Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

OPINION RELEASE: * * Less Respect For The Profession Than When Starting Law School * *

Expand Messages
  • We The People Constitutional Activism
    Rick Stanley Constitutional Activist Phone: 303-329-0481 E-mail: rick@wtpconstitutionalactivism.org We the People Scoop 1/1/06
    Message 1 of 1 , Jan 1, 2006
      Rick Stanley
      Constitutional Activist
      Phone: 303-329-0481
      E-mail: rick@...

      We the People Scoop 1/1/06
      ======================================================================
      WE THE PEOPLE SCOOP - TO EXPOSE! **
      ** Visit the offshore website at: **
      ** http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org **
      ** Like the Scoop? Forward it to everyone you know! **
      ** **
      ** SPECIAL NOTICE: Many of our readers know that the Scooplist has **
      ** been down for just over a month. Our previous site at **
      ** www.stanley2002.org was just closed down by the Powers That Be **
      ** that do not want to see this kind of info coming out. **
      ======================================================================

      OPINION RELEASE: * * Less Respect For The Profession Than When Starting Law School * *


      ----- Original Message -----
      From: <VictoryUSA@...>
      Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 5:48 PM
      Subject: * * Less Respect For The Profession Than When Starting Law School * *


      J.A.I.L. News Journal
      ______________________________________________________
      Los Angeles, California December 29, 2005
      ______________________________________________________
      The Inherent Right of ALL People to Alter or Reform Abusive Government
      The Right Upon Which All Other Rights Depend
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      www.SouthDakotaJudicialAccountability.org
      The Torchbearer for J.A.I.L. Nationally - Support Them!
      P.O. Box 412, Tea, S.D. 57064 - (605) 231-1418

      Less Respect For The Profession Than When Starting Law School
      By Stacy Ryan, Recent Law School Graduate
      Nebraska JAILer, sar8297@...

      The public is tired of a runaway legal system accountable to
      only themselves. Although its members have recognized
      the problem for years and announced a call for reform,
      the system does not change. As a result, the public lost respect
      for the legal profession and has begun to demand change.
      There is corruption in every profession but lawyers and judges
      are in the position to do the most damage not only to the public,
      but also to our justice system. If the legal system wants
      the respect it once deserved it will be accountable,...
      -- Stacy Ryan
      Barbie & Ron,


