Re: Incentives to maintain rural property ; Georgist rack rent
- --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, David Reed
> In the Banning/Beverly Hills example,underThat claim is false. Rent is the most anyone is
> Georgist LVT, the milliner( !) would make
> nothing in Banning and nothing in Beverly Hills.
WILLING TO PAY for use of the site. Neither rent
nor the "Georgist LVT" can POSSIBLY be so much
that no one can make any money by using the site,
as obviously no one will be willing to pay so
much rent that they end up working for nothing.
> Taking 100% of the location advantage is rackAgain, I implore David to read this as many times
> rent under whatever system,since productive
> people would make nothing.
as it takes for him to understand it:
-- Roy Langston