Re: [InstantRunoffMO] Article on voting procedures
- I read that article when it appeared in print. I was surprised and
disappointed that it didn't even mention IRV in any form. The closest it
came was approval voting which would be an improvement over what we have
However, the method they seemed to focus the most on was the Borda count,
which is a point system for adding up the votes. It means that even if
someone's first place choice is in first place, their second and subsequent
choices will also be raising the scores of other candidates. The potential
for using strategy to help your favorite candidate is increased for the
knowledgable voter. By making sure the candidate you expect to be the most
significant rival is far down the list in your choices, you can make more
than a one point difference in the key race. A voter that ranks the
candidates more honestly may make a smaller difference.
I think that any system that can sometimes allow one person to have a
greater effect, or prevent a votor from having any affect on the race
between the two leaders is flawed.
on 1/29/01 4:05 PM, Eric S. Harris at eric_harris_76@... wrote:
> An article with some relevance to IRV.
> I'm not all that wild about IRV, from either a short- or long-term practical
> standpoint, or theoretical wonderfulness.
> One thing that's lacking is a way to compensate the voters whose are stuck
> a choice they don't much care for. Henri Lepage described one possible way to
> address this in "Tomorrow, Capitalism". It has its own practical and
> theoretical problems, though: insincere votes, lack of secret ballot, the cost
> of being an abstainer.
> Oh, well, can't have everything. -Eric S.