      I am proud to say I am a recent law school graduate. I am sorry to say I have
      less respect for the profession than I did when I started my law school career.
      So, why did I spend 3 years and thousands of dollars to attend law school?
      Because after years of messy, expensive, unethical litigation with my ex-husband
      (by the way he's a judge in my city) I was sure this was not the way the system
      was supposed to work. I was sure that I could somehow expose the unethical
      conduct of both my ex and his lawyers and perhaps help others before they were
      caught in the "litigation vortex".
      In telling my story to legal types, most would look at me skeptically and say
      nothing. I found there is a code of silence with lawyers, they will not
      criticize one another, no matter how egregious their peer's conduct might be.
      Before I spent class time in my law school's legal clinic, the administration
      found I was active in judicial accountability and I was cornered by two law
      professors who actually demanded that I disengage myself from any criticism of
      the judiciary. Two members of the bar instructed me that I was not "allowed" to
      say anything bad about a judge! They wholeheartedly agreed with me that the
      courthouse was a "good ol boys" club but as a law student soon to be lawyer I
      could not speak my mind. That semester they kept me out of the courthouse
      because they were convinced they would lose cases because of me.
      For my last paper, I chose to research the lawyer disciplinary process. I would
      have researched the judicial disciplinary process but not much information is
      available. Lawyers and only lawyers become judges so I believe this is relevant
      to J.A.I.L.
      J.A.I.L will find the research interesting yet nothing new. Distrust of the
      legal system is also nothing new to the American Bar Association. Despite the
      ABA's efforts to reform the profession, its members are still not listening.
      This is interestingly but not surprisingly illustrated by the continual
      criticism of the South Dakota effort by various bar members.
      Some information from my law school paper:
      In 1970, an ABA committee reviewed the nation's attorney discipline system. The
      committee found a "scandalous situation" requiring "immediate attention. Led by
      retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Tom Clark, the Clark committee found
      deliberate efforts to discourage any public dissemination of disciplinary
      activities. Fueled by the public's dissatisfaction with the bar and the courts,
      the Clark Report stated, "With few exceptions, the prevailing attitude of
      lawyers toward disciplinary enforcement ranges from apathy to outright
      hostility. Disciplinary action is practically nonexistent in many jurisdictions;
      practices and procedures are antiquated; many disciplinary agencies have little
      power to take effective steps against malefactors."
      In 1992, an ABA panel led by New York University Dean Robert McKay, reported
      that the public has a "growing mistrust" of the lawyer disciplinary process. The
      McKay Commission concluded that the practice of allowing bar officials to
      control state disciplinary systems was perceived as a gross conflict of
      interest. The commission criticized attorney discipline as "too slow, too
      secret, too soft and too self-regulated."
      In August 1996, the Conference of Chief Justices passed a resolution for a
      National Study and Action Plan Regarding Lawyer Conduct and Professionalism. In
      that resolution, it was noted that a significant decline in professionalism
      existed in the bar. The public's confidence showed a corresponding decline. From
      the conference report: "There is the perception and frequently the reality that
      some members of the bar do not consistently adhere to principles of
      professionalism and thereby sometimes impede the effective administration of
      justice." The Conference focused on an effort to involve the state supreme
      courts in raising public opinion of the profession. The court of highest
      jurisdiction in each state was considered to have the ultimate responsibility
      for regulation of the legal profession.
      In 1999, the National Action Plan on Lawyer Conduct and Professionalism was
      adopted by the Conference of Chief Justices. The plan included recommendations
      on how lawyer complaints should be handled. Some jurisdictions dismissed up to
      ninety percent of all complaints because supposedly the conduct alleged did not
      violate the rules of professional conduct. The commission gathered information
      about the dismissed complaints and found that many of them in fact did state
      legitimate grounds. In their recommendations, the commission claimed that the
      disciplinary system disregarded tens of thousands of complaints annually.
      According to the American Bar Association, in 2002, 121,000 complaints were
      filed against 1.2 million lawyers. Only 3.5 percent led to formal disciplinary
      action and just one percent resulted in disbarment. Of these 121,000 complaints,
      96.5 percent resulted in no discipline or informal punishments in the form of
      private sanctions.
      In 2002, HALT, An Organization of Americans for Legal Reform, produced the
      Lawyer Discipline Report Card to assess whether states had taken any action to
      improve their lawyer discipline system. HALT is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public
      interest group dedicated to reform projects that challenge the legal system to
      improve access to the courts and reduce costs at both the state and federal
      levels. (see www.HALT.org)
      In just one area of their report, HALT criticized state "gag rules". Alaska,
      Arkansas, Georgia, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, South Dakota and
      Washington prohibited complainants from telling anyone about their lawyer
      complaint before complaints become "public". (note that most lawyer complaints
      never become public) The complainant who talks could be held in contempt, fined
      or even imprisoned! A few of these states have struck down their gag rules,
      finding that the rule poses an unconstitutional restraint on free speech,
      already noted by the Chief Justices in 1999.
      Speaking from experience, I was instructed that my complaint against a judge
      "remained confidential under Nebraska law". Despite my best efforts I could not
      get the highest court to explain to me just what that directive meant. I found
      later that my state indeed has a "gag rule."
      The following incident was reported in my city and illustrates just why the
      public has lost confidence in the justice system.
      In March 2005, an Omaha Douglas County District Judge reviewed the file of a
      26-year-old Omaha man whose third drunken-driving infraction put a motorcyclist
      in critical condition. The Judge declared that probation was not appropriate.
      The accused's wife began crying, the man begged the judge not to send him to
      prison. The judge changed his mind. The accused's attorney (who by the way, was
      a buddy of the judge) mentioned that the accused's dad is a lawyer. "I know his
      father," the judge said. "That's another problem. By that I mean it just makes
      this more difficult."
      In an appeal attempt, this judge's decision was affirmed by the higher court.
      The public is tired of a runaway legal system accountable to only themselves.
      Although its members have recognized the problem for years and announced a call
      for reform, the system does not change. As a result, the public lost respect for
      the legal profession and has begun to demand change.
      Despite the poor press, lawyers exceed one million in the United States. There
      are surely ethical lawyers in practice but they fail to report or criticize one
      of their own. The result is the good suffer the poor conduct of the bad. In my
      research, I also found that the public often fails to employ a lawyer because of
      distrust of the profession.
      There is corruption in every profession but lawyers and judges are in the
      position to do the most damage not only to the public but also to our justice
      system. If the legal system wants the respect it once deserved it will be
      accountable, invite public opinion and involvement, openly emphasize and
      demonstrate ethical conduct and properly punish the unethical. I would then be
      proud to be a part of a profession that demonstrates integrity and respect for
      our nation's legal system.


      It is time bar members start listening and follow the directives of their own
      organizations.


      Here's to change in 2006!

      Respectfully,
      Stacy Ryan
      Nebraska JAILer
      sar8297@...

