- Quoting Harry Pollard on Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:04:13 -0800: ___RL___ But full information is required describing each parcel, including who holds it.”Message 1 of 199 , Feb 28, 2013View SourceQuoting Harry Pollard on Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:04:13 -0800:
But full information is required describing
each parcel, including who holds it.
The size and shape and location of the parcel and the owner is
indeed all thats necessary. That our modern governments want
to know lots of things about us is beside the point. Just
size, shape, and owner is all thats needed for land valuation.
Need physical encumbrances (or an active auction market), too.
A Superfund site can't and won't rent for the same as neighbors
until fully remediated. Same for swamps, etc.
- ... Right. Both almost surely true. ... And the truths find there way in there too! WMessage 199 of 199 , Mar 5 4:00 AMView Source--- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "roy_langston" <roy_langston@...> wrote:
>Right. Both almost surely true.
> --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "walto" <calhorn@> wrote:
> > --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "roy_langston" <roy_langston@> wrote:
> > >
> > > So you are saying that the existence of the Flat Earth Society DOES make the spheroidal shape of the earth disputable?
> > My degree of confidence is roughly the same as that in my above judgment regarding your personality. Put it this way: is it possible I'm wrong about either the shape of the earth or your arrogance? Sure, I could be wrong about pretty much every proposition that seems obvious to me--that is the nature of human fallibility. But it's really, really doubtful in both cases.
> So you claim the earth's spheroidal shape is not only disputable, but about as disputable as your opinion of my personality?
> "A sick man dreams nothing so dreadful that some philosopher isn't saying it." -- Marcus Terentius VarroAnd the truths find there way in there too!
> -- Roy Langston