Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [KeelyNet_Interact] Re: Mr Bubb's post

Expand Messages
  • Jerry Decker
    Hola Folks! I seem to remember a news post recently saying the carbon could be separated from the oxygen in the CO2 molecule and used as fuel, fertilizer or
    Message 1 of 4 , Dec 31, 2009
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      Hola Folks!

      I seem to remember a news post recently saying the carbon could be
      separated from the oxygen in the CO2 molecule and used as fuel,
      fertilizer or chemical uses. Don't have the URL handy but I think
      converting it to other uses is better than burying it underground...

      http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2007/03/12/why_cant_we_burn_cosub2sub_to_stop_global_warming/

      "It is possible to turn carbon dioxide back into carbon and oxygen, but
      this always costs energy. You get energy by burning carbon and
      making carbon dioxide, but to reverse this you need to add in energy.

      Suppose that it were somehow possible (which it isn't) to burn carbon
      dioxide and somehow get back carbon and oxygen. If this got you
      energy, or even if it could be done with no cost, it would mean that you
      could start off with some carbon, burn it, get energy, then get
      the carbon back again, and start all over. This would mean getting
      endless energy for nothing -- which is obviously impossible.

      The best way to turn carbon dioxide back into carbon-containing fuels
      and oxygen is to let plants handle the job. They combine carbon
      dioxide and water to make carbon-based fuels (like wood) using the
      energy from the sun."
      ---------------
      So it looks like stopping deforestation, reforesting and blooming
      deserts for more plants to take care of the additional CO2 would be a
      better answer than technology or burying.

      Or just give it all up and take no steps to try to fix anything since
      Jesus is going to save all the believers when the Rapture comes...<lol>...

      Happy New Year!

      Jerry



      Mr. Bubb wrote:
      >
      > I didn't start the thread. I also didn't stutter. I said what I
      > meant, and I meant what I said. I'm also pretty sure you know who
      > "they" (collectively) is.
      >
      > I happen to live in the country 'they' want money (carbon credits)
      > FROM, not one of the underdeveloped countries 'they' want to give the
      > money TO. This makes MY energy costs go up 3-4 times what it is now
      > because of socialistic foolishness. Then I read posts containing
      > ideas of putting carbon dioxide under ground. Why? To create yet
      > another regulatory segment of the environmental hygenics industry? It
      > sure isn't going to make a hoot of difference in the percentage of
      > CO2 in the atmosphere.
      >
      > There was more CO2 emmitted into the atmosphere from all the planes
      > and limos flying & driving into that 190 member conference last month
      > than my whole family will emit in a lifetime. There's unmitigated
      > proof that scientists have been tampering with the data in order to
      > justify the scam. There are those who seem to be of the opinion that
      > some countries just have too much money and think it's their job to
      > spread the wealth around. This is about control, and nothing to do
      > with CO2. The CO2 is just a convenient excuse. It's all bunk, and
      > yes........I'm not happy about it. So I vented. So what?
      >
      > R

      > ...snip....

      --
      ========================================================
      from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
      Hope through Science and Invention
      Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
      Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
      Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
      MexiStim Energy Stimulator
      http://www.keelynet.com/mexistim/nexcrock.htm
      Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVDs)
      http://www.vanguardsciences.biz
      ========================================================
    • slavek krepelka
      Haya guys, It is all in the money flow. MrBubb is correct to state that reforestation is the way to go. This is beyond any doubt. The only detail missing is
      Message 2 of 4 , Jan 1, 2010
      View Source
      • 0 Attachment
        Haya guys,

        It is all in the money flow.

        MrBubb is correct to state that reforestation is the way to go. This is
        beyond any doubt. The only detail missing is the reforestation mimicking
        the nature, i.e. mixed native cultures.

        The global warming is of course a periodic occurrence we humans do
        somewhat contribute, but our contribution is rather negligible and
        temporary.

        The carbon tax is a scheme to transfer money from richer countries to
        poorer countries. This will only allow the poorer countries to use the
        collected tax transferees to extend their imaginary assets, therefore to
        further extend their borrowing power, therefore to open themselves to
        even more exploitation and the bulk of the tax multiplied by the
        borrowing margin will drive them into even greater debt with the
        proceeds ending in reptilian coffers, while a smaller portion will end
        up in reptilian administration.

        Global warming, if any, shall contribute to:

        1) acceleration of algae growth in the oceans, which will contribute to
        temporary deposition of carbon in living algae and higher species like
        fish etc. and consequently in the fossils of all that in the form of
        calcium and magnesium carbonates.

        2) acceleration of plant growth of all kinds and swamping of the dry
        lands with consequent deposits of hydrocarbons seeping into the ground
        to eventually fossilize into crude oil.

        This is of course only the bulk of it, but hoax it is for certain.

        With kind regards, Slavek.


        Mr. Bubb wrote:
        >
        >
        >
        > I didn't start the thread. I also didn't stutter. I said what I meant,
        > and I meant what I said. I'm also pretty sure you know who "they"
        > (collectively) is.
        >
        > I happen to live in the country 'they' want money (carbon credits)
        > FROM, not one of the underdeveloped countries 'they' want to give the
        > money TO. This makes MY energy costs go up 3-4 times what it is now
        > because of socialistic foolishness. Then I read posts containing ideas
        > of putting carbon dioxide under ground. Why? To create yet another
        > regulatory segment of the environmental hygenics industry? It sure
        > isn't going to make a hoot of difference in the percentage of CO2 in
        > the atmosphere.
        >
        > There was more CO2 emmitted into the atmosphere from all the planes
        > and limos flying & driving into that 190 member conference last month
        > than my whole family will emit in a lifetime. There's unmitigated
        > proof that scientists have been tampering with the data in order to
        > justify the scam. There are those who seem to be of the opinion that
        > some countries just have too much money and think it's their job to
        > spread the wealth around. This is about control, and nothing to do
        > with CO2. The CO2 is just a convenient excuse.
        > It's all bunk, and yes........I'm not happy about it. So I vented. So
        > what?
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.