Re: London Squares under the Scientisitic Georgists
- --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "roy_langston1" <roy_langston1@...> wrote:
>As I said. David's suggestion that "Central London" has nothing but high-end digs seemed odd to me too, but I haven't been there since 1974.
> --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, David Reed
> <dbcreed@> wrote:
> >"...the universal individual LVT exemption would
> > probably not be enough to make such tony locations
> > affordable" (to hoi polloi who would in any case
> > be too coarse to appreciate their sophisticated
> > charms) But later on " The UI land rent exemption
> > ensures everyone has a chance to live in Central
> > London"
> That is of course not a self-contradiction at all.
> It could only be a self-contradiction if there were
> no residences in Central London with lower land
> value per dwelling space than Georgian terraces --
> a claim for which I will await evidence patiently,
> but in vain --
- --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "walto" <calhorn@...> wrote:
> As I said. David's suggestion that "Central London"On a wider note. The UK government had a deliberate policy of making London a super-city. A major world-city. Other cities in the UK suffered, Liverpool and Manchester clearly did. Liverpool, from being richer than London at one point near slid into the river Mersey.
> has nothing but high-end digs seemed odd to me too,
> but I haven't been there since 1974.
Public Money was poured into London in mainly the infrastructure. It has 5 airports. A skewed calulation of economic growth - bang-for-buck - was set up to justify pouring money into London. A city surrounded by small rural market towns in the bottom right hand corner of the country, away from the main industrial base. Fred Harrison pulls this to bits.
In the 1950s Liverpool and Manchester clearly togther were wealthier than London. Not today. All sorts of lame excuses were dreampt up to explain the fall of these two cities and the "inexplicable" rise of London. Most sucked it in and believed it.
London is a black hole. It sucks in public money at the expense of others and the bright people of the rest of the country. As a result accommodation prices are horrendous.
We have many problems in the UK that need adressing:
1. The planning policies are a means to control the population not promote quality environments and accomodation.
2. Black hole London sucking the life out of the rest of the country.
3. Leasehold. This is a licence to print money for freeholders. It wuill force me out of an apartment, which I am supposed to "own" into rented accommodation in my old age and right out of the area I have lived most of my life. I am not alone in this, I am just a given example.
LVT will not solve the above points.
- --- In LandCafe@yahoogroups.com, "John" <burns-john@...>
> We have many problems in the UK that need adressing:Because landowner privilege makes this profitable for
> 1. The planning policies are a means to control the
> population not promote quality environments and
the privileged. Take away the profit motive by
recovering publicly created land rent for public
purposes and benefit, and planning need no longer be
a corrupt, indirect way of taking from the productive
and giving to idle landowners.
> 2. Black hole London sucking the life out of the restIf the land rent created in London is recovered to pay
> of the country.
for the services and infrastructure that create it, it
is no longer an unrequited transfer of wealth from the
productive rest of the country to the Duke of
Westminster and his rich, privileged friends. The black
hole is not London. It's landowner privilege.
> 3. Leasehold. This is a licence to print money forWith LVT and a universal individual exemption, there is
> freeholders. It wuill force me out of an apartment,
> which I am supposed to "own" into rented accommodation
> in my old age and right out of the area I have lived
> most of my life. I am not alone in this, I am just a
> given example.
no license to print money, but equal liberty to use land.
If in retirement you find yourself occupying more land
than you can afford, you can just sell your improvements
and buy another place on less pricey land nearby with the
> LVT will not solve the above points.Combined with a universal individual exemption to
restore the right to liberty, yes, it will.
-- Roy Langston