Re: Why is no one here talking about Greece?
- --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "roy_langston1" <roy_langston1@...> wrote:
>One of the things that confuses me about this stuff is that a stationary annual average depreciation % seems inconsistent with roughly the same % of "good houses" and "crap houses" being built at any given time. I mean, if that good-to-crap construction ratio remained constant over time we'd expect the overall % of "good houses" to rise over time, and thus the annual depreciation avg to decrease because the good houses would remain, and some portion of the crap houses would be replaced by good ones.
> --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "walto" <calhorn@>
> > I'd think that an annual avg figure, whether 2%, 3%
> > or whatever, may mask a widely varying reality.
> Of course. The point is that the Officially Approved
> Figure of 1.5% applies to perhaps 5% of all houses,
> and the average is far higher. Looking at old houses
> and observing that they still have some value simply
> commits a survivor bias: it doesn't include all the
> houses that have depreciated to zero and been
> -- Roy Langston
OTOH, if what remains constant is the overall ratio of good to crap houses (say good always replaces good and crap always replaces crap), it must be that a higher and higher % of new construction each year would have to be of crap houses, since the good houses don't need replacing as often. Is that what is actually happening? What does the median age of 32 years really tell us about how fast houses are depreciating? Don't we need a lot of other data to have a good sense? E.g., how much is being expended on upkeep to keep the 100-year old houses going?
- --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "John" <burns-john@...>
> Henry George was adamant that full Land Value Tax,I don't recall him saying that, and it certainly isn't
> the Single Tax, would mean all would gain, no losers.
true. Many people will lose, especially in the
transition period. That is why we must design the
transition to be as painless as possible for the great
majority of landowners: those who own only the land
under their dwellings. And that is why restoring the
equal individual right to liberty through a universal
individual exemption (or, second best, a CD) is crucial
to our success. This is something Henry George either
did not understand or did not give enough weight to, or
the exemption would have been a central feature of his
Single Tax advocacy.
> All boats rise on the same rising tide.Er, those who can't be bothered swimming or walking are
drowned by a rising tide.
> * Will the corporations still be loyal to the US?Is a tapeworm loyal to its host?
> * Will they do everything to get the LVTYes. And that will include assassination. Let's not
> implementing government out?
kid ourselves on that score. This is serious business,
and the vital interests of some very powerful and
deeply evil people are at stake.
-- Roy Langston