147Re: Standard form for a perod of time
- Feb 2, 2001Yes, 2001-02-03T20/24 is equivalent to 2001-02-03T20/2001-02-03T24,
and to 2001-02-03T20/2001-02-04T00.
But what about 2001-02-03T20/00? According to section 5.5.4 of
ISO8601:1988(E), the free PDF file, this expression is equivalent only
The T is not necessary in "/24" because it is truncated along with the
2001-02-03. 2001-02-03T20/04T00 requires a T in both parts to separate
the days from the hours.
--- In ISO8601@y..., "o-Dzin Tridral" <Tridral@B...> wrote:
> Dear all,
> I would like to know whether the folowing means
> 8pm-midnight on the 3rd February 2001 :
> The part I'm not sure about is the /24. Should this be /T24 or is
> 24 sufficient?
> I've looked at the standard (1988 copy). It mentions that you can
> leave out parts of the date in a time period, but it's not explicit
> what to do with the time portion.
> Many thanks.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>