Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [LandCafe] Re: FT

Expand Messages
  • JDKromkowski
    That s literature. And literature like all the arts can help us see, feel, understand beauty and truth and other aspect of the human condition. There is no
    Message 1 of 111 , Nov 18, 2012
      That's literature. And literature like all the arts can help us see, feel, understand beauty and truth and other aspect of the human condition.

      There is no Jesuit or nor diocesan nor priest of any order that believes that science is an obstacle to Catholicism. Give me the name and location so I might inquire with his bishop or superior or him personally.

      We should do this here, because you cannot persuade governments to adopt lvt from the fringe, and I might be a radical but I am not on the fringe of the masses.

      So if you've got some kooky baggage then everybody ought to know about it or you ought to be able to keep it to yourself, but quite a few of you have decided you want to lead with it.

      On Nov 18, 2012, at 4:10 PM, "roy_langston" <roy_langston@...> wrote:


      --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, JDKromkowski <jdkromkowski@...> wrote:

      > RL "So religions typically offer an array of just-so stories to explain phenomena that pre-scientific thinking could not explain"
      > Classic conflation between pagan non scientific superstitious nonsense and the Church's tradition going back to Jewish roots. (You [the pagans] worship what you do not know; we know what we worship [the Jews]).

      I.e., the God that periodically puts a rainbow in the sky to remind the Jews of his covenant with them, and not just whenever sunlight coming from behind them happens to refract and reflect through raindrops in front of them...

      And snakes have no legs because one of them deceived the first woman, not because it led to reproductive success in certain niches eons before the first woman was born.


      > Science presents no obstacle to my tradition

      The seminary Jesuits beg to differ.

      But lets not do this on LandCafe, OK?

      -- Roy Langston

    • Harry Pollard
      JDK, Those who survive are presumably the fittest to survive for the fittest just describes those who have survived. With regard to your last sentence –
      Message 111 of 111 , Nov 23, 2012

        Those who survive are presumably the fittest to survive for the "fittest" just describes those who have survived.

        With regard to your last sentence – Stalin got there first.


        The Alumni Group 
        The Henry George School
        of Los Angeles
        Tujunga   CA   90243
               (818) 352-4141

        On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:54 AM, JDKromkowski <jdkromkowski@...> wrote:

        Evolution is not really: the survival of the "fittest" It is just survival of that which survives. Evolution is a way of describing the process of how variation within a population will lead to variation eventually of species.  There are plenty of genes along for the ride which are not particularly "the fittest".  

        Yes the survival of the two apostolic lungs of Christianity (Catholics and the Eastern church) despite its massive weakness and in fact embracement of weakness of the god who becomes human and is rejected and put to death is a puzzle and crazy on its face. It drove Nietzsche crazy (well that and syphillus drove him crazy).  It also drove the communists crazy too.   Massive defense? How many tanks does the church have?


        Sent from my iPad

        On Nov 16, 2012, at 11:26 PM, "mattbieker" <agrarian.justice@...> wrote:


        --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, John David Kromkowski <jdkromkowski@...> wrote:
        > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:01 PM, mattbieker <agrarian.justice@...
        > > wrote:
        > >
        > > The catholic church has one real function: serving the clergy. When it
        > > was able to, it dominated a large swath of the earth in an imperial form.
        > > It can't now, so it fills out whatever niches it can; but the main thing is
        > > ensuring that members of clergy don't have to go and get real jobs.
        > >
        > Thanks for sharing this one too. I'm getting better picture of Land Cafe.
        > It really is best if we get it all out in the open. It's for the same
        > reason I won't hide my background.
        > This isn't a cocktail party, where we need to avoid the topic for
        > charitable purposes - or at least for the purposes of not interfering with
        > mutual love of beer or gin or your choice. I'd still have a beer in
        > Baltimore (once), with any of you clowns.
        > JDK

        *shrugs* Whatever one thinks of Roy's evolutionary basis for morals, I think there's fairly clearly a pseudo-evolutionary basis for ideas and institutions. Dawkins made this case in his "The Selfish Gene." Basically, ideas are duplicated, with variation, in the minds of individuals; from there, it's survival of the fittest. The conceptual equivalent to a gene being a "meme." Why do religious institutions survive despite being a load of crap that generally act as a drain on society? They're very advanced critters in the world of memes; they've evolved a whole host of defenses to offset their massive weaknesses, such as the notion that it's not polite or even acceptable to question a man's faith, or that without beliefs in these memes, we have no basis for social behavior.

        Catholicism isn't necessarily the most egregious case of this sort of memetic virus (that has to go to Scientology, don't you think?), but that's what it is, and all the bottom line of them all is the same: enrichment (both financial as well as emotional) of clergy. Still and all, its senseless and generally ad-hoc opposition to contraception, even in the light of AIDS epidemics, is horrible enough in and of itself to give me a fairly thoroughgoing distaste for it in particular, and I'd pretty much rather not see any meme I deem useful or good to be mixed up with it.

        Personally, I think one of the best parts of online discussion is that there's less tendency to hold back one's beliefs; many lament this, saying that the internet just makes everyone rude because they don't fear social repercussions, but I believe there's inherent value there, as it allows for a more rapid evolution of memes. The noise and nastiness comes with the territory, and I think people will just eventually find a new normal.

        One common Christian meme is certainly right though: hate the sin, and not the sinner. I agree, I'd have a beer with any of you. It's worth making a conscious effort not to take attacks against our beliefs too personally, because it turns out everyone tends to be wrong quite often.

      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.