Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [ISO8601] Re: I was scoffed at my NaD, Bless you

Expand Messages
  • hjwoudenberg@aol.com
    In a message dated 7/1/2007 9:10:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time, PIEBALDconsult@aol.com writes: Exactly. Plus, what if an unknown future date value finds its
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 1 7:16 PM
    • 0 Attachment
      In a message dated 7/1/2007 9:10:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time, PIEBALDconsult@... writes:
      Exactly.

      Plus, what if an "unknown future date" value finds its way into a
      birthdate field where an "unknown past date" ought to be? etc.

      There is no need for two such values. The best one can do with ISO 8601
      is use an empty string, which works just fine -- if you have no value,
      then don't provide one.

      For the record; I scoff at the concept, not the poster.
      Thanks
      hjw




      See what's free at AOL.com.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.