Re: Ajax or JavaFx
Idk anything about JavaFx specifically, but I do know that Java is *best* kept server-side, if that. Yes, you can do anything with Java, but she's slow and bulky and her time in the limelight has passed (for now).
Combine the advantages of Flash and Ajax? Flash has "Ajax" functionality already, it has for quite awhile. I'm assuming by Ajax you mean interacting with the server after the user has performed an action and returning content/media, etc., without refreshing the page. Yeah, Flash has that yo.
So this is alot of information, but check it out yo, this is where node.js really nails it. YOU DON'T HAVE TO LEARN MORE THAN ONE LANGUAGE. YOU DON'T HAVE TO RELY ON THIRD PARTY and/or personnel to support you, you can do it all on your own, because it's the same language. sure, the techniques are different, but it's not like learning a new trix is anywhere as difficult as learning a new language.
Plus, it's entirely/completely/magnificently open-source. You can go to github right now and fork the entire application you are trying to get done, albeit not in one piece, but still.
Flash and Java are great programming languages and have their uses, however they do not lie in the realm of cutting edge web development. At least for now.
Good luck! Get your DOM on!
> I have to decide what to use on an internet application for client side programming. Ajax or JavaFx.
> My client side application must be like an applet having some dyanmic graphs, tables, and animation.
> I read that JavaFx is going to combine the advantage of flash and ajax. It is true?
> What choice is the best to learn and use: JavaFx or Ajax? What is the future?
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]