Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

the calculus of personality and character traits from holograph analysis, advances in graphoanalysis of observer relative identity parameters

Expand Messages
  • David Crockett Williams
    The calculus of personality and character traits from holograph analysis, advances in graphoanalysis of observer relative identity parameters: Not sure why
    Message 1 of 1 , Jan 3, 2006
    • 0 Attachment

      The calculus of personality and character traits from holograph analysis,

      advances in graphoanalysis of observer relative identity parameters:

       

      Not sure why this handwritten note is included, as to relevance of

      content, but very interesting traits, writing shows unusually deep abstract

      imagery (ability to mentally image concepts/ideas) in the height

      of the upper loops in the h an l letters, unusually deep and broad

      practical imagery (ability to image things perceivable with five senses)

      shown in the depth and breadth of the lower loops in the y and g

      letters.  Also shows very high comprehension, and analytical thinking,

      in the n and m and h letters spiked tops of normally rounded stroke,

      and v at bottom of stroke.  This writer relies on analysis (comparing

      and contrasting) and comprehension and imagination more than

      cumulative logical thinking like eg Thomas Edison classic example.

      This writer relies generally exclusively on reason rather than intuition,

      indicated by the relative lack of breaks between the letters within words,

      ie, the more such breaks between letters the more a person tends to rely

      on their intuition, eg, Ira Einhorn’s style as almost pure printing is way,

      way, into reliance on intuition, even to the routine exclusion of reason.

       

      The below writer has loops in the small d and t letters which indicates

      what I call a runaway abstract imagination, in that this trait is called

      sensitivity to criticism, appearing in the d regarding one’s self, and in

      the t as regarding one’s goals, plans, and objectives.  So below writer

      is mildly to moderately sensitive to imagined criticism regarding both

      self and about goals plans and objectives.  This fear/motivator trait is common

      and considered a supportive trait for success as its “flip-side” motivator

      aspect is that persons with this trait strive for praise and recognition to

      counterbalance the imagined criticism they suffer from moment to

      moment while in that mode shown during time of the writing, which mode

      may be different later in different moods with different stuff on or off mind etc.

       

      But the below writer tends to react neither to this common sensitivity to criticism

      fear/motivator trait by deception, indicated by double loops inside small o,

      or a letters, nor self-deceit shown by extra loop on left side of o and a and d

      letters, both bigtime in that guy Sloan, nor secretiveness shown in the extra loop

      in the letters o and a on the right side of the letter.  These three are escape

      defenses, self-deceit, deceit, and secretiveness, and I call them pathological

      because folks with these traits are not consciously exhibiting these traits

      but spontaneously due to emotional/mental makeup as evinced by this

      psycho-neuro-muscle graph, holograph, handwriting, as per interpretations

      of standard graphoanalysis terminology and objective evaluability by anyone

      educated in graphoanalysis per http://www.igas.com

       

      Ira Einhorn’s printing occasionally reveals loops in some letters, eg,

      in one letter to me a moderate double loop in an o letter, meaning

      empirically he was experiencing in that moment of writing that

      letter this charater/personality trait graphoanlysis calls “deceit,”

      keeping in mind that like all scientific/empirical study based

      graph analysis systems certain words are kind of co-opted from

      the dictionary as closest but no cigar to what the calculus of the

      graph says, ie, that is why to distinguish for general readership

      from intentional deceit, I term this double looper as “pathological

      deceit” because “they don’t know they are doing it” – other side

      of the coin is they think everyone else is like them as we all tend

      to do psychologically until proven otherwise.  I have not mentioned

      this before lest Ira be overly condemned by one letter o, since this

      kind of information is like psychologist to patient privileged info,

      but in this case of truth to light as best solution and on this occasion

      of apparent interest in this arena, take it or leave it as you will.

       

      David 1/3/2006 2:54 PM

       

      David Crockett Williams, Jr. (III) dob 17May45: ~35yrs a

      Graphoanalyst -- www.igas.com

      Bachelor of Science, Chemistry -- www.csun.edu

      Chartered Life Underwriter -- www.theamericancollege.edu

       


      From: Jack Sarfatti [mailto:sarfatti@...]
      Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 1:43 PM
      To: caryn anscomb
      Subject: Sidney Gottleib, Harold Chipman, Russell Tark, MK Ultra SRI RV

       

      On Jan 3, 2006, at 1:13 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:



       

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.