Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
Attention: Starting December 14, 2019 Yahoo Groups will no longer host user created content on its sites. New content can no longer be uploaded after October 28, 2019. Sending/Receiving email functionality is not going away, you can continue to communicate via any email client with your group members. Learn More

61RE: [James. F. Ross Study Group] Slow Read

Expand Messages
  • John Strong
    Feb 21, 2014

      Go ahead and finish reading Christians Get the Best of Evolution and we’ll talk about which work is best to read.

       

      Oderberg writes with exception rigor and so he is much easier to understand than Ross, but he won’t give you some of the critical insights that only a reading of Ross’ works affords.

       

      From: James_F_Ross_Study_Group@yahoogroups.com [mailto:James_F_Ross_Study_Group@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of James Barham
      Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 1:49 PM
      To: James_F_Ross_Study_Group@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [James. F. Ross Study Group] Slow Read

       

       

      John:

       

      That sounds good to me.

       

      I'm sure all three of you are well ahead of me in your understanding of Thomistic metaphysics, and no doubt much else, as well. But I did just finish Oderberg's book with the feeling that I could follow most of it, and am reading Ross's Thought and World now (with somewhat less comprehension).

       

      At any rate, with respect to the slow read of "Christians Get the Best of Evolution," I have been making some notes, and hope to have some specific comments by tomorrow.

       

      Best,

       

      James

       

       

      On Friday, February 21, 2014 6:50 AM, John Strong <pluviosilla@...> wrote:

       

      James Barham, we are a tiny group, but we have two notable contributors: Jim Given and Dennis Pollis, both of whom are regular contributors in the principal Aquinas forums.

       

      Jim Given has already introduced himself, but I’d like to add that he is the only person in my acquaintance who has read James F. Ross’ important work Philosophical Theology carefully from cover to cover. I myself have only read segments of it. It is a pretty technical work that examines the logic of theological propositions. I’ve had trouble interesting Jim in a slow read of Ross in the past, but if we were to read a work like that he would probably chime in with some very technical observations.

       

      Dennis Polis has very broad interests within metaphysics and theology, and usually provides a lot of historical context to his observations. He has written an impressive book which I still have not read. He and Jim Given appear to have sustained a fruitful conversation over the years. Jim Given *has* read Dennis Polis’ book.

       

      In short, both of these guys are smart and well informed. If you and I were to start a slow read of one of Ross’ works, I’m sure they would chime in from time to time with stimulating observations.

       

       

       

       

    • Show all 3 messages in this topic