Re: [LandCafe] Re: Attention Geoists: LVT Poll
- To small and indistinct to read!Harry
********************The Alumni GroupThe Henry George Schoolof Los AngelesTujunga CA 90243(818) 352-4141********************
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Edward Miller <progressive_1987@...> wrote:If more people take the survey, the responses can change, but as of now the responses can be found here:
From: Edward Miller <progressive_1987@...>
To: chicagogeorgiststalk <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "LandCafe@yahoogroups.com" <LandCafe@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:05 PM
Subject: Attention Geoists: LVT Poll
I created a poll, and it has a dozen or so responses already, but if I can get more that'd be helpful. I'll be sure to share the results. Your answers will be anonymous.
--- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "John" <burns-john@...> wrote:
> --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "jdk_maryland_atty" <jdkromkowski@> wrote:
> > Can we just be blunt and truthful about this?
> > What we are talking about is a "tax" on land value.
> It is also how it is branded. In over 100 years branding it as a tax has not worked.Stop the madness. Do you really want to be considered a crackpot or a disinformer.Every single state in the US, HAS an LV Tax as part of the property tax. Even the council tax is a form of LVT, even though it's ridiculous in its implementation.JDK