Cheops Secret Chamber - Sensational Megalithic Wall
- View SourceDear LexiLiners,
Ddi you watch the opening of the secret chamber? If you did, I hope
you put it on video. I did and I have been studying the video
material´. I imagine that most of the scholarly world saw no
sensation in the secret chamber and the stone wall found - but I
find it is sensational - for reasons you will find below.
This material will be posted to some of my sites soon.
In addition, I am uploading
cheops1.gif and .tif
and cheops2.gif and cheops2.tif
to our files.
THE SECRET CHAMBER OF CHEOPS
SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 UPDATE - MEGALITH FOUND
WHAT HAPPENED ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 ?
On September 17, 2002, nearly 10 years after Rudolf Gantenbrink's
robot discovered a stone slab (with copper and gypsum seals) at the
end of the southern shaft of the Queen's Chamber in the Cheops
Pyramid, a worldwide TV broadcast showed a new high-tech robot
photographing what lay behind the stone slab at the end of the shaft.
WHAT WAS FOUND BEHIND THE STONE SLAB? A MEGALITHIC WALL !
What was found was an ancient megalithic wall or a megalith built
into the wall across from the shaft-end stone slab, an ancient
megalith which is a "boulder" carved with figures and itself
standing alone in a small apparently otherwise empty room, and
seemingly blocking the way to another room possibly filled with
informational or worldly treasures.
The result, analyzed here on the same day as the TV program, was a
fantastic, enormous discovery, clearly binding the megalithic age
with the Pyramids - unmistakably CONNECTING the megaliths and the
pyramid builders. The importance of this development has not yet
been recognized by anyone else other than this author. Furthermore,
the September 17, 2002, finding confirmed this author's singular
analysis of the Secret Chamber as being related to the
Westcar Papyrus and the Qumran Copper Scroll. We predicted a seal
would be found - and a large "seal" of megalithic proportions has
indeed been found, guarding another chamber in the Great Pyramid.
WHY IS A MEGALITH INSIDE A PYRAMID A SENSATION?
Why is this megalith (viz. megalithic wall) a sensation? Because it
is made of rough, carved stone. The ancient pharaohs went to a great
deal of trouble to make smooth stones for the building of the
Pyramid, so why in the innermost secret sanctum of the Great Pyramid
of Cheops do we find a rough megalith apparently guarding another
THE MEGALITH STEMS FROM A MORE ANCIENT ERA
The days of the megalith-builders, as shown by this author at
Megaliths.net centered around ca. 3117 BC, one kingdom or ca. 684
years prior to the building of the Great Pyramid of Cheops. The
megalith in the Cheops Pyramid is much older than the pyramids. Does
this mean that the Cheops Pyramid supplanted this ancient megalith
at Giza? Did the Cheops Pyramid take its place? Was the
calender "revised" due to precession - and was this the "revision"
discussed in ancient documents by Gardiner and Erman? Surely it was
so. The Cheops Pyramid replaced the megalith found in the secret
chamber just uncovered. That is why it is there. We must of course
also ask: if an ancient megalith guards a room in the Great Pyramid,
then it surely also guards something ancient - is this also the
legendary Hall of Records? The future will tell.
WHY DID TODAY'S MAINSTREAM EGYPTOLOGISTS ERR?
Most past statements about the secret chamber made by "modern"
mainstream Egyptologists have been proven wrong, wildly wrong. They
did not know what they were talking about, and things have not
gotten better for them after September 17, 2002. The reason for this
is that the Egyptologists do not know or do not wish to accept the
actual reason why the Great Pyramid was built - which was for
geodetics and astronomy. Since the Egyptologists have little
knowledge in these disciplines by training, they are as a group
generally unprepared in any way to judge or analyze any of this new
discovery and one should generally disregard their opinions on it.
They carry no weight. Most Egyptologists are linguists, and nothing
more. Except for perhaps Mr. Zahi Hawass, who is by heart and
soul "The Keeper of the Pyramids", this is not an Egyptologist's
THE ANALYSIS BY ANDIS KAULINS - WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?
Being a good researcher means not to overlook things. While everyone
has been concentrating on robots and stone slabs, no one has been
looking at the obvious markings at the end of the shaft near the
stone slab. These markings - in part clearly cup marks - as on many
megaliths around the world - identify the stars to the North, West
and East of the Queens Chamber shaft on the effective "date" of the
building of the Cheops Pyramid, which is July 25, 2430 BC, when
there was a solar eclipse at the Summer Solstice point at sunrise
(ca. 6 a.m.) - the time to which all data apply.
