Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Messages List

1149

JalV2 with rickpic and eeprom data supression.

I'm porting my MarkIII sample programs from Jal0.4.62 to jalv2 and I'm having problems with the hex file output of the Jalv2 compiler. After futzing around a
    Mark Gross
    Mar 16, 2007
    #1149
    This message has attachments
    1148

    google rankings

    ... Actually Wouter's site is ABOVE the JAL wikipedia entry on Google, as are two other JAL pages. http://www.google.nl/search?q=jal (hit 7, 8, 9) Yes, google
    Eur van Andel
    Mar 9, 2007
    #1148
     
    1147

    Re: Jalv2

    ... Jalv0.4.xx has it hay day a few years ago. Since then its development has stagnated. In a sense it became "mature" in so much as it worked well enough
      Mark Gross
      Feb 25, 2007
      #1147
      This message has attachments
      1146

      Re: Jalv2

      ... IIRC, there was never much development that happened on the JALv1 sourceforge project (or, never much productive development? Seemed like a lot of churn
      WilliamChops Westfield
      Feb 25, 2007
      #1146
       
      1145

      Re: Jalv2

      ... Jal V2 was a coup d'etat by some people. I have never installed it and never ran it. I rely on some weird JAL features ( like raw interrupts) that do not
      Eur van Andel
      Feb 25, 2007
      #1145
       
      1144

      Jalv2

      I'm just starting to play with Jalv2, and the first thing I've noticed is that the URL for the source in almost all of the documentation out on the net point
        Mark Gross
        Feb 24, 2007
        #1144
        This message has attachments
        1143

        Fix for pin_eX_direction

        Hi, I've spotted these lines in jpic.jal: var bit pin_e0_direction at trisc : 0 var bit pin_e1_direction at trisc : 1 var bit pin_e2_direction at trisc : 2 I
          Marco Pantaleoni
          Jan 26, 2006
          #1143
          This message has attachments
          1142

          Re: Patch for jal

          Hi all, Available patches in jal.sf.net: ID Summary 1352435 10Fxxx support 1352433 Preprocessor support 1118846 JAL 16F648 Extensions Regards, Javi.
          Javier Martinez
          Nov 9, 2005
          #1142
           
          1141

          Re: Patch for jal

          ... Yes, I understand. ... This sounds great! Thanks. In the meantime I'll try to come to a more integrated solution. I'll keep you posted. Cheers, Marco --
            Marco Pantaleoni
            Nov 8, 2005
            #1141
            This message has attachments
            1140

            Re: Patch for jal

            Hi all, ... Marco, you hit in the bulls eye. Ask in the jallist how many of them have a C compiler to build latest JAL sources .... ... and now think that
            Javier Martinez
            Nov 8, 2005
            #1140
             
            1139

            Re: Patch for jal

            ... I agree, but while on unix-like systems a pre-processor is (almost) always present, on other systems (windows), it is not. I'm not interested in windows
              Marco Pantaleoni
              Nov 7, 2005
              #1139
              This message has attachments
              1138

              Re: Patch for jal

              ... hello Marco, Javi, As a non-C-programmer, I cann't understand the full extend / consequences of this C-isch macro implementation, but here a few remarks:
              Stef Mientki
              Nov 7, 2005
              #1138
               
              1137

              Re: Patch for jal

              ... You are right, it would impede code sharing. I think of this feature as a "sharp knife", to be used exclusively when unavoidable, but I understand that
                Marco Pantaleoni
                Nov 7, 2005
                #1137
                This message has attachments
                1136

                Re: Patch for jal

                Hi Marco, ... Yes, but what about sharing code? These macro functions will make JAL "other" language (JAL-cpp vs JAL), that is you'll not able to share code
                Javier Martinez
                Nov 7, 2005
                #1136
                 
                1135

                Re: Patch for jal

                ... Yes, but if someone doesn't need it, he can just ignore it. One possible solution could be to selective enable the preprocessor support when running the
                  Marco Pantaleoni
                  Nov 7, 2005
                  #1135
                  This message has attachments
                  View First Topic Go to View Last Topic
                  Loading 1 - 15 of total 1,254 messages