...>
      Subject: Flight 93 Lawsuit Filed



      FLIGHT 93 LAWSUIT FILED
      By: Devvy Kidd
      > September 21, 2006
      >
      > � 2006 - NewsWithViews.com
      >
      > "For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to
      know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." Patrick Henry
      >
      > Each new 911 column brings mixed reactions from Americans who are just
      beginning to ask questions to those who call me all the usual labels. To give
      you an idea, here are just two samples with no changes:
      >
      > "This is nothing I want any part of. I'm canceling right away. You
      conspiracy theory is nothing but garbage. Enjoy yourself." I have no idea what
      the reference to canceling right away is, but we're right back to the conspiracy
      theory rhetoric. I guess the federal government is the only entity that can use
      'conspiracy' legitimately.
      >
      > "Wake up and pull your head out of the sand!!!!!!!! You wouldn't know
      an actual lie or truth if it jumped into your face and proved itself. I'm never
      reading your drivel again. The only difference between Bush and Hitler - Hitler
      could speak." As with the former e-mailer, neither provided any example of what
      they disagreed with and I feel confident they didn't watch one single minute of
      the 911 Mysteries: Demolitions. Why? Because watching a video presentation like
      911 Mysteries, which contains no political haranguing, no accusations, just
      science, might force the viewer to ask questions. This is a no-no because too
      many Americans are afraid to ask questions which is outside their comfort zone
      and they won't go there. When you're searching for the truth, you can't just ask
      the comfortable questions.
      >
      > I would remind people that FDR knew the Japanese were coming and
      allowed the slaughter of 2400 Americans at Pearl Harbor. This isn't a conspiracy
      theory, but backed up by official government documents which a federal judge
      forced the release of from a FOIA lawsuit; see here. This is a very painful
      truth which cannot be denied because the authenticity of the documents cannot be
      denied.
      >
      > There has always been a great deal of speculation about Flight 93
      crashing in a field outside the little burg of Shanksville, PA. This bothered me
      so much, last summer I went there to interview witnesses and get my own
      impression of what happened; full report here. At the conclusion of my report I
      stated that in my mind, the county coroner was covering up something and that
      Flight 93 crashed in that field because I had no other hard evidence to say
      otherwise. Then came the question: was Flight 93 shot down by our military to
      prevent it from making it to Washington, DC? We know debris from a plane was
      found at Indian Lake about seven miles from the crash site. This is
      unexplainable if the plane had simply gone in unmolested by a missile of some
      sort. Unless this can be confirmed by testimony from the pilots who allegedly
      shot it down, it still remains speculation and you can't take that into a court
      of law.
      >
      > Many disagree with me and proclaim emphatically that no plane crashed
      in that field. The reason for this insistence that no plane crashed in the field
      as shown to the world is primarily due to a press release issued by the Mayor of
      Cleveland, Ohio, on September 11, 2001, but was withdrawn a few hours later. In
      this press release, it states Flight 93 made an emergency landing at
      Cleveland-Hopkins Airport and that all passengers had been taken off the plane;
      view press release here. You can also see many, many photos of that crime scene
      here.
      >
      > Of course, this immediately raised huge red flags. Was this an error
      made in the heat of total confusion as America watched the World Trade Center
      Towers burn along with the Pentagon, or did this event at Cleveland-Hopkins
      really happen? Did flight 93 land, taken to a "secure location" and passengers
      "evacuated"? You see, this is the million dollar question regarding theories
      about the Pentagon and Flight 93: If Flights 77 & 93 didn't crash as believed,
      where are the planes and the passengers? Click here to see analysis and many
      photos you may not have seen of the Pentagon.
      >
      > Judicial Watch filed a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request to
      get all the videos running on September 11, 2001, from cameras around the
      Pentagon. Earlier this year, DOJ released the same frames most of us saw a year
      ago; click here. This is the same film recently released to JW. This video is in
      slow motion, but I had to watch it over and over before I could finally see what
      appears to be a white plane that looks very small, but it's so hard to tell
      because it literally takes a split second to hit the building. Because it's so
      fast, you just can't see what kind of plane and it looks so small and tiny
      compared to the length of the building. Almost two weeks ago, Judicial Watch
      released another video they received from DOJ purporting to show a plane hitting