July 25, 2430 BC, 6 a.m. - Positions of the Stars
On July 25, 2430 B.C. starting at ca. 6 a.m. there was a solar
eclipse over the Nile Delta at the Summer Solstice point. Looking
north at this time one finds the North Celestial Pole in the tail of
Draco. In the East, there is a solar eclipse at sunrise below Chort
and Zosma (Duhr) in Leo - this is represented by the importance of
the Sphinx (Leo) and by the lion head found inscribed on the
megalith in the room just behind the stone slab at the end of the
southern shaft from the Queen's Chamber (see the graphic below). In
the West, we find Andromeda and Pegasus. These positions are clearly
marked on the stone blocks above and to the left and right of the
stone slab at the end of the shaft. They tell us the stellar
See the graphic cheops1. gif or .tif showing the markings on blocks
of stone above, left and right of the stone slab at the end of the
This stellar location matches the figures found inscribed on the
megalith (viz. megalithic wall) found on September 17, 2002 opposite
the stone slab at the end of the Cheops shaft. The megalith in
entirety has the shape of a lion's head and of course has other
figures carved on it in the interlocking fashion known for megaliths
in the Neolithic era. Each half has a pharaoh's head, with the left
head wearing the crown of Lower Egypt - the DESHRET - and the right
head wearing the crown of Upper Egypt (Egyptologists' nonsensical P3
= PAR, i.e. Indo-Germanic, e.g. Latvian "OVER", German ÜBER). This
megalith marks the Milky Way at Cassiopeia and Cepheus (Cheops). In
terms of the sky, "lower Egypt" consists of the stars outside of the
Milky Way whereas "upper Egypt" includes the stars within the
ellipse of the Milky Way. There is also a distinction in terms of
day and night, explained below.
Various incorrect names are applied to the names of the crowns of
ancient Egypt, one already discussed above. The name DESHRET for the
crown of Lower Egypt is the same as Latvian DEZHURET
meaning "direct, watch, especially night duty". That is why this
crown was later written NT, i.e. "night". DESHRET has NOTHING to do
with the color "red", contrary to what the Egyptologists allege. The
name HDT for the crown of Upper Egypt is the same as Latvian VADIT
or VADZIT which means "to lead, to guide, to watch over, applied to
day duty". VADIT i.e. HDT has NOTHING to do with the color "white",
contrary to what the Egyptologists allege - it applies rather
See in our files cheops2.gif or .tif, for a graphic showing the
figures inscribed on the megalith (megalithic wall) across from the
Stone Slab in the room discovered in the Cheops Pyramid on September
17, 2002. Next to that graphic is a picture made with Starry Night
Pro and showing the two crowns of Egypt in a heavenly context.
The Cheops Pyramid is Hebrew Qevia "calendric fixing". It is the
calendric fixing one kingdom or 684 years after the start of the Old
Kingdom which is equal to 18 x 19 x 2 = 684 - as a predictive
multiple of the Saros (18 years) and Metonic (19 years) lunar and
solar cycles. As written long ago by Eusebius "it is all astronomy"
and will continue to be astronomy when the next secret chamber is
opened behind the megalith - though I am not certain that any
additional chamber must exist. The megalith is the required record.
- View SourceHello,
This is the most incredible and fascinating insight! I found it most
fascinating and more exciting than anything imaginable. I was
wondering if you had any pictures showing those marks that you
mentioned as I was disapointed by the National Geographic picture.All
I could see was the rough stone with some cracks. I did not or am
not trained to see some of the markings that you discussed. I am so
glad to have read your amazing article which makes perfect sense.
Why indeed would the Egyptians have a sealed off chamber to a large
boulder in the middle of the pyramid. Why indeed!!!! Thank you for
the most astonishing observations.
--- In LexiLine@y..., "Andis Kaulins" <AKaulins@a...> wrote:
- View Source--- In LexiLine@y..., "cinders1313" <cinders1313@y...> wrote:
> What information!
> This is the most incredible and fascinating insight! I found it
> fascinating and more exciting than anything imaginable. I waspicture.All
> wondering if you had any pictures showing those marks that you
> mentioned as I was disapointed by the National Geographic
> I could see was the rough stone with some cracks. I did not oram
> not trained to see some of the markings that you discussed. I amso
> glad to have read your amazing article which makes perfect sense.large
> Why indeed would the Egyptians have a sealed off chamber to a
> boulder in the middle of the pyramid. Why indeed!!!! Thank youfor
> the most astonishing observations.Cynthia,
> Cynthia Crowley
I do not have a program which would permit me to transport the video
to the PC. Perhaps National Geographic will have a decent photograph
Let me also say that I should have added the following to my
My use of the terms "megalithic wall", "megalith" or "boulder"
should still be viewed with a bit caution until everything is really
examined in full by Hawass and friends - they ARE experts at that
kind of thing.
It looks like a megalith on the photograph and looks like it is a
roundish stone boulder, but you never know, it could be other
material - we will have to wait until they develop robots to go up
the shaft and actually touch the material, take sample scrapes and
see what it is, how thick, if there is anything behind it, and so
on. That will be quite exciting, I am sure. But if it is a
megalithic stone - it is sensational.