- ... But it was property in land that not only made them exploitable by removing their rights to liberty, but made the proceeds of the exploitation go toMessage 1 of 43 , Nov 21, 2012View Source--- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "John" <burns-john@...> wrote:
> --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "roy_langston" <roy_langston@> wrote:But it was property in land that not only made them exploitable by removing their rights to liberty, but made the proceeds of the exploitation go to landowners far more than capitalists.
> > --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, David Reed <dbcreed@> wrote:
> > > He said cheap food would mean lower wages
> > Proving conclusively that he did not understand the Law of Rent.
> Marx focussed on Capital being the problem. The appalling laws at the time did allow Capitalists to exploit the masses of uneducated poor for sure.
> Fred Harrison note a few parts of Marx's writings. Marx wrote:One gets the impression at times that Marx was trying to deflect attention from the facts about land in order to maintain a spurious rationale for violent revolution and seizure of capital.
> "..the monopoly of property in land is even the basis of the monopoly of capital"
> Overturning the whole Marxist structure. The power was in the hands of the land monopolists - even Marx knew that.
-- Roy Langston
- The point is, Scott, that the little fields of Britain cannot compete with the mass production of the US. Harry ********************** *The Alumni Group * *TheMessage 43 of 43 , Dec 1, 2012View SourceThe point is, Scott, that the little fields of Britain cannot compete with the mass production of the US.Harry
********************The Alumni GroupThe Henry George Schoolof Los AngelesTujunga CA 90243(818) 352-4141********************
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Scott Bergeson <scottb@...> wrote:
Quoting Harry Pollard on Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:06:15 -0800:
if we import our bulk foods, farm land is given over to animals,
which provide instant food while crops are being started (not
to mention they improve fertility rather than use it up).
Importing meat and animal feed needn't be a huge strategic
concern, if you're willing, when besieged, to slaughter
most of the animals (preserving the meat, of course) and
switch to a primarily vegetarian diet.
As you know, the combine harvesters in the US probably
work all day in a field, then stop until next morning
when they continue harvesting in the same field.
Many of them have lights. Combines are a separate business
from farming. They migrate, following the harvest.