Re: Jainism is NOT ANTI-VEDIC
- 5000 years ago, there were no Vedics in India. They came from Urasia
and wrote Rigved at Western India. The Indus Valley civilization is
the oldest in India and it did not belong to Vedics.
--- In JatHistory@yahoogroups.com, "drvivekarya" <drvivekarya@...>
> 5000 years back there was only one vedic dharma.
> post mahabharta war many new sects evolved and every day i think
> new guru with his sects takes birth in our country.anti
> they mere divides our country people and ake them weak against
> nation forces.<ameetpjain@>
> dr. vivek arya
> - In JatHistory@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Chaudhary"
> <ravichaudhary2000@> wrote:
> > --- In JatHistory@yahoogroups.com, AMIT PRAKASH JAIN
> > wrote:yes
> > >
> > > Dear members,
> > > Jainism is an independent religion, it is not anti-vedic.But,
> > there are a lot of differences in the jain & vedic philosophies.other
> > > Well, the differences in the vedism & jainism were always
> > **********
> > A difference in philosophy is healthy, very healthy. Only through
> > differences in intellectual approaches, do we reach a higher
> > of understanding.
> > It is hard to define Vedic, or later Hinduism, or the various
> > streams of philosophies, that later became called Religion asrecently,
> > to Dharam.
> > To day we see The Sikh Dharam which has evolved, fairly
> > that too incorporates many principles that are similar to
> > ancient philosophies.
> > Will others evolve tomorrow?
> > We should expect that.
> > That in itself does not mean that the streams are anti each other
> > We will explore our history, without getting bogged down in idle
> > rhetoric.
> > Ravi