Re: Detroit Land Grab
- --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, John David Kromkowski <jdkromkowski@...> wrote:
> https://www.lincolninst.edu/subcenters/land-values/land-prices-by-state.aspI'll tell you why I don't take a look at it: it uses the fallacious, absurd, and dishonest land residual valuation method. It also uses an absurd, anti-economic 1.5% depreciation rate for residential improvements, which only takes a brief _300_years_ to reduce a house's value to 1% of its value when built. That is a depreciation rate that would be roughly accurate for a typical Egyptian pyramid.
> Why don't you take a look at this data set. I am making a very specific
> point about "residential land values".
IOW, that paper is nothing but a bunch of idiotic anti-LVT lies.
> Here is also an interesting paper.We have negative land value, do we? How convenient! Of course that calls for public revenue to pay those poor, put-upon landowners for performing the arduous public service of owning their land!
Really, John? REEEEEAAAAAAALLLLLLYYYYY???
Both these papers are absurd and dishonest anti-LVT propaganda from the Lincoln Institute, a known anti-LVT disinformation mill.
-- Roy Langston
- --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "walto" <calhorn@...> wrote:
> The main point of resorting to natural law pronoucements of the kind you have bellowed is that they are supposed to help us determine what the various human-made laws SHOULD say. That is, if we have a question about know how some law should be constructed with respect to, e.g., who should receive various benefits and for how long or which protections of person or property must be enforced, or whatever, natural law claims are sometimes made--just as you have confidently made them in this context. It is, thus plainly circular to respond, when asked to specify the characteristics of some claimed natural law, "You'll have to consult the local legislature and courts--they'll tell us."Which might be why I haven't done so. Citizenship self-evidently isn't a question of natural law, and I've explained why residence defined as six months + reflects the relevant natural law principles.
-- Roy Langston