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Our thanks to Stacy for this personal testimony and research on this very
      important topic. She even commented "Distrust of the legal system is also
      nothing new to the American Bar Association. Despite the ABA's efforts to
      reform the profession, its members are still not listening. This is
      interestingly but not surprisingly illustrated by the continual criticism of the
      South Dakota effort by various bar members."

      Yet, we recently had an admonition from another JAILer, an attorney, who warned
      Ron that he deserves to lose this cause because he dared to ask rhetorically of
      the 250 members of the South Dakota Bar Association:
      "Do the People of South Dakota actually believe these lawyers have decided to do
      this out of the kindness of their hearts?" --referring to the free legal
      services SD lawyers say they will be offering to the poor. Many of our readers
      have told us of the "free legal services" they were offered, and as the saying
      goes, "There is free cheese in every mouse trap."
      See JNJ 12/26/05 "South Dakota State Bar Panics"
      http://www.jail4judges.org/JNJ_Library/2005/2005-12-26.html.

      It is no secret that besides the judiciary itself, the Bar Association
      nationally is the natural enemy of J.A.I.L., as is its closely associated law
      enforcement industry. It is the Bar Association that hosts and trains
      (brainwashes) the legal fraternity consisting of judges and lawyers. It is the
      Bar Association that has made the legal system what it is today and which the
      People seek to alter and reform through J.A.I.L. Ron's disdain for the legal
      profession shouldn't be a surprise to anyone-- and it is the profession to which
      Ron's above question is directed. Ron has numerous attorney-friends, and so he
      recognizes not all lawyers are corrupt. However, the system prevents them from
      having any impact on resolving the corruption. As Stacy reports,
      "There are surely ethical lawyers in practice but they fail to report or
      criticize one of their own. The result is the good suffer the poor conduct of
      the bad." She says that there is a "code of silence" with lawyers.

      Ron recognizes J.A.I.L.'s enemy when he sees it, and the South Dakota State Bar
      has no effective disguise. "Prejudging" the motivations of the members of the
      Bar is, in fact, not an issue. Their track record has long been shown for many
      years. The evidence has already been established and they routinely depend on
      their brethren, the judges, to cover up for them (and this includes law
      enforcement corruption). Ron has experienced this phenomenon himself throughout
      his 18 years of legal battle. He has been fighting a closed club all those
      years, and realized that law doesn't matter. Of course they're going to
      criticize J.A.I.L.
      -Barbie
      victoryusa@...


      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



      J.A.I.L.- Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - www.jail4judges.org
      Contribute to J.A.I.L. at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
      See our active flash, http://www.jail4judges.org/national_001.htm
      JAIL is a unique addition to our form of gov't. heretofore unrealized.
      JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
      E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
      Get involved at JAIL_SALE_USA-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
      To be added or removed, write to VictoryUSA@...
      Your help is needed: www.SouthDakotaJudicialAccountability.com

      "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless
      minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams

      "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
      striking at the root." -- Henry David Thoreau <><


      ======================================================================
      Disclaimer: Information shared in the We The People Scoop is not necessarily
      the opinion of the editor or staff. It is shared for information
      purposes only and it is recommended that you come to your own conclusions.
      ======================================================================
      Live Free or Die! Liberty in our Lifetime!
      We the People Scoop
      http://www.stanley2002.org (Down currently but will also be recreated offshore)
      http://www.wtpconstitutionalactivism.org
      Reply to: rick@...

      Listen to: Standing Up for America Radio Show with Rick Stanley
      Every Sunday, 6pm MST for 1 hour
      On Truth Radio Network
      to listen, click here: http://www.truthradio.com
      Sponsored by:
      Stanley Fasteners and Shop Supply http://www.stanleyfasteners.com

      Also check out The Revolutionary Coalition!
      This group is working to unite all third parties that defend the
      constitution, independents, and non-voters (making up 60% of
      Americans) into one SUPER THIRD PARTY!

      On Yahoo groups at
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRevolutionaryCoalition

      This group has a single line platform: "To defend our (Natural)
      God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed
      rights."

      Subscribe by sending email to:
      therevolutionarycoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

      Also see our main website at:
      http://www.therevco.org


      To subscribe to the We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
      send a message to subscribe@...

      If you wish to unsubscribe from We the People Constitutional Activism Scoop,
      send a message to unsubscribe@...

      All other changes for personal attention, such as changing your email address, send to
      webmaster@...


      Be aware that you may be receiving mail forwarded from a group,
      in which case you may have to visit http://groups.yahoo.com to unsubscribe.
      Please also note that mail sent to our "reply to:" address,
      newsletter@... is usually ignored....




      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.