      the Pentagon. This one is from the CITGO gas station; click here. To say this
      video is a joke is putting it mildly. Not only does it show nothing but static
      blurred images, the date on the upper left hand corner is 01-01-93!
      >
      > JW isn't the only organization filing FOIAs. Ed Haas of the Muckraker
      Report filed a FOIA regarding the authenticity of the infamous Bin Laden tapes.
      He received the standard reply I have received to some of mine: "....Department
      of Defense...lacks the records that document the authenticity and the
      factualness of the reported circumstances surrounding the discovery of the
      December 13, 2001 Osama bin Laden "confession video" - that there is not
      government provided evidence to accompany and substantiate what the government
      has told us about the "confession video" - it's time to revisit recent history
      from a dutiful perspective." The feds are saying these Bin Laden videos
      plastered all over the world via satellite TV they claim have been authenticated
      don't have any records to prove they're authentic or factual! How many billions
      are the taxpayers pouring into "intelligence operations" and this is the best
      they can come up with?
      >
      > At this point in time, what we have is speculation that Flight 93
      landed at Cleveland based on a press release later withdrawn. Civilians have a
      difficult time in getting answers and hard documents on 911 and other "events"
      such as the OKC bombing, TWA Flight 800 and Waco. Family members and journalists
      have done incredible work in digging for the facts for all the aforementioned
      because what we seek is the truth. We the people are doing the job the
      government refuses to do because their hands are dirty. On that note, and
      because I want to know if Flight 93 did or didn't land in Cleveland, I filed a
      FOIA on November 14, 2005 against the FAA seeking routine data which is released
      to the public all the time without a FOIA. I had been trying to get this
      documentation through a friend who has a good working relationship with a member
      of Congress, but this request was being stonewalled, so I had no other choice
      but to file a FOIA requesting:
      >
      > All take off and landing logs for Cleveland-Hopkins International
      Airport for September 10, 11 and 12, 2001. This list of landings and take offs
      at Cleveland-Hopkins International Airport should include: All flights which
      landed from midnight to midnight (24 hour period) on those dates. All flights
      which took off (departed) from midnight to midnight (24 hour period) on those
      dates. This list should include the carrier (i.e., United, Delta, American
      Airlines), the flight number and time landed. The same would apply for all
      flights which departed this airport on those dates during the 24 hour period:
      carrier, flight number and departure time.
      >
      > On January , 2006, I sent a certified letter to the FAA asking why
      they refuse to process my FOIA. On February 14, 2006, I again sent another
      certified letter notifying them there still was no response and that they were
      clearly in violation of the legally mandated time for response. On February 28,
      2006, I received an electronic response from a Vicki Morris at the FAA. This
      mail wasn't even directed to me, it was a copy of her e-mail to someone named
      Karyl (no other identifying information or agency) asking this individual for
      some information regarding hold on requests for the dates in my FOIA. Upon
      receipt of this baloney, I e-mailed Ms Morris with the request she process my
      FOIA.
      >
      > On April 15, 2006, I sent another certified letter to Morris reminding
      her that I still have not received the information I requested. On June 15,
      2006, I received a letter from the FAA notifying me that they're busy gathering,
      scanning and indexing all agency 911 records and should be finished in about
      three months. Of course, this is just more stalling so I notified them back that
      if they didn't get my FOIA processed by September 19th, I would sue them. No
      surprise, they never responded. On September 19, 2006, I filed a lawsuit in in
      the U.S. District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. MO-06-CV 119. Much to my
      shock, the filing fee went from $150 to $350! Let me tell you it hurt to write a
      $350 check because I live on a very tight budget and can't print up money when
      ever I need it. I don't have some big media organization behind me with a fat
      budget.
      >
      > I can tell you from experience that the government will stall and use
      every trick in the book to fight this FOIA. I have filed FOIAs in the past,
      i.e., obtaining McVeigh's medical records and the lying - supported by their own
      documentation - is beyond sickening. But, I feel it is absolutely imperative
      that we the people find out if Mayor White made an honest mistake that day in
      the confusion or did Flight 93 land at Cleveland. And, I feel so strongly about
      it, I shelled out the $350 filing fee. The defendants have 60 days to respond to
      the lawsuit; I will keep readers updated.
      >
      > As for those who continue to sling the ever popular Ministry of
      Propaganda labels like conspiracy nuts, I suggest we the people demand the
      federal government prove their version of events: prove fire brought down the
      World Trade Center Towers. Prove there were actually 19 foreigners who hijacked
      those four jet liners and provide their real identifies with iron clad
      documentation. (Based on some hard research, it appears that some of the alleged
      hijackers are alive; see here.) I submit to you they can't and neither can
      popular pro-war media mouthpieces like Shawn Hannity and Bill O'Reilly or
      Popular Mechanics Magazine. They might be mildly interested to know the list of
      individuals asking questions is growing; here's a partial list:
      >
      > Berg, Philip J. - Deputy Attorney General, Pennsylvania; Burks, Fred -
      State Department Interpreter for Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton;
      Christison William - Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political
      Analysis; Cole, John M - Intelligence Operations Specialist, FBI; Conrad, David
      Mark - Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs; Costello, Edward J. -
      Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBI; Dew, Rosemary N. - Supervisory Special
      Agent, Counterterrorism & Counterintelligence, FBI; Graham, Gilbert M. - Special
      Agent, Counterintelligence, FBI; Honegger, Barbara - White House Policy Analyst
      Under Ronald Reagan; Pahle, Theodore J. - Senior Intelligence Officer, Defense
      Intelligence Agency; Peck, Edward L. - Deputy Director of the White House Task
      Force on Terrorism under Ronald Reagan; Ray, Col. Ronald D. - Deputy Assistant
      Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan; Reynolds, Morgan - Chief Economist,
      U.S. Department of Labor under George W. Bush; Rokke, Maj. Douglas - Director
      U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project; Sarshar, Behrooz - Language Translation
      Specialist, FBI; Shayler, David - Counterterrorism Agent, MI5 (UK); Stubblebine,
      Maj. Gen. Albert - Commanding General, U.S. Army Intelligence; Sullivan, Brian
      F. - Special Agent and Risk Management Specialist, FAA; Tortorich, Larry J. - US
      Naval Officer and Dept. of Homeland Security; Turner, Jane A. - Special Agent,
      FBI; Wittenberg, Capt. Russ - Air Force Fighter Pilot and Commercial Jet Pilot;
      Wright, Col. Ann - U.S. Army and Former Diplomat. Full list found here.
      >
      > Are all the 50 people on the full list a bunch of wackos, conspiracy
      crack pots, Bush haters and terrorist appeasers?
      >
      > � 2006 - NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
      >
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      >
      > Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind
      Loyalty, which sold close to 2,000,000 copies. Devvy appears on radio shows all
      over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker.
      Your complimentary copy of the 32-page report may be obtained from El Dorado
      Gold. Devvy is a contributing writer for www.NewsWithViews.com.
      >
      > Devvy's website: www.devvy.com
      >
      > E-mail is: devvyk@...

      ======================================================================
      Disclaimer: Information shared in the Stanley Scoop is not necessarily
      the opinion of the editor or staff. It is shared for information
      purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
      ======================================================================
      Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
      We the People Scoop
      http://www.stanley2002.org
      http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
      Reply to: rick@...

      Listen to: Standing Up for America Radio Show with Rick Stanley
      Every Sunday, 6pm MST for 1 hour
      On Truth Radio Network
      to listen, click here: http://www.truthradio.com
      Sponsored by:
      Stanley Fasteners and Shop Supply http://www.stanleyfasteners.com

      Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
      This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
      constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
      Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

      On Yahoo groups at
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

      This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
      God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
      rights."

      Subscribe by sending email to:
      therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


      To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
      send a message to subscribe@...

      If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
      send a message to unsubscribe@...

      All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address, send to
      webmaster@...


      Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
      in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
      Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
      newsletter@... is usually ignored....




      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.