28287Re: Well, it's time to order a new laptop--and it's a bit complicated these days...
- Aug 6, 2010I wound up buying the simple one with Intel graphics, not the hybrid graphics setup. I will use the difference in cash for some other things--like the upgraded hard disk I bought last night and the external DVD burner.
It turns out Amazon sells the UL30A-X5K (with their Kindle app pre-installed) for $50 less than one without the Kindle stuff--$599.95.
Thus far, I am very favorably impressed.
There's a CompUSA store here in the Dallas area, and they had a sale on a Seagate Momentus hybrid drive--7200 rpm, with a 4 GB solid state mini-drive built in with software that is supposed to take care of putting the most frequently used files into the flash automagically.
The original drive, also a 500 GB, I will put in an external USB drive case for backups. The result of this change should be that the laptopS will run much faster--in addition to the solid state component, the new drive is a 7200 rpm unit while the original is a 5400.
With the new, much faster drive and the old one in the external case, the cost was within $10 of the computer model that has manually-switchable hybrid graphics. Since the Intel integrated graphics will play video files smoothly, that combination should be a very practical one for me.
I am burning the Win 7 recovery DVDs as I write this. Later today, I'll be repartitioning and installing Linux on the machine. Because of some proprietary Windows software that is necessary for my wife's upcoming ebook reader, I will keep the machine as a dual boot. However, I will also probably install one of the virtualization apps to run it through Linux at some point soon.
Anyway, thus far I am extremely impressed with the ASUS UL30.
--- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, "glenn596658" <glenn596658@...> wrote:
> --- In LINUX_Newbies@yahoogroups.com, David Neeley <dbneeley@> wrote:
> > Greetings!
> > Within the next couple days, I should be ordering a new laptop to
> > replace this one, which is on its last legs.
> > For various reasons -- including the international warranty and a
> > decent repair record, I plan to get an ASUS machine. This time out, I
> > have fairly well determined it'll be one of the small, light ones with
> > good battery life--probably something from the UL30 series of 13.3
> > inch screen machines. At present, These all have either the SU7300 ULV
> > dual core, or the new Core I3 or I5 Mobile CPUs. The newer CPU
> > machines are quite a bit more expensive, as you might expect.
> > However, the things I do these days are not particularly taxing, so
> > the SU7300 should be fine. My conundrum, though, is whether to simply
> > go with the Intel 4500M integrated graphics models (which can be had
> > new for $600 including 500 GB hard disk and 4 GB of RAM), or to pay
> > another hundred and change for one with switchable graphics that
> > include nVidia discrete graphics chips in addition.
> > I am not a gamer, nor do I do things like video encoding that cry out
> > for all the CPU and graphics horsepower you can throw at them.
> > However, I still do appreciate decent performance, so I am tempted to
> > the models with switchable graphics.
> > The only problem is, support for these boxes is still kind of sketchy
> > in Linux, it seems. The 2.6.34 kernel has incorporated "VGA
> > Switcheroo"--but that is not yet fully stable and tested with
> > Intel/nVidia combinations like the ASUS boxes.
> > Oh, yes, one more issue--the older models often have WIFI issues--many
> > of them have difficulty getting solid connections even when sitting
> > within ten feet of a wireless router. If I get one of these, I would
> > also get a much better wireless card and at least one additional
> > antenna, as ASUS has been only putting in a single antenna. Thus, I
> > will probably be out another thirty or forty bucks or so and about ten
> > or fifteen minutes labor to make the switch.
> > So, what's your opinion--should I simply get the cheaper machines with
> > integrated graphics only, or would I be a bit too much on the cutting
> > edge to get the dual graphics machines? What would you do? (And who
> > knows, there might be someone here already using one of these
> > machines, and I would most definitely love to hear your thoughts in
> > particular.)
> > TIA,
> > David
> > Thanks for any suggestions you may have.
> > David
> The only advice is... think of the future not the present. I can tell you that I installed a video card in my desktop and stopped using the embedded one and I didn't see much of an overall performance increase ie. booting up or starting apps, but videos played much more smoothly and looked sharper. When I buy a new computer or replace my Main Board I will definitely get one with a separate video card.
- << Previous post